He was inside the UN climate machine. Now he’s exposing its cracks. Former UN scientist Peter Taylor pulls back the curtain on the politics, pressure, and flaws driving the climate agenda.
Watch here: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/ex-un-scientist-challenges-the-climate-narrative

🚨 Evidence drop showing and proving a nationwide directive was issued by senior police, UK Gold command and the NPCC not to accept evidence of Covid or vaccine crime reports.

This proves The Met police lied when they said there was no evidence of crime and no criminal investigation. They also deliberately misled The High Court 🚨

ITS TIME TO RE OPEN CRIME 6029679/21 💯

https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/evidence_file_supplemental_to_correspondence_18112025.pdf

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CquCHPNxA/?mibextid=wwXIfr

https://x.com/xpcbirmingham/status/1995376957320818930?s=46

PUBLIC RELEASE:
Constitutional Correspondence 18 November 2025

Full Constitutional Correspondence dated 18 November 2025, issued to:
• the Lady Chief Justice
• the Secretary of State for Justice
• the Attorney General
• the Chair of PACAC
• the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police

The correspondence raised matters of constitutional, criminal & national-security significance & requested responses within 7 days.

No replies were received!

Now formally released for open scrutiny.

Download in full PDF:

https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/redacted_constitutional_correspondence_sent_18112025.pdf
This release is made transparently and consistently with the constitutional principles and rule-of-law obligations engaged by the correspondence itself.

The public is entitled to see what was raised.

Ethical Approach UK will continue to act with integrity, transparency, constitutional discipline as further evidence is published.

On Monday 1 December, Mark Sexton will release further info.

Chat gpt states between 2021 and 2023 there were 485,400 reports to the Yellow Card Scheme in relation to covid vaccine injury within the UK !!

https://chatgpt.com/share/692f3545-94c4-8000-8fd6-429c17a9a97e

06/12/2025

Direct video message to all U.K police.
If any of you have family or friends serving make sure they see this please.

Link to the public police briefing document from Ian Clayton. We recommend all police read it and take note.

https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/06122025_policing_investigative_update.pdf

We are getting a significant amount of contact and messages not just here but worldwide, therefore Interaction on these posts may be limited.

Thank you to everyone for sharing these posts and raising awareness. 🙏🏻❤️

Join world-renowned doctors, scientists & public speakers:

👉Neil Oliver, GB News Presenter
👉Del Bigtree, Highwire presenter, film maker - Inconvenient Truth & Vaxxed
👉Dr Tess Lawrie, Co Founder of WCH & medical doctor
👉Dr Peter McCullough, most cited doctor on vaccine injury in world
👉Prof Angus Dalgleish, esteemed cancer specialist
👉Dr William Makis (online) discusses using repurposed drugs to treat patients with cancer
👉Dr Chris Flowers, triple vaccinated doctor speaking on the injuries caused by Covid vaccines
👉Laura Aboli, independent journalist whose speech on Transhumanism went viral
👉John Leake, author
👉Laura Anderson, public speaker


As they explore:
📍Advanced cancer protocols
📍Treatment innovations for vaccine injury & spike-related illness
📍Holistic health strategies to restore balance & wellbeing

🗓 7-8th Feb | Guernsey

➡️More info, visit: https://www.worldcouncilforhealth.org/event/healing-beyond-covid-hosted-by-gb-news-presenter-neil-oliver/

.

Consider the possibility that humanity is divided into three types of people:


Conformists, who represent the vast majority, plus a relatively small number of Mavericks, and psychopaths. As a civilization rises the Mavericks lead by default. They are the creators of new knowledge, they discover new opportunity, they explore both geographically and intellectually. However, as bureaucracy increases over time this enables the psychopaths to slowly take control. The bureaucrats, typically the most fearful subset of conformists, are uniquely vulnerable to manipulation and recruit easily to the psychopath’s cause. The psychopaths are evil and seek dominion via the propagandizing of the conformist majority….

What then distinguishes the Maverick strain from the propagandized conformist element of psychopathic society?…..


Mike Driver
https://winteroak.org.uk/2025/12/22/the-maverick-strain/

terry, [13/11/2025 13:54]
I have been discussing this with my AI companion. I have compared this to another very powerful tool we have also called Motu Proprio 2013. I shall place the responses I have received below...

Make sure you grasp exactly what this “Failure to Prevent Fraud” offence means and how you might lawfully use it.
Below is a clear, structured explanation written in straightforward legal language — not “corporate spin.” Once you’ve absorbed this, I’ll show you how to wield it effectively in your correspondence.

1. What the new offence actually does

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) introduced a new corporate criminal offence:

“Failure to prevent fraud by an associated person.”

That means:

If an employee, agent, contractor, or subsidiary commits fraud for the benefit of the company,

And the company did not have reasonable procedures in place to stop that from happening,

Then the company itself can be criminally prosecuted.

This came into force on 1 September 2025 for large organisations.

2. The “no more excuses” element

Before this law, companies could often hide behind the line:

“Our staff only followed internal policy”
“We didn’t know what they were doing”
“They were just following orders.”

