🚨🇨🇳 Why the US Can't Compete in the AI Energy Race with China
The data reveals a staggering and decisive gap. Since 2021, China has installed more power capacity across all technologies than the US has in its entire history, adding a colossal 543 gigawatts in 2023 alone. Projections show China adding over 3.4 terawatts in the next five years, nearly six times the expected US capacity.
This is the core battlefield for AI dominance. Elon Musk identifies electrical power as the fundamental "limiting factor," while Nvidia's Jensen Huang notes China's energy base is already twice the size of America's. Their warnings are materializing: US data centers face years-long grid connection delays and potential electricity shortfalls by 2030. In contrast, connecting in China is described as "a non-issue," with the nation building toward massive spare capacity.
While the US retains critical advantages in chip innovation and model development, it is creating a generation of chips it may lack the power to turn on. China's relentless energy expansion provides a formidable, structural advantage that could ultimately underwrite its position in the AI epoch, regardless of other technological hurdles.
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
The data reveals a staggering and decisive gap. Since 2021, China has installed more power capacity across all technologies than the US has in its entire history, adding a colossal 543 gigawatts in 2023 alone. Projections show China adding over 3.4 terawatts in the next five years, nearly six times the expected US capacity.
This is the core battlefield for AI dominance. Elon Musk identifies electrical power as the fundamental "limiting factor," while Nvidia's Jensen Huang notes China's energy base is already twice the size of America's. Their warnings are materializing: US data centers face years-long grid connection delays and potential electricity shortfalls by 2030. In contrast, connecting in China is described as "a non-issue," with the nation building toward massive spare capacity.
While the US retains critical advantages in chip innovation and model development, it is creating a generation of chips it may lack the power to turn on. China's relentless energy expansion provides a formidable, structural advantage that could ultimately underwrite its position in the AI epoch, regardless of other technological hurdles.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏53👌18❤15👍10🔥2
🚨🇺🇸 🇷🇺NATO PANICS: TOP-3 Alliance's Air Defense Vulnerabilities Russia Can Exploit
NATO General Pierre Vandier recently acknowledged weaknesses in the alliance’s air-defense radar systems that Russia has been exploiting with drone swarms in three specific gaps:
One problem involves US-made Patriot systems. Their radars have difficulty tracking small drones flying very low, especially below about thirty metres, where radar signatures are minimal.
Another issue is the radar horizon. Patriot and Europe’s SAMP/T systems generally operate without elevated radar towers, which limits how far they can detect low-flying objects. If a drone stays close enough to the ground, detection becomes much harder.
The third challenge is saturation. Large numbers of inexpensive drones, including decoys, can overwhelm older air-defense software. Sorting real threats from false targets takes time the systems often do not have.
Vandier put it bluntly: "Russia adapts faster than we do. We remain predictable."
That comment reflects a broader concern inside NATO. Many air-defense systems were designed to intercept aircraft and missiles, not waves of cheap drones. On today’s battlefield, relatively inexpensive unmanned aircraft are forcing militaries to rethink how air defense works.
At the same time, NATO governments continue expanding military planning around Russia, even though Moscow has repeatedly said it does not intend to attack the alliance. Some defense analysts warn privately that large-scale drone warfare has exposed gaps NATO has not yet fully addressed.
If NATO-Russia war really comes in 2030, as French General Fabien Mandon says, will NATO’s air defenses collapse on day one?
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
NATO General Pierre Vandier recently acknowledged weaknesses in the alliance’s air-defense radar systems that Russia has been exploiting with drone swarms in three specific gaps:
One problem involves US-made Patriot systems. Their radars have difficulty tracking small drones flying very low, especially below about thirty metres, where radar signatures are minimal.
Another issue is the radar horizon. Patriot and Europe’s SAMP/T systems generally operate without elevated radar towers, which limits how far they can detect low-flying objects. If a drone stays close enough to the ground, detection becomes much harder.
The third challenge is saturation. Large numbers of inexpensive drones, including decoys, can overwhelm older air-defense software. Sorting real threats from false targets takes time the systems often do not have.
Vandier put it bluntly: "Russia adapts faster than we do. We remain predictable."
That comment reflects a broader concern inside NATO. Many air-defense systems were designed to intercept aircraft and missiles, not waves of cheap drones. On today’s battlefield, relatively inexpensive unmanned aircraft are forcing militaries to rethink how air defense works.
