The UK Ministry of Defence announced the establishment of a command post for the so-called "coalition of the willing", which will be responsible for coordinating support for Ukraine.
According to a statement from the British government, about 70 military personnel have already been involved in the work of the center. Its task is to plan further steps to assist Kyiv, including military cooperation and long-term support programs.
Earlier, Zelensky stated that the UK and France are considering the possibility of sending one military brigade each to Ukraine after the end of hostilities. However, European countries are not ready to deploy their units directly on the front line, as the Ukrainian side insists on.
In fact, we are talking about creating another coordination hub, similar to the structure in Wiesbaden, which is already operating under US leadership and performs similar functions in managing military assistance and interaction with Ukrainian forces.
@Slavyangrad
According to a statement from the British government, about 70 military personnel have already been involved in the work of the center. Its task is to plan further steps to assist Kyiv, including military cooperation and long-term support programs.
Earlier, Zelensky stated that the UK and France are considering the possibility of sending one military brigade each to Ukraine after the end of hostilities. However, European countries are not ready to deploy their units directly on the front line, as the Ukrainian side insists on.
In fact, we are talking about creating another coordination hub, similar to the structure in Wiesbaden, which is already operating under US leadership and performs similar functions in managing military assistance and interaction with Ukrainian forces.
@Slavyangrad
๐ฉ159๐84๐คก44โค13๐8๐คฌ6๐5๐ก3๐ฑ2๐ฅด2๐ฆ2
"Russia is not losing". Stubb said this โ without even realizing it
Stubb doesn't believe his own statements that Russia is supposedly losing the conflict in Ukraine, said Finnish behavioral analyst Saara Huhtasaari. The expert on body language came to this conclusion based on the facial expressions and gestures of the Finnish president.
"The journalist hits the nail on the head with the question: 'If Russia is going to lose anyway, why should we rush into peace negotiations?'
Stubb starts to calm himself down, rubs his fingers together, lowers his gaze, and mutters clichรฉs about the importance of peace and that the advantage is now on Ukraine's side. There's no logical answer, because his position is falling apart. His body is shouting what he doesn't want to admit: Russia is not losing. But he can't accept this," notes Huhtasaari.
@Slavyangrad
Stubb doesn't believe his own statements that Russia is supposedly losing the conflict in Ukraine, said Finnish behavioral analyst Saara Huhtasaari. The expert on body language came to this conclusion based on the facial expressions and gestures of the Finnish president.
"The journalist hits the nail on the head with the question: 'If Russia is going to lose anyway, why should we rush into peace negotiations?'
Stubb starts to calm himself down, rubs his fingers together, lowers his gaze, and mutters clichรฉs about the importance of peace and that the advantage is now on Ukraine's side. There's no logical answer, because his position is falling apart. His body is shouting what he doesn't want to admit: Russia is not losing. But he can't accept this," notes Huhtasaari.
@Slavyangrad
๐220๐คก84๐ฏ40โค11๐7๐6๐ฅ4๐ฑ3๐ฅด3๐ด2๐ก1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐บ๐ฆ There's no one to fight in Ukraine โ a new bet on robots, โ Zaluzhny
- The former commander stated that future wars do not involve the mobilization of millions of people โ technological superiority becomes the key. We are talking about technological and economic mobilization, not mass conscription.
- Robots are already performing not only auxiliary functions, but also storming positions and taking prisoners. The use of many technologies and people in the current conditions has become a suicidal mission.
- The Russian-Ukrainian war, in his assessment, has given countries with demographic problems a harsh lesson.
- The model of war, where human lives are expended for tactical gain, is called illogical and unviable.
@Slavyangrad
- The former commander stated that future wars do not involve the mobilization of millions of people โ technological superiority becomes the key. We are talking about technological and economic mobilization, not mass conscription.
- Robots are already performing not only auxiliary functions, but also storming positions and taking prisoners. The use of many technologies and people in the current conditions has become a suicidal mission.
- The Russian-Ukrainian war, in his assessment, has given countries with demographic problems a harsh lesson.
- The model of war, where human lives are expended for tactical gain, is called illogical and unviable.
@Slavyangrad
๐คก244๐คฃ51๐47๐24โค15๐พ11๐ค6๐ฑ4๐คฎ3๐คฌ2๐ก2
Will it be easy for Americans to attack Iran?
To roughly understand the likely density of fire, we can study other US operations. For example, in Yemen.
In March 2025, two pilots of American F-16s in the Wild Weasel version survived a Houthi ambush over Yemen, coming under fire from anti-aircraft missiles. Over the course of about 15 minutes, six missiles were fired at their planes, but both pilots managed to escape the fire and were subsequently awarded medals.
