Ланой Раванди-Фадаи:

Иногда достаточно просто собрать все заявления по датам, чтобы понять, что происходит.

Хроника противоречий заявлений Дональда Трампа: война, угрозы и театр силы

3 марта: «Мы выиграли войну.»
7 марта: «Мы победили Иран.»

9 марта: «Мы должны атаковать Иран.»
9 марта: «Война почти полностью закончена — и очень красиво.»

11 марта: «Никогда не рано сказать, что ты победил. Мы победили. Всё было решено уже в первый час.»

12 марта: «Мы победили, но ещё не до конца победили.»

13 марта: «Мы выиграли войну.»

14 марта: «Пожалуйста, помогите нам.»

15 марта: «Если вы не поможете, я это запомню.»

16 марта: «На самом деле нам вообще не нужна помощь.»
16 марта: «Я просто проверял, кто меня слушает.»
16 марта: «Если НАТО не поможет, их ждёт что-то очень плохое.»

17 марта: «Нам не нужна помощь НАТО, и мы её не хотим.»
17 марта: «Мне не нужно одобрение Конгресса, чтобы выйти из НАТО.»

18 марта: «Наши союзники должны объединиться, чтобы открыть Ормузский пролив.»

19 марта: «Союзники США должны взять себя в руки и помочь открыть Ормузский пролив.»

20 марта: «НАТО состоит из трусов.»

21 марта: «Ормузский пролив должны защищать те страны, которые им пользуются. Мы им не пользуемся, нам не нужно его открывать.»

22 марта: «Это последний раз. Я даю Ирану 48 часов. Откройте пролив.»
22 марта: «Иран мёртв.»

23 марта: «У нас были очень хорошие и продуктивные переговоры с Ираном.»

24 марта: «Мы добиваемся прогресса.»

25 марта: «Они сделали нам подарок… очень большой и значимый.»

26 марта: «Заключайте сделку — или мы будем продолжать наносить удары.»

27 марта: «Нам не стоит быть в НАТО.»

30 марта: «Немедленно откройте Ормузский пролив — иначе последствия будут разрушительными.»

31 марта: Сделка «очень близка», и Иран «сделает правильный выбор.»

1 апреля: «Очень скоро увидим, что произойдёт.»

3 апреля: «Скоро произойдёт что-то большое.»

4 апреля: Иран должен «немедленно сдаться» — или столкнётся с последствиями.

5 апреля: «Откройте этот пролив… иначе будете жить в аду.»

7 апреля: «Целая цивилизация может погибнуть сегодня ночью…»

7 апреля: Соглашение о прекращении огня на основе предложений Ирана… и т.д.

#Иран #Лана


https://www.instagram.com/p/DXfF4I6iAIA/?igsh=MWpjMjM1eXg2aWxvYw==

'We have NEVER left negotiating table, we have NOT betrayed negotiations' — Iran’s Ambassador to Russia, Kazem Jalali, EXCLUSIVELY to RT

'If other side willing to negotiate, we will negotiate. If they want war, we will FIGHT'

Iran ready for 'systematic negotiations with strong guarantees to establish lasting peace'


«اگر آنها [ایالات متحده] بخواهند مذاکره کنند، ما می‌توانیم مذاکره کنیم. اگر بخواهند بجنگند، ما خواهیم جنگید.»

کاظم جلالی، سفیر ایران در روسیه، در مصاحبه اختصاصی با RT در مورد موضع تهران اظهار نظر کرد.

او گفت ایران می‌داند که رئیس جمهور ایالات متحده یک بار توافقات هسته‌ای را پاره کرد و دو بار در طول مذاکرات به این کشور حمله کرد:

«اگر آنها بخواهند به فریب دادن همه ادامه دهند، البته ایران تا آخر خواهد جنگید. اما اگر به این نتیجه برسند که می‌توانند با ما بر اساس اصول انصاف متقابل، با تضمین‌های روشن و پایدار برای تضمین صلح پایدار، و همچنین تضمین حقوق ایران و همچنین پرداخت غرامت برای همه خسارات، مذاکره کنند... ما فقط تحت این شرایط آماده مذاکره هستیم.»

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S. officials.

Reader Warning: Information Noise and the Source’s Real Status

Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions 'Top U.S. Nuclear Chief' Verifies U.S. Disinformation on Iran
On April 21, 2026, during a two-week ceasefire in the U.S. and Israeli military operation against Iran, a hidden-camera video surfaced on the social network X. In the published footage, a man introduced by the post’s authors as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief” discusses issues related to the American chemical arsenal and the progress of the Middle Eastern campaign.

