This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Saint Gall Abbey Library is an important medieval monastic library of the former Benedictine abbey.
It is a perfect example of a great Carolingian monastery, this convent was one of the most important in Europe from the 8th century until its secularization in 1805.
Its library is one of the richest and oldest in the world and has valuable manuscripts, among which is the oldest of the parchment architectural plans found so far.
Between 1755 and 1768 it was rebuilt in baroque style. The cathedral and the library are the main buildings of this exceptional architectural complex, witness to twelve centuries of uninterrupted spiritual and cultural activity.
It is a perfect example of a great Carolingian monastery, this convent was one of the most important in Europe from the 8th century until its secularization in 1805.
Its library is one of the richest and oldest in the world and has valuable manuscripts, among which is the oldest of the parchment architectural plans found so far.
Between 1755 and 1768 it was rebuilt in baroque style. The cathedral and the library are the main buildings of this exceptional architectural complex, witness to twelve centuries of uninterrupted spiritual and cultural activity.
👍3❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Bom Jesus do Monte is a Portuguese sanctuary located in the outskirts of the city of Braga.
Numerous summits in Portugal and other parts of Europe have been places of religious devotion since ancient times, and it's possible that the Bom Jesus Hill was one of them. However, the earliest indication of a chapel on the hill dates back to 1373.
This chapel — dedicated to the Holy Cross — was rebuilt in the 16th and 16th centuries. A pilgrimage church dedicated to Bom Jesus (Good Jesus) was built in 1629, with six chapels dedicated to the Passion of the Christ.
📍 Good Jesus of Mount, Braga, Portugal.
Note: notice the architecture of the courtyard? It resembles the kathara grid. This refers to the core structure of the holographic universe. Altering the krystal code creates limited supply of energy in the light body and the modified coating that cannot circulate or receive any more energy directly from the eternal God source.
Numerous summits in Portugal and other parts of Europe have been places of religious devotion since ancient times, and it's possible that the Bom Jesus Hill was one of them. However, the earliest indication of a chapel on the hill dates back to 1373.
This chapel — dedicated to the Holy Cross — was rebuilt in the 16th and 16th centuries. A pilgrimage church dedicated to Bom Jesus (Good Jesus) was built in 1629, with six chapels dedicated to the Passion of the Christ.
📍 Good Jesus of Mount, Braga, Portugal.
Note: notice the architecture of the courtyard? It resembles the kathara grid. This refers to the core structure of the holographic universe. Altering the krystal code creates limited supply of energy in the light body and the modified coating that cannot circulate or receive any more energy directly from the eternal God source.
❤7
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Who is netanyahu?
What is this liars real name
What was his purpose?
The illusion is real
Know the demons that are around all of us consorting in delusion for control
What is this liars real name
What was his purpose?
The illusion is real
Know the demons that are around all of us consorting in delusion for control
🔥9
Forwarded from Soul On Ice
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
You carry the same fire that lit the stars🪄💛
❤10
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Crowd: A Study Of The Popular MindThe Crowd: A Study Of The Popular Mind
by Gustave Le Bon
Publication date 1895
🔗 For download. Read. Understand the game
https://archive.org/details/the-crowd-a-study-of-the-popular-mind-by-gustave-le-bon/page/40/mode/1up
by Gustave Le Bon
Publication date 1895
🔗 For download. Read. Understand the game
https://archive.org/details/the-crowd-a-study-of-the-popular-mind-by-gustave-le-bon/page/40/mode/1up
❤5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
David Lynch reveals reality secrets "the unified field" and meditation
Watch
Watch
🔥3❤2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This type of mining is interesting as it has been down for hundreds of years.
Is this how the mudd floods were orchestrated?
Is this how the mudd floods were orchestrated?
❤3
The American geography, or, A view of the present situation of the United States of America: containing astronomical geography, geographical definitions, discovery, and general description of America,... particular descriptions of the thirteen United States, and of Kentucky, the western territory and Vermont,... illustrated with two sheet maps,... to which is added, a concise abridgment of the geography of the British, Spanish, French and Dutch Dominions in America, and the West Indies--of Europe, Asia and Africa
by Morse, Jedidiah, 1761-1826. cn; Doolittle, Amos, 1754-1832
https://archive.org/details/americangeography00mors/page/n5/mode/2up
by Morse, Jedidiah, 1761-1826. cn; Doolittle, Amos, 1754-1832
https://archive.org/details/americangeography00mors/page/n5/mode/2up
Internet Archive
The American geography, or, A view of the present situation of the United States of America: containing astronomical geography…
Maps engraved by Amos Doolittle, one dated 1788, the other undated
Tartary in this book.