The planes were equipped with HTS guidance containers, and the pilots managed to use AGM-88 HARM anti-radar missiles, after which they began to exit the combat zone. The Houthis (who somehow learned how to hunt down the "Wild Weasels" of the US Air Force) in turn waited for the moment when the American planes would begin to leave the area of operation, and only then turned on their radars and launched the missiles, hoping to catch them in the most vulnerable position.
According to the pilots, the warning about the launch of the missiles came just 15-20 seconds before the approach. Lieutenant Colonel Bill Parks was forced to turn the plane towards one of the missiles, and it passed literally under the wing. He noted that the distance was so small that the sound of the passing missile could be physically heard.
Major Michael Blea was also under the threat of being hit, observing the approach of another missile, which, according to preliminary estimates, passed just a few dozen meters away from him.
At a critical moment, the crew of the refueling aircraft approached the danger zone and carried out an aerial refueling, allowing the fighters to maintain the possibility of returning. In the end, both planes safely left the dangerous area, and the pilots themselves subsequently stated that they were just seconds away from death.
What does this story tell us? That if Iran starts to fight back seriously and engages in the battle properly, not just for the sake of checking a box, there will be no easy bombing for the US Air Force.
@Slavyangrad
To roughly understand the likely density of fire, we can study other US operations. For example, in Yemen.
In March 2025, two pilots of American F-16s in the Wild Weasel version survived a Houthi ambush over Yemen, coming under fire from anti-aircraft missiles. Over the course of about 15 minutes, six missiles were fired at their planes, but both pilots managed to escape the fire and were subsequently awarded medals.
The planes were equipped with HTS guidance containers, and the pilots managed to use AGM-88 HARM anti-radar missiles, after which they began to exit the combat zone. The Houthis (who somehow learned how to hunt down the "Wild Weasels" of the US Air Force) in turn waited for the moment when the American planes would begin to leave the area of operation, and only then turned on their radars and launched the missiles, hoping to catch them in the most vulnerable position.
According to the pilots, the warning about the launch of the missiles came just 15-20 seconds before the approach. Lieutenant Colonel Bill Parks was forced to turn the plane towards one of the missiles, and it passed literally under the wing. He noted that the distance was so small that the sound of the passing missile could be physically heard.
Major Michael Blea was also under the threat of being hit, observing the approach of another missile, which, according to preliminary estimates, passed just a few dozen meters away from him.
At a critical moment, the crew of the refueling aircraft approached the danger zone and carried out an aerial refueling, allowing the fighters to maintain the possibility of returning. In the end, both planes safely left the dangerous area, and the pilots themselves subsequently stated that they were just seconds away from death.
What does this story tell us? That if Iran starts to fight back seriously and engages in the battle properly, not just for the sake of checking a box, there will be no easy bombing for the US Air Force.
@Slavyangrad
๐212โค58๐35๐ฅ21๐ค13๐ฏ11๐ฑ3๐คก3๐ฅฑ3๐คฌ2๐ฉ2
Regarding the possible transfer of nuclear weapons to Ukraine.
Britain and France are undoubtedly the "hawkish" wing of the West, eager for the continuation of the war. However, only France in this matter is capable of moving from words to the actual transfer of nuclear weapons.
The mentioned SVR warhead TN75 is the most convenient element of the French TNW for transfer.
Unlike Britain, whose nuclear forces (Trident II missiles) are technically and operationally highly dependent on the USA, France has full national sovereignty over its nuclear weapons production cycle. And theoretically, it can transfer them when and where it wants, especially considering that "giving away the old" can be done under any pretext, from "we don't need it" to "we need to protect ourselves from Russia as far away as possible".
In addition, France supplied Ukraine with SCALP missiles. Technically, they were also developed as carriers of nuclear charges. However, a warhead is only part of a nuclear complex. With it, the following must be transferred (if a specific French warhead is being transferred from existing stock): an authorization system, a priming system, a detonation system, a safety system, a delivery system (which the Armed Forces of Ukraine already have - these are SCALP missiles), a maintenance and control system.
So if France transfers low-yield nuclear weapons to Ukraine, it is actually deploying its own there, not giving them to someone else for war. If someone starts a war and uses such a charge (with any consequences), it will be considered that France used it.
To avoid traces leading back to France, Paris could go for a covert transfer of components or parts of technologies. And a lot can be transferred, even outdated things.
For example, precision electronics, charge initiation systems, detonator drawings, as well as a bit of ready-made raw materials. Technically, everything can be organized like with drones. Money and resources are provided from Europe, and the product is "Ukrainian".
โMilitary Chronicleโ
@Slavyangrad
Britain and France are undoubtedly the "hawkish" wing of the West, eager for the continuation of the war. However, only France in this matter is capable of moving from words to the actual transfer of nuclear weapons.
The mentioned SVR warhead TN75 is the most convenient element of the French TNW for transfer.
