Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺
109K subscribers
490 photos
496 videos
22 files
1.16K links
Official engl. channel, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, German/American Lawyer and co-founder:
Corona-Investigative-Committee
Responsible in terms of press law: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich.
Download Telegram
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Boeing CEO on the barbecue point when will we see the PfizerCEO and his boy group (The Plandemics) being roasted?
The banner supporting Reiner Fuellmich, thought out by Astrid Stuckelberger, created by Jean-Marie Steinmetz, and financed by Francis le procédurier, in cooperation with Dominique Baudinaud, at the big demonstration against the plans of the #WHO in Geneva on June 1st, has found its way to Germany. Today it was used for the first time at the vigil in front of Rosdorf Prison. Many thanks to all the initiators and to Hélène Brauer, who sent the banner to Göttingen and thus initiated an international project!

From now on, the banner will travel through cities and countries until Reiner Fuellmich is free!

"Now that we have realized that this is a politically motivated trial, we feel a special need to fight for Reiner's release!"

Thanks also to Elke and her son, Susanne, Beate, Gerhard, Daniela, Achim, Evelin, Jürgen, Angela and everyone else who remind us every Thursday of Fuellmichs political persecution . #FreeReiner
Forwarded from Zeee Media 🎙
If you missed it👇

Former Pfizer employee and Biotech Analyst Karen Kingston joins Maria Zeee to discuss the revelations of 4 more U.S. States to sue Pfizer, with a 5th expected to follow.

https://zeeemedia.com/interview/karen-kingston-5-more-u-s-states-to-sue-pfizer/

Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
Forwarded from Zeee Media 🎙
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Coviditiot has mental breakdown because healthcare staff told her masks don’t actually work.

Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
Forwarded from Läkaruppropet
🇺🇸🇨🇦🇬🇧🇮🇪🇦🇺🇳🇿🇿🇦 There are legal developments both in the United States and most recently in Canada regarding government claims that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective.

Canadian family and emergency physician Charles Hoffe is the subject of disciplinary proceedings at the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia (BC) for making public statements about SARS-COV-2, the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines and other alternative treatments including ivermectin. The College has alleged that the doctor's statements are misleading, inaccurate or inflammatory and constitute professional misconduct. The College asked the Disciplinary Board to put the following facts on the record, thereby preventing the doctor from presenting rebuttal evidence in his defense:

1. the Covid virus kills or causes other serious effects
2. The virus does not discriminate;
3. Vaccines work;
4. Vaccines are generally safe and have a low risk of adverse effects, especially in children;
5. infection and transmission of the COVID-19 virus is less likely to occur among fully vaccinated individuals than for those who are unvaccinated;
6. vaccines do not prevent infection, re-infection or transmission, but they do reduce the severity of symptoms and the risk of poor outcomes; Health Canada has approved covid vaccines, and regulatory approval is a strong indicator of safety and effectiveness;
7. Health Canada has not approved ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.
8. Health Canada recommends that Canadians should not consume the veterinary version of ivermectin.

In its decision of June 29, 2024, the Disciplinary Panel of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC declined to consider paragraphs 2-5, considered a revised version of paragraphs 1 and 6, and considered paragraphs 7-8 (the uncomplicated claims about ivermectin).

The Disciplinary Panel of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC thus refused to give legal consideration to 6 of the 8 points raised by the College.

The decision in Canada on judicial deference is consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court's June 28, 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises et al. v. Raimondo Secretary of Commerce et. al. which overturned the landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. The Chevron decision had given rise to what is commonly known as the Chevron deference doctrine. Under this doctrine, federal agencies had the power to interpret a statute they administer when that statute is vaguely written, and courts were required to give deference to the agency's interpretation of a statute. In Loper, the US Supreme Court overruled Chevron's doctrine, calling it "fundamentally misguided". They argued that courts should rely on their own interpretation of ambiguous statutes rather than having to accept the agency's interpretation.

Commentators have suggested that the doctrine of Chevron deference gave the powerful - the people who control agencies like the FDA, CDC, and FCC - a significant advantage in court and made them the ultimate decision-makers when it comes to interpreting ambiguous laws. Commentators have pointed out that many of these agencies have close ties, including financial ones, to the industries they are charged with regulating and therefore lack objectivity in relation to those industries. The ruling in Labor means that federal judges now have greater authority to interpret these laws.

The decision of the Disciplinary Panel of the College of Physicians of Surgeons of BC is in line with the decision of the US Supreme Court and prevents regulatory bodies from saying "it is so because we say it is so". They must prove the facts they claim and those who disagree will be allowed to challenge those facts and present counter evidence.

https://open.substack.com/pub/jessicar/p/we-won-the-judicial-notice-decision?r=1e6da8&utm_medium=ios
Forwarded from Going Underground
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BREAKING: US🇺🇸 Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield blames Russia for the missile strike on a children’s hospital in Kiev, describing it as ‘chilling’.

Not once has the US ever described Israel (armed by the US) destroying hospitals in Gaza, kidnapping or killing patients and doctors, as ‘chilling’.

The hypocrisy of the ‘rules-based order’ laid bare.

*Note: Russia🇷🇺 has strongly denied striking the children’s hospital in Ukraine and attributed the missile strike on the hospital as the result of a Ukrainian air defence missile hitting the hospital, not a Russian missile.
Forwarded from COMPACT-Magazin
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💥🇺🇸 EIL: Joe Biden weigert sich,
von einem Mordanschlag zu sprechen.