Confirmation that NATO has "boots on the ground" in Ukraine is irrefutable at this point.
💯34🤬6🤡3👎2
And Macron is looking to increase escalation exponentially. This is an open declaration and act of war.
💯46🤡6💩4👍2❤🔥1👎1🥱1🦄1
Forwarded from RT News
❗️France Preparing Troops For Ukraine Deployment - Russian Foreign Intel Service Head
2,000 troops will be sent in the initial stage, Sergey Naryshkin told TASS.
Paris is concerned by the increasing number of French people killed in Ukraine which has “already exceeded a psychologically significant threshold, as they say in the Elysee Palace,” he added.
"Sooner or later, Macron will have to reveal the ugly truth, but he will strive to delay the confessions as much as possible,” he concluded.
2,000 troops will be sent in the initial stage, Sergey Naryshkin told TASS.
Paris is concerned by the increasing number of French people killed in Ukraine which has “already exceeded a psychologically significant threshold, as they say in the Elysee Palace,” he added.
"Sooner or later, Macron will have to reveal the ugly truth, but he will strive to delay the confessions as much as possible,” he concluded.
👍12🔥7💅3🙏2🤣2❤1
In other news, the NATO surveillance drones are beginning to suffer failures not immediately obvious to the bastards that operate them. Isn't that a daisy?
😁41🔥7👏6🤡4👍2👎1
Forwarded from Eurasia & Multipolarity
❗An American MQ9 Reaper drone lost contact with its base in the Miroslavets area in northwestern Poland, and then crashed during an emergency landing outside the airfield.
Polish General Ireniusz Nowak told the details:
The crashed Reaper took off from a military base in Romania and was supposed to land in Poland. The drone was carrying out a "training mission". At a certain point, the connection with it was lost.
The drone crashed in the north-west of Poland, in a specially designated area near the airfield for such cases. The drone was found nine minutes after the crash.
The version that the cause of the accident was the loss of the GPS signal is unlikely. The investigation of the causes of the accident will be conducted by the American side with the help of Polish specialists.
Polish General Ireniusz Nowak told the details:
The crashed Reaper took off from a military base in Romania and was supposed to land in Poland. The drone was carrying out a "training mission". At a certain point, the connection with it was lost.
The drone crashed in the north-west of Poland, in a specially designated area near the airfield for such cases. The drone was found nine minutes after the crash.
The version that the cause of the accident was the loss of the GPS signal is unlikely. The investigation of the causes of the accident will be conducted by the American side with the help of Polish specialists.
🎉56🤡22👍8🤣6🫡4❤2👏2🔥1
This complete dereliction of duty and abdication of responsibility is unacceptable. The director should immediately resign.
👍18🤡3🤣1
Forwarded from Russian Mission Vienna
🇷🇺 Comment by Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the International Organizations in Vienna Mikhail Ulyanov to TASS news agency
❓The IAEA issued a statement on the drone attack against the Zaporozhskaya NPP, but did not name the guilty party, despite calls from Russia. What is the reason for this policy of the Organization? Can we expect the Agency to change its approach on this issue?
💬 The IAEA refers to the fact that the Agency's Statute does not provide for the Secretariat to perform attributive functions, that is, the functions of determining the guilty party. Here, however, there is one fundamental exception. On May 30, 2023, after lengthy consultations with Moscow and Kiev, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi announced at the UN Security Council «five specific principles» for ensuring security at the Zaporozhskaya NPP. The most important of them is the inadmissibility of attacks against the NPP. Rafael Grossi pledged, if an attack on the Zaporozhskaya NPP does occur, to immediately make this fact public. Thank God, since November 20, 2022, there have been no Ukrainian strikes directly on the territory of the object
❓Does the Russian side agree with the conclusions of experts that the strike did not affect the nuclear safety of the Zaporozhskaya NPP, as well as with the conclusions that the exact nature of the strike (a drone or another missile) cannot be established?
