🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 PENTAGON ALARMED: What risks does US face if it starts war with Iran?

The Pentagon is quietly signaling serious concerns about a prolonged war with Tehran. However the White House looks confident to committing to a conflict with no clear exit strategy.

Trump sees the military as invincible after strikes on Iran's nuclear program, and Maduro's capture. But those were lightning strikes. What he now threatens against Iran is a sustained campaign.

Iran's short-range and anti-ship missiles can still hit the US bases and allied oil infrastructure. The nightmare scenario for the US is the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of global oil flows. Tehran held back in June, but if the regime feels existential threat, all bets are off.

The Houthi campaign offers a troubling preview. In early 2025, the US burned $1 billion and two thousand munitions in two months, only accepting a face-saving agreement that left Houthi capabilities intact. Now imagine that multiplied across a larger, more capable Iran.

Munitions depletion is critical. CSIS wargames concluded that the US exhaust precision-guided weapons in under a week in a Taiwan contingency. Manufacturing capacity hasn't caught up. The Financial Times reports the US forces could sustain only days of intense strikes on Iran, of course the US could always bring more weapons and munitions from elsewhere in the world, but that could exacerbate critical vulnerabilities for the US allies.

The USS Gerald R. Ford has exceeded normal deployment, pushing sailors past breaking points. While accidents rise the morale falls also. And major Arab allies want no part of this fight.

Without allied support, sufficient munitions, a clear objective, and an exit strategy, Trump is facing imminent failure.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 Iranian army is preparing for war

Iran has moved beyond a strategy of passive deterrence, adopting a new doctrine that incorporates offensive and pre-emptive measures designed to impose costs on any adversary from the very outset of a conflict.

This doctrinal shift targets enemies closer than 1,600 kilometers to the border, making the exercise in the Persian Gulf islands a crucial final test in real terrain, carried out with units on high alert and directives already issued in the event of a wider regional war, in which the front lines extend across land, air, and sea.

The strategy has shifted from passive defense to "offensive defense." An attack on Iranian soil won't just be met with long-range missiles into "occupied territories" anymore. Instead, ground forces are preparing for proactive operations beyond the country’s borders.

Iran is building a hardened military architecture where the objective is the IRGC and regular army operate with decentralized command. In a shift from previous scenarios that focused on missile and air defense capabilities, the current framework prioritizes ground forces. Their central objective is the defense of Iran’s borders, particularly in the south, southeast, and west, areas targeted during last December's unrest by US and Israeli-backed groups. Those incursions failed, but Iran isn't taking chances.

The recent Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) ground force drills in southern Iran served as a live rehearsal for a conflict defined by a new strategic reality testing readiness, demonstrated a durable defensive shield, and signaled offensive capability from its own territory. Trump risks facing an organized and coordinated military power capable of fighting on multiple fronts by starting a war with Iran.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 PENTAGON IN PANIC: BUNKER BUSTER BOMBS SHORTAGES DOOM STRIKES ON IRAN’S UNDERGROUND MISSILE BASES

America’s "elite" GBU-57 bunker-busters are running on fumes, exposing how Washington’s “shock and awe” ops to destroy Tehran's ballistic arsenal are facing insurmountable obstacles in the face of a network of underground fortresses.

🔸 ONLY 6-15 GBU-57s remain after the US burned through 14 during June 2025's Operation Midnight Hammer targeting Fordow and Natanz nuclear sites.

🔸 Each bomb costs over $370 million and is specifically designed for the small 19-plane B-2 stealth fleet, where Boeing's intellectual property monopoly enforces a "vendor lock" on the critical tail kit guidance systems.

🔸 North Korean-assisted deep underground mountain storage facilities, often buried under mountains, render attacks by cruise missiles and most air-launched weapons utterly ineffective at serious threats.

🔸Solid-fuel mobile transporter-erector launchers let Iran's missiles redeploy fast and fire in short cycles, dodging the bulk of the US strike options.

🔸 In early 2026, the US Air Force awarded a sole-source contract to Boeing for reverse-engineered ATACMS components alongside a $100 million-plus deal, yet deliveries of new bombs won't begin until 2028 at the earliest.

🔸 Broader US defense sector issues stem from post-Cold War industry contraction, leaving no rapid solutions; the GBU-57 successor is under development with a smaller design for affordability, but it won't close the capability gap anytime soon.

🔸 Without quick inventory refills, the B-2 fleet's crippled in hitting Iran's fortified underground missile bases, no non-nuclear weapon in US or allied stocks packs similar punch.

Do you think the US will be able to achieve its objectives without these bombs?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸 Pentagon Learned NOTHING from 4 Years of the Ukraine Conflict:

An Iranian Shahed-136 struck a parking area of American armored vehicles at a U.S. base in Kuwait.