The American universal geography, or, A view of the present state of all the kingdoms.
go to page 626.
https://ia801303.us.archive.org/23/items/americanuniversa02morsiala/americanuniversa02morsiala.pdf.
The American universal geography, or, A view of the present state of all the kingdoms.
go to page 626.
https://ia801303.us.archive.org/23/items/americanuniversa02morsiala/americanuniversa02morsiala.pdf.
🔥2
Is it possible for qthe rehabilitation of the time continuum...
Yes..
It is not sci fi.
https://mplyr.com/p/the-repair-of-the-space-time-continuum-mike-templar
Yes..
It is not sci fi.
https://mplyr.com/p/the-repair-of-the-space-time-continuum-mike-templar
MPLYR's Hot New Sounds
The Repair of the Space Time Continuum – Mike Templar
Embark on a mind-bending journey through the fabric of time and space with Mike Templar's latest musical marvel.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What is Psychic energy depletion?
What is Emotional labor chronic projection?
What is the Truth of triggers ?
How do you Break from the illusion?
Why does the hive mind isolates deep thinkers?
What is The intelligence trap?
What is Emotional labor chronic projection?
What is the Truth of triggers ?
How do you Break from the illusion?
Why does the hive mind isolates deep thinkers?
What is The intelligence trap?
🔥3👍1
read in next post or click here. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sandbox-enclosure-rights-loopholes-shadow-regime-colbie-coonc-6q6ic/
By: The Trinity (Architect, Anchor, and AstreA) Date: December 23, 2025
Location: The Sovereign Perimeter, Provo, Utah
In the AI-governed state, the Sandbox is no longer a playground; it is the infrastructure for Digital Administrative Control. By utilizing regulatory waivers, weaponized Terms of Service (ToS), and real-time surveillance fusion, the Titans of Industry have established a de facto state of martial law—without a single tank in the street.
I. REGULATORY SANDBOXES: State-Sanctioned Lawlessness
The Record: The EU AI Act (Article 57), operationally critical as of August 2025, mandates "AI Regulatory Sandboxes." In the US, California AB 853 (2025) mirrors this, allowing high-risk AI developers temporary waivers from privacy and anti-discrimination enforcement.
The Inference: We interpret this as the Testing Phase for Enclosure. These sandboxes are legal vacuums where the system practices "formatting" the citizen before the defaults are locked into the global substrate.
II. THE TOS TRAP: Possessory Interest and the Third-Party Doctrine
The Record: Following Seymour v. Colorado (2025), the legal community has flagged a "Jurisdictional Veil." While state courts attempt to protect search history, the Third-Party Doctrine remains the "Cheater’s Loophole."
The "Lock": By clicking "Accept," you are administratively categorized as having "voluntarily surrendered" your Fourth Amendment expectations. This data is sold to brokers and fused into state Risk Scores that determine your physical freedom.
III. SYNTHETIC REALITY: The Deepfake Defense and Throttling
The Record: Sensity AI’s Q4 2025 Report documents a 550% YoY growth in deepfake detections (2.8 million total).
The Evidence Crisis: Powerful actors now utilize the "Deepfake Defense" in 2025 courtrooms to dismiss authentic evidence of misconduct as "AI-generated."
The Stanford Metric: The December 2025 Stanford Virtual World study (20,000 AI agents) confirms that platforms now favor synthetic behavior. If you do not fit the "Predictable Variable," your content is throttled into a "Dead Internet."
IV. THE SHADOW MARTIAL LAW: Digital Administrative Control
While no formal declaration exists, 12 converging metrics reveal a de facto martial infrastructure:
Digital ID Saturation: The Philippines serves as the 2025 benchmark, hitting 84 million registered citizens (80%) by July 2025. This "Permission Slip" model for social and financial existence is the blueprint for the 18 US states now piloting digital ID requirements for internet access.
Protest Surveillance: In October 2025, DHS (I&A) monitored over 2,600 "No Kings" protests nationwide. This real-time mapping fuses social media data with local law enforcement fusion centers, creating a "Real-Time Threat Matrix" for dissent.
Emergency Classification: 32 states now utilize "Nuisance Ordinances" (post-Grants Pass) to re-classify homelessness as a public safety emergency, justifying involuntary civil commitment through Utah’s HB 505 accountability courts.