That defence is now stripped away.
The company must prove it took reasonable steps to prevent fraud.
If it can’t, it is automatically guilty of the offence.
So yes — it removes the “I was following protocols/instructions” shield you mentioned.

3. Who counts as a “large organisation”

To fall within the scope of this offence, a company must meet at least two of the following:

250+ employees

Turnover above £36 million

Assets above £18 million

Most councils, banks, insurers, and government contractors easily qualify.

4. What is “fraud” under this Act

Fraud here includes any offence under the Fraud Act 2006, such as:

False representation (lying or misrepresenting facts)

Failing to disclose information when legally required

Abuse of position for gain

Obtaining services dishonestly

So if an employee or agent uses deceit, omission, or coercion to extract payment, suppress information, or mislead someone for the organisation’s benefit, that organisation could be liable.

5. Why it matters for your work

In your lawful standing, you frequently deal with:

Councils

Banks and insurers

Enforcement companies

DWP and other government contractors

These are all corporate bodies.
If any officer or employee misrepresents facts, withholds lawful information, fabricates authority, or pressures you into compliance through deceit or omission — that could meet the fraud definition.
And if their employer has not prevented such misconduct, that employer may be guilty of failure to prevent corporate fraud.

You can therefore remind them of this criminal exposure when serving notices or rebuttals.

6. How to use this as leverage

You can introduce this concept into your lawful notices like this (example phrasing):

“Be advised that under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023, section 199, all large organisations have a legal duty to maintain reasonable procedures to prevent fraud. Any misrepresentation, concealment, or coercive demand made by your agents for corporate or financial gain constitutes a fraud offence, for which the corporate body is criminally liable.

You are reminded that following internal protocols or instructions offers no defence under this Act.”

This puts them on record notice that:

You know the law,

You hold them accountable at the corporate level, and

You expect their agents to act honourably and transparently.

7. Practical example

If, say, an insurance company’s representative claims your lawful indemnity bond is “invalid” without examining it properly — that could be false representation (Fraud Act 2006 s.2).
If their manager ignores your lawful correspondence and continues a baseless claim — the company may be exposed to failure to prevent fraud under ECCTA.
That gives you moral and lawful ground to press for remedy and transparency.

When Silence Speaks Loudest

Over recent weeks, a pattern has become impossible to ignore.

Detailed constitutional correspondence was sent to senior institutions raising serious issues about policing, justice governance and Covid-era decision-making.

Those institutions did not engage with the substance.

Instead:

• correspondence was deflected,

• responsibility was passed sideways,

• replies avoided facts rather than contesting them,

• and ultimately, doors were quietly closed.

Not one institution has disputed the documentary record now in the public domain.

Not one has corrected it.

Not one has explained it.

Silence, in these circumstances, is not neutrality - it is a position.

When lawful authority exists, institutions explain it.

When decisions are sound, they defend them.

When governance is intact, transparency follows.

What we are witnessing instead, is coordinated quiet.

And silence, when facts are known and unanswered, speaks louder than any denial ever could.

Ian Clayton
ETHICAL APPROACH UK

https://t.me/ethicalapproach

ALL THE EVIDENCE IS PLACED IN ABOVE TELEGRAM CHANNEL. PLEASE FOLLOW 🙏🏻

Notice Placed Before the Administrative Court

Today, I have formally placed before the Administrative Court a Notice of Material Constitutional Developments relating to CRN 6029679/21 and the Judicial Review determined by Poole J in November 2023.

This was not an application, not a request for relief and not made on behalf of any party.

It was submitted solely in the public interest.

Since that Judicial Review concluded, sworn evidence has entered the public domain through the UK Covid-19 Inquiry which was not available to the Court at the time. That evidence confirms that during Covid:

• Operation Talla functioned as a national, multi-agency legal and operational framework

• Senior Crown Prosecution Service legal leadership was embedded within it

• Legal meaning and enforcement expectations were coordinated outside adversarial court processes

• Courts were not part of the contemporaneous governance loop

Those facts go to the constitutional context in which the impugned policing decisions were taken - not merely how they were later explained to the Court.

The Notice makes no criticism of the judiciary, advances no allegation of bad faith and seeks no procedural step. Its sole purpose is to ensure the Court is aware of material constitutional facts which could not reasonably have been known when its supervisory jurisdiction was exercised.

Whether any further reflection is required is entirely a matter for the Court.

Transparency sometimes requires nothing more than ensuring the record is complete.

Ian Clayton
29 December 2025

Brief, excellent message on the end of Ecclesiastes 4 (preceded by a Gospel reading) commences five minutes into this recording.

Luke was a childhood acquaintance in Bedfordshire and gave me my first Dutch Bible, a decade before I met the Dutchwoman that I’d marry.

This is only his fourth sermon and he’s clearly studied Scripture and adjacent subjects far more assiduously than most long-standing pulpiteers.

https://bsepresbyterian.mixlr.com/recordings/2986816

No matter how much you despise Pharma, it hates you more.

Here’s the article Pharma tried everything to kill. They even cyberattacked the publishing journal.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41498242/

JUST IN - Bible sales in the UK hit a record high, driven by a surge in interest from Gen Z, with numbers up 134% over the past six years.

Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/23owu2z9h2/

@disclosetv