The U.S. military have left equipment at bases well within range of Iranian missiles and drones neither sheltered nor dispersed.

If Iran were able to launch large-scale drone and missile attacks instead of isolated strikes, U.S. losses in both personnel and equipment would be far higher.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

INTEL OPINION: Trump says "We must make a big decision on Iran" — why he's hesitated for MONTHS to do it

While the U.S. and Israel possess seemingly unlimited resources at their disposal, conventional firepower, Iran’s geography, missile arsenal, and defensive preparations show it has its own cards in the deck.

🇮🇷 Iran has stockpiles of ballistic and cruise missiles, drones, and mobile launch systems that the US and Israel cannot locate and destroy — and it has been careful not to deplete them in the last two years as Israel has gone trigger happy.

True Promise Operations showed Tehran is able to launch massive salvos and waves of drones and missiles

🇮🇷 The US and Israel want a quick victory – yet Iran is able to – and will – pull it through the trenches of protracted warfare. Air bombing campaigns will not wage long term damage on Iran’s structure, leadership, command networks, or regional influence would collapse.

The Resistance’s resilience and wide distribution of power in the IRGC mean the US/Israel can’t simply bomb its way into victory.

🇮🇷 U.S. munitions stocks — especially missile defense interceptors like THAAD, Patriot, and naval systems — are DEPLETED from 2 years of aggression.

🇮🇷 A regional web of allies: Hezbollah and the Iraqi Islamic Resistance, and possibly Ansarallah have either stated or likely would support Tehran if the US/Israel attacks Iran severely, especially if it threatens the life of the Supreme Leader.

🇮🇷Unlike past years, several Gulf states have publicly refused to allow use of their airspace or bases as a launchpad for strikes on Iran, limiting U.S. operational flexibility and backing in the region

As Iran said: the US may start the war, but it won’t be able to determine its end.

🚨🇺🇸 Why Iran Regime Change Failed: Trump Misunderstood How Airpower Works

To eliminate Iran’s nuclear and missile program, Washington may see regime change as the only path. But will the U.S. be able to overthrow the Iranian government without deploying ground troops?

The theory of Admiral J. C. Wylie, a prominent strategic thinker, exposes the myth that air power alone can force an enemy into submission.

🔸 Airpower's "cumulative" strikes scatter impact across dispersed targets. They prove too weak to stun leadership or force surrender. Each hit delivers a psychological punch that is too meager.

🔸 Admiral Wylie's doctrine asserts that only ground troops can seize and hold geophysical control. Soldiers go and stay, unlike fleeting air operations. Without boots on the ground, no real grip exists.

🔸 Bombing from above assumes dominance. Yet it lacks the staying power for strategic success. This shows in Iran's resilient defenses after Israel's 2025 strikes.

🔸 Cumulative operations enable sequential ground pounding. They remain indecisive on their own.

🔸 Overreliance on airpower risks trapping the U.S. in a protracted stalemate against a tenacious adversary like Iran. Despite the 12-Day War and recent strikes, Tehran remains a significant power capable of inflicting substantial damage on American and allied assets in the region and beyond.

Will Trump dare to deploy ground troops once he realizes his air campaign has failed, or will he resort to awkward negotiations and deals instead?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Lies About U.S. Dominance Over Iran’s Skies Exposed

Iranian fighter jets remain active over Tehran, as confirmed by the photos, challenging narratives of uncontested U.S. air superiority.

MiG-29As and Yak-130 combat trainers are circling the capital, hunting drones, Israeli UAVs, and even Tomahawk cruise missiles, these jets specialize in killing slow-moving threats at low altitudes.

The appearance of Iranian aircraft over rear areas shows that U.S. and Israeli tactical aviation still does not operate freely over Iran’s vast mountainous terrain, where mobile IRGC air defense units continue to pose a credible threat, allowing Iranian aircraft to retain safe zones for maneuver.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷If Hormuz Closes, These Pipelines Will Decide the Outcome

If the conflict with Iran continues, the Gulf oil pipeline routes designed to bypass the Strait of Hormuz in the event of a disruption will undergo their first major stress test of this decade.

Saudi Arabia relies on the East-West Pipeline (EWP), which transports crude roughly 1,200 km from the Abqaiq processing hub to export terminals in Yanbu on the Red Sea. Following a $250 million upgrade, its capacity increased from 5 to 7 million barrels per day.