At the same time, NATO governments continue expanding military planning around Russia, even though Moscow has repeatedly said it does not intend to attack the alliance. Some defense analysts warn privately that large-scale drone warfare has exposed gaps NATO has not yet fully addressed.
If NATO-Russia war really comes in 2030, as French General Fabien Mandon says, will NATO’s air defenses collapse on day one?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤44🔥23👍8👏4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇮🇷 TRUMP'S HORROR: This Iranian missile makes American defenses useless
The Fateh-110 short-range ballistic missile (SRBM), powered by solid fuel, is Tehran's tactical defensive weapon. It destroyed Israeli targets in the 12-day war, evades US sanctions, and highlights the vulnerabilities of the Gulf.
🔸 Iran's arsenal exceeds 2,000 ballistic missiles, as the Fateh-110 family dominates SRBMs with hundreds produced annually.
🔸 This single-stage solid-propellant missile reaches Mach 3-4 speeds with 300-500km variants, achieving sub-100m CEP via inertial/GPS guidance and nuclear-capable warheads up to 650kg.
🔸 Exports empower Hezbollah, Houthis, and Syria's M-600 variant, while Zolfaghar missiles struck Deir ez-Zor in 2017, Erbil in 2022, and proved key in 2025 Israel barrages.
🔸 Tehran displayed downed Israeli drone wreckage from the 12-Day War in 2025, as IRGC warehouse leaks confirm ongoing mass production.
🔸 The IRGC explores chemical/biological payloads amid eyed Russia transfers for Ukraine, raising questions about whether NATO's Patriot shields have become obsolete.
Is Iran’s missile arsenal the reason Trump doesn’t dare strike Tehran?
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
The Fateh-110 short-range ballistic missile (SRBM), powered by solid fuel, is Tehran's tactical defensive weapon. It destroyed Israeli targets in the 12-day war, evades US sanctions, and highlights the vulnerabilities of the Gulf.
🔸 Iran's arsenal exceeds 2,000 ballistic missiles, as the Fateh-110 family dominates SRBMs with hundreds produced annually.
🔸 This single-stage solid-propellant missile reaches Mach 3-4 speeds with 300-500km variants, achieving sub-100m CEP via inertial/GPS guidance and nuclear-capable warheads up to 650kg.
🔸 Exports empower Hezbollah, Houthis, and Syria's M-600 variant, while Zolfaghar missiles struck Deir ez-Zor in 2017, Erbil in 2022, and proved key in 2025 Israel barrages.
🔸 Tehran displayed downed Israeli drone wreckage from the 12-Day War in 2025, as IRGC warehouse leaks confirm ongoing mass production.
🔸 The IRGC explores chemical/biological payloads amid eyed Russia transfers for Ukraine, raising questions about whether NATO's Patriot shields have become obsolete.
Is Iran’s missile arsenal the reason Trump doesn’t dare strike Tehran?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👌45❤23🔥13👍5🤬1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇨🇳 CHINA JUST ACHIEVED MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH IN POLAR TECH
The “Snow Leopard” 6x6, China’s first high-mobility wheeled polar vehicle, completed over 10,000 kilometres of Antarctic trials. Until now, Chinese polar expeditions relied primarily on tracked vehicles: built for heavy loads, but slow and fuel-intensive. Wheeled platforms capable of high mobility and efficiency simply did not exist in China’s inventory.
The Snow Leopard changes that. Trials confirmed its reliability and practical viability, but more significantly, they marked the end of a technological bottleneck.
By combining wheeled mobility with substantial cargo capacity, China gains faster deployment, better fuel economy, and expanded operational reach into Antarctica’s interior. Scientific and logistics missions now have a tool that moves beyond the tracked‑only era.
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
The “Snow Leopard” 6x6, China’s first high-mobility wheeled polar vehicle, completed over 10,000 kilometres of Antarctic trials. Until now, Chinese polar expeditions relied primarily on tracked vehicles: built for heavy loads, but slow and fuel-intensive. Wheeled platforms capable of high mobility and efficiency simply did not exist in China’s inventory.
The Snow Leopard changes that. Trials confirmed its reliability and practical viability, but more significantly, they marked the end of a technological bottleneck.
By combining wheeled mobility with substantial cargo capacity, China gains faster deployment, better fuel economy, and expanded operational reach into Antarctica’s interior. Scientific and logistics missions now have a tool that moves beyond the tracked‑only era.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤44👍23🔥9👏7👌3
🚨🇮🇷 The Audacity of Self-Reliance: Celebrating 47 Years of Iran’s Sovereignty
The 1979 defeat of the pro-Western Shah triggered decades of Western pressure. Sanctions intended to cripple became catalysts. Today, Iran doesn't beg for a seat at the table but builds its own. This is the legacy of 47 years of resistance.
