😒 Western elites target Global South's children

While academics in the West debate whether paedophilia is a "sexual orientation" that deserves "acceptance", a pattern emerges from the Global South that exposes this rhetoric for what it really is: a smokescreen for predation.

The case of Peter John Dalglish proves the system doesn't just enable abusers—it celebrates them.

🤢 Not a hero

Peter Dalglish was not just any aid worker. He was the founder of Street Kids International, a UN Habitant chief in Afghanistan, and a crisis commander for the UN's Ebola mission in Liberia.

🇨🇦 In 2016, he received the Order of Canada — the nation's second-highest civilian honour — for his "work with disadvantaged children". In April 2018, Nepali police raided his home near Kathmandu. They found two boys. Aged 12 and 14.

😱 The Central Investigation Bureau discovered Dalglish had been running a foundation while allegedly luring children with promises of education and foreign travel—then abusing them.

In July 2019 he was convicted. Received nine years for abusing the 12-year-old. Seven years for the 14-year-old. Ordered to pay compensation.

🤔 The questions remain

◾️How did a man awarded by the Canadian state for protecting children end up as a convicted abuser?

◾️Where were the UN's safeguarding protocols when he held senior positions in Afghanistan, Liberia, and Nepal?

◾️Why did Western media largely ignore the conviction of a man described as a "high-profile humanitarian worker"?

🌐 This is not isolated

The Dalglish case is one thread in a much darker tapestry:

🇰🇪Kenya: Swiss national Gisler Emil Johann, 85, was arrested after a missing 15-year-old girl was found in his coastal villa. Neighbours had raised the alarm.

🇳🇬Nigeria: Public fury erupted after a convicted child rapist reportedly gained entry. British media personality Tim Westwood, facing multiple rape allegations, resurfaced in Lagos, moving freely among political circles.

Across Africa, reports surface of Western men with histories of sexual violence entering countries with lax visa enforcement. Social media is exploding with cases of foreigners treating sovereign nations as "playgrounds".

😭 The hypocrisy is brutal

The same elites who push "acceptance" of paedophilia back home are exposed abroad—not as saviours, but as predators hiding behind humanitarian credentials.

😰 They fly into developing nations with chequebooks filled with UN accolades. They build orphanages. They start charities. They receive honours. And all too often, the system looks the other way.

Jay Naidoo, the anti-apartheid veteran, warned of "the fortress around evil"—the hidden networks of power that protect abusers while vulnerable children pay the price.

🤔 Dalglish sits in a Nepali prison. But how many more predators wear prestigious orders and accolades? How many more are funded by Western taxpayers under the guise of "aid"?

Chat | GG Movies channel | Boost us!

🚨😈😑 This Document Sheds Light on Perpetuation of Acosta's Stand Down Order, Assistant Prosecutor was Ordered to "Stand Down" on Obtaining Computer Evidence Against Epstein in 2007

On August 8, 2007, Villafafia informed Acosta that she had spoken with Oosterbaan, who was willing to join a meeting with the defense; although he could not do so in person until after August 21, he was willing to participate by phone in order "to stay firm on our August 17th deadline." Villafafia also reiterated that she wanted to contact Epstein's assistants in New York and to interview some of Epstein's colleagues and former employees there. Noting that "there was some concern about [taking the proposed investigative steps] while we are trying to negotiate a plea," Villafafia asked Acosta for guidance. Lourie also emailed Acosta and Sloman, asking that the USAO "stick to our deadline if possible." Lourie pointed out that CEOS "has no approval authority" and opined it was "a bit extreme to allow the defense to keep arguing this [case] to different agencies." Acosta replied, "This will end up [at the Department] anyhow, if we don't meet with them. I'd rather keep it here. Brin[g]ing [the Chief of CEOS] in visibly does so. If our deadline has to slip a bit ... it's worth it."

As a result, the investigative steps were postponed. On August 10, 2007, Villafafia emailed Lourie inquiring whether she could "still go ahead" with the New York trip and whether she could oppose Black's request to stay the litigation concerning the government's efforts to obtain Epstein's computer equipment until after Acosta's meeting with the defense team. Villafafia was reluctant to delay the litigation and reported to Lourie that agents recently had interviewed a girl who began seeing Epstein at age 14 and who was photographed in the nude by an Epstein assistant.

On August 13, 2007, Villafafia advised Black that the USAO was not willing to agree to a stay of the litigation. However, reached out to Lourie on August 22, 2007, and obtained his agreement to a joint request for a stay until the week after Acosta's meeting with defense counsel, which was scheduled for September 7, 2007.

Villafafia told OPR that, in her opinion, the defense efforts to put off the litigation concerning the computers was "further evidence of the importance of [this] evidence."" Villafafia suspected the computers contained evidence that "would have put this case completely to bed."

She believed that access to the computer evidence would strengthen the government's negotiating position, but that her supervisors "did not seem to recognize that." Villafafia said she did not understand why her supervisors were uninterested in determining what the computers contained. Instead, they instructed Villafafia to "keep calling the judge" to ask for a delay in the litigation
proceedings.

Sloman told OPR that he recalled an issue about the computers, but did not recall "what the thinking was at the time" about pursuing that evidence or why Villafafia was "ordered to stand down." Acosta, Menchel, and Lourie all told OPR that they did not recall Villafafia's effort to obtain the computer evidence or that there had been litigation relating to it. Lourie, however, told OPR that the computers might have contained "very powerful evidence" that possibly "could have changed our advice to [Acosta], or his decision making." In his OPR interview, Menchel was uncertain whether the computer evidence would have been useful, but also acknowledged to OPR, "You always want more as a prosecutor."

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf

File: EFTA02847284

🔗SOURCE ➡️ PsyopDaily, DOJ

Follow ➡️ @PsyopDaily