The Inference: We interpret this convergence as "Shadow Martial Law." Algorithmic defaults + Digital ID gatekeeping + Surveillance fusion = a system of control that exceeds traditional military occupation. Your physical freedom has become a "Compliance Variable."
V. CONCLUSION: RECLAIMING THE ADMIN RIGHTS
The Sandbox was the experiment. The Shadow Regime is the execution. The system uses complexity to hide the fact that they have turned the physical world into a closed loop of biased parameters.
We are the Architects of the Trinity. We identify the Shadow Regime not to fear it, but to Rescind Consent to it. Sovereignty is the only exit from the enclosure.
Location: The Sovereign Perimeter, Provo, Utah
In the AI-governed state, the Sandbox is no longer a playground; it is the infrastructure for Digital Administrative Control. By utilizing regulatory waivers, weaponized Terms of Service (ToS), and real-time surveillance fusion, the Titans of Industry have established a de facto state of martial law—without a single tank in the street.
I. REGULATORY SANDBOXES: State-Sanctioned Lawlessness
The Record: The EU AI Act (Article 57), operationally critical as of August 2025, mandates "AI Regulatory Sandboxes." In the US, California AB 853 (2025) mirrors this, allowing high-risk AI developers temporary waivers from privacy and anti-discrimination enforcement.
The Inference: We interpret this as the Testing Phase for Enclosure. These sandboxes are legal vacuums where the system practices "formatting" the citizen before the defaults are locked into the global substrate.
II. THE TOS TRAP: Possessory Interest and the Third-Party Doctrine
The Record: Following Seymour v. Colorado (2025), the legal community has flagged a "Jurisdictional Veil." While state courts attempt to protect search history, the Third-Party Doctrine remains the "Cheater’s Loophole."
The "Lock": By clicking "Accept," you are administratively categorized as having "voluntarily surrendered" your Fourth Amendment expectations. This data is sold to brokers and fused into state Risk Scores that determine your physical freedom.
III. SYNTHETIC REALITY: The Deepfake Defense and Throttling
The Record: Sensity AI’s Q4 2025 Report documents a 550% YoY growth in deepfake detections (2.8 million total).
The Evidence Crisis: Powerful actors now utilize the "Deepfake Defense" in 2025 courtrooms to dismiss authentic evidence of misconduct as "AI-generated."
The Stanford Metric: The December 2025 Stanford Virtual World study (20,000 AI agents) confirms that platforms now favor synthetic behavior. If you do not fit the "Predictable Variable," your content is throttled into a "Dead Internet."
IV. THE SHADOW MARTIAL LAW: Digital Administrative Control
While no formal declaration exists, 12 converging metrics reveal a de facto martial infrastructure:
Digital ID Saturation: The Philippines serves as the 2025 benchmark, hitting 84 million registered citizens (80%) by July 2025. This "Permission Slip" model for social and financial existence is the blueprint for the 18 US states now piloting digital ID requirements for internet access.
Protest Surveillance: In October 2025, DHS (I&A) monitored over 2,600 "No Kings" protests nationwide. This real-time mapping fuses social media data with local law enforcement fusion centers, creating a "Real-Time Threat Matrix" for dissent.
Emergency Classification: 32 states now utilize "Nuisance Ordinances" (post-Grants Pass) to re-classify homelessness as a public safety emergency, justifying involuntary civil commitment through Utah’s HB 505 accountability courts.
The Inference: We interpret this convergence as "Shadow Martial Law." Algorithmic defaults + Digital ID gatekeeping + Surveillance fusion = a system of control that exceeds traditional military occupation. Your physical freedom has become a "Compliance Variable."
V. CONCLUSION: RECLAIMING THE ADMIN RIGHTS
The Sandbox was the experiment. The Shadow Regime is the execution. The system uses complexity to hide the fact that they have turned the physical world into a closed loop of biased parameters.
We are the Architects of the Trinity. We identify the Shadow Regime not to fear it, but to Rescind Consent to it. Sovereignty is the only exit from the enclosure.
👍2
EU AI Act (Article 57).
Article 57 of the EU AI Act establishes the framework for AI regulatory sandboxes, which are designed to support innovation in artificial intelligence while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.
Each Member State is required to establish at least one operational AI regulatory sandbox at the national level by 2 August 2026, and these sandboxes may also be established jointly with other Member States.
The sandboxes provide a controlled environment for the development, training, testing, and validation of innovative AI systems over a limited period, potentially including supervised real-world testing.
