Netanyahu is considered by religious Zionists as the last PM of Israel.

Afterwards Mashiah should come (according to them).

So his presumable death means much more than just war casualty or the successful retaliation of Iranians.

The eschatological dimension is now essential.

https://x.com/AGDugin/status/2032713435213914364

✡️@JewTruthArchive

Must watch - Trump and the nuke plane.

🙏

https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/2030599171594760480

✡️ @JewTruthArchive

“Jesus fulfilled it all. There is a new covenant. Those that are in Christ, that is the new people of god. The church is the new Israel. The land is meaningless.” –Carrie Boller

https://x.com/Uncommonsince76/status/2032996387600634216

✡️@JewTruthArchive

Pakistan has joined Iraq, Iran, and Mexico in burning the child-trafficking demon Baal, with the ✡️Star of David on his forehead.

The crowd said it symbolized opposition to Israel and global Satanism.

https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/2033010015431201042

✡️ @JewTruthArchive

White House Unveils "Strait-Sourcing" Initiative: Why Patrol When You Can Outsource?

WASHINGTON D.C.
In a bold reimagining of American naval hegemony that has left defense analysts clutching their pearls and the Fifth Fleet checking their spam folders, the Trump administration reportedly announced a new strategy for the Strait of Hormuz: asking China to handle it. 🇨🇳

According to sources inside the Situation Room, the logic is impeccable, provided you view geopolitics through the lens of a timeshare presentation.

"Look, we have the best ships. Tremendous ships. But they're very expensive to run," the President allegedly reasoned, gesturing at a map of the Middle East as if it were a distressed property listing.

"China has ships too. They're over there anyway. Why don't we let them open the door? We'll stand in the back and look tough."

The plan, dubbed "Operation Bamboo Curtain-Raiser," marks a historic pivot in U.S. foreign policy.

For decades, the United States positioned itself as the global guarantor of free trade, patrolling critical chokepoints to ensure the flow of oil.

Under the new doctrine, the U.S. will instead act as a "consulting partner," allowing Beijing to manage the actual security while America retains the rights to tweet about it.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was seen struggling to explain the nuance to a room of bewildered correspondents.

"Think of it as a joint venture," Leavitt stated, dodging a paper airplane thrown by a retired Admiral in the press gallery.

"The United States provides the brand recognition, and China provides the destroyers. It's a win-win. Actually, it's a win-win-win.

China wins, we win, and the oil tankers get to pass. Nobody loses, except maybe the sailors who were planning to use the ocean."
.....

"Asking a strategic rival to police a critical energy artery you've protected for fifty years is like asking the wolf to guard the sheep because he has 'very sharp teeth and a great track record with digestion,'" said Dr. Evelyn Thorne, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

"It's not a strategy; it's a surrender letter written in Sharpie."

The administration, however, remains undeterred.

Reports suggest the President is already drafting the invoice he plans to send Beijing for "management oversight."

"We're going to bill them for the privilege," the President reportedly told the Joint Chiefs, who were busy updating their résumés.

"They open the Strait, we send the bill. If they don't pay, we tariff the oil. It's very simple."

Meanwhile, the Chinese Foreign Ministry responded with a statement that diplomats say translates roughly to: "Wait, seriously? You want us to do the job you've been doing since the Cold War? Okay... but we're charging tolls."

As the sun sets on American naval dominance, or perhaps just sets on a very confusing afternoon briefing, one thing is clear: The Strait of Hormuz is about to become the world's most awkward carpool lane.

Americans watching from home expressed mixed emotions, mostly settling on the sentiment captured by Ohio voter Gary Miller: "I voted for America First, not America Asks China First. This feels like we're subletting the superpower apartment."

At press time, the USS Gerald R. Ford was reportedly turning around to save gas, while a Chinese destroyer was seen idling at the entrance of the Strait, waiting for the access code to be Venmo'd.

https://x.com/IslanderWORLD/status/2033033528774926493

✡️@JewTruthArchive

US Ambassador Chas Freeman says Netanyahu cabinet makes the Nazis look humane.

He exposes how Israel has completely destroyed its global reputation while simultaneously dismantling American civil liberties and constitutional restraints from the inside.

https://x.com/FurkanGozukara/status/2032903904053059796

✡️@JewTruthArchive

Steve Witkoff, the special envoy to the Middle East who President Donald Trump tasked with negotiating a deal with Iran, does not sound very much like a diplomat lately.

“There’s almost no stopping them, they have an endless supply of [enriched uranium],” Witkoff told Sean Hannity the day the war began.

“They thought they could strong-arm us. ... It was very, very clear that it was — it was going to be impossible, probably by the second meeting.”

“They bragged about having 60% enriched fuel, enough for 11 bombs,” he told reporters seven days into the conflict.

“They told me and Jared, ‘We’re not going to give you diplomatically what you couldn’t take militarily.’ So you know, I think they’re gonna need a change of attitude.”

“In a year, if you had someone who didn't have the courage to do this action, you'd have 30 or 40 nuclear bombs,” he said in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday.

These are just some of the public statements that have sparked serious questions about Witkoff’s role in the outbreak of war.

Witkoff and his co-negotiator, Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, reportedly told the White House on the eve of the campaign that Iran was simply using talks to buy time — a conclusion that factored into Trump’s decision to greenlight the operation, according to at least three separate reports.

Trump himself publicly claimed that the pair had helped persuade him to go to war.

That decision came on the back of a months-long pressure campaign from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, one that was coordinated with pro-war Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), and urged on by a coterie of longtime influential hawks, like Hannity and Mark Levin.

Witkoff’s statements haven’t just raised eyebrows for their oddly bellicose nature.

Several experts and foreign officials have also taken issue with Witkoff and Kushner’s apparent ignorance of the technical issues involved.

Read More [HERE]

✡️@JewTruthArchive