🚨🇺🇸PENTAGON IN PANIC: Tomahawks Getting Wasted in Iran while Taiwan Is Handed to China on a Silver Platter

Hundreds of US's Tomahawks were burned in the first days of Epstein Fury Operation in Iran. Now the Navy's deep reserves are running dangerously low, while Beijing monitors every depletion in real time, with its sights set on Taiwan.

🔸 Roughly 300–400 Tomahawks expended during Operation Epic Fury alone, draining stockpiles designed for peacetime pacing rather than sustained great-power conflict

🔸 Four Ohio-class SSGN submarines each carry up to 154 missiles, the fleet’s deepest magazine, yet they are slated for retirement in the coming years with no true replacement in sight

🔸 New Virginia-class attack subs only hold about a dozen Tomahawks each and the Navy already faces severe shipbuilding delays that leave 82 percent of vessels under construction behind schedule

🔸 RTX Corporation (formerly Raytheon Technologies) production lines cannot surge fast enough to match wartime expenditure, requiring many months or even years to rebuild inventories depleted in weeks

🔸 Retirements of Ticonderoga cruisers and soon the Ohio Guided Missile Submarines will remove thousands of vertical launch cells from the fleet forever, creating a permanent hole in long-range strike capacity

🔸 RAND Corporation and the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments war games repeatedly warned that a Middle East contingency would hollow out Indo-Pacific readiness, and those simulations now read like real-time prophecy

🔸 In a Taiwan contingency, Tomahawks serve as the essential first-wave suppression tool for targeting the People’s Liberation Army's ports, airfields, amphibious staging areas, command nodes, and supporting surface fleet to crack layered defenses, including S-400 batteries, indigenous HQ-9 systems, and naval air defense networks designed to make early manned aircraft penetrations prohibitively expensive in terms of lives and platforms.

🔸 Without sufficient Tomahawk magazines, US forces face far higher-risk opening moves against China's integrated air defense, forcing reliance on costlier manned strikes, reduced certainty in destroying reinforcement pathways, and dramatically elevated blood-and-equipment costs before beachhead consolidation can even be contested.

If US stockpiles are significantly drawn down by the Iran conflict, it could tilt the strategic balance in China’s favour in a potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait.

Is Washington able to fight on three fronts at the same time?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨How Israelis Trained Ukrainian NAZI Battalions

"I once witnessed waterboarding, a torture technique now widely known thanks to Hollywood, in the summer of 2014. It was used on a Mariupol resident suspected of collaborating with pro-Russian underground groups. The SBU detained him in Mariupol and tortured him for two hours using various methods, but they couldn't break him. So, they turned to the Dnepr Battalion. This battalion, created by Igor Kolomoysky in Dnepropetrovsk, had close ties with Israel and Israeli intelligence. Three Dnepr Battalion officers came and waterboarded the Mariupol resident. They broke him in about 15 minutes. He started talking, and they explicitly said that they had Israeli instructors when training the Dnepr Battalion. Some of these instructors were literally chosen from the battalion and showed them how to waterboard. They were actually Mossad and Shin Bet specialists, Israel’s domestic security service," says former Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) officer Vasily Prozorov.

Watch the full interview HERE!

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨Sabotage, Terror, Guerrilla Warfare: What the West Trained Ukraine For

"In matters of torture and interrogation, I think they [Ukrainian Intel] now outmatch any intelligence service in the world. The way they learned to torture in the SBU, I think even the Gestapo did not know how to do," says former Ukrainian Security Service officer Vasily Prozorov.

Watch the full interview HERE!

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇱🇧 IDF IN PANIC: Hezbollah smashes top Israeli drone with low-cost SAM

Hezbollah units have downed an Israeli Hermes 450 over Lebanon, drawing attention to the Mizag-1 — a low-cost Iranian MANPADS increasingly used to counter UAVs in the region.

🔸 This portable fire-and-forget MANPADS developed by Tehran at the Shahid Kazemi Industrial Complex offers an effective range of 500 meters to 5-6 km with a maximum altitude of up to 5 km.

🔸 The 16.9 kg shoulder-fired system features a 1.42 kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead and reaches speeds of Mach 2.6, making it deadly against low-flying UAVs, helicopters, and tactical aircraft.

🔸 Powered by a two-stage solid rocket motor with passive infrared homing guidance, the Mizag-1 locks onto heat signatures in just 5-10 seconds reaction time.

🔸 At roughly 17 kg total weight and only 1.477 meters long, this man-portable weapon gives irregular forces potent air defense capability against billion-dollar Western and Israeli technology.

