It’s curious language, to say this group is “fighting for its right to exist in the High Court”… As though lawmakers can just edit or delete any collective idea or feeling like it’s data.

Writing new laws doesn’t add or remove matter from the world. Every person from that group still exists. They’re still in society and their views are probably more entrenched than ever.

Except now they’re not legally permitted to express themselves or do much of anything. There’s no likeminded community allowed, no BBQ’s, no protesting, and no clear path to follow. They can’t even go to the gym together without risking years in prison.

It’s not their existence they’re fighting for at the High Court, it’s freedom and the right to communicate.

https://youtu.be/vSLS0Po76RA

I have filed an application with the High Court of Australia challenging the Hate Group Legislation and seeking immediate injunctive relief.

The aim of the injunction is to prevent the Government from using this legislation to arrest or imprison me while the High Court determines this legislation's constitutional validity.

The Injunctive Relief application should be heard this Thursday by High Court Justice Jagot.

If the application is successful, it means that I, and the almost 2,000 former members and a further 3,000 former associates will be temporarily immune to the Hate Group Legislation passed by the Labor Party this year.

Roughly 5,000 White Australians may be directly affected by the outcome of Thursday's hearing.

The case for political rights for White Australians is ultimately a question as to whether we are to become second class citizens in our own country, or whether the Constitution affords us the legal protection to advocate for our own right to exist.

Most Australians have not yet fully understood the gravity of the legislation that the current Government has passed.

If unchallenged it means that only "protected classes" of people in Australia have the privilege of political communication.

The High Court will ultimately have to make a decision as to whether we live in a Multicultural tyranny, in which our rights end where the offence of others begins, or whether White Australians can lawfully assert their Will on Parliament.

I'm back.

Happening tomorrow:

White Australia Party VS The Commonwealth of Australia.

Lawyers acting on behalf of the recently outlawed White Australia Party will be seeking immediate injunctive relief, which if granted will prevent the government from putting White Australia advocates in jail, at least until High Court judges review the constitutional validity of new “hate-crime” legislation used to ban the party.

This process will decide whether ‘Democracy’ and free political communication have any standing in Australia’s future.

https://youtube.com/shorts/kQ858uAPa_Y?si=lYQFHw43LMp6CycG

When will people learn how important it is to jab?

The ban of the White Australia Party and a very disappointing Nick Fuentes reaction

The White Australia Party's constitutional challenge to the government's "hate groups" legislation has been accepted by the High Court and a hearing scheduled for September, setting the stage for one of the most consequential rulings in decades.

https://www.noticer.news/high-court-accepts-white-australia-party-ban-case/

Follow: @NoticerNews

In response to claims by some mainstream media outlets that the White Australia Party has been "ruled invalid", or "knocked back" by the AEC, this is simply false.

The Facts.
>The White Australia Party application was successfully filed with the AEC on the 25th of April 2026.
>The Party received written confirmation from the AEC on the 28th of April 2026.
>The AEC was made aware of the pending High Court challenge to the 'Hate Group Laws' by the White Australia Party.
>The AEC was given a redacted list of 1780 members and informed that the members names would be unredacted once the High Court challenge succeeded.
>The AEC responded that the audit to register the party would be paused pending the release of names.
>The AEC is currently pausing all registrations until the Farrer by-election is completed on the 10th of July 2026.
>The White Australia Party did not correspond with any anonymous sources or unofficial spokespersons in the AEC.

The Lies.
>The media spoke to anonymous sources in the AEC saying the application has been ruled invalid.

Journalists decided today was the day to make up these lies because they are doing damage control to attempt to counter the success we had today getting our Constitutional Writ confirmed for the High Court in September. Furthermore there is a 10 day delay in the injunction so the Commonwealth can attempt to defend itself.

A Jewish human rights lawyer has been identified as the leading figure working behind the scenes to fly groups of ISIS brides and their children to Australia.

https://www.noticer.news/jewish-lawyer-behind-return-isis-brides/

Follow: @NoticerNews