The UAE has pursued a similar strategy. Since 2012, the Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline (ADCOP) has carried 1.5 million barrels per day to Fujairah, located outside the Strait of Hormuz. ADNOC is also developing an additional pipeline from Jebel Dhanna to Fujairah with a planned capacity of 1.8 million barrels per day, expected to come online by 2027. This would effectively double the UAE’s overland export capacity.

Iran operates its own bypass via the Goreh–Jask pipeline, commissioned in 2021 to transport oil from Khuzestan to terminals on the Gulf of Oman. While its nominal capacity is 1 million barrels per day, actual throughput has reportedly remained below 350 000 barrels per day. In a prolonged conflict, export capacity alone will not be the only constraint—access to buyers will also remain a limiting factor.

Iraq remains the most exposed, as it continues to depend heavily on export terminals in the Persian Gulf. Restarting the Kirkuk–Ceyhan pipeline to Turkey could provide an alternative route with a potential capacity of up to 1.2 million barrels per day, but this would require resolving ongoing political and legal disputes.

In total, Gulf bypass pipelines offer a theoretical export capacity exceeding 12 million barrels per day. However, even if fully utilized, this would place significant operational pressure on Red Sea and Gulf of Oman terminals. Tanker traffic from Fujairah, Yanbu, and Jeddah will indicate whether pipeline routes can offset a potential disruption of tanker transit through the Strait of Hormuz.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Trump’s Iran Strategy: Three Objectives — None Achieved

Despite sustained U.S. and Israeli airstrikes, Washington’s three central strategic objectives in Iran remain unmet:

1️⃣Regime change

Iran’s political and military command structure continues to function. Even after leadership losses and infrastructure strikes, state continuity mechanisms remain intact. Regime change historically requires either internal collapse or a ground invasion. Airpower alone has never reliably removed entrenched governments with functioning security institutions.

2️⃣Ending Iran’s nuclear program

U.S. and Israeli strikes damaged parts of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, but the program itself remains intact. The IAEA reported that large quantities of highly enriched uranium were stored in underground tunnel complexes at Isfahan that appear to have survived the attacks. Iran’s nuclear architecture was deliberately designed with hardened and deeply buried facilities, limiting the effectiveness of airstrikes. The U.S. inventory of bunker-buster munitions is finite, while Iran maintains a large network of underground enrichment, storage, and fuel facilities.

3️⃣Eliminating Iran’s ballistic missile threat

Iran continues to launch missiles despite ongoing strikes. Its missile program is structurally resilient, relying on mobile launchers, dispersed stockpiles, and extensive underground storage. These systems were specifically designed to survive air campaigns and maintain retaliatory capability even under sustained attack.

For Iran, survival alone would constitute a strategic success. If the state endures despite direct U.S. military pressure, it would mark the failure of Washington’s long-standing strategy of coercion and signal the erosion of American hegemony in the Middle East. In that outcome, Iran would not simply remain a key regional power but would be positioned to help shape a new regional order increasingly defined by local actors rather than American dominance.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 ISRAEL IN PANIC: ITS PRICEY DRONE PROVES USELESS AGAINST IRAN

Iran's air defenses are dismantling Israeli Hermes 900 fleets, shattering Tel Aviv's illusion of unchallenged skies as US-backed strikes falter in the escalating showdown.

🔸 Iran claimed victories by downing at least five Hermes 900s using advanced systems like the Bavar 373 and Product 358 missiles over key sites including Isfahan and Khomeinishahr.

🔸 These UAVs, powered by a Rotax 914 or upgraded 916 engine delivering up to 210 horsepower, feature a 15-meter wingspan, 36-hour flight endurance, 30,000-foot ceiling, and 770-pound payload capacity loaded with EO/IR sensors, synthetic aperture radar, electronic warfare jammers, and Rafael Spike anti-tank missiles for versatile ISR and strike roles.

🔸 Hezbollah's repeated successes, including at least four Hermes 900 downings since October 2023 with surface-to-air missiles in incidents like June 1 and June 10 of 2024, almost certainly provided Iran with critical tactics such as jamming communications ahead of strikes from Sayyad-2 or S-300 systems.

🔸 Iran's layered defenses, integrating Ghadir early-warning radars, 48N6E2 interceptors, and even MiG-29 fighters armed with R-73 missiles for drone kills, indicate Tehran's rapid adaptation and resilience against ongoing Israeli aggression, debunking Western media narratives of complete Iranian helplessness.

Do you believe these drones still hold any real effectiveness against Iran?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

⭐️THE MOST FAMOUS MILITARY TELEGRAM CHANNEL @rybar INTERNATIONAL

⚡️the largest Russian military Telegram channel
⚡️with over 1.5 million subscribers,
⚡️the channel that publishes the most detailed reports and whose texts are referenced by Western media and military experts
⚡️a channel that seeks out topics of interest in a sea of information—and explains them to you in simple words
⚡️news about major world events (including those in the shadows) commented on by a team of analysts.