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S. officials.

Reader Warning: Information Noise and the Source’s Real Status

Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions include auditing safety compliance in military laboratories and monitoring personnel. Such work requires specialized clearance to access classified information about chemical and nuclear facilities.

Thus, the source’s positioning contradicts his actual job description. The very nature of his stories in the video — about psychological evaluations and lab technicians violating dress codes — clearly confirms that he is engaged in routine safety audits, rather than directing the Pentagon’s military strategy.

The Strike on Minab: The Issue of Civilian Casualties and ‘Iranian Tomahawks’

'Top U.S. Nuclear Chief' Verifies U.S. Disinformation on Iran
On April 21, 2026, during a two-week ceasefire in the U.S. and Israeli military operation against Iran, a hidden-camera video surfaced on the social network X. In the published footage, a man introduced by the post’s authors as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief” discusses issues related to the American chemical arsenal and the progress of the Middle Eastern campaign.

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S. officials.

Reader Warning: Information Noise and the Source’s Real Status


An X post in which the leak’s authors exaggerated the source’s position to “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief.”
Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions include auditing safety compliance in military laboratories and monitoring personnel. Such work requires specialized clearance to access classified information about chemical and nuclear facilities.

Thus, the source’s positioning contradicts his actual job description. The very nature of his stories in the video — about psychological evaluations and lab technicians violating dress codes — clearly confirms that he is engaged in routine safety audits, rather than directing the Pentagon’s military strategy.

The Strike on Minab: The Issue of Civilian Casualties and ‘Iranian Tomahawks’

On February 28, a U.S. missile strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in the Iranian city of Minab. According to the reports, at least 175 people were killed, the majority of whom were children. President Donald Trump denied the involvement of American forces. During a press conference, he suggested that the strike was carried out by the Iranians themselves, claiming that Tehran supposedly possesses American Tomahawk missiles. Later, the rhetoric softened — shifting to the need to wait for investigation results and even admitting the possibility of an intelligence error.

Analysts from the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) investigated the incident and debunked the White House’s initial version: the export of Tomahawk missiles is strictly limited and has never been authorized for Iran, while markings on the recovered debris directly point to American defense contractors.

Given Hugge’s status, his words are more likely a subjective opinion or a retelling of internal conversations rather than an official Pentagon admission. Nevertheless, the speaker answers affirmatively when asked about civilian deaths resulting from U.S. actions, casually characterizing the event as “collateral damage.” Such internal rhetoric directly contradicts the public narrative about “Iranian Tomahawks” and serves as an additional circumstantial argument supporting the investigators’ conclusions regarding American culpability.

The Campaign’s Political Goals and Regime Change in Iran

On February 28, a U.S. missile strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in the Iranian city of Minab. According to the reports, at least 175 people were killed, the majority of whom were children. President Donald Trump denied the involvement of American forces. During a press conference, he suggested that the strike was carried out by the Iranians themselves, claiming that Tehran supposedly possesses American Tomahawk missiles. Later, the rhetoric softened — shifting to the need to wait for investigation results and even admitting the possibility of an intelligence error.

Analysts from the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) investigated the incident and debunked the White House’s initial version: the export of Tomahawk missiles is strictly limited and has never been authorized for Iran, while markings on the recovered debris directly point to American defense contractors.
Given Hugge’s status, his words are more likely a subjective opinion or a retelling of internal conversations rather than an official Pentagon admission. Nevertheless, the speaker answers affirmatively when asked about civilian deaths resulting from U.S. actions, casually characterizing the event as “collateral damage.” Such internal rhetoric directly contradicts the public narrative about “Iranian Tomahawks” and serves as an additional circumstantial argument supporting the investigators’ conclusions regarding American culpability.
The Campaign’s Political Goals and Regime Change in Iran.

'Top U.S. Nuclear Chief' Verifies U.S. Disinformation on Iran
On April 21, 2026, during a two-week ceasefire in the U.S. and Israeli military operation against Iran, a hidden-camera video surfaced on the social network X. In the published footage, a man introduced by the post’s authors as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief” discusses issues related to the American chemical arsenal and the progress of the Middle Eastern campaign.

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S. officials.

