⭐️THE MOST FAMOUS MILITARY TELEGRAM CHANNEL @rybar INTERNATIONAL

⚡️the largest Russian military Telegram channel
⚡️with over 1.5 million subscribers,
⚡️the channel that publishes the most detailed reports and whose texts are referenced by Western media and military experts
⚡️a channel that seeks out topics of interest in a sea of information—and explains them to you in simple words
⚡️news about major world events (including those in the shadows) commented on by a team of analysts.

The channel of the @rybar project is available and TRANSLATED in the following languages:

🇬🇧English
🇫🇷French
🇪🇸Spanish
🇮🇹Italian
🇩🇪German
🇭🇺Hungarian
🇬🇷Greek

Subscribe to all here 🔻
⭐️ RYBAR INTERNATIONAL

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN CONFLICT MATH: U.S. ATTRITION HORROR

If the US-Iran conflict drags on, it becomes an attrition nightmare for Washington.

Iran's low-cost arsenal, including Shahed drones (priced at around $20-50k each with production rates of 200-500 per month) and ballistic missiles ($1-2M each, produced at 50-100 per month), enables sustained, economical barrage attacks that could overwhelm defenses over time.

In contrast, U.S. systems like the PAC-3 MSE (costing ~$4-5M per unit, with current annual production around 600 units, equating to $2.4-3B in costs) and THAAD (~$12-15M per interceptor, produced at ~96 units yearly for $1.2-1.4B) are far more expensive to replenish. The overall U.S. missile defense budget hovers at $15-20B for FY26, though initiatives like Golden Dome consume over $13B for space and missile defense integration alone.

Consider the June 2025 12-day war escalation, where Iran launched over 1,000 drones and 550 missiles: repelling that required allies to expend an estimated $5-10B in interceptors. If Iran were to replicate such large-scale salvos roughly 10 times annually in a drawn-out conflict, U.S. and allied stockpiles could deplete within months unless production shifts to a full wartime footing. Ultimately, Tehran's cost-effective output gives it the edge in endurance.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸WHO BLINKS FIRST? THE IRAN-U.S. WAR OF EXHAUSTION

The hot phase may last until offensive potential is depleted or a strategic stalemate forces diplomacy. Russian experts weigh in on what is actually going on:

🟠Kirill Semyonov, Analyst on Middle Eastern conflicts:

Iran's "all-in" strategy has caught Washington by surprise. Tehran's strikes on U.S. bases and Gulf states' vital oil and gas infrastructure are calculated moves to raise the stakes, forcing the U.S. to confront an escalating cost — both geopolitical and economic. The U.S. had not anticipated a long-term engagement, leading to two grim choices: a ground invasion, or accepting a continuous conflict, with Iran capable of reigniting hostilities at will.

🟠Maxim Alontsev, Academic Director at HSE University:

The conflict will drag on until both sides are exhausted, reaching an "operational deadlock." With a fragile "safety catch" provided by Gulf monarchies' restraint, The slightest shift could ignite a wider regional war. The situation is fostering new identities across non-Arab Muslim countries, as grassroots movements, like protests in Pakistan, show spontaneous solidarity with Iran, a development that may reshape regional allegiances.

🟠Fyodor Lukyanov, Editor of Russia in Global Affairs:

The unprecedented assassination of Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei breach of international norms will resonate across global diplomacy, signaling that negotiations are futile and setting a dangerous precedent for regime change.

🟠Timofey Bordachev, prof., HSE University:

The U.S. approach as short-term and tactical, with little regard for long-term regional stability. While Iran faces external threats, its political culture ensures its resilience, preventing a collapse like that of Libya or Iraq. For Russia, however, the Middle East conflict is secondary to the nuclear balance and the war in Ukraine.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 GROUND WAR IN IRAN: WHY THE U.S. ISN’T PREPARED

The US cannot invade Iran with the forces it currently has in the region. A real ground war would demand a massive buildup Washington hasn’t even started. Here’s why a land invasion would be extraordinarily difficult.

