Addresses of Upcoming Marathons:

Ranchi
4th Floor, Vasundhra Megamart, Argoda Chowk, Opposite to Mahi Restaurant, Ranchi.
Timings: 11:00am-4:00pm

Patna
IMA Building. Dr. AKN Sinha Marg, Gandhi Mandan Road, Patna
Timings: 11:00am-4:00pm

Kolkata
NUJS Kolkata
Timings: 11:00am-4:00pm

Nagpur
The Gate Academy:
The 2nd Floor, Ojas Tower, Besides Batukbhai Jewellers, Dharampeth, Nagpur
Timings: 10:30am-2:00pm

Raipur
LegalEdge Raipur
Timings: 11:30am-3:00pm

Imp:
1. ONLY those who have registered themselves through the Marathon page on the LegalEdge website are allowed to attend the Marathon.
2. If you haven’t done it yet, you may register by end of day today.
3. Please take your seats 15 minutes before the Marathon starts.

Tune in at 7:45 pm today for a YouTube live session on '5 Mistakes to Avoid while preparing for CLAT 2.0' by Harsh Gagrani. 😊
Link: https://youtu.be/6PYH3MTDFq0

Find the LegaLE Answers & Explanations to the couple of tests that are inside it. 👍 Hope you got all of them correct.

The correct answer is (b). The discrepancy: lighteners, which are without cholesterol, raise the blood cholesterol levels of consumers higher than does the milk, which contains 2 milligrams of cholesterol. The key here is that lighteners contain more saturated fat than milk. So we’re looking for a choice that will explain the relationship between saturated fat and cholesterol, with regard to blood cholesterol levels. (B) does just that.

Reminder: See you here in 10 minutes 🙂

Question of the Day (Critical Reasoning)
People with serious financial problems are so worried about money that they cannot be happy. Their misery makes everyone close to them—family, friends, colleagues—unhappy as well. Only if their financial problems are solved can they and those around them be happy.

Which one of the following statements can be properly inferred from the passage?

(a) Only serious problems make people unhappy.
(b) People who solve their serious financial problems will be happy.
(c) People who do not have serious financial problems will be happy.
(d) If people are happy, they do not have serious financial problems.

The correct answer is (d). This is really a thinly veiled formal logic stimulus. The first sentence can be put into if-then form: If people have serious financial problems, then they can’t be happy.

And this, of course, is logically equivalent to its contrapositive: if people are happy, then they do not have serious financial problems.

LE News:

Team LegalEdge taught a lot of students for a lot of entrances beyond CLAT over the last many years but it wasn't published much as we wanted the brand name LegalEdge to be always connected with and revolve around Legal Education.

We taught kids who qualified for IPMs, NPATs, HSEE, AATs, DU JATs etc., and are studying in some prestigious colleges of the country.

But now, our new venture SuperGrads will officially take care of these entrances.

Our alumni is present in all colleges and the Telegram Channel
https://t.me/SuperGrads shall have their experiences of studying these courses under our upcoming section, Super Alumni. We will also be publishing Super Insights on Exams and Colleges discussed above.

We are gearing up for the BIG launch of our SG Office, Offline and Online Live Classrooms and Test Series with Video Analysis and Explanations of all such Exams on 15 March 2020.

Question of the Day (Critical Reasoning)
It is repeatedly claimed that the dumping of nuclear waste poses no threat to people living nearby. If this claim could be made with certainty, there would be no reason for not locating sites in areas of dense population. But the policy of dumping nuclear waste only in the more sparsely populated regions indicates, at the very least, some misgiving about safety on the part of those responsible for policy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument?

(a) Evaluation plans in the event of an accident could not be guaranteed to work perfectly except where the population is small.
(b) In the event of an accident, it is certain that fewer people would be harmed in a sparsely populated than in a densely populated area.
(c) Dumping of nuclear waste poses fewer economic and bureaucratic problems in sparsely populated than in densely populated areas.
(d) There are dangers associated with chemical waste, and it, too, is dumped away from areas of dense population.

The correct answer is (c). Because waste gets disposed of in less populated areas, those who are responsible for dumping are not as fearless about its effects as they claim. This assumes that there is no plausible alternate explanation for the disposal pattern. (c) weakens the argument by giving a reasonable alternative Explanation: Dumping nuclear waste in less populated areas poses fewer economic and bureaucratic problems than dumping in areas of denser population.