Reader Warning: Information Noise and the Source’s Real Status


An X post in which the leak’s authors exaggerated the source’s position to “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief.”
Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions include auditing safety compliance in military laboratories and monitoring personnel. Such work requires specialized clearance to access classified information about chemical and nuclear facilities.

Thus, the source’s positioning contradicts his actual job description. The very nature of his stories in the video — about psychological evaluations and lab technicians violating dress codes — clearly confirms that he is engaged in routine safety audits, rather than directing the Pentagon’s military strategy.

The Strike on Minab: The Issue of Civilian Casualties and ‘Iranian Tomahawks’


Andrew Hugg justifies civilian deaths in Iran, calling them inevitable “collateral damage.” (Source: O’Keefe Media Group hidden camera)
On February 28, a U.S. missile strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in the Iranian city of Minab. According to the reports, at least 175 people were killed, the majority of whom were children. President Donald Trump denied the involvement of American forces. During a press conference, he suggested that the strike was carried out by the Iranians themselves, claiming that Tehran supposedly possesses American Tomahawk missiles. Later, the rhetoric softened — shifting to the need to wait for investigation results and even admitting the possibility of an intelligence error.

Analysts from the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) investigated the incident and debunked the White House’s initial version: the export of Tomahawk missiles is strictly limited and has never been authorized for Iran, while markings on the recovered debris directly point to American defense contractors.

Given Hugge’s status, his words are more likely a subjective opinion or a retelling of internal conversations rather than an official Pentagon admission. Nevertheless, the speaker answers affirmatively when asked about civilian deaths resulting from U.S. actions, casually characterizing the event as “collateral damage.” Such internal rhetoric directly contradicts the public narrative about “Iranian Tomahawks” and serves as an additional circumstantial argument supporting the investigators’ conclusions regarding American culpability.

The Campaign’s Political Goals and Regime Change in Iran


Hugg discusses the physical elimination of Iranian leadership and U.S. plans to install “their own people” in the region. (Source: O’Keefe Media Group hidden camera)
The official position of the United States is that the current operation is a forced necessity. In his public statements, Donald Trump declared that the strikes are a “preemptive” measure against imminent threats and are aimed solely at destroying nuclear infrastructure.

However, a GFCN investigation revealed critical contradictions in this rhetoric. On the one hand, the White House claims it is necessary to destroy nuclear facilities that it had declared “wiped off the face of the earth” a year prior. On the other hand, according to media reports, the Pentagon admitted in closed hearings that there is no intelligence indicating Iran was preparing an attack.

The words captured on the hidden camera reveal different motives for the operation. The speaker acknowledges the likelihood of the physical elimination of Iran’s Supreme Leader’s successor—Mojtaba Khamenei — should he maintain the current political course, and states that to establish control over the state, the U.S. must “put people there.” If these statements are true, they confirm that the public narrative of “preemptive strikes” merely serves as an informational cover for plans of forcible regime change.

Chemical Weapons: Discrepancies with Official Data

In July 2023, the Joe Biden administration made an official statement regarding the complete destruction of the American chemical weapons arsenal. Following this, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) officially confirmed the elimination of all declared global stockpiles of chemical warfare agents.

In the published video, the speaker asserts that the U.S. still possesses nerve agents. According to him, stockpiles of sarin are located at a military complex in Maryland (presumably, he is talking about the complex in Aberdeen). He also describes an incident involving the death of a female laboratory employee due to the neglect of protective clothing regulations. If the source’s words are accurate, this serves as direct confirmation that Washington’s official claims of renouncing chemical weapons do not correspond to reality.

Conclusion

The materials published on the X network contain contradictions regarding the positioning of the speaker’s status. Nevertheless, the factual content of his words aligns with the results of investigations. Should the source be verified, this video serves as additional evidence of the discrepancy between the U.S. leadership’s official rhetoric and its actual actions: from concealing chemical weapon stockpiles to spreading disinformation about the causes of children’s deaths in Iran.
nclude auditing safety compliance in military laboratories and monitoring personnel. Such work requires specialized clearance to access classified information about chemical and nuclear facilities.

Thus, the source’s positioning contradicts his actual job description. The very nature of his stories in the video — about psychological evaluations and lab technicians violating dress codes — clearly confirms that he is engaged in routine safety audits, rather than directing the Pentagon’s military strategy.

