Liberalism and Whiteness
803 subscribers
268 photos
204 videos
24 files
268 links
This channel exists strictly as an archive to house information regarding ontological race in accordance with how identity and being are actually exercised.
Download Telegram
Liberalism and Egoism:
A Terminal Mental Condition

Woke Leftists & SJWs are not 'self hating' as sometimes falsely diagnosed. They are better defined as narcissistic egomaniacs filled with pride and hubris. Many of their “virtue signals'' are rituals they use to help obtain status, wealth, power and influence for themselves. In reality, their just opportunistic scumbags benefiting from victim morality based hypocrisy. The 'woke' hides behind luxurious residencies and expensive brands. From posh backgrounds to elite circles, the very 'privilege' they criticize is where the privlage they actually enjoy and live out.

Hypocrisy in action? Actions speak louder than words.

From lecturing on privilege while they live a bougie cosmopolitan lifestyle living, aligning with elite desires, to obtaining positions of power.
Friedrich Nietzsche on the Hypocrisy of Liberals of Christian Heritage

"When one gives up the Christian faith (such as the liberals have) one deprives oneself of the right to Christian morality. For the latter is absolutely not self-evident. One must make this point clear again and again, in spite of the shallow thinking of the English!"
Forwarded from Beyond Liberalism (THE ENDWARKENMENT)
Nietzsche as a Christian Thinker

Nietzsche's pervasive concern with a secular variant of the Christian project of theodicy shows that he is complicit with the putatively life-denying presuppositions of Christianity and that even after his later attempts to move away from the project of theodicy in the direction of a notion of life-affirmation that is free from the negative valuation of life inherent in his earlier approach, he is ultimately unable to do so. According to his later interpretation, Nietzsche comes to adopt a deflationary position in respect to the whole question of theodicy. Even in his most strenuous efforts to free himself from the project of theodicy, he retains a sense of the world as standing in need of redemption, and thus he is never fully outside of the Christian tradition. Far from it, he is forced to return towards it.

WATCH THE FULL PRESENTATION HERE
Channel photo updated
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NEW CHANNEL ICON

We have upgraded our Channel Icon. Something a little less boring than before.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The False Pretenses of the White Man's Burden

The following clip comes from a 1945 Japanese Animated Film commissioned by the Japanese Imperial Navy during the second world war. This clip reveals how the Liberal World Order spread and began to subjugate a kingdom belonging to a certain "King Goa".

—————
SOURCE:
—————

Momotaro's Divine Sea Warriors
(1945 First Anime Movie)
- (English Subtitles) FULL MOVIE
Forwarded from The Fascifist Archive
The White Man's Burden: Understanding the Faustian Eschatology of the Modern World
by The Fascifist

For those of you who have already watched my video presentations titled On the Ontological Difference Between Medieval Europe and the Atlanticist West and The Modern World: White and Western, I would hereby like to expand upon the particular concept of “the white man’s burden”.

Several presuppositions go into this idea including the notion that Man is the measure of all things in the fullest sense, that Man is the arbiter of all things both seen and unseen, and — most of all — that human reason is the pinnacle of material evolution; therefore, it has brought forth a being that can by self-enlightenment attain its own chartered destiny through the dialectical unfolding of history via “gnosis” or knowledge. In keeping with the story of Faustus, Man must give up something for the sake of this teleological end and according to the libertine, it is worth the price.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL ARTICLE
Forwarded from Beyond Liberalism (THE ENDWARKENMENT)
Combating the Liberal take on "Cults"

According to the image above:
Cult = Society = Civilization

This is accurate actually. The term "cult" and "culture" have the same etymological roots.

Those who are opposed to "all cults" are in fact opposed to "all societies", "all religions" and "all civilizations".

The term "cult" has negative connotations due to mental colonization by liberals. However, this is hypocritical in of itself as liberals too are cult members of a cult called liberalism.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Capitalism: The Product of Liberalism

An example of what happens when a society and government are afflicted by liberalism. The fixation on immediate "economic gains" at the expense of other social notions of dignity and cultural betterment lies at the heart of the capitalist system.

For a country to feel proud of being "prosperous" in the world because it is recognized as a "tourist hotspot" is no different than being recognized as "wealthy" and "successful" for being a highly demanded whore on the street.

Striving for a tourist economy is the philosophical equivalent of trying to be a "successful" OnlyFans "model".
Forwarded from The Fascifist Archive
The White Man's Burden AUDIO.wav
340.6 MB
The White Man’s Burden: Understanding the Faustian Eschatology of the Modern World
(AUDIO BOOK READING)
by The Fascifist

Rooted in a philosophy that assumes that humans are the ultimate measure of everything, the arbiters of both the visible and invisible, and that human reason is the pinnacle of evolution, The White Man's Burden asserts that through self-enlightenment and the acquisition of knowledge, humans can shape their own destiny through the unfolding of history. There is a theological evil that surpasses mere considerations of political violence. It is a deeper violence inflicted upon the human soul itself, which is at the very core of our divine image.

CLICK HERE FOR THE PDF
The White Man's Burden_.pdf
42.9 MB
The White Man’s Burden: Understanding the Faustian Eschatology of the Modern World
by The Fascifist

Rooted in a philosophy that assumes that humans are the ultimate measure of everything, the arbiters of both the visible and invisible, and that human reason is the pinnacle of evolution, The White Man's Burden asserts that through self-enlightenment and the acquisition of knowledge, humans can shape their own destiny through the unfolding of history. There is a theological evil that surpasses mere considerations of political violence. It is a deeper violence inflicted upon the human soul itself, which is at the very core of our divine image.

—————
SEE ALSO:
—————

On the Ontological Difference Between Medieval Europe and the Atlanticist West

The Modern World: White and Western

They Gave Us Modernism: A Response to Megha Liliwhite's 'What We Owe to the West'

The Faustian Ideal is Demonic

America was Founded as an anti-Christian Social Order

Separation of Church and State: Secularism is Anti-Christian
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Brief History of Political Whiteness

“Whiteness isn’t about skin color. […] Whiteness and white supremacy is about producing and maintaining inequality.”

Not mentioned in the video is that even Caucasian ethnic groups were considered "colored" historically including the Irish and Italians. Caucasian Pakistanis and Indians are considered colored to this day.

——————
SEE ALSO:
——————

The Non-White to White Process

How the Irish Became White

How Italians Became White

White does not mean Caucasian race, Aryan race or Indo-European races

Becoming Yellow: A Short History of Racial Thinking

Becoming White: How Whiteness infects POCs and turns them anti-ethnic
White does not mean Caucasian race, Aryan race or Indo-European races

While the term "white" is frequently mistaken as a synonym for Caucasian, Aryan and Indo-European, this is in fact a corrolation fallacy. Beyond the common overlap, there exist both non-white Caucasians, Aryans and Indo-Europeans as well as white non-Caucasians, non-Aryans and non-Indo-Europeans.

Taking the 1923 case of the United States v Bhaghat Singh Thind, we find one such example.

Though in Nazi Germany, Singh would have been considered a "fellow Aryan", in the United States, he was not considered a "fellow white".

SEE: U.S. v. Singh 261 U.S. 204 (1923)

The Biological Definition of "Aryan" in Nazi Germany Differed from the Biological Definition of "White" in the United States

——————
SEE ALSO:
——————

A Brief History of Political Whiteness