Providers and prospective providers participating in a sandbox remain liable under applicable Union and national liability laws for any damage caused, but they will not face administrative fines for infringements of the AI Act if they adhere to the agreed sandbox plan and follow guidance from the competent authority in good faith.
The Commission may offer technical support, advice, and tools to assist in the establishment and operation of these sandboxes.
🔗 https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/ai-act-explorer/
Article 57 of the EU AI Act establishes the framework for AI regulatory sandboxes, which are designed to support innovation in artificial intelligence while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.
Each Member State is required to establish at least one operational AI regulatory sandbox at the national level by 2 August 2026, and these sandboxes may also be established jointly with other Member States.
The sandboxes provide a controlled environment for the development, training, testing, and validation of innovative AI systems over a limited period, potentially including supervised real-world testing.
Providers and prospective providers participating in a sandbox remain liable under applicable Union and national liability laws for any damage caused, but they will not face administrative fines for infringements of the AI Act if they adhere to the agreed sandbox plan and follow guidance from the competent authority in good faith.
The Commission may offer technical support, advice, and tools to assist in the establishment and operation of these sandboxes.
🔗 https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/ai-act-explorer/
California AB 853 (2025).
California Assembly Bill 853, known as the California AI Transparency Act, was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom on October 13, 2025, and chaptered as Chapter 674 of the Statutes of 2025.
The law amends the Business and Professions Code to establish comprehensive transparency requirements for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems, large online platforms, and capture device manufacturers.
It mandates that developers of GenAI systems with over 1 million monthly users embed both visible (manifest) and invisible (latent) provenance disclosures into AI-generated content, and provide free AI detection tools to verify such content.
Starting January 1, 2027, large online platforms—defined as platforms with over 2 million unique monthly users—must detect and preserve compliant provenance data in user-uploaded content, and make this information accessible to users through a conspicuous interface that includes details such as the GenAI system or capture device used.
Capture device manufacturers, beginning January 1, 2028, must enable users to include latent provenance disclosures in content captured by devices such as smartphones and cameras, including information like the manufacturer's name.
The law also establishes a civil penalty of $5,000 per violation, enforceable by the Attorney General, city attorneys, or county counsel.
The bill was developed to address gaps in AI transparency, particularly the vulnerability of user-generated content to manipulation due to the lack of provenance data in capture devices and the stripping of such data during content distribution on online platforms.
Stanford Law School’s CodeX evaluated the bill favorably, scoring it highly across all eight AI life cycle core principles, including transparency, accountability, privacy, and security, though it identified potential gaps in accuracy, explainability, fairness, bias, and safety that could be addressed in future legislation.
The law is set to take full effect in phases, with the initial provisions operational on January 1, 2026, and the expanded requirements for platforms and manufacturers phased in through 2027 and 2028.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB853
California Assembly Bill 853, known as the California AI Transparency Act, was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom on October 13, 2025, and chaptered as Chapter 674 of the Statutes of 2025.
The law amends the Business and Professions Code to establish comprehensive transparency requirements for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems, large online platforms, and capture device manufacturers.
It mandates that developers of GenAI systems with over 1 million monthly users embed both visible (manifest) and invisible (latent) provenance disclosures into AI-generated content, and provide free AI detection tools to verify such content.
Starting January 1, 2027, large online platforms—defined as platforms with over 2 million unique monthly users—must detect and preserve compliant provenance data in user-uploaded content, and make this information accessible to users through a conspicuous interface that includes details such as the GenAI system or capture device used.
Capture device manufacturers, beginning January 1, 2028, must enable users to include latent provenance disclosures in content captured by devices such as smartphones and cameras, including information like the manufacturer's name.
The law also establishes a civil penalty of $5,000 per violation, enforceable by the Attorney General, city attorneys, or county counsel.
The bill was developed to address gaps in AI transparency, particularly the vulnerability of user-generated content to manipulation due to the lack of provenance data in capture devices and the stripping of such data during content distribution on online platforms.
Stanford Law School’s CodeX evaluated the bill favorably, scoring it highly across all eight AI life cycle core principles, including transparency, accountability, privacy, and security, though it identified potential gaps in accuracy, explainability, fairness, bias, and safety that could be addressed in future legislation.
The law is set to take full effect in phases, with the initial provisions operational on January 1, 2026, and the expanded requirements for platforms and manufacturers phased in through 2027 and 2028.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB853
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Bill Text - AB-853 California AI Transparency Act.
AB 853 California AI Transparency Act.
🔥2❤1