💬 The corresponding section of the statement published by the IAEA causes, to say the least, bewilderment and disappointment. The emphasis in this message is placed in some bizarre way. Indeed, the drone attack in the immediate vicinity of a diesel fuel storage facility fortunately did not lead to negative consequences for nuclear safety, but it did create an extremely serious threat. The vapors released by diesel fuel are explosive. Taking into account the huge reserves of diesel in the storage facilities adjacent to the Zaporozhskaya NPP, the consequences could be catastrophic. This fundamental aspect was completely ignored by the Agency Secretariat, as if it were completely indifferent to it. The experts’ statement that they were unable to determine the origin of the crater they saw five meters from the fence of the diesel fuel storage facility also sounded absurd. From the point of view of nuclear safety and the IAEA mandate, it makes no difference whether the crater was the result of a drone explosion or some other explosive device. The very fact of delivering a strike close to a vital facility on the territory of an industrial zone adjacent to the perimeter of the Zaporozhskaya NPP is important. In addition to the risk of fire and explosion, it should be borne in mind that reserve diesel fuel reserves are extremely important to ensure guaranteed power supply to the station in the event of power line failure. The drafters of the document in the Agency Secretariat demonstrated a completely detached attitude towards this, limiting themselves to a dry presentation of the facts
💬 We have brought our criticisms to the attention of the Secretariat
💬 We emphasized that in the future we expect more verified and objective assessments from the Agency employees at the Zaporozhskaya NPP and the IAEA headquarters in Vienna
❓The IAEA issued a statement on the drone attack against the Zaporozhskaya NPP, but did not name the guilty party, despite calls from Russia. What is the reason for this policy of the Organization? Can we expect the Agency to change its approach on this issue?
💬 The IAEA refers to the fact that the Agency's Statute does not provide for the Secretariat to perform attributive functions, that is, the functions of determining the guilty party. Here, however, there is one fundamental exception. On May 30, 2023, after lengthy consultations with Moscow and Kiev, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi announced at the UN Security Council «five specific principles» for ensuring security at the Zaporozhskaya NPP. The most important of them is the inadmissibility of attacks against the NPP. Rafael Grossi pledged, if an attack on the Zaporozhskaya NPP does occur, to immediately make this fact public. Thank God, since November 20, 2022, there have been no Ukrainian strikes directly on the territory of the object
❓Does the Russian side agree with the conclusions of experts that the strike did not affect the nuclear safety of the Zaporozhskaya NPP, as well as with the conclusions that the exact nature of the strike (a drone or another missile) cannot be established?
💬 The corresponding section of the statement published by the IAEA causes, to say the least, bewilderment and disappointment. The emphasis in this message is placed in some bizarre way. Indeed, the drone attack in the immediate vicinity of a diesel fuel storage facility fortunately did not lead to negative consequences for nuclear safety, but it did create an extremely serious threat. The vapors released by diesel fuel are explosive. Taking into account the huge reserves of diesel in the storage facilities adjacent to the Zaporozhskaya NPP, the consequences could be catastrophic. This fundamental aspect was completely ignored by the Agency Secretariat, as if it were completely indifferent to it. The experts’ statement that they were unable to determine the origin of the crater they saw five meters from the fence of the diesel fuel storage facility also sounded absurd. From the point of view of nuclear safety and the IAEA mandate, it makes no difference whether the crater was the result of a drone explosion or some other explosive device. The very fact of delivering a strike close to a vital facility on the territory of an industrial zone adjacent to the perimeter of the Zaporozhskaya NPP is important. In addition to the risk of fire and explosion, it should be borne in mind that reserve diesel fuel reserves are extremely important to ensure guaranteed power supply to the station in the event of power line failure. The drafters of the document in the Agency Secretariat demonstrated a completely detached attitude towards this, limiting themselves to a dry presentation of the facts
💬 We have brought our criticisms to the attention of the Secretariat
💬 We emphasized that in the future we expect more verified and objective assessments from the Agency employees at the Zaporozhskaya NPP and the IAEA headquarters in Vienna
Telegram
Russian Mission Vienna Media
🤡19👍12🔥9❤1👎1
From our sister Faina, in Donbass. Placed on myrotrovets death list at the tender age of 12 for telling the truth. A living angel.