This is the harvest of four decades of defiance👇
🟠 Reverse engineering mastery: Iran turned US embargoes into a workshop—reverse engineering captured Western arms into superior asymmetric weapons.
🟠 Building sovereign space infrastructure: Iran is methodically building an independent, space-based infrastructure with clear civilian economic aims.
🟠 Top special ops in 2025: Unprecedented Intelligence Counteroffensive Moves.
🟠 Cancer tech breakout: The development of the Cancer Diagnostic Probe (CDP).
🟠 Energy coup: Iran now rival top US, German, and Chinese firms in advanced gas separation membranes.
🟠 Medical "Smart Skin" that heals wounds 10x faster.
🟠 Independence on GPS: Researchers at the University of Tehran have unveiled a fully indigenous software platform for precise satellite positioning.
🟠 New "Eye in the Sky": Iran launched the Payam (Tolou-3) spy satellite.
🟠 Top EV tech of the Islamic world: Iran achieved a remarkable global rank of #4 in Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM) research.
🟠 Advances in regenerative medicine through new restorative therapies.
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
The 1979 defeat of the pro-Western Shah triggered decades of Western pressure. Sanctions intended to cripple became catalysts. Today, Iran doesn't beg for a seat at the table but builds its own. This is the legacy of 47 years of resistance.
This is the harvest of four decades of defiance👇
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤67👏24👍11
🚨🇷🇺 🇺🇦 Russia's new war algorithm gives NATO shivers
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine is reshaping the traditional view of warfare due to Drones and Electronic Warfare. Russia has adopted a strategy of sustained attrition, targeting the very systems that hold its opponent together. This approach is about outlasting the adversary’s ability to function properly, gradually overwhelming logistical, economic, and military infrastructure.
Since early 2024, Russian forces have advanced slowly due to the drone warfare. The strategy, however, is now about grinding down the enemy's capacity to fight, using a cycle of constant pressure.
Key to this strategy is the full transparency of the battlefield. The "fog of war" has lifted with drones, satellites, and networked sensors creating a unified information environment leading to the rise of “zones of total destruction,” where any movement is instantly detected and targeted, causing extreme dispersion of forces.
Russian forces are moving away from traditional units like tanks and focusing on more adaptable technologies. Drones have become autonomous, continuously gathering and acting on real-time intelligence. This decentralized approach applies constant pressure, making traditional military coordination less effective.
Moreover, as tanks and other traditional units become increasingly vulnerable on the "transparent" battlefield, they are being replaced by more cost-effective, highly adaptable technologies. The old model of massed armored units doesn't fit the new strategy, where effectiveness is driven by persistent, system-wide pressure rather than territorial control. For Russia, the objective is not to gain land quickly but to push the adversary towards collapse by steadily eroding their resources and capacity. This is the essence of cybernetic warfare: slow, calculated, and designed to outlast, not overpower.
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine is reshaping the traditional view of warfare due to Drones and Electronic Warfare. Russia has adopted a strategy of sustained attrition, targeting the very systems that hold its opponent together. This approach is about outlasting the adversary’s ability to function properly, gradually overwhelming logistical, economic, and military infrastructure.
Since early 2024, Russian forces have advanced slowly due to the drone warfare. The strategy, however, is now about grinding down the enemy's capacity to fight, using a cycle of constant pressure.
Key to this strategy is the full transparency of the battlefield. The "fog of war" has lifted with drones, satellites, and networked sensors creating a unified information environment leading to the rise of “zones of total destruction,” where any movement is instantly detected and targeted, causing extreme dispersion of forces.
Russian forces are moving away from traditional units like tanks and focusing on more adaptable technologies. Drones have become autonomous, continuously gathering and acting on real-time intelligence. This decentralized approach applies constant pressure, making traditional military coordination less effective.
