Single inhaler #triple therapy versus inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting β2-agonist therapy for chronic #obstructive pulmonary disease (TRILOGY): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)31354-X/abstract
Interpretation
We provide evidence for the clinical benefits of stepping up patients with COPD from an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination treatment to triple therapy using a single inhaler.
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)31354-X/abstract
Interpretation
We provide evidence for the clinical benefits of stepping up patients with COPD from an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination treatment to triple therapy using a single inhaler.
Diagnostic Yield of #Triple-Rule-Out CT in an #Emergency Setting
http://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.15.15717?journalCode=ajr
CONCLUSION. In 8.9% of patients, TRO CT detected a significant noncoronary diagnosis that could explain acute chest pain, including pathologic findings that would not be identified on dedicated coronary CT angiography.
http://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.15.15717?journalCode=ajr
CONCLUSION. In 8.9% of patients, TRO CT detected a significant noncoronary diagnosis that could explain acute chest pain, including pathologic findings that would not be identified on dedicated coronary CT angiography.
!!
Once-Daily Single-Inhaler #Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with #COPD
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1713901?query=featured_home
The rate of moderate or severe exacerbations in the triple-therapy group was 0.91 per year, as compared with 1.07 per year in the fluticasone furoate–vilanterol group (rate ratio with triple therapy, 0.85; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.80 to 0.90; 15% difference; P<0.001) and 1.21 per year in the umeclidinium–vilanterol group (rate ratio with triple therapy, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.81; 25% difference; P<0.001). The annual rate of severe exacerbations resulting in hospitalization in the triple-therapy group was 0.13, as compared with 0.19 in the umeclidinium–vilanterol group (rate ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.78; 34% difference; P<0.001). There was a higher incidence of pneumonia in the inhaled-glucocorticoid groups than in the umeclidinium–vilanterol group, and the risk of clinician-diagnosed pneumonia was significantly higher with triple therapy than with umeclidinium–vilanterol, as assessed in a time-to-first-event analysis (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.92; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Triple therapy with fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol resulted in a lower rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations than fluticasone furoate–vilanterol or umeclidinium–vilanterol in this population. Triple therapy also resulted in a lower rate of hospitalization due to COPD than umeclidinium–vilanterol.
Once-Daily Single-Inhaler #Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with #COPD
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1713901?query=featured_home
The rate of moderate or severe exacerbations in the triple-therapy group was 0.91 per year, as compared with 1.07 per year in the fluticasone furoate–vilanterol group (rate ratio with triple therapy, 0.85; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.80 to 0.90; 15% difference; P<0.001) and 1.21 per year in the umeclidinium–vilanterol group (rate ratio with triple therapy, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.81; 25% difference; P<0.001). The annual rate of severe exacerbations resulting in hospitalization in the triple-therapy group was 0.13, as compared with 0.19 in the umeclidinium–vilanterol group (rate ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.78; 34% difference; P<0.001). There was a higher incidence of pneumonia in the inhaled-glucocorticoid groups than in the umeclidinium–vilanterol group, and the risk of clinician-diagnosed pneumonia was significantly higher with triple therapy than with umeclidinium–vilanterol, as assessed in a time-to-first-event analysis (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.92; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Triple therapy with fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol resulted in a lower rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations than fluticasone furoate–vilanterol or umeclidinium–vilanterol in this population. Triple therapy also resulted in a lower rate of hospitalization due to COPD than umeclidinium–vilanterol.
!!
#Triple therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k4388
21 trials (19 publications) were included. Triple therapy consisted of a long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long acting β agonist (LABA), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). Triple therapy was associated with a significantly reduced rate of moderate or severe exacerbations compared with LAMA monotherapy (rate ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.85), LAMA and LABA (0.78, 0.70 to 0.88), and ICS and LABA (0.77, 0.66 to 0.91). Trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and quality of life were favourable with triple therapy.
The overall safety profile of triple therapy is reassuring, but #pneumonia was significantly higher with triple therapy than with dual therapy of LAMA and LABA (relative risk 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 1.87).
Conclusions Use of triple therapy resulted in a lower rate of moderate or severe exacerbations of #COPD, better lung function, and better health related quality of life than dual therapy or monotherapy in patients with advanced COPD.
#Triple therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k4388
21 trials (19 publications) were included. Triple therapy consisted of a long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long acting β agonist (LABA), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). Triple therapy was associated with a significantly reduced rate of moderate or severe exacerbations compared with LAMA monotherapy (rate ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.85), LAMA and LABA (0.78, 0.70 to 0.88), and ICS and LABA (0.77, 0.66 to 0.91). Trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and quality of life were favourable with triple therapy.
The overall safety profile of triple therapy is reassuring, but #pneumonia was significantly higher with triple therapy than with dual therapy of LAMA and LABA (relative risk 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 1.87).
Conclusions Use of triple therapy resulted in a lower rate of moderate or severe exacerbations of #COPD, better lung function, and better health related quality of life than dual therapy or monotherapy in patients with advanced COPD.
The BMJ
Triple therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective To compare the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations between triple therapy and dual therapy or monotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.…
Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.…