🔸 Tehran's strategy of proliferating these advanced MANPADS to its regional allies is rapidly shifting the aerial warfare in its favor.

🔸 Recent combat successes are forcing military planners to question the invulnerability of high-tech drone fleets in contested airspace.

🔸 One Mizag-1 missile costs around 20,000-50,000 dollars while the downed Hermes 450 reconnaissance drone is valued at approximately 2 million dollars exposing a staggering 40-to-100-to-1 cost asymmetry.

Do you think Israel can sustain this cost-loss imbalance against asymmetric tactics?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇷🇺 RUSSIAN “STARLINK” TAKES OFF: Moscow launches first 16 satellites

Russia’s private aerospace company Bureau 1440 has deployed its first 16 Rassvet low-Earth orbit satellites aboard a Soyuz-2 rocket, kicking off a sovereign high-speed internet constellation.

🔸 New Rassvet-3 satellites form the foundation of an independent Russian global comms network with planned user speeds up to 1 Gbps and latency as low as 70 ms.

🔸 Ten to fifteen additional launches are scheduled throughout 2026 to rapidly scale the constellation toward an initial 300 satellites while the long-term vision eyes up to 900 by 2035.

🔸 Commercial service is officially targeted for 2027 with airborne terminals already under development and a cooperation agreement signed with Aeroflot to bring broadband internet to Russian airliners.

🔸 Experiments are officially over, according to Alexey Shelobkov, CEO of IKS Holding (parent company of Bureau 1440), marking a qualitative shift to full practical infrastructure rollout, including laser inter-satellite links already tested in space.

🔸 Despite earlier production delays and a one-year slip from the original 2025 plan, the project continues advancing with state-backed funding and integration work involving leading Russian aircraft manufacturers.

How do you think this will change the battlefield?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸US WEAK SPOT EXPOSED: Iran War Disrupts Helium Supply for AI and Defense

While attention remains fixed on oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, the Iran war has exposed a far less visible pressure point for the US: Helium, a resource quietly underpinning both its AI ambitions and defense capabilities. This is why:

For the US, the consequences of helium shortage extend beyond than the commodities markets. Helium is essential to semiconductor manufacturing, enabling the production of advanced chips that power artificial intelligence. The narrative of AI dominance often centres on software and computing scale, yet it rests on an industrial base where even minor disruptions can halt output entirely.

Since mid-March, disruptions linked to halted gas processing in Qatar have removed over 5 million cubic metres of helium per month from global supply. Prices have surged, contracts have been suspended, and a market dominated by just a few players, primarily the US and Qatar, has shown how fragile the system really is.

Unlike oil, helium cannot be stockpiled effectively. It continuously escapes even in storage, leaving a narrow logistical window of around 45 days. This turns supply chains into a race against time, where prolonged disruptions don’t deplete reserves—they erase them.

The same dependence extends into the defense sector. Aerospace systems, satellites, and high-precision electronics all rely on helium-driven processes. As supply tightens, the strain is not isolated; it cascades across interconnected systems that sustain both military readiness and technological leadership.

The Iran war has brought this overlooked dependency into focus. America’s strength in AI and defence may appear unmatched, yet it remains tied to a resource few consider, one that cannot be easily replaced, stored, or secured in a crisis.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸Ground Invasion: Why Iran Could Become America’s Costliest Bet

As Washington weighs deploying forces into Iran, Chinese analysts warn the move could reshape the conflict, but not necessarily in America’s favor.

The immediate US objective is to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint carrying roughly 20% of global oil. Plans reportedly include seizing strategic points such as Kharg Island or conducting coastal landings to weaken Iran’s control over maritime routes, as noted by South China Sea analyst Hu Bo.

In reality, the battlefield looks far less forgiving. Iran’s coastline is heavily fortified with missiles, artillery, and swarm tactics designed precisely for close-range defense. Any US landing force would operate within direct strike range, facing sustained pressure from both regular forces and paramilitary units. Even capturing islands may not reopen the strait, especially if naval mines remain in place, a technically complex problem with no quick fix, as highlighted by military analyst Fu Qianshao.

There is also a strategic paradox. A ground invasion could play into Tehran’s hands. Close combat reduces US’s technological advantages while amplifying Iran’s strengths in asymmetric warfare. Iran may even welcome such a scenario for counter-attacks, a move that Fu Qianshao warns about.