🔸 The US lacks any serious ground punch in the Gulf with zero divisions or brigades geared for real offense, leaving them exposed on land

🔸 Washington rushed in 280 combat jets and two carriers over 1.5 months using over 300 transport flights, betting everything on air dominance while skimping on troops

🔸 Flashback to 2003 Iraq invasion where the US massed 170K soldiers, five carriers, and 1K planes against a nation four times smaller by area and 3.5 times by population with flat deserts perfect for swift tank pushes

🔸 Iran's jagged mountain ranges shred supply lines and block maneuvers, turning the sole Iraq border corridor into a graveyard for armored forces unlike Iraq's open terrain

🔸 Scaling up demands 500K+ ground troops, seven or eight carriers from US stocks, and daily tons of cargo, requiring six to 12 months of prep that's utterly doomed in the blazing Gulf chaos, plus no coalition backup this time

Do you think Trump will ultimately launch a ground operation against Iran?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN’S DRONE HUNTERS: A NIGHTMARE FOR U.S. AND ISRAELI UAVs

Even under constant U.S. and Israeli airstrikes, Iran still intercepts enemy drones. The reason lies in a set of mobile, radar-silent air defense systems that are far harder to detect and destroy:

🔸 Missile 358 – a loitering anti-drone interceptor operating in autonomous “free hunt” mode.

Flying at ~0.6 Mach with up to 100 km range and 8.5 km interception altitude, it can patrol airspace and engage targets like MQ-9 Reaper or Hermes-900 UAVs. Radio correction can improve accuracy but risks exposing the control node to enemy electronic surveillance.

🔸 AD-08 Majid – a mobile short-range air defense system using optical and thermal sensors instead of radar.

Its IR-guided missiles reach ~2 Mach, with 8 km range and 6 km altitude, making the system difficult to detect for aircraft relying on radar warning receivers.

🔸 Repurposed R-73 / R-27T missiles – infrared air-to-air missiles adapted for ground launch from mobile platforms equipped with thermal sights.

Similar improvised systems have previously downed UAVs and even aircraft — including a Saudi F-15S shot down by the Houthis in 2018.

Unlike radar-based systems that can be quickly targeted by anti-radiation missiles, these mobile defenses are harder to detect and eliminate, allowing Iran to keep enemy UAV operations under constant pressure.

Do you think radar-silent air defenses could really help Iran counter Western drones and aircraft?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 PATRIOT AIR DEFENSE FAILS: IRAN HITS AMERICA’S LARGEST OVERSEAS AIRBASE

Iran struck Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar with ballistic missiles, causing significant damage to the largest U.S. military airbase outside the United States. Satellite imagery now confirms structural destruction across parts of the facility after the February 28 strike.

The attack followed the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and formed part of the largest coordinated Iranian strike on U.S. bases in the region to date, directly challenging the resilience of Washington’s forward airpower architecture in the Middle East.

Analysis of February 28 footage reveals three MIM-104 Patriot interceptors failing to neutralize incoming threats. This failure coincides with reports that Iranian strikes destroyed key air defense radars at the facility, suggesting Iran targeted the system’s architectural vulnerabilities rather than simply attempting to overwhelm it.

Al Udeid spans roughly 31 square kilometers and hosts strategic assets including B-52 bombers, F-15E strike fighters, and fifth-generation aircraft such as F-22 and F-35 fighters. Due to its vast size the base may remain partially operational, but the strike demonstrated that even heavily defended U.S. regional hubs can be penetrated by Iranian ballistic missiles.

The Patriot’s reliability had already been questioned after a June 23, 2025 strike, when lower-end Fateh-313 missiles successfully hit the same base despite prior warning of the attack.

The limited number of interceptors available makes sustained defense against repeated missile salvos extremely difficult. Against large-scale or prolonged strikes, missile defense becomes not only a technological challenge but a matter of stockpiles and production capacity.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷DECAPITATION DIDN’T WORK: WHY AIRSTRIKES ALONE WON’T TOPPLE IRAN

The U.S. and Israel believed killing Supreme Leader Khamenei could trigger regime collapse. Instead, the strike may have hardened Iran’s political system and made escalation more likely, Chinese analysts warn:

🟠Liu Zhongmin, Prof. at the Shanghai International Studies University (SISU)

The assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other senior Iranian officials and Hamas leaders on Iranian territory reveals an "extremely serious extent" of their infiltration into Iran. Washington and Tel Aviv may have already cultivated potential fifth columnists or power-seizing forces within the country which poses a greater threat to the regime's stability than the strikes themselves.