🙏64💩3🫡2❤1🤮1🤣1
Oleg Tsarev writes about the military war. The comments (use translate button) are also extremely educational).
In June 2023, Vladimir Putin, during a meeting with military officers in the Kremlin, said that due to shelling of Russian territories in Ukraine, a “sanitary zone” could be created: “If this continues, then we must, apparently, consider the issue - I am I say very carefully - in order to create some kind of sanitary zone on the territory of Ukraine at such a distance from which it would be impossible to reach our territory.”
Unfortunately, the shelling did not stop.
And yesterday the President returned to the topic of the “sanitary zone”: “ ...I do not rule out that, bearing in mind the tragic events taking place today, we will be forced at some point - when we consider it appropriate - to create a certain “sanitary zone” for today’s territories subordinated to the Kiev regime. To create a security zone, which will be quite difficult to overcome, using the weapons that the enemy uses, primarily, of course, foreign-made.”
There are many questions. Among other things, the size of this demilitarized zone is unclear, since Western weapons can strike at a distance of more than 500 km.
What conclusion can be drawn by analyzing the President's statements? Firstly, the decision has not been made yet. The President said that this decision will be made when deemed appropriate. That is, there is no such solution yet.
Secondly, the decision to create sanitary zones somewhat contrasts with the decision, for example, to go to Kyiv or Lviv. If you get to Kyiv or Lvov, there will be no need to create sanitary zones. The issue will be resolved finally and irrevocably.
Thus, from all of the above, we can conclude that the decision to what borders and limits the Russian army should reach has not yet been made.
In June 2023, Vladimir Putin, during a meeting with military officers in the Kremlin, said that due to shelling of Russian territories in Ukraine, a “sanitary zone” could be created: “If this continues, then we must, apparently, consider the issue - I am I say very carefully - in order to create some kind of sanitary zone on the territory of Ukraine at such a distance from which it would be impossible to reach our territory.”
Unfortunately, the shelling did not stop.
And yesterday the President returned to the topic of the “sanitary zone”: “ ...I do not rule out that, bearing in mind the tragic events taking place today, we will be forced at some point - when we consider it appropriate - to create a certain “sanitary zone” for today’s territories subordinated to the Kiev regime. To create a security zone, which will be quite difficult to overcome, using the weapons that the enemy uses, primarily, of course, foreign-made.”
There are many questions. Among other things, the size of this demilitarized zone is unclear, since Western weapons can strike at a distance of more than 500 km.
What conclusion can be drawn by analyzing the President's statements? Firstly, the decision has not been made yet. The President said that this decision will be made when deemed appropriate. That is, there is no such solution yet.
Secondly, the decision to create sanitary zones somewhat contrasts with the decision, for example, to go to Kyiv or Lviv. If you get to Kyiv or Lvov, there will be no need to create sanitary zones. The issue will be resolved finally and irrevocably.
Thus, from all of the above, we can conclude that the decision to what borders and limits the Russian army should reach has not yet been made.
👍29❤3🔥3🤡3
Forwarded from Олег Царёв
В июне 2023 года Владимир Путин в ходе встречи с военкорами в Кремле заявил, что из-за обстрелов территорий России на Украине может быть создана «санитарная зона»: «Если это будет продолжаться, тогда мы должны, видимо, будем рассмотреть вопрос — я это говорю очень аккуратно — чтобы создать на территории Украины какую-то санитарную зону на таком удалении, с которого невозможно было бы доставать нашу территорию».
К сожалению, обстрелы не прекратились.
И вчера Президент вернулся к теме «санитарной зоны»: «…Не исключаю, что, имея в виду происходящие сегодня трагические события, мы вынуждены будем в какой-то момент - тогда, когда посчитаем целесообразным, - создать определенную «санитарную зону» на сегодняшних территориях, подчиненных киевскому режиму. Создать зону безопасности, преодолеть которую будет достаточно сложно, применяя те средства поражения, которые противник использует, прежде всего, конечно, иностранного производства».
Вопросов много. В том числе, непонятны размеры этой демилитаризованной зоны, ведь западное оружие может бить и на расстояние более 500 км.