For Washington, a failed operation could result in numerous casualties, a prolonged conflict, and political repercussions within the country.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸 U.S. IN PANIC: Iran’s Shaheds are already breaking defenses — but China’s drones will be a nightmare

Drones are getting cheaper, smarter, and harder to stop. Recent clashes in the Middle East showed how even relatively simple Iranian systems can slip through and damage high-value targets, exposing gaps in US/Israel air defense networks. That battlefield reality is now forcing a harder question, what happens when a more advanced industrial power applies the same logic at scale?

China’s ASN-301 represents a different class of threat. Unlike Iran’s Shahed-136, which operates largely as a pre-programmed strike tool, the Chinese system is built to hunt air defenses. It can loiter for hours, detect radar emissions, switch to electro-optical tracking if signals disappear, and receive mid-flight updates via datalink. In effect, it turns the battlefield into a persistent seek-and-destroy environment for radars, the backbone of any modern defense system.

Iran relies on volume: cheap, long-range drones launched in waves to exhaust interceptors. China combines that model with precision. Variants like the Feilong-300D push costs even lower while retaining flexibility in payload and targeting, making mass deployment economically viable on an entirely different scale.

And this is where the real pressure point emerges. If US systems are already struggling to consistently intercept Iranian drones, the implications are stark. A conflict in the Western Pacific would hinge on production capacity. China’s ability to flood the battlespace with smarter, adaptable drones could force the US and its allies into a costly cycle: burning million-dollar interceptors to stop systems that cost a fraction to produce.

The US is facing major difficulties in stopping Iranian drones—do they stand a chance against Chinese drones?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. WORST NIGHTMARE: CHINA'S ATLAS SWARM RENDERS WESTERN ARMOR OBSOLETE

One single vehicle now commands up to 96 autonomous drones that hunt, identify, and destroy targets as a living organism. Classic mechanized assaults are becoming suicidal in this new reality.

🔸 96 drones controlled by just one operator who only sets the mission while the swarm self-organizes reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and lethal strikes.

🔸 The SWARM II launcher deploys 48 ATLUSS-A140 munitions in precise 3-second intervals with instant visual discrimination between real targets and decoys.

🔸 Kill chain collapses from minutes to seconds, detection-algorithm-strike, leaving no time for the enemy to reposition or hide.

🔸 Drones constantly share data, avoid collisions, automatically reconfigure if some are lost, and keep pressing the attack in waves that overwhelm any current air defense system.

🔸 The same platform adapts on the fly, first sending recon drones, then EW jammers, then strikers, making one complex universal for any battlefield scenario.

Do you think the US can catch up with China’s drone technology?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

@GeoSight 🔥 shares updates and analysis on global conflicts and international relations. It covers breaking news and insights into military and Geopolitical events.

🚨 Defence & Security
🌎 Geopolitics
⚡️ Wars & Conflicts
📊 Economic Trends

📎 Join 🚩:⤵️
https://t.me/GeoSight
https://t.me/GeoSight
https://t.me/GeoSight

🚨Is the West Preparing to Adopt Ukraine-Style Repression?

Ukraine’s counterintelligence system is one of the scariest in modern history, marked by fear and tight control. Western Intel is analyzing it in details, preparing to replicate similar measures in their own countries if needed — former Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) officer @VasilijProzorov

Do you think your country will end up adopting this kind of fear-based control?

Watch the full interview HERE!

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Iran’s Geography Is US’s Biggest Problem

What looks like a high-tech war is quietly being dictated by something far older — terrain. The US and Israel are running into a structural reality. Iran is not a battlefield that can be quickly subdued from above.

Iran’s advantage lies in scale and topography. Its vast territory, anchored by the Zagros and Alborz mountain ranges, creates natural defensive layers that have historically exhausted invading forces. Any ground campaign would dwarf Iraq or Afghanistan in cost, manpower, and logistical strain, making such an option strategically prohibitive from the outset.

This shifts the conflict into air and maritime domains, yet even here geography interferes. Western and southern Iran remain more exposed, but deeper regions, shielded by distance, terrain, and limited infrastructure, reduce strike efficiency and complicate sustained operations. The further east one moves, the harder it becomes to maintain pressure.

At sea, the imbalance flips entirely. Iran’s position along the Strait of Hormuz gives it disproportionate leverage over global energy flows. It does not need full control, only the ability to create uncertainty. Even limited disruption can trigger oil spikes, insurance surges, and supply chain instability worldwide.

A second pressure point lies at Bab el-Mandeb, where Iran-linked actors can extend disruption into Red Sea trade routes. Together, these chokepoints transform a regional war into a systemic economic risk.