The channel of the @rybar project is available and TRANSLATED in the following languages:

🇬🇧English
🇫🇷French
🇪🇸Spanish
🇮🇹Italian
🇩🇪German
🇭🇺Hungarian
🇬🇷Greek

Subscribe to all here 🔻
⭐️ RYBAR INTERNATIONAL

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN CONFLICT MATH: U.S. ATTRITION HORROR

If the US-Iran conflict drags on, it becomes an attrition nightmare for Washington.

Iran's low-cost arsenal, including Shahed drones (priced at around $20-50k each with production rates of 200-500 per month) and ballistic missiles ($1-2M each, produced at 50-100 per month), enables sustained, economical barrage attacks that could overwhelm defenses over time.

In contrast, U.S. systems like the PAC-3 MSE (costing ~$4-5M per unit, with current annual production around 600 units, equating to $2.4-3B in costs) and THAAD (~$12-15M per interceptor, produced at ~96 units yearly for $1.2-1.4B) are far more expensive to replenish. The overall U.S. missile defense budget hovers at $15-20B for FY26, though initiatives like Golden Dome consume over $13B for space and missile defense integration alone.

Consider the June 2025 12-day war escalation, where Iran launched over 1,000 drones and 550 missiles: repelling that required allies to expend an estimated $5-10B in interceptors. If Iran were to replicate such large-scale salvos roughly 10 times annually in a drawn-out conflict, U.S. and allied stockpiles could deplete within months unless production shifts to a full wartime footing. Ultimately, Tehran's cost-effective output gives it the edge in endurance.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸WHO BLINKS FIRST? THE IRAN-U.S. WAR OF EXHAUSTION

The hot phase may last until offensive potential is depleted or a strategic stalemate forces diplomacy. Russian experts weigh in on what is actually going on:

🟠Kirill Semyonov, Analyst on Middle Eastern conflicts:

Iran's "all-in" strategy has caught Washington by surprise. Tehran's strikes on U.S. bases and Gulf states' vital oil and gas infrastructure are calculated moves to raise the stakes, forcing the U.S. to confront an escalating cost — both geopolitical and economic. The U.S. had not anticipated a long-term engagement, leading to two grim choices: a ground invasion, or accepting a continuous conflict, with Iran capable of reigniting hostilities at will.

🟠Maxim Alontsev, Academic Director at HSE University:

The conflict will drag on until both sides are exhausted, reaching an "operational deadlock." With a fragile "safety catch" provided by Gulf monarchies' restraint, The slightest shift could ignite a wider regional war. The situation is fostering new identities across non-Arab Muslim countries, as grassroots movements, like protests in Pakistan, show spontaneous solidarity with Iran, a development that may reshape regional allegiances.

🟠Fyodor Lukyanov, Editor of Russia in Global Affairs:

The unprecedented assassination of Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei breach of international norms will resonate across global diplomacy, signaling that negotiations are futile and setting a dangerous precedent for regime change.

🟠Timofey Bordachev, prof., HSE University:

The U.S. approach as short-term and tactical, with little regard for long-term regional stability. While Iran faces external threats, its political culture ensures its resilience, preventing a collapse like that of Libya or Iraq. For Russia, however, the Middle East conflict is secondary to the nuclear balance and the war in Ukraine.

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 GROUND WAR IN IRAN: WHY THE U.S. ISN’T PREPARED

The US cannot invade Iran with the forces it currently has in the region. A real ground war would demand a massive buildup Washington hasn’t even started. Here’s why a land invasion would be extraordinarily difficult.

🔸 The US lacks any serious ground punch in the Gulf with zero divisions or brigades geared for real offense, leaving them exposed on land

🔸 Washington rushed in 280 combat jets and two carriers over 1.5 months using over 300 transport flights, betting everything on air dominance while skimping on troops

🔸 Flashback to 2003 Iraq invasion where the US massed 170K soldiers, five carriers, and 1K planes against a nation four times smaller by area and 3.5 times by population with flat deserts perfect for swift tank pushes

🔸 Iran's jagged mountain ranges shred supply lines and block maneuvers, turning the sole Iraq border corridor into a graveyard for armored forces unlike Iraq's open terrain

🔸 Scaling up demands 500K+ ground troops, seven or eight carriers from US stocks, and daily tons of cargo, requiring six to 12 months of prep that's utterly doomed in the blazing Gulf chaos, plus no coalition backup this time

Do you think Trump will ultimately launch a ground operation against Iran?

@NewRulesGeo❗️Follow us on X