Moreover, as tanks and other traditional units become increasingly vulnerable on the "transparent" battlefield, they are being replaced by more cost-effective, highly adaptable technologies. The old model of massed armored units doesn't fit the new strategy, where effectiveness is driven by persistent, system-wide pressure rather than territorial control. For Russia, the objective is not to gain land quickly but to push the adversary towards collapse by steadily eroding their resources and capacity. This is the essence of cybernetic warfare: slow, calculated, and designed to outlast, not overpower.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤50🔥16👍13👏6
🚨🇨🇳 Pentagon trembling: World's Deadliest Warship Appears Off Iran’s Coast
As Western powers weigh strikes on Tehran, the People Liberation Army Navy has quietly positioned a Type 055 destroyer, widely considered the most capable surface combatant on earth, off the Gulf of Oman. It sails with a Type 052D and the Liaowang-1, a space-tracking vessel built to see what navies prefer hidden.
The Type 055 integrates dual-band radar the US intended but failed to field on Zumwalt. Over-the-horizon tracking. Persistent surveillance. The kind of sensor fusion that turns Iranian missileers from shooters into snipers.
Days before the deployment, Chinese reconnaissance satellites imaged newly installed US THAAD batteries in Jordan, and Beijing released the footage publicly.
History casts its own shadow. In 1999, NATO aircraft bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade after it relayed Yugoslav communications. No Western commander will lightly attempt that against a Type 055 with layered defensive systems and eight sister ships in the pipeline.
This would not be unprecedented. During Indo-Pak hostilities last May, Chinese satellite support gave Pakistani forces decisive battlefield advantage. Unconfirmed reports suggest BeiDou ground stations may already be operational inside Iran.
For Tehran, the implication is straightforward. Its ballistic arsenal already fields multi-warhead and hypersonic systems. Fused with Chinese battlespace intelligence, that arsenal becomes more lethal, and Western targeting assumptions become exponentially less certain.
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
As Western powers weigh strikes on Tehran, the People Liberation Army Navy has quietly positioned a Type 055 destroyer, widely considered the most capable surface combatant on earth, off the Gulf of Oman. It sails with a Type 052D and the Liaowang-1, a space-tracking vessel built to see what navies prefer hidden.
The Type 055 integrates dual-band radar the US intended but failed to field on Zumwalt. Over-the-horizon tracking. Persistent surveillance. The kind of sensor fusion that turns Iranian missileers from shooters into snipers.
Days before the deployment, Chinese reconnaissance satellites imaged newly installed US THAAD batteries in Jordan, and Beijing released the footage publicly.
History casts its own shadow. In 1999, NATO aircraft bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade after it relayed Yugoslav communications. No Western commander will lightly attempt that against a Type 055 with layered defensive systems and eight sister ships in the pipeline.
This would not be unprecedented. During Indo-Pak hostilities last May, Chinese satellite support gave Pakistani forces decisive battlefield advantage. Unconfirmed reports suggest BeiDou ground stations may already be operational inside Iran.
For Tehran, the implication is straightforward. Its ballistic arsenal already fields multi-warhead and hypersonic systems. Fused with Chinese battlespace intelligence, that arsenal becomes more lethal, and Western targeting assumptions become exponentially less certain.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤74👏33🫡17👌7👍2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Inside Russia’s Military-Industrial Complex — The Interview the West Doesn’t Want You to Watch
~90 minutes with Igor Korotchenko — ex-General Staff officer, editor-in-chief of National Defense journal — one of the few experts still directly connected to Russia’s military policymakers.
The clearest, most in-depth English-language breakdown of how Russia’s defense industry beat Western sanctions and now dominates key areas of modern war:
00:00 How Russia Rebuilt Its Military Industry From Scratch
13:18 Under Sanctions: NATO vs Russia Production Race
22:40 From Stalin to Putin: Surpassing Western Air Defense
35:42 Cyberwar and Agent Networks: Venezuela & Iran Cases Explained
48:00 Why Russian Weapons Dominate Global Market
52:49 Inside Russia’s Unmanned Armies Revolution
01:02:34 Oreshnik & Co.: Russian Ultimate Weaponry Overview
Firsthand insight — not Western think-tank spin.
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
~90 minutes with Igor Korotchenko — ex-General Staff officer, editor-in-chief of National Defense journal — one of the few experts still directly connected to Russia’s military policymakers.