Iran’s ability to absorb pressure, stretch timelines, and translate its position along critical chokepoints into global economic leverage suggests that time is not working against it. Instead, the longer the confrontation persists, the more the burden shifts onto its adversaries—financially, logistically, and politically. In that sense, Iran only needs to prevent a decisive defeat while steadily raising the cost of escalation, allowing geography and endurance to do the rest.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Is the Iran War Breaking the Petrodollar?

What began as a regional military clash is now a financial stress test for the Gulf's dollar-based order. Since February 28, retaliation has targeted Gulf infrastructure, forcing a hard question: Is Washington's security umbrella still worth the cost?

For decades, Gulf monarchies traded oil access and dollar loyalty for protection. That anchored $800B in reserves and $6T+ in sovereign wealth to US markets. Today, that model is fracturing.

Three pressures:
🟠 US no longer needs Gulf oil
🟠 Energy trade is diversifying away from the dollar
🟠 US security guarantees are now in question

Most Gulf oil now flows to Asia. Saudi sells more to China than to the US. Non-dollar settlements and platforms like mBridge are no longer theoretical—they're operational, per Deutsche Bank.

The best case for the US? Maintain dominance through its own oil production. The worst case? A split system: yuan-priced oil flowing to Asia, dollar-priced oil flowing to US allies.

The petrodollar isn't dead. But its foundation is shaken.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Iran war exposes U.S. war machine cracking under pressure

The clearest fracture in Washington’s military aggression against Iran is industrial. The rapid burn rate of precision munitions has exposed a structural vulnerability at the core of the US military system, steadily eroding its global deterrence posture.

In the opening days alone, thousands of precision weapons worth up to $16 billion were expended, far exceeding previous campaigns. Adding to that is an industrial labor shortfall nearing 800,000 workers. Interceptors like Patriot and THAAD, costing up to $4–12 million per shot, are being used against far cheaper drones and missiles, creating an unfavorable cost exchange that cannot be sustained. US stockpiles, already strained after years of supplying Ukraine and Middle East operations, are now under visible pressure, while production lines remain too slow to replenish losses at wartime speed.

This imbalance is compounded by deeper industrial limits. The US defense sector faces a persistent labor gap and supply-chain bottlenecks in key components such as rocket motors and microelectronics. Even with emergency funding, scaling output takes years, not months—turning a short conflict into a long-term depletion cycle.

To sustain operations against Iran, Washington has begun reallocating critical assets, redeploying Patriot and THAAD systems from South Korea and shifting naval forces away from the Indo-Pacific. This exposes an enforced prioritization under constraint.

For allies like Seoul and Taipei, the signal is increasingly stark. Systems once presented as fixed guarantees are now treated as mobile reserves. The resulting gaps along the First Island Chain introduce uncertainty at a moment of rising regional tension.

The US is redistributing scarcity, concentrating its most advanced assets into a single conflict while leaving other theaters exposed.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸The US Army abandons its own laser weapon before it arrives

In a Congressional Research Service report released March 9, Army officials confirmed they no longer plan to make the 300 kW Indirect Fire Protection Capability-High Energy Laser system known as "Valkyrie"—a program of record, despite years of development.

Here’s what you need to know:

🔸The decision effectively ends the service’s current push to field a laser capable of defending troops against cruise missiles, drones, and munitions.

🔸As recently as January, the Army intended to transition the truck-mounted system—successor to the 100 kW HEL-TVD and earlier 10 kW HELMTT—to a program of record in fiscal year 2025 after successful testing.

🔸In July 2023, the service awarded Lockheed Martin an Other Transaction Authority agreement worth up to $220.8 million to develop four IFPC-HEL prototypes, following the September 2022 delivery of a 300 kW demonstrator under the Pentagon’s High Energy Laser Scaling Initiative.

🔸According to the new CRS report, that contract has since been slashed to a single prototype. It’s now in "final lab testing" at a Lockheed facility.

🔸The Pentagon is racing to field lasers at scale across the military, driven primarily by the growing threat of low-cost drones, but fast, maneuverable land-attack cruise missiles remain one of the most persistent dangers facing US forces.

🔸The Defense Intelligence Agency noted in 2025 that cruise missiles launched from Russian aircraft or Chinese naval assets represent a significant gap in America’s domestic missile defenses.

