Forwarded from Android - Reddit
AEmulator - Android emulator that simulates older android firmware
https://aemulator.gt.tc/
https://redd.it/1wu4a9b
@reddit_android
https://aemulator.gt.tc/
https://redd.it/1wu4a9b
@reddit_android
β€36π5
Fitbit Edge will sit in-between the screenless Fitbit Air and the Pixel Watch 5
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Fitbit-Charge-6-successor-leaks-with-a-domed-display-and-elevation-tracking.1415694.0.html
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Fitbit-Charge-6-successor-leaks-with-a-domed-display-and-elevation-tracking.1415694.0.html
Notebookcheck
Fitbit Charge 6 successor leaks with a domed display and elevation tracking
The Charge 6 has gone three years without a direct successor, but that could soon change. Leaked Fitbit Edge images show a tracker with a domed screen for notifications, directions and music controls. It is also said to offer built-in GPS and up to sevenβ¦
β€17π2πΏ2
Cloudflare Opensources Forge: the open source pipeline for generating SDKs, CLIs, docs, and more
https://github.com/cloudflare/forge
https://github.com/cloudflare/forge
GitHub
GitHub - cloudflare/forge
Contribute to cloudflare/forge development by creating an account on GitHub.
β€33β5π€‘3π€1
Here's how YouTube looks on the iPhone Duo on both inner and cover display
π€‘87π€£31β€4π₯3π€·ββ1β1
Forwarded from Hikari Calyx Tech
And, time to kill marketplace created by those gsm tools dev.
Due to licensing issues from original developer, it will not become into a feature of lmnflash (which is MIT licensed), but a separated program.
Due to licensing issues from original developer, it will not become into a feature of lmnflash (which is MIT licensed), but a separated program.
π47β€6
Forwarded from Hikari Calyx Tech
GitHub
GitHub - Maikyxd/val-protocol: Motorola LK Patcher That Allows Unlock Bootloader And Remove FRP on MTK Devices Using Fastboot andβ¦
Motorola LK Patcher That Allows Unlock Bootloader And Remove FRP on MTK Devices Using Fastboot and LK cert exploit - Maikyxd/val-protocol
β€15
You can now turn OFF Apple Intelligence in your MacBooks to reclaim your 12GB storage
Note: With the Apple models gone, you lose all Siri-related AI features, Writing Tools, Genmoji, Image Playground, ChatGPT integration, summaries, smart replies, inline predictions, Photos Clean Up, Spatial Photos, and Xcode predictive completion
https://github.com/omlahore/RemoveMacAI
Note: With the Apple models gone, you lose all Siri-related AI features, Writing Tools, Genmoji, Image Playground, ChatGPT integration, summaries, smart replies, inline predictions, Photos Clean Up, Spatial Photos, and Xcode predictive completion
https://github.com/omlahore/RemoveMacAI
GitHub
GitHub - omlahore/RemoveMacAI: Debloat macOS: turn off Apple Intelligence, analytics, ads and pop-ups. A native app and CLI, andβ¦
Debloat macOS: turn off Apple Intelligence, analytics, ads and pop-ups. A native app and CLI, and every change can be undone. - omlahore/RemoveMacAI
β32β€12π₯±5π€1
BREAKING: Googlebooks bootloader is officially unlockable with Magisk root support
Google has officially documented bootloader unlocking on the GoogleBook support page. Magisk doesn't support Headless System User Mode (HSUM) out of the box, and USB flashing requires special cables, but John Wu has already developed fixes for both and will share setup details soon to root the GoogleBooks.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Googlebook-gets-unlocked-Bootloader-unlocking-paves-the-way-for-Magisk-root.1415945.0.html
Google has officially documented bootloader unlocking on the GoogleBook support page. Magisk doesn't support Headless System User Mode (HSUM) out of the box, and USB flashing requires special cables, but John Wu has already developed fixes for both and will share setup details soon to root the GoogleBooks.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Googlebook-gets-unlocked-Bootloader-unlocking-paves-the-way-for-Magisk-root.1415945.0.html
β€82π₯28π€―10β€βπ₯3
vxTwitter / fixvx
π 2.28K π 81
π 2.28K π 81
Luckey Faraday (@luckeyfaraday)
I asked Opus 5.5 and GPT-Astra to make Chun-Li in Blender.
But I added one very important requirement:
βMake sure that thang CLAPS.β
Clearly, Opus 5.5 is the better gooner.
γQRT of Luckey Faraday (@luckeyfaraday):γ
β¦
But I added one very important requirement:
βMake sure that thang CLAPS.β
Clearly, Opus 5.5 is the better gooner.
γQRT of Luckey Faraday (@luckeyfaraday):γ
β¦
π58π€£23β5π5π5β‘2β€2π₯΄2
Forwarded from Android - Reddit
Samsung is deliberately crippling Linux/AVF support on its phones, and Iβm honestly tired of it
Iβm genuinely frustrated with Samsungβs approach to Androidβs Android Virtualization Framework (AVF) and the new Linux Terminal. I recently bought a Galaxy F56 (Exynos 1480, One UI 8.5 / Android 16) specifically expecting that Android 16βs Linux/virtualization capabilities would be something I could actually use. Instead, after checking the device through ADB, it appears that Samsung simply hasnβt included the necessary components on this phone. I checked:
```
adb shell pm list packages | grep -E 'virtualization|microdroid|avf'
```
Nothing.