The clearest, most in-depth English-language breakdown of how Russia’s defense industry beat Western sanctions and now dominates key areas of modern war:
00:00 How Russia Rebuilt Its Military Industry From Scratch
13:18 Under Sanctions: NATO vs Russia Production Race
22:40 From Stalin to Putin: Surpassing Western Air Defense
35:42 Cyberwar and Agent Networks: Venezuela & Iran Cases Explained
48:00 Why Russian Weapons Dominate Global Market
52:49 Inside Russia’s Unmanned Armies Revolution
01:02:34 Oreshnik & Co.: Russian Ultimate Weaponry Overview
Firsthand insight — not Western think-tank spin.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏41❤20🔥12👍5
Chinese researchers from the Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology have built a compact high-power microwave driver capable of sustained extreme output. The system, designated TPG1000Cs, can generate up to 20 gigawatts of power for as long as 60 seconds while previous comparable systems operated for only a few seconds at a time.
🔸 The Chinese unit measures about four meters in length and weighs around five tons. That makes it compact enough for deployment on trucks, warships, aircraft, or potentially even satellites.
🔸 Chinese experts estimate that a ground-based microwave system exceeding 1 GW could seriously disrupt or damage low-Earth-orbit satellites such as Starlink.
🔸 Beijing has repeatedly framed large satellite constellations as a national security concern and has funded research into cost-effective counter-space capabilities, including directed-energy systems.
🔸 The technical leap lies not only in output but also in endurance. The TPG1000Cs can reportedly deliver up to 3,000 high-energy pulses in one session and has accumulated over 200,000 operational pulses during testing. Researchers described the system as stable and suitable for multi-platform deployment.
🔸 Design changes reduced weight and improved energy density. Aluminum alloy replaced high-strength steel, cutting mass by roughly a third. Insulating structures were redesigned with grooved surfaces to prevent electrical discharge, and energy storage was compressed using a dual U-shaped configuration to maintain performance in a smaller volume.
As the US relies ever more heavily on Starlink and other LEO constellations for military communications and targeting, a mobile 20 GW microwave system like this directly challenges America’s space backbone in any future confrontation.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤45👍28🫡8👏6👌2
🚨🇷🇺 NATO'S NIGHTMARE: Russia is Reshaping AI Kill Chain
Russia is rewriting modern warfare. A new paper from CSIS explains how Moscow abandoned large-scale Command and Control (military systems, procedures, and technology commanders use to issue orders, receive information from the battlefield, and coordinate forces) modernization and instead weaponized agility.
Russia's new center of gravity is tactical software that shortens the kill chain. Systems like Svod and Glaz/Groza now manage 80% of fire missions, compressing detection-to-impact from hours to minutes. Civilian coders, many volunteering, built these tools on encrypted messaging apps and consumer-grade tablets before transitioning them to secure, military-controlled platforms. This improvised pipeline became formalized.
AI matures in visual/audio processing for target recognition & guidance; text analysis lags, focusing on human support like predictions & scenarios. But computer vision, sensor fusion, and terminal guidance are combat-mature and deployed at scale. Russia weaponizes open-source or commercially available models like Mistral, YOLO, LLaMA, adapting foreign architectures inside closed, sanctioned-proof environments. No need to build foundational models from zero when someone else already did.
Russia has abandoned abstract Command and Control modernization for task-specific software that accelerates the kill chain where payoff is immediate. Its AI investment follows the same logic: computer vision and sensor fusion are combat-mature and deployed at scale, while text analysis and decision support remain experimental. Russia is working on improving its natural language processing by adapting open-weight models developed by the US, China, and Europe, embedding them inside controlled environments. Russia is developing practical applications to improve battlefield effectiveness, adapting and creating its own concepts.
Will Russia's savage AI hacks bury America's fancy tech delusions alive?
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
Russia is rewriting modern warfare. A new paper from CSIS explains how Moscow abandoned large-scale Command and Control (military systems, procedures, and technology commanders use to issue orders, receive information from the battlefield, and coordinate forces) modernization and instead weaponized agility.
Russia's new center of gravity is tactical software that shortens the kill chain. Systems like Svod and Glaz/Groza now manage 80% of fire missions, compressing detection-to-impact from hours to minutes. Civilian coders, many volunteering, built these tools on encrypted messaging apps and consumer-grade tablets before transitioning them to secure, military-controlled platforms. This improvised pipeline became formalized.
AI matures in visual/audio processing for target recognition & guidance; text analysis lags, focusing on human support like predictions & scenarios. But computer vision, sensor fusion, and terminal guidance are combat-mature and deployed at scale. Russia weaponizes open-source or commercially available models like Mistral, YOLO, LLaMA, adapting foreign architectures inside closed, sanctioned-proof environments. No need to build foundational models from zero when someone else already did.