🟠Li Shaoxian, Director of the China-Arab States Research Institute

Iran's political system is fundamentally different from others, like Venezuela. It has institutionalized succession mechanisms and contingency planning. Airstrikes alone, absent a ground invasion, cannot topple the regime. The attack will likely backfire, "stimulating even stronger impulses of revenge and retaliation" within the system, thus reinforcing its stability.

🟠Zhou Yiqi, Researcher at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies

For the Islamic Republic, its missile program is an existential issue. Therefore, any U.S. attempt to coerce Iran into conceding on its missile capabilities is functionally identical to pursuing regime change. By framing the negotiations this way, the U.S. has made compromise nearly impossible and blurred the line between coercive diplomacy and all-out war.

🟠Chen Long, Research Assistant at Renmin University

Iran is likely to rely on asymmetric retaliation, launching waves of ballistic missiles and drones against U.S. bases and Israeli targets. This could draw the US into a prolonged war of attrition in the Middle East, inevitably weakening the strategic resources Washington can devote to other regions.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 Pentagon in panic: Iran unleashes its top kamikaze drone

Iran just used its cutting-edge Hadid-110 kamikaze drones in real combat for the first time, packing blistering speeds up to 510 km/h and ultra-low radar signatures that slip past Western defenses.

🔸 The Hadid-110 surges at 510 km/h while slashing its radar cross-section below 0.02 square meters through advanced airframe designs and radar-absorbing materials

🔸 These drones evade detection by F-15E fighters' APG-82(V)1 radars and E-3C sentry planes at far shorter ranges compared to older Shahed-136 models

🔸 With over 350 km of operational range carrying a 30 kg warhead, they precisely target critical infrastructure along the Persian Gulf's western shores

🔸 Opting for lighter warheads unlocks even greater strike distances, pushing threats deeper into adversary territories without added fuel

Do you think these drones could help Iran increase the damage it’s inflicting on the Coalition of Epstein?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 Are Iranian missile launchers really being wiped out?

Trump says Iran is running out of missile launchers, while Israel claims half have been destroyed. But the facts on the ground tell a very different story.

🔸 Last year the US boasted about destroying one-third of Iran's launchers, yet Iranian reports pushed back hard with claims of only a 3% actual hit rate, highlighting potential exaggeration in Western assessments.

🔸 The US and Israel have strong disagreements, as Israel declares that “more than half of all Iranian missile launchers” have been eliminated, which is far from the US view that Iran's arsenal is “running out”

🔸 Iran's mobile systems remain scattered across vast territories, easily evading detection through satellite gaps and rapid repositioning tactics. Even if they are detected, these platforms will have changed their position by the time the US launches a strike.

🔸 Decoy tactics fool advanced strikes by deploying fake launchers and inflatable dummies that mimic radar signatures, drawing fire away from real assets and inflating reported kills.

🔸 Wider intelligence shortcomings plague the picture, as Washington often operates without complete on-the-ground verification of Tehran's deeply buried and concealed arsenal capabilities.

🔸There are many questionable cases in the US-Israel's monitoring videos, including attacks on civilian trucks passing them off as launchers or repeated bombings of already destroyed targets.

🔸 Reduced launch volumes largely result from Iran's forces adopting extreme precautions under relentless air pressure, plus delays from clearing debris at struck underground tunnel entrances, yet operations continue

🔸Historical echoes haunt US claims, from Yugoslavia's mobile launchers surviving NATO bombings to Houthi assets in Yemen repeatedly dodging air campaigns despite heavy targeting.