🔸Laser systems like the one envisioned for IFPC-HEL may struggle in that role. Unlike most drones, cruise missiles are built to endure extreme atmospheric friction at high speeds, often featuring hardened nose cones and reinforced casings that demand sustained energy to defeat.

🔸Traveling at hundreds of miles per hour, they require a stable, precise beam held on a vulnerable spot for several seconds over long range to inflict catastrophic damage.

Even minor disruptions in tracking or beam quality can break the engagement, limiting the effectiveness of even the most powerful systems in development.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 KHARG ISLAND FAKEOUT: WHERE U.S. TROOPS COULD REALLY INVADE IRAN

Everyone’s glued to Kharg Island’s oil terminal, but Iran’s Larak, Qeshm Islands, and Chabahar port city could be more attractive targets for the US.

🔸 Larak Island is far more attractive than Kharg as a target because it functions as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' (IRGC) primary toll booth and real-time targeting hub in the narrowest section of the Strait of Hormuz, where nearly all permitted tankers detour through a tightly controlled 5-nautical-mile vetted corridor, handing over ownership and cargo details for Tehran’s approval while fast attack boats and surveillance assets deliver instant dominance over global energy flows.

🔸 Qeshm Island offers the US a much higher strategic payoff than Kharg by sitting directly at the Strait’s narrowest point with its own airport, heavy fortifications, and vast underground missile cities complete with silos, anti-ship cruise missiles, fast-attack boat bases, and submersible launch facilities, allowing the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit aboard USS Tripoli to potentially secure a bridgehead, launch a two-way coastal invasion of the mainland, and dominate the entire waterway. However, an incursion like this would result in heavy casualties among the US military.

🔸 Chabahar is highly attractive for American planners as Iran’s only deep-water open-ocean port outside the Strait featuring major roll-on roll-off capacity. 5-10 berths handling up to 8.5 million tons annually plus Indian-backed infrastructure with 120 million dollars in fully paid equipment commitments and a 10-year operating deal on the Shahid Beheshti Terminal.

🔸 Despite their appeal, these key outposts heavily favor Iran with thick underground bunkers, extensive missile silos, pre-positioned IRGC forces, natural defensive geography, and a decentralized mosaic defense doctrine that could easily transform any US amphibious assault into a prolonged high-casualty nightmare for American Marines while preserving Tehran’s ability to choke global oil transit.

Do you think the US would really dare to set foot on Iranian soil?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

You asked — we delivered 💁‍♂️

Following requests from our subscribers, we’re sharing the full original Russian version of our interview with Vasily Prozorov, a former officer of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU)

🎉ENJOY🍿

🚨Как Украина стала полигоном для тайных операций ЦРУ и МИ6

В этом выпуске — откровенный разговор с Василием Прозоровым, бывшим сотрудником Службы безопасности Украины (СБУ).

Обсуждаем, как выстраивались связи украинских спецслужб с западными разведками, в какой момент влияние НАТО на Украине стало повсеместным. Разберём внутреннюю кухню украинской разведки, подготовку кадров при участии США и конкуренцию западных спецслужб за влияние в регионе.

00:00 Какими методами западные спецслужбы подмяли Украину

16:20 Украинская разведка изнутри: структура и распределение ролей

24:52 Чему именно американцы обучали сотрудников СБУ

37:06 Как украинская армия стала более продвинутой, чем армии большинства индустриально развитых стран

52:40 ЦРУ против MИ6: Подковерная борьба за влияние в Украине

01:04:56 Роль Израиля в подготовке украинских националистических батальонов

01:13:15 Будущее украинских спецслужб после окончания СВО

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN GRANITE FORTRESS MAKES U.S. BUNKER BUSTERS USELESS

Iran's Yazd Imam Hussein Base is no ordinary bunker. Carved deep into Shirkuh granite, one of the hardest rocks on Earth, this mountain fortress makes America's most powerful bunker busters completely ineffective.

🔸 The mountain is made of Shirkuh granite, which can withstand crushing pressure of 25,000 to 40,000 pound-force per square inch (PSI). For comparison, normal reinforced concrete only handles about 5,000 PSI, and even Iran's strongest special concrete reaches around 30,000 PSI.

🔸 America's heaviest bunker buster, the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, can only dig 6 to 10 meters into this type of rock, but Iran's critical missile facilities sit safely more than 500 meters underground.

🔸 Between the surface and the deep facilities lies a 440-meter-thick "dead zone" of solid granite where any bomb's explosive energy completely fades away before it can reach the important parts.