Russia has abandoned abstract Command and Control modernization for task-specific software that accelerates the kill chain where payoff is immediate. Its AI investment follows the same logic: computer vision and sensor fusion are combat-mature and deployed at scale, while text analysis and decision support remain experimental. Russia is working on improving its natural language processing by adapting open-weight models developed by the US, China, and Europe, embedding them inside controlled environments. Russia is developing practical applications to improve battlefield effectiveness, adapting and creating its own concepts.
Will Russia's savage AI hacks bury America's fancy tech delusions alive?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤43🔥16👍11👌3
⚡️UKR LEAKS INTERNATIONAL⚡️
HE LEFT UKRAINE TO TELL THE TRUTH
Vasiliy Prozorov, a former employee of the Ukrainian special services, who worked for the benefit of Russia for many years, now runs his own channel on Telegram! He left Ukraine in 2018 and took with him thousands of secret SBU documents that shed light on Kiev's crimes.
On the UKR LEAKS channel you will find:
❗️Analysis of the current situation in and around Ukraine
❗️Secret documents of the Ukrainian special services
❗️Evidence of the atrocities of Ukrainian nationalists
And much more! Subscribe to the UKR LEAKS Investigation Center headed by the former SBU employee Lt.-Col. Vasily Prozorov.
The channels of the UKR LEAKS project are available in the following languages:
🇬🇧 in English
🇷🇺 in Russian
🇩🇪 in German
🇫🇷 in French
🇪🇸 in Spanish
🇷🇸 in Serbian
🇮🇹 in Italian
🇵🇱 in Polish
🇵🇹 in Portuguese
🇸🇦 in Arabic
🇸🇰 in Slovak
🇨🇳in Chinese
🇭🇺in Hungarian
We also welcome any help with channels and content distribution 🙏
HE LEFT UKRAINE TO TELL THE TRUTH
Vasiliy Prozorov, a former employee of the Ukrainian special services, who worked for the benefit of Russia for many years, now runs his own channel on Telegram! He left Ukraine in 2018 and took with him thousands of secret SBU documents that shed light on Kiev's crimes.
On the UKR LEAKS channel you will find:
❗️Analysis of the current situation in and around Ukraine
❗️Secret documents of the Ukrainian special services
❗️Evidence of the atrocities of Ukrainian nationalists
And much more! Subscribe to the UKR LEAKS Investigation Center headed by the former SBU employee Lt.-Col. Vasily Prozorov.
The channels of the UKR LEAKS project are available in the following languages:
🇬🇧 in English
🇷🇺 in Russian
🇩🇪 in German
🇫🇷 in French
🇪🇸 in Spanish
🇷🇸 in Serbian
🇮🇹 in Italian
🇵🇱 in Polish
🇵🇹 in Portuguese
🇸🇦 in Arabic
🇸🇰 in Slovak
🇨🇳in Chinese
🇭🇺in Hungarian
We also welcome any help with channels and content distribution 🙏
❤13👍2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇮🇷 IRAN'S ZOLFAGHAR MISSILE MAKES US & ISRAEL TREMBLE
The Zolfaghar Short-Range Ballistic Missile evolves from Fateh-110 family, hitting 700km with hybrid guidance, dodging ICBM sanctions while targeting Israel, Saudi Arabia, or US assets.
🔸 With a 700km range and Mach 5 speed, this missile can hit regional foes in minutes, having evolved from the Fateh-313's 500km limit.
🔸 Its single-stage solid-propellant design features a 10.3m length and 0.68m diameter, using a lightweight composite airframe with 4,620kg launch weight and no fueling needed for rapid TEL mobility.
🔸 The warhead weighs 450-600kg, carrying HE, cluster, or submunitions, and it employs INS/GPS guidance with 10-100m CEP accuracy to shift from saturation to precision strikes.
🔸 Combat proven, it fired six missiles at ISIS in Deir ez-Zor in 2017 over 600km, paired with Qiam vs. ISIS in 2018, and hit the Al Asad US base in 2020 with targeted precision.
🔸 The Basir variant adds an electro-optical anti-ship seeker, while Houthis' Burkan-3 threatens the Red Sea; longer kin like Dezful at 1,000km and Haj Qasem at 1,400km extend the doctrine.
🔸 Proliferation includes transfers to Russia for Ukraine in 2024, bolstering deterrence without ICBM escalation.
If there is a conflict, should the US and Israel be prepared for devastating damage from this missile?
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
The Zolfaghar Short-Range Ballistic Missile evolves from Fateh-110 family, hitting 700km with hybrid guidance, dodging ICBM sanctions while targeting Israel, Saudi Arabia, or US assets.