Какой вывод можно сделать, анализируя заявления Президента? Во-первых, решение еще не принято. Президент сказал, что это решение будет принято тогда, когда это сочтут целесообразным. То есть пока такого решения нет.
Во-вторых, решение создать санитарные зоны несколько контрастирует с решением, например, дойти до Киева или до Львова. Если дойти до Киева или до Львова, то не будет необходимости создавать санитарные зоны. Вопрос будет решен окончательно и бесповоротно.
Таким образом из всего вышесказанного можно сделать вывод о том, что решение, до каких границ и пределов должна дойти российская армия, еще не принято.
К сожалению, обстрелы не прекратились.
И вчера Президент вернулся к теме «санитарной зоны»: «…Не исключаю, что, имея в виду происходящие сегодня трагические события, мы вынуждены будем в какой-то момент - тогда, когда посчитаем целесообразным, - создать определенную «санитарную зону» на сегодняшних территориях, подчиненных киевскому режиму. Создать зону безопасности, преодолеть которую будет достаточно сложно, применяя те средства поражения, которые противник использует, прежде всего, конечно, иностранного производства».
Вопросов много. В том числе, непонятны размеры этой демилитаризованной зоны, ведь западное оружие может бить и на расстояние более 500 км.
Какой вывод можно сделать, анализируя заявления Президента? Во-первых, решение еще не принято. Президент сказал, что это решение будет принято тогда, когда это сочтут целесообразным. То есть пока такого решения нет.
Во-вторых, решение создать санитарные зоны несколько контрастирует с решением, например, дойти до Киева или до Львова. Если дойти до Киева или до Львова, то не будет необходимости создавать санитарные зоны. Вопрос будет решен окончательно и бесповоротно.
Таким образом из всего вышесказанного можно сделать вывод о том, что решение, до каких границ и пределов должна дойти российская армия, еще не принято.
🤡5🔥2👍1
Oleg Tsarev writes about the Information War -
"I went to visit a good friend. Her TV was working. Before it was turned off at my request, I watched a fragment of a program where they discussed the life of a Ukrainian politician and a Ukrainian oligarch. The experts discussed people whom they themselves had previously only seen on TV.
I won’t discuss the show on its merits; both characters are complete scoundrels. In essence, everything is true, although they lied a lot in detail. But I have only one question for the Russians: aren’t you tired of the Ukrainian topic in the news?
Isn’t it more interesting to discuss the ins and outs of Russian politicians and Russian oligarchs on Russian television than Ukrainian ones?"
"I went to visit a good friend. Her TV was working. Before it was turned off at my request, I watched a fragment of a program where they discussed the life of a Ukrainian politician and a Ukrainian oligarch. The experts discussed people whom they themselves had previously only seen on TV.
I won’t discuss the show on its merits; both characters are complete scoundrels. In essence, everything is true, although they lied a lot in detail. But I have only one question for the Russians: aren’t you tired of the Ukrainian topic in the news?
Isn’t it more interesting to discuss the ins and outs of Russian politicians and Russian oligarchs on Russian television than Ukrainian ones?"
👍27🤡5🔥4👏2
Forwarded from Олег Царёв
Зашел к хорошей знакомой в гости. У неё работал телевизор. До того, как по моей просьбе его выключили, я наблюдал фрагмент передачи, где обсуждали жизнь одного украинского политика и одного украинского олигарха. Эксперты обсуждали людей, которых сами до этого видели максимум по телевизору.
Не буду обсуждать передачу по существу, оба героя законченные мерзавцы. По сути все верно, хоть и наврали много в деталях. Но у меня только один вопрос к россиянам: не надоела украинская тема в новостях?
Не интереснее ли на российском телевидении обсудить подноготную российских политиков и российских олигархов, чем украинских?
Не буду обсуждать передачу по существу, оба героя законченные мерзавцы. По сути все верно, хоть и наврали много в деталях. Но у меня только один вопрос к россиянам: не надоела украинская тема в новостях?
Не интереснее ли на российском телевидении обсудить подноготную российских политиков и российских олигархов, чем украинских?