```
adb shell pm list features | grep -i virt
```
Nothing.
```
adb shell ls -l /dev/kvm
```
Result:
```
/dev/kvm: No such file or directory
```
And:
```
adb shell cmd virtualizationservice help
```
returns: Can't find service: virtualizationservice
The Samsung Linux Terminal package itself is also completely absent: Unknown package: com.android.virtualization.terminal So this isn't simply a case of Samsung hiding an app or forgetting to add a launcher shortcut. The underlying virtualization infrastructure doesn't appear to be present on my phone's stock firmware either. And that's what annoys me. Android itself has been moving toward proper virtualization with AVF, Microdroid, protected VMs, etc. Android 16 makes the Linux Terminal increasingly useful. Some Galaxy devices get the functionality, while other Samsung phones running essentially the same Android generation and One UI version don't. Why? If the hardware and Android platform are capable of supporting virtualization, why should Samsung decide that a particular phone simply doesn't get it?
I'm not asking Samsung to give a βΉ20,000 phone every feature of a flagship. I'm asking for software capabilities that are already part of the Android platform to not be arbitrarily crippled or omitted. Samsung already has a huge history of limiting software features by device and region, but virtualization is particularly frustrating because it has enormous potential for:
* Linux development
* Running isolated
* Linux environments
* Developer/testing workloads
* Security research
* Container/VM experimentation
* Android development
* Education
* General power-user use
And Android's Linux Terminal could have turned a modern Samsung phone into a genuinely useful portable Linux development machine. Instead, on my F56, I'm apparently back to Termux + proot if I want Linux userspace. That's useful, but it isn't equivalent to having a proper VM backed by hardware virtualization. What makes this even more frustrating is that Samsung's own ecosystem is increasingly marketed toward developers and power users, while capabilities like this are being selectively withheld. Samsung: if AVF isn't supported because of a genuine hardware limitation, explain it. If there is a technical limitation, explain it. But if the hardware is capable and you're simply choosing not to ship the necessary components, please stop pretending that One UI's Android 16 features are universally available. At minimum, Samsung should publish a clear list of which Galaxy devices support AVF/Linux Terminal and why others don't. I bought an Android phone, not a phone where Samsung decides which parts of Android I'm allowed to use. Has anyone else checked their Galaxy device with ADB to see whether /dev/kvm, virtualizationservice, and the AVF packages are actually present?
https://redd.it/1wxb4tf
@reddit_android
Iβm genuinely frustrated with Samsungβs approach to Androidβs Android Virtualization Framework (AVF) and the new Linux Terminal. I recently bought a Galaxy F56 (Exynos 1480, One UI 8.5 / Android 16) specifically expecting that Android 16βs Linux/virtualization capabilities would be something I could actually use. Instead, after checking the device through ADB, it appears that Samsung simply hasnβt included the necessary components on this phone. I checked:
```
adb shell pm list packages | grep -E 'virtualization|microdroid|avf'
```
Nothing.
```
adb shell pm list features | grep -i virt
```
Nothing.
```
adb shell ls -l /dev/kvm
```
Result:
```
/dev/kvm: No such file or directory
```
And:
```
adb shell cmd virtualizationservice help
```
returns: Can't find service: virtualizationservice
The Samsung Linux Terminal package itself is also completely absent: Unknown package: com.android.virtualization.terminal So this isn't simply a case of Samsung hiding an app or forgetting to add a launcher shortcut. The underlying virtualization infrastructure doesn't appear to be present on my phone's stock firmware either. And that's what annoys me. Android itself has been moving toward proper virtualization with AVF, Microdroid, protected VMs, etc. Android 16 makes the Linux Terminal increasingly useful. Some Galaxy devices get the functionality, while other Samsung phones running essentially the same Android generation and One UI version don't. Why? If the hardware and Android platform are capable of supporting virtualization, why should Samsung decide that a particular phone simply doesn't get it?
I'm not asking Samsung to give a βΉ20,000 phone every feature of a flagship. I'm asking for software capabilities that are already part of the Android platform to not be arbitrarily crippled or omitted. Samsung already has a huge history of limiting software features by device and region, but virtualization is particularly frustrating because it has enormous potential for:
* Linux development
* Running isolated
* Linux environments
* Developer/testing workloads
* Security research
* Container/VM experimentation
* Android development
* Education
* General power-user use
And Android's Linux Terminal could have turned a modern Samsung phone into a genuinely useful portable Linux development machine. Instead, on my F56, I'm apparently back to Termux + proot if I want Linux userspace. That's useful, but it isn't equivalent to having a proper VM backed by hardware virtualization. What makes this even more frustrating is that Samsung's own ecosystem is increasingly marketed toward developers and power users, while capabilities like this are being selectively withheld. Samsung: if AVF isn't supported because of a genuine hardware limitation, explain it. If there is a technical limitation, explain it. But if the hardware is capable and you're simply choosing not to ship the necessary components, please stop pretending that One UI's Android 16 features are universally available. At minimum, Samsung should publish a clear list of which Galaxy devices support AVF/Linux Terminal and why others don't. I bought an Android phone, not a phone where Samsung decides which parts of Android I'm allowed to use. Has anyone else checked their Galaxy device with ADB to see whether /dev/kvm, virtualizationservice, and the AVF packages are actually present?
https://redd.it/1wxb4tf
@reddit_android
Reddit
From the Android community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the Android community
π37β€9π9π€£4π1