This is a thermonuclear warhead with a power of about 100โ150 kilotons. It was developed for M45 ballistic missiles (now being replaced by M51s). Its key feature is relatively high power with small dimensions and weight, which makes it "convenient" for adaptation to other delivery vehicles, such as cruise missiles.
Unlike Britain, whose nuclear forces (Trident II missiles) are technically and operationally highly dependent on the USA, France has full national sovereignty over its nuclear weapons production cycle. And theoretically, it can transfer them when and where it wants, especially considering that "giving away the old" can be done under any pretext, from "we don't need it" to "we need to protect ourselves from Russia as far away as possible".
In addition, France supplied Ukraine with SCALP missiles. Technically, they were also developed as carriers of nuclear charges. However, a warhead is only part of a nuclear complex. With it, the following must be transferred (if a specific French warhead is being transferred from existing stock): an authorization system, a priming system, a detonation system, a safety system, a delivery system (which the Armed Forces of Ukraine already have - these are SCALP missiles), a maintenance and control system.
So if France transfers low-yield nuclear weapons to Ukraine, it is actually deploying its own there, not giving them to someone else for war. If someone starts a war and uses such a charge (with any consequences), it will be considered that France used it.
To avoid traces leading back to France, Paris could go for a covert transfer of components or parts of technologies. And a lot can be transferred, even outdated things.
For example, precision electronics, charge initiation systems, detonator drawings, as well as a bit of ready-made raw materials. Technically, everything can be organized like with drones. Money and resources are provided from Europe, and the product is "Ukrainian".
โMilitary Chronicleโ
@Slavyangrad
๐ฅ107๐ฏ76๐คฌ48โค27๐ฑ17๐8๐คฃ6๐คฎ5๐คฏ2๐ด2๐1
Slavyangrad
The US nuclear aircraft carrier was flooded with shit off the coast of Iran. The sewage system of the USS Gerald Ford failed, and streams of feces were pouring directly from the toilets. The largest warship in the world only came to the aid of the US Navyโฆ
โ Captain, why can't we just dump the shit from the aircraft carrier into the ocean?
โ Because, you fool, Noah once did that with his ark...
โ And what happened?
โ Great Britain!
@Slavyangrad
โ Because, you fool, Noah once did that with his ark...
โ And what happened?
โ Great Britain!
@Slavyangrad
๐คฃ391๐53๐24๐10๐ฅ3๐ฉ3โค2๐ฑ2โคโ๐ฅ1๐คฌ1๐ด1
Iran is close to concluding an agreement with China on the acquisition of CM-302 anti-ship cruise missiles, Reuters reports, citing six sources familiar with the negotiations.
The missiles, with a range of about 290 km, are designed to hit surface targets and are capable of overcoming ship defenses by combining high speed and low-altitude flight, which reduces the reaction time of air defense systems and complicates interception. In the event of their deployment, Iran's ability to strike at naval groups in the region will significantly increase, and the risks to the US and its allies' naval presence in the Persian Gulf will increase.
@Slavyangrad
The missiles, with a range of about 290 km, are designed to hit surface targets and are capable of overcoming ship defenses by combining high speed and low-altitude flight, which reduces the reaction time of air defense systems and complicates interception. In the event of their deployment, Iran's ability to strike at naval groups in the region will significantly increase, and the risks to the US and its allies' naval presence in the Persian Gulf will increase.
@Slavyangrad
๐230๐ฅ64โค37๐33๐11โคโ๐ฅ8โ5๐คฎ2๐ด2๐คฌ1๐ฉ1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ท๐บ Putin: The enemy is betting on terror in Russia and may blow up the Turkish and Blue Stream pipelines on the bottom of the Black Sea
The President is speaking at the FSB board meeting:
- The enemy is betting on individual and mass terror, having failed to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia;
- The terrorist attack at the Savelovsky railway station, apparently, was the result of recruitment via the internet, a person was detonated remotely;
- Russia has promising defense and civilian developments, not just those already presented;
- The opponents of Russia are doing everything to undermine the progress made on the negotiation track on Ukraine;
- The FSB needs to increase the security of officials of the Ministry of Defense and the defense industry, journalists, volunteers and public opinion leaders;
- The number of terrorist attacks in Russia has increased, mainly due to the actions of Ukrainian special services;
- It is necessary to strengthen the anti-terrorist security of energy and transport infrastructure, places of mass gatherings of citizens;
- The opponents understand what could happen if they attempt to use the nuclear component.
