We were informed in advance of Trump's post regarding Iran.

We do not see an imminent end to the war, and we plan to continue operations while avoiding targeting energy facilities.

We are dealing with a man who I believe is the most respected and the leader.

It is not the Supreme Leader; nobody has heard from him, and we don’t know if he is living.

We want the nuclear dust. We’re going to want that, and I think we’re going to get that.

We’ve agreed to that—yeah, we’re going to; we’ve agreed to that.

If you end up hitting Iranian power plants, how is that different from what Russia is doing in Ukraine?

I think it’s a lot different... I’m not a fan of what Russia is doing either, just so you understand, but it’s a lot different.

There are many points of agreement with Iran right now like 15 points.

They’re not going to have a nuclear weapon—that’s number one. That’s number one, two, and three.

They will never have a nuclear weapon—they’ve agreed to that.

If you obliterated their nuclear sites last summer, then how can you argue it was an imminent threat now?

We hit them we obliterated them. But that doesn’t mean with the right equipment you can’t dig down and go get it. We don’t want that.

The United States has asked us not to target power plants in Iran.

There is no doubt that Trump has backed down, as he realized that his threat complicates the situation.

The system that failed to intercept the ballistic missiles launched from Iran that directly hit Arad and Dimona is the "David's Sling" system.