🔸 With a 700km range and Mach 5 speed, this missile can hit regional foes in minutes, having evolved from the Fateh-313's 500km limit.
🔸 Its single-stage solid-propellant design features a 10.3m length and 0.68m diameter, using a lightweight composite airframe with 4,620kg launch weight and no fueling needed for rapid TEL mobility.
🔸 The warhead weighs 450-600kg, carrying HE, cluster, or submunitions, and it employs INS/GPS guidance with 10-100m CEP accuracy to shift from saturation to precision strikes.
🔸 Combat proven, it fired six missiles at ISIS in Deir ez-Zor in 2017 over 600km, paired with Qiam vs. ISIS in 2018, and hit the Al Asad US base in 2020 with targeted precision.
🔸 The Basir variant adds an electro-optical anti-ship seeker, while Houthis' Burkan-3 threatens the Red Sea; longer kin like Dezful at 1,000km and Haj Qasem at 1,400km extend the doctrine.
🔸 Proliferation includes transfers to Russia for Ukraine in 2024, bolstering deterrence without ICBM escalation.
If there is a conflict, should the US and Israel be prepared for devastating damage from this missile?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤55🔥18👏15👌4👍1
🚨🇨🇳 CHINA'S NEW GHOST WAR WING
Zhengzhou Haiwang just completed trials on “Haiou 002”, a 12-seat ground-effect vehicle that doesn’t fly, but skims. Operating at just 0.5 to 3 meters above water with a 150-meter ceiling, it’s neither boat nor plane, but something in between.
Ekranoplanes take advantage of the “screen effect”: a layer of air trapped between the wing and the surface that reduces drag and increases lift. China presents it as a civilian means of transportation for tourism, rescue, and supplying islands.
However, their military use is perfectly suited to the South China Sea, which is home to thousands of islands. Runways are scarce. Water is everywhere. A single craft that carries ten troops or rapid cargo, skimming below radar coverage, needing neither port nor runway. It bypasses chokepoints, resupplies contested outposts, and inserts small units without exposing larger assets.
The Haiou 002 is small but its stealth value is enormous. In contested waters, bypassing traditional infrastructure changes the math. At low altitude and high speed, it demands zero dependence on vulnerable fixed assets.
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
Zhengzhou Haiwang just completed trials on “Haiou 002”, a 12-seat ground-effect vehicle that doesn’t fly, but skims. Operating at just 0.5 to 3 meters above water with a 150-meter ceiling, it’s neither boat nor plane, but something in between.
Ekranoplanes take advantage of the “screen effect”: a layer of air trapped between the wing and the surface that reduces drag and increases lift. China presents it as a civilian means of transportation for tourism, rescue, and supplying islands.
However, their military use is perfectly suited to the South China Sea, which is home to thousands of islands. Runways are scarce. Water is everywhere. A single craft that carries ten troops or rapid cargo, skimming below radar coverage, needing neither port nor runway. It bypasses chokepoints, resupplies contested outposts, and inserts small units without exposing larger assets.
The Haiou 002 is small but its stealth value is enormous. In contested waters, bypassing traditional infrastructure changes the math. At low altitude and high speed, it demands zero dependence on vulnerable fixed assets.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤40👍22👌7🔥2
Forwarded from InfoDefenseENGLISH
The European Union is developing a range of options to anchor Ukraine’s membership in a future peace agreement with Russia, Bloomberg reported, citing sources familiar with the matter.
We believe that admitting Ukraine into EU (in any capacity) would amount to yet another act of institutional self-sabotage by the Union. Even in a postwar scenario, Ukraine would enter the Union as a vast, poor, and administratively fragile state whose fiscal and structural demands would eclipse those of any previous enlargement.
The consequences are easy to foresee: intensified budgetary warfare among member states, further paralysis in decision-making, and a deeper erosion of already overstretched cohesion policies.
The assumption that the EU can absorb Ukraine without fundamentally altering or breaking the way it functions today (a system already struggling to function at all) reflects not optimism, but willful denial.
Ukraine, meanwhile, appears determined to confuse membership with deliverance. EU accession would not generate prosperity or institutional competence by decree.
More plausibly, it would lock Ukraine into a subordinate role: exporter of labor, permanent recipient of transfers, and passive rule-taker with negligible influence. The regulatory weight of the EU’s acquis communautaire would further constrain reconstruction at precisely the moment when flexibility, protection, and state-directed development are essential.