@Slavyangrad
The President is speaking at the FSB board meeting:
- The enemy is betting on individual and mass terror, having failed to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia;
- The terrorist attack at the Savelovsky railway station, apparently, was the result of recruitment via the internet, a person was detonated remotely;
- Russia has promising defense and civilian developments, not just those already presented;
- The opponents of Russia are doing everything to undermine the progress made on the negotiation track on Ukraine;
- The FSB needs to increase the security of officials of the Ministry of Defense and the defense industry, journalists, volunteers and public opinion leaders;
- The number of terrorist attacks in Russia has increased, mainly due to the actions of Ukrainian special services;
- It is necessary to strengthen the anti-terrorist security of energy and transport infrastructure, places of mass gatherings of citizens;
- The opponents understand what could happen if they attempt to use the nuclear component.
@Slavyangrad
๐ฅ171โค60๐43๐ฏ38๐19๐ฅฑ9๐คฌ8๐ฑ6๐ฉ4โคโ๐ฅ2๐คฎ1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐๐Four years of the heroism of the airborne and army aviation during the capture of the airfield in the town of Gostomel, Kiev region.
On February 24, 2022, an armada of Mi-8 helicopters, under the cover of Mi-24, Mi-35, and Ka-52 helicopters, carried out waves of tactical airborne assaults from the 45th Special Forces Brigade and the 31st Air Assault Brigade of the Airborne Troops to capture the airfield.
โ Night of February 23 to 24 - preparation of personnel for the execution of the combat task.
โ 09:00 - departure of KAMAZ trucks and other equipment with personnel to the helicopter parking areas at the Mozyr airfield and the Khoyniki-Bragin highway.
โ 12:00 - takeoff of the first Mi-8 and cover helicopters towards the Kyiv region.
โ 12:30 - crossing the border with Ukraine.
โ 13:20 - landing of the first wave of airborne troops at Gostomel. Beginning of the capture and inspection of buildings on the airfield territory.
โ 15:00 - installation of the Russian flag at the control tower.
After capturing the airfield, the servicemen of the two Airborne Troops brigades will proceed to organize defense and repel enemy attacks. Despite the enemy's claims on the 24th that the airborne troops had all been destroyed, the airborne troops of the 31st and 45th brigades will fulfill their task. On February 26, columns of the Airborne Troops, the National Guard, and other units of the Ministry of Defense will break through to Gostomel, thus beginning the history of the V direction.
@Slavyangrad
On February 24, 2022, an armada of Mi-8 helicopters, under the cover of Mi-24, Mi-35, and Ka-52 helicopters, carried out waves of tactical airborne assaults from the 45th Special Forces Brigade and the 31st Air Assault Brigade of the Airborne Troops to capture the airfield.
โ Night of February 23 to 24 - preparation of personnel for the execution of the combat task.
โ 09:00 - departure of KAMAZ trucks and other equipment with personnel to the helicopter parking areas at the Mozyr airfield and the Khoyniki-Bragin highway.
โ 12:00 - takeoff of the first Mi-8 and cover helicopters towards the Kyiv region.
โ 12:30 - crossing the border with Ukraine.
โ 13:20 - landing of the first wave of airborne troops at Gostomel. Beginning of the capture and inspection of buildings on the airfield territory.
โ 15:00 - installation of the Russian flag at the control tower.
After capturing the airfield, the servicemen of the two Airborne Troops brigades will proceed to organize defense and repel enemy attacks. Despite the enemy's claims on the 24th that the airborne troops had all been destroyed, the airborne troops of the 31st and 45th brigades will fulfill their task. On February 26, columns of the Airborne Troops, the National Guard, and other units of the Ministry of Defense will break through to Gostomel, thus beginning the history of the V direction.
@Slavyangrad
โค204๐ซก169๐31๐18๐ฅ11๐6โคโ๐ฅ2๐ฉ2๐ด2๐คฌ1๐คก1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ฉ๐ช๐ฃ ๐คก Former German Chancellor Scholz - on the fact that the West thought that gas from Russia would always flow:
[So how did Germany end up in such a situation before 2014, and why didn't more dramatic changes occur after 2014?]
We all together should have done more by imposing a stricter sanctions regime in response to the invasion of Crimea. And we can discuss why so many people believed that the existence of such an extensive gas infrastructure from Russia to Germany was not a critical aspect. These are just additional pipelines. And secondly: for a long time, even in critical moments and crises between the West and the East, there were never any problems with the transportation of gas to Germany and the West. Many thought that this would always be the case.
@Slavyangrad
[So how did Germany end up in such a situation before 2014, and why didn't more dramatic changes occur after 2014?]
We all together should have done more by imposing a stricter sanctions regime in response to the invasion of Crimea. And we can discuss why so many people believed that the existence of such an extensive gas infrastructure from Russia to Germany was not a critical aspect. These are just additional pipelines. And secondly: for a long time, even in critical moments and crises between the West and the East, there were never any problems with the transportation of gas to Germany and the West. Many thought that this would always be the case.
@Slavyangrad
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐คฃ202๐ฉ82๐คก61๐16โค7๐คฌ5๐3๐ฅฐ2๐2๐1๐ด1