🔥14🤡2👍1
Probably THE BEST video explaining Russian political sentiment in the recent election - Estonian propagandists try to provoke Russian citizens living in Estonia as the come out after voting in the Russian embassy in Tallin. The answers (ENG SUBS) are educational! Thanks to Lord Bebo for this gem!
👍38🤡2🏆2
Forwarded from Lord Bebo & Friends (крип)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇪🇪🇷🇺‼️🚨
@MyLordBebo | Boost us! | X
“But he’s in power for 25 years.”
Answer: “Have you been to Russia 25 years ago and now?”
@MyLordBebo | Boost us! | X
🔥65👏36❤15👍15🥰2🤡2
Forwarded from Planet Z News
🇬🇧 NEVER FORGET UK & US WAR CRIMES 🇺🇸
On this day 21 years ago, the US and UK launched a brutal and illegal invasion of Iraq
The reason for the invasion was the lie that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and collaborated with al-Qaeda.
MIT estimates that between 800,000 and 1.3 million people have died in Iraq due to the war. During the first month, about 15 thousand people died during the invasion.
Photos taken from the CIA and US Army torture program at Abu Ghraib prison.
NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGIVE.
@PlanetZnews @PlanetZchat
On this day 21 years ago, the US and UK launched a brutal and illegal invasion of Iraq
The reason for the invasion was the lie that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and collaborated with al-Qaeda.
MIT estimates that between 800,000 and 1.3 million people have died in Iraq due to the war. During the first month, about 15 thousand people died during the invasion.
Photos taken from the CIA and US Army torture program at Abu Ghraib prison.
NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGIVE.
@PlanetZnews @PlanetZchat
👍66🤬65💯29😱4😭4👏2😢2🤮2🤣2🤡1😡1
Forwarded from 🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺
❗️Dmitry Medvedev approves of France sending troops to Ukraine:
"It would be nice if the restless French sent a couple of regiments to Banderaland. It is very problematic to hide such a number of military personnel, and, therefore, the issue of their systematic destruction will not be the most difficult but an extremely important task.
⚡But how beneficial it would be!
With so many coffins that will be delivered to France from a foreign, distant country, it will be impossible to hide the mass death of professional military personnel. Moreover, you can no lie and say that, supposedly, mercenaries themselves choose their fate and dispose of their right to life. These unfortunates will become full-fledged combatants as part of the intervention contingent. Their destruction will be the priority and glorious task for our Armed Forces.
🇫🇷But for the roosters from the French leadership, this will be like the guillotine. They will be cut into pieces by angry relatives and evil representatives of the opposition, who were told that France is not at war with Russia. And it will be a good lesson for other restless idiots in Europe"
🎙Subscribe @AussieCossack
"It would be nice if the restless French sent a couple of regiments to Banderaland. It is very problematic to hide such a number of military personnel, and, therefore, the issue of their systematic destruction will not be the most difficult but an extremely important task.
⚡But how beneficial it would be!
With so many coffins that will be delivered to France from a foreign, distant country, it will be impossible to hide the mass death of professional military personnel. Moreover, you can no lie and say that, supposedly, mercenaries themselves choose their fate and dispose of their right to life. These unfortunates will become full-fledged combatants as part of the intervention contingent. Their destruction will be the priority and glorious task for our Armed Forces.
🇫🇷But for the roosters from the French leadership, this will be like the guillotine. They will be cut into pieces by angry relatives and evil representatives of the opposition, who were told that France is not at war with Russia. And it will be a good lesson for other restless idiots in Europe"
🎙Subscribe @AussieCossack
👏85👍21🤡7🔥6🏆3🥰1
"German schoolchildren should be prepared for war to 'strengthen our resilience', the country’s education minister has said...'civil defence' exercises should be held in schools as part of efforts to help youngsters cope in the years to come."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/german-children-prepared-war-192511872.html?guccounter=1
https://www.yahoo.com/news/german-children-prepared-war-192511872.html?guccounter=1
Yahoo News
German children ‘should be prepared for war’
German schoolchildren should be prepared for war to “strengthen our resilience”, the country’s education minister has said as tensions with Russia continue to soar.
🤮74🤡30🤬14💩5👎4😁2🤣2👍1😢1