KIEV YET TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON VICTIMS OF ALLEGED BUCHA MASSACRE

South Front, Oct 24 2022

It is not surprising that the so-called international community has already forgotten about the “terrible #WarCrimes” of the #Russian military in the #Ukrainian city of #Bucha.

The #fake #massacre in Bucha has disappeared from the #MSM headlines around the world, and no international organization is investigating the truth.

Today, it seems that the Russian authorities are the only ones who are worried about the fate of the victims, who were allegedly killed by Russian soldiers, according to the dirty information campaign of the Kiev regime.

On October 24, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey #Lavrov claimed that Ukraine still has not provided data on people who allegedly died due to the actions of the Russian military in #Bucha.

At a press conference during a meeting with Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei #Lavrov recalled the #Ukrainian provocation in Bucha, which was committed at the end of March.

So far, the #Kiev #regime has not yet provided any results of the investigation, as well as any reliable information to blame the Russian side.

Lavrov said at a press conference:

"Since then, we have repeatedly appealed to everyone who can help with a request to provide information about the names of those people who fell victim, and their bodies were shown to the whole world as evidence of the “atrocities” of the Russian military."

The Russian Minister also added that a month ago he publicly appealed to UN Sec-Gen Antonio Guterres with a request to obtain a list of these persons, but there was no reaction in response to Lavrov’s request.

🇪🇺⚡️ The column "High relations" from Politico: Macron and Scholz have growing concerns about unfair competition from the United States

There are many disagreements between the leaders of France and Germany, but there is one issue on which they have a common position: they do not like the idea to move production from Europe to the United States.

"They agreed that recent American state subsidy plans represent market-distorting measures that aim to convince companies to shift their production to the U.S.," Politico writes with reference to people familiar with their discussions.

France and Germany plan to discuss with Washington unfair competition, at the same time they assure that they are ready to hit back if necessary.

It is important to note that "Berlin — which has traditionally been more reluctant when it comes to confronting the U.S. in trade disputes — is indeed backing the French push. Scholz agrees that the EU will need to roll out countermeasures similar to the U.S. scheme if Washington refuses to address key concerns voiced by Berlin and Paris" is stated in article.

🤔 Isn't this another example of the lack of unity in the West that Putin announced yesterday at Valdai?

"Allies"

👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇

Democratic Party, 2022:

"If you're not
with us,
you're not with
the terrorists!"

Russia suspends grain deal after this morning’s drone attack on their naval forces.

Also worth noting—because why is no one concerned about this?—that Russia openly accuses UK of involvement in today’s attack, as well as Nordstream sabotage.

Suddenly direct conflict, no longer proxy.

#ukraine #russia #wheat

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-suspends-participation-deal-ukraine-grain-exports-tass-2022-10-29/

Kek

Now it’s clear who Biden is constantly looking for to say hello 😂
@TrFormer 💤

A sweater that uses "adversarial patterns" to confuse AI.

Definitely on my Christmas shopping list.

@therealnoiz

This naval drone found near Sevastopol.
Reposted from our subscriber.

Follow 👉 @TrFormer💤

🇮🇱🇺🇲 Jewish organisation ADL warns Twitter boss Elon Musk of "dire consequences" if specific users, namely Donald Trump, Nick Fuentes, Alex Jones, David Duke, and Andrew Tate, are allowed to return to the online social media platform.

🌍 @European_Insider | 🕊 Retweet

What was it? (About the grain deal, which now has become a history)
Based on the sources from AIF
Since August 1, when the sea export of grain began, 8.3 million tons of agricultural products have been exported. In total, almost 400 vessels received permission to leave Ukrainian ports. At the same time, as noted by the Turkish authorities, about 62% of deliveries fell on Europe, 19.5% - Asia, 13% - Africa and 5.3% - the countries of the Middle East. About 70 ships during the deal were delayed or suspended due to systematic violations and attempts to smuggle in caches.

“Sea exports are extremely important for Ukraine because it is expensive to transport grain by plane, and the throughput of its railways is small - 2-3 million tons per month,” explained Alexander Korbut, vice president of the Russian Grain Union. - They mainly export oil, corn, soybeans, wheat much less often, because the basis of Ukrainian exports is feed corn. But it is easier to deliver grain by ships - bulk carriers.

According to a number of international agencies, Ukrainian agricultural exports tripled during the deal. On the world market, “after the conclusion of the“ grain deal ”, exchange prices for food began to decline along with prices for other goods, sometimes even faster,” said Yevgeny Kogan, professor at the Higher School of Economics.

Russia is no longer accused of allegedly wanting to force a billion people to starve. In addition, the sanctions against our agricultural exports (grain and fertilizers), which many anti-Russian politicians demanded, were not introduced.

But Turkey and Europe benefited the most from the agreement, and the former, in addition to grains and oil, also received a political, reputational profit - as a guarantor of a humanitarian agreement.

“Europe got everything it wanted from this deal,” Korbut stated. - The European Union compensated for the decline in corn production at the expense of Ukrainian supplies, saturating its market with sunflower oil. Do you remember how much the Germans wrote about the shortage of oil in Germany before the “grain deal” and how abruptly they stopped writing about it? In addition, Europe received very cheap grain - Ukraine sold it at a very large discount. No one hid the size of the discount - Ukrainian grain went to other countries at a price 50% lower than the cost of its production!

Great Britain, Israel and South Korea, as well as such large and strong, albeit developing countries as India, China and Egypt received a lot of Ukrainian grain. Needy states, in particular Somalia, Ethiopia, Yemen, Sudan, Afghanistan, received only 3% of food. And most of the starving countries of the world got nothing at all.
Vladimir Putin was the first to speak about the fact that food does not go to the underdeveloped countries, but to the West. And the UN leadership "silently" reclassified the initiative from humanitarian to commercial, emphasizing the importance of stabilizing world food prices. Already in October, the UN officially recognized that “50% of Ukrainian grain was sent to high-income countries, 24% to low- and lower-middle-income countries, and 25% to middle-income countries.” At the same time, 1% of food was sent to countries with “different levels of income”.

Follow @TrFormer 💤