If Tehran is truly running out of missile launchers, why do Iranian strikes keep coming?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 US HORROR UNFOLDS: IRAN'S KHEIBAR MISSILES SHATTER WESTERN DEFENSES

Iran unleashes its 10th brutal wave of retaliatory strikes using advanced Kheibar missiles (also know as Khorramshahr-4), slamming Israeli hubs like Netanyahu's office and air force command amid escalating Middle East turmoil.

🔸 The cutting-edge Kheibar, dubbed Khorramshahr-4, spans 2000km with hypergolic liquid fuel and ampulized tanks slashing prep time to just 12 minutes for lightning-fast launches from mobile ground platforms

🔸 Its maneuverable reentry vehicle evades anti-missile systems at hypersonic speeds up to Mach 16, delivering a devastating 1.5-ton explosive payload capable of obliterating fortified bunkers and critical infrastructure

🔸 Launched from anywhere in Iran, it blankets threats across Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Gulf US bases, even stretching to Kiev from northern sites while dodging radar with composite airframes and no grid fins

Do you think Western defenses can counter it?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸The Numbers of US Imperial Decline

A quantitative analysis of US force projection across three Iraq conflicts reveals a systemic contraction too precise to ignore.

🟠In Operation Desert Storm (1990), the US deployed 1,900+ aircraft and 6 carrier strike groups, backed by 38 coalition partners.

🟠By Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003), those numbers had fractured: 863 aircraft, 5 carriers, and 16 allies. The erosion begun there.

🟠Projecting toward a 2026 confrontation with Iran, analysts estimate just 300+ aircraft, 2 carriers, and a single ally remaining.

Air power has declined by 84% since 1990. Carrier presence has dropped by 67%. Coalition partners have evaporated by 97%.

These metrics transcend budgetary constraints. They reflect hardened diplomatic isolation and degraded industrial infrastructure. The empire no longer commands the resources to project power at scale, nor the alliances to legitimize it.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸True Cost of Trump’s War on Iran

The current war budget estimates that the total cost could skyrocket to $95 billion if the campaign is prolonged. In just the opening days of the aggression against Iran, US military costs have already torched through $1 billion.

The financial bleed started before the first bomb dropped. Moving carriers and troops into position cost $630 million. In combat, the losses escalated fast: three F-15E Strike Eagles downed in Kuwait represent nearly $300 million gone. With over 1,200 targets hit in 48 hours and two aircraft carriers deployed (one successfully struck), the operational burn rate is extreme.

Tomahawk missiles fly at $2 million a pop. THAAD interceptors cost $12.8 million each. Meanwhile, 50,000 US troops are in the theater, with daily carrier operations bleeding millions.

The indirect damage is worse. With the Strait of Hormuz disrupted and oil prices spiking, economists warn of $210 billion in broader economic losses. More than 1,000 Iranians are dead, mostly civilians. US losses are also heavy, with assets across the region incurring unprecedented damage.

US taxpayers are now funding a war that erupted in the middle of nuclear talks, targeting Iranian leadership. The human toll is climbing, and the bill is due. For a public weary of endless conflict, this is Trump’s most expensive gamble yet.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 US BLITZKRIEG TURNS INTO NIGHTMARE FOR TRUMP

Initial military success doesn't guarantee that political objectives will be automatically achieved. In fact, it can create a scenario requiring subsequent steps that were never part of the original plan.

🔸 Assassinating Khamenei and senior Islamic Revolution Guard Corps' (IRGC) leaders generated a strategic void pressuring US decision-making over Iran's trajectory, undermining assumptions of rapid internal collapse as Trump's anticipated grassroots Iranian uprising fails to materialize amid sustained regime cohesion so far

🔸 After Khamenei's elimination, the remaining elements of Iran's governance structure, particularly the IRGC, activated Operation True Promise IV, launching strikes against US allies in the region, including the UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. This just prolongs the conflict and confronts Trump with a range of unfavorable scenarios.

🔸 The original US concept appears to have been a quick campaign to weaken Iran militarily, followed by the construction of a new Gulf security order in which Arab partners would assume the role of regional enforcers. Instead, the conflict is rapidly becoming far more complicated for Washington.