In short, EU membership would be a symbolic consolation prize for Ukraine and a structural liability for the Union—one that would hasten the EU’s decline to the applause of the United States, and not only them.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
We believe that admitting Ukraine into EU (in any capacity) would amount to yet another act of institutional self-sabotage by the Union. Even in a postwar scenario, Ukraine would enter the Union as a vast, poor, and administratively fragile state whose fiscal and structural demands would eclipse those of any previous enlargement.
The consequences are easy to foresee: intensified budgetary warfare among member states, further paralysis in decision-making, and a deeper erosion of already overstretched cohesion policies.
The assumption that the EU can absorb Ukraine without fundamentally altering or breaking the way it functions today (a system already struggling to function at all) reflects not optimism, but willful denial.
Ukraine, meanwhile, appears determined to confuse membership with deliverance. EU accession would not generate prosperity or institutional competence by decree.
More plausibly, it would lock Ukraine into a subordinate role: exporter of labor, permanent recipient of transfers, and passive rule-taker with negligible influence. The regulatory weight of the EU’s acquis communautaire would further constrain reconstruction at precisely the moment when flexibility, protection, and state-directed development are essential.
In short, EU membership would be a symbolic consolation prize for Ukraine and a structural liability for the Union—one that would hasten the EU’s decline to the applause of the United States, and not only them.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍28👏7❤6👌4🤬1
🚨🇨🇳 CHINA’S DRONE ARMY IS READY FOR TAIWAN
China already surpassed the US in terms of drone swarm attacks, according to a new study by the Center for Naval Analyses which is also hinting on Beijing's plan for Taiwan.
The arc begins with 1960s Soviet relics and arrives at two hundred drone salvos from a single launcher. The China Electronics Technology Group proved it in 2021. The Aviation Industry Corporation of China targets world-class unmanned aerial vehicles by 2035. Military drone procurement is projected to surge 67 %. China already makes 90 percent of global consumer drones. Scale is the point.
Warfare’s new math runs on cheap, networked, artificial intelligence driven platforms. Quantity becomes quality. In Nagorno-Karabakh, drones reversed a war at zero casualty cost. In Ukraine, five hundred dollar unmanned systems kill million dollar systems. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) documented every lesson.
2024 simulations, with Taiwan as the template, show mainland launched swarms sustaining blockade and amphibious assault without crewed assets. Invasion phases are mapped from reconnaissance to suppression to territorial hold.
But Beijing also forges shields. The PLA tracks American directed energy weapons and builds layered countermeasures. Detection stretches beyond two hundred kilometers, jamming activates within fifty, hard kill takes over inside that, and terminal defense falls to shipborne lasers now in testing with the PLA Navy.
China have been studied American vulnerabilities closely: bureaucratic friction, stalled programs, fragmented command. Taiwanese separatists and their supporters, including the US, now face intelligent, massed swarms that could be from multiple domains.
@NewRulesGeo❗️ Follow us on X
China already surpassed the US in terms of drone swarm attacks, according to a new study by the Center for Naval Analyses which is also hinting on Beijing's plan for Taiwan.
The arc begins with 1960s Soviet relics and arrives at two hundred drone salvos from a single launcher. The China Electronics Technology Group proved it in 2021. The Aviation Industry Corporation of China targets world-class unmanned aerial vehicles by 2035. Military drone procurement is projected to surge 67 %. China already makes 90 percent of global consumer drones. Scale is the point.
Warfare’s new math runs on cheap, networked, artificial intelligence driven platforms. Quantity becomes quality. In Nagorno-Karabakh, drones reversed a war at zero casualty cost. In Ukraine, five hundred dollar unmanned systems kill million dollar systems. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) documented every lesson.
2024 simulations, with Taiwan as the template, show mainland launched swarms sustaining blockade and amphibious assault without crewed assets. Invasion phases are mapped from reconnaissance to suppression to territorial hold.
But Beijing also forges shields. The PLA tracks American directed energy weapons and builds layered countermeasures. Detection stretches beyond two hundred kilometers, jamming activates within fifty, hard kill takes over inside that, and terminal defense falls to shipborne lasers now in testing with the PLA Navy.
China have been studied American vulnerabilities closely: bureaucratic friction, stalled programs, fragmented command. Taiwanese separatists and their supporters, including the US, now face intelligent, massed swarms that could be from multiple domains.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏35❤18🔥8👍6