Currently rehearsing each evening for the leading role of Oklahoma. Will be performing live August 19-September 5 on a farm in Roseland, VA. Don’t worry, the Project Veritas team is still moving mountains and will be releasing two Federal Government Insider stories next week…
CNN does doorstop of private Dr. saying “masks may not work” - copying Project Veritas methods, but they only do this to the non-powerful… https://twitter.com/escarry/status/1423086987620323331?s=21
Twitter
Eddie Scarry
CNN cornered a doctor when he was shirtless to confront him over why he said masks “may not work” and that vaccines “may be dangerous.” Appalling.
Notice how they love punching down. They do not blur the number of this business. Their friends in tech said it was ‘doxxing’ for us to do this with the VP of Facebook who was on tape talking about freezing comments for hate speech.
Cuomo targeted Project Veritas in 2014 with subpoena to produce every single document going back three years. The most venial aspect of the political targeting by Cuomo against Project Veritas was that he rescinded the subpoena after I went public about it on Lou Dobbs. That shows what it is: bullshit.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Andrew Cuomo targeted Project Veritas in 2014 with subpeona to produce every single document going back three years. The most venial aspect of the political targeting by Cuomo against Project Veritas was that he rescinded the subpoena after I went public about it on Lou Dobbs. The fact that Cuomo stood down after I went public was an indicator of political game playing using his executive authority.
63921_2020_Project_Veritas_v_Project_Veritas_DECISION_ORDER_ON_161.pdf
870.6 KB
NYT Motion for Stay DENIED: Project Veritas now allowed to depose the NYT!!!! HUGE!
Fresh off the press: The New York Supreme Court has sided with Project Veritas: Project Veritas will be permitted to depose The New York Times. And for the first time in history, you’ll be right there with us to witness it.
As you know, we sued the Times for claiming our Minnesota ballot harvesting video was “deceptive.” The New York Times attempted to dismiss the case and we won a historic victory when the New York Supreme Court denied the motion, ruling that the terms “deceptive” and “disinformation” apply to the New York Times’ reporters’ actions and claims. The Times appealed and then asked the Court to issue a stay that would effectively prohibit us from depositing the Times until the appeal is resolved - a process that could last up to three years.
The Court today issued a mic drop of an opinion: “Here, having failed to convince the Court that [Project Veritas’] case should be dismissed, [The New York Times] also failed to demonstrate the extraordinary justification required for the imposition of the drastic remedy of a stay pending appeal.” The Court noted that “despite the fact that [the New York Times has] been permitted to file anti-SLAPP motions to dismiss for decades, the [New York Times] here failed to cite any cases in which an unsuccessful moving was granted a stay pending appeal[.]”
Ladies and gentlemen: Let the depositions begin. Stay tuned. We’re about to drop the first New York Times deposition any day.
As you know, we sued the Times for claiming our Minnesota ballot harvesting video was “deceptive.” The New York Times attempted to dismiss the case and we won a historic victory when the New York Supreme Court denied the motion, ruling that the terms “deceptive” and “disinformation” apply to the New York Times’ reporters’ actions and claims. The Times appealed and then asked the Court to issue a stay that would effectively prohibit us from depositing the Times until the appeal is resolved - a process that could last up to three years.
The Court today issued a mic drop of an opinion: “Here, having failed to convince the Court that [Project Veritas’] case should be dismissed, [The New York Times] also failed to demonstrate the extraordinary justification required for the imposition of the drastic remedy of a stay pending appeal.” The Court noted that “despite the fact that [the New York Times has] been permitted to file anti-SLAPP motions to dismiss for decades, the [New York Times] here failed to cite any cases in which an unsuccessful moving was granted a stay pending appeal[.]”
Ladies and gentlemen: Let the depositions begin. Stay tuned. We’re about to drop the first New York Times deposition any day.
Columbia Journalism Professor Bill Grueskin. Thing is; I’ve been deposed many times. I’ve got nothing to hide. How many times have NYT reporters been deposed and those videotaped depositions released to the public? ZERO. They have everything to hide, but when you're under oath on camera, they’ll be forced to tell the damned truth.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Remember: the NYT admitted in the lawsuit “answer” to our defamation complaint, they got the facts wrong yet they refuse to correct. They also admitted they didn’t make calls for comment. The lack of journalism ethics and morals is astounding. They project all of this onto us. That’s why this case is so important.