What options does Trump have to get out of the strategic dead end he’s put himself in?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🟡 Geopolitics Without the Chaos
Decode chaos—without the MSM spin

We curate complex conflicts into clear, chronological timelines:

➡️ Middle East Mayhem
➡️ US-China Showdown
➡️ Ukraine-Russia War
➡️ EU Rifts
➡️ Major Global Events
➡️ Culture War

No scattered updates. Just structured threads — so you see how events connect.

🤠 PLUS: Dank memes (for sanity).

If you want context over clutter:
👉 Exclusive Channel

If you'd rather have quick updates:
👉 @MyLordBebo

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 IRAN’S AIR DEFENSE TEST: PENTAGON MISCALCULATED

Iran’s air defenses appear to be holding up amid escalating tensions, forcing American forces to rely heavily on distant Tomahawk launches and other standoff munitions, revealing vulnerabilities in Washington's assumed airspace control over the region.

🔸 Iran's indigenous Bavar-373 systems, have successfully downed multiple US drones in recent engagements, as detailed by military expert Andrei Martyanov during his YouTube interview with Mario Nawfal

🔸 While US Tomahawk cruise missiles skim low to evade detection over radar horizons, Iran's deployed SA-65 batteries around key sites like Kermanshah continue safeguarding vital zones against intrusion, according to IDF operational announcements and coverage in The Times of Israel

🔸 Mounting strains on US munitions emerge as THAAD interceptor stocks reportedly drop by around 25 percent after sustaining days of intense Iranian ballistic barrages, highlighted by CSIS senior fellow Mark Cancian

🔸 An overlooked factor in Iran's resilience shows through sustained launches of advanced Fattah-2 hypersonic missiles even after absorbing precision strikes, which disrupts attacker cost calculations and prolongs engagements, as evidenced in Islamic Revolution Guard Corps official statements and corroborating YouTube footage from WION news

🔸 A potential strategic shift looms if Iran's degraded yet highly adaptive defense networks drag the conflict into a prolonged war of attrition, exhausting high-end US resources, as warned by Lt. Gen. Dan Karbler in his insights during an ABC News Live interview

Do you think the US and Israel could establish total control of Iranian skies, or is that just Pentagon daydreaming?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 How the U.S. Kurdish Gambit in Iran May Backfire

Washington's push to arm Iranian Kurds could spectacularly backfire by rallying hardliners in Tehran, supercharging Persian nationalism as a regime lifeline, and splintering the fragile anti-Iran coalition, mirroring the 1979 ethnic uprisings that didn't crush the revolution but instead forged the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) into a powerhouse.

🔸 Kurdish militias armed with CIA small arms number just hundreds to low thousands, representing only 10% of Iran's population, making any incursion big enough to ignite widespread nationalist fury but too weak to genuinely endanger the regime's hold.

🔸 Tehran already launched pre-emptive strikes on Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan and Kurdistan Freedom Party bases in Iraqi Kurdistan days before escalations, broadcasting a fierce warning to all ethnic minorities that external alliances will trigger swift and severe retaliation.

🔸 Drawing from civil war studies like Barbara Walter's work, Iran's reputational trap forces disproportionate crackdowns to prevent copycat challenges from Azeris, Arabs, and Baloch, turning a targeted push into a broad regime-strengthening spectacle.

🔸 Regional blowback intensifies as Turkey bristles over Kurdistan Free Life Party's deep ties to the Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency threatening its fragile peace process, while Iraq's government flatly orders its Kurdish region to block any militant crossings, comparing US support to the risky 1980s Afghan jihad playbook.

🔸 Pakistan watches warily amid shared Baloch insurgent ecosystems, with UN warnings of mass border crossings already materializing as nearly 1,000 flee into Balochistan, fearing that degrading IRGC border control could spill over and empower Jaish al-Adl's rebranded Popular Resistance Front.

🔸 This US strategy unwittingly gifts Tehran diplomatic victories by alienating key players, as Ankara, Baghdad, and Islamabad weigh American ethnic arming as a bigger sovereignty threat than Iranian reprisals, potentially fracturing the coalition before it fully mobilizes.

Do you think that an Iranian Balkanization is really possible?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X