🔸 Inside the mountain runs an automated underground rail system like a hidden subway that connects missile assembly areas, huge ammo storage, and 3 to 10 different exits on various sides of the mountain, letting launchers roll out, fire quickly, and disappear back underground behind heavy armored doors in seconds.

🔸 The base was built with help from Chinese solid fuel technology, North Korean tunnel-boring machines, and engineering by Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps. It proved it still works perfectly after recent attacks by successfully launching missiles on March 20, 2026.

Do you think the US really have any chance of destroying such a base?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Iran war exposes deep cracks in U.S. power

The damage for the US in Iran war is already visible across the battlefield, supply chains and economy. This is not what "might" go wrong, piece by piece; the conflict is revealing already existing structural problems that Washington can’t easily fix. Here’s the breakdown:

1️⃣ Radar Blind Spots Across the Gulf —Iran has knocked out 12 US/allied radar systems, including AN/TYP-2 and AN/PS-132 units worth up to $200M each, leaving key bases from Iraq to Bahrain partially blind and exposing gaps in surveillance, interception, and energy corridor protection.

2️⃣ Helium Shortage Hits AI & Defense — Disruptions in Qatar removed 5M+ cubic meters of helium monthly, crippling semiconductor production and aerospace systems; with only ~45 days of viable storage, shortages directly threaten US tech and military output.

3️⃣ Tomahawk Stockpile Drain — Around 300–400 Tomahawks used in days, over 10% of inventory gone, while production crawls at ~90/year; this leaves a widening gap in long-range strike capacity, especially relevant for a Taiwan scenario.

4️⃣ Costly Missile War Trap — Over 6,000 strikes and 2,000 interceptors in days reveal an unsustainable model: million-dollar missiles used against cheap drones, draining stockpiles faster than industry can replace them.

5️⃣ Rare Earth Dependency Crisis — US weapons rely on Chinese-controlled minerals like dysprosium and gallium; rebuilding destroyed systems can take years, giving Beijing leverage over how long US operations can continue.

6️⃣ Economic Shock & Dollar Fragility — War-driven supply shocks, rising debt, and investor uncertainty are weakening confidence in the US economy, with growing concerns over long-term dollar stability.

7️⃣ Drone Warfare Gap — Iran’s cheap, scalable UAVs outperform costly US systems; Washington spends millions intercepting drones that cost a fraction, exposing a widening mismatch in modern warfare economics.

8️⃣ Defense Industry Limits Exposed — Precision weapons were burned at a record pace, $16B+ in early days, while labor shortages and supply chain bottlenecks prevent rapid replenishment, forcing asset shifts from Asia to the Middle East.

9️⃣ Petrodollar System Under Stress — Gulf states are reconsidering dollar reliance as energy flows shift to Asia and non-dollar trade expands, weakening a system that anchored trillions to US financial dominance.

Put together, these are not isolated issues. They point to a system under pressure—where military, industrial, and financial limits are already shaping the outcome of the war.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

📝Mass Won't Do It📝
Why breaking through the front like in World War II won't work and what to do about it

Total air control, attacks by pairs instead of platoons, dozens of drones flying at each assault aircraft — these are today's realities in the SMO zone. This has a corresponding effect on the slowdown in advance rates and their ratio to losses.

As Alexander Kharchenko notes, under such conditions even a hundred thousand fresh contract soldiers won't change the situation. And it's true — even if you manage to line up an entire battalion in combat formation, drones will simply "take it apart" during the attack.

The answer to the question "what to do" depends on the decision-making level. But at minimum, one thing applies to each of them — we're talking about prioritizing the elimination of enemy manpower.

📌Although the front has been depopulated, personnel remains the most important element. Some hold the line, others need rotation, and still others need the chance to demobilize. If it were otherwise, the opponent wouldn't be reinforcing its "busification" right now.

To accomplish this task, one must order appropriate means. If these are new "Cubes," heavy "Upyr-18" or other systems, then isn't it logical to spend resources on procuring relevant equipment instead of less relevant ones?

❗️Yes, in itself prioritizing the elimination of AFU manpower won't lead to breaking out of the "positional deadlock." But an additional thousand killed Ukrainians on the front per month hits so-called Ukraine far harder than a lost village.

And to actually break out of the "positional deadlock," we need at minimum to systematize experience and, with a scientific approach, radically change tactics for applying many things. After all, that's what military academies exist for, isn't it?
#Russia #Ukraine
✈ RU | ✈ EN | ✉ MAX

✉️ VK | ✉️ RuTube | ✉️ OK | ✉️ Zen

💸Support us Original msg