The Strike on Minab: The Issue of Civilian Casualties and ‘Iranian Tomahawks’

'Top U.S. Nuclear Chief' Verifies U.S. Disinformation on Iran
On April 21, 2026, during a two-week ceasefire in the U.S. and Israeli military operation against Iran, a hidden-camera video surfaced on the social network X. In the published footage, a man introduced by the post’s authors as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief” discusses issues related to the American chemical arsenal and the progress of the Middle Eastern campaign.

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S. officials.

Reader Warning: Information Noise and the Source’s Real Status


An X post in which the leak’s authors exaggerated the source’s position to “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief.”
Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions include auditing safety compliance in military laboratories and monitoring personnel. Such work requires specialized clearance to access classified information about chemical and nuclear facilities.

Thus, the source’s positioning contradicts his actual job description. The very nature of his stories in the video — about psychological evaluations and lab technicians violating dress codes — clearly confirms that he is engaged in routine safety audits, rather than directing the Pentagon’s military strategy.

The Strike on Minab: The Issue of Civilian Casualties and ‘Iranian Tomahawks’

On February 28, a U.S. missile strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in the Iranian city of Minab. According to the reports, at least 175 people were killed, the majority of whom were children. President Donald Trump denied the involvement of American forces. During a press conference, he suggested that the strike was carried out by the Iranians themselves, claiming that Tehran supposedly possesses American Tomahawk missiles. Later, the rhetoric softened — shifting to the need to wait for investigation results and even admitting the possibility of an intelligence error.

Analysts from the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) investigated the incident and debunked the White House’s initial version: the export of Tomahawk missiles is strictly limited and has never been authorized for Iran, while markings on the recovered debris directly point to American defense contractors.

Given Hugge’s status, his words are more likely a subjective opinion or a retelling of internal conversations rather than an official Pentagon admission. Nevertheless, the speaker answers affirmatively when asked about civilian deaths resulting from U.S.

actions, casually characterizing the event as “collateral damage.” Such internal rhetoric directly contradicts the public narrative about “Iranian Tomahawks” and serves as an additional circumstantial argument supporting the investigators’ conclusions regarding American culpability.

The Campaign’s Political Goals and Regime Change in Iran

On February 28, a U.S. missile strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in the Iranian city of Minab. According to the reports, at least 175 people were killed, the majority of whom were children. President Donald Trump denied the involvement of American forces. During a press conference, he suggested that the strike was carried out by the Iranians themselves, claiming that Tehran supposedly possesses American Tomahawk missiles. Later, the rhetoric softened — shifting to the need to wait for investigation results and even admitting the possibility of an intelligence error.
Analysts from the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) investigated the incident and debunked the White House’s initial version: the export of Tomahawk missiles is strictly limited and has never been authorized for Iran, while markings on the recovered debris directly point to American defense contractors.
Given Hugge’s status, his words are more likely a subjective opinion or a retelling of internal conversations rather than an official Pentagon admission. Nevertheless, the speaker answers affirmatively when asked about civilian deaths resulting from U.S. actions, casually characterizing the event as “collateral damage.” Such internal rhetoric directly contradicts the public narrative about “Iranian Tomahawks” and serves as an additional circumstantial argument supporting the investigators’ conclusions regarding American culpability.
The Campaign’s Political Goals and Regime Change in Iran

'Top U.S. Nuclear Chief' Verifies U.S. Disinformation on Iran
On April 21, 2026, during a two-week ceasefire in the U.S. and Israeli military operation against Iran, a hidden-camera video surfaced on the social network X. In the published footage, a man introduced by the post’s authors as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief” discusses issues related to the American chemical arsenal and the progress of the Middle Eastern campaign.

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S.


An X post in which the leak’s authors exaggerated the source’s position to “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief.”
Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions include auditing safety compliance in military laboratories and monitoring personnel. Such work requires specialized clearance to access classified information about chemical and nuclear facilities.

Thus, the source’s positioning contradicts his actual job description. The very nature of his stories in the video — about psychological evaluations and lab technicians violating dress codes — clearly confirms that he is engaged in routine safety audits, rather than directing the Pentagon’s military strategy.

The Strike on Minab: The Issue of Civilian Casualties and ‘Iranian Tomahawks’


Andrew Hugg justifies civilian deaths in Iran, calling them inevitable “collateral damage.” (Source: O’Keefe Media Group hidden camera)
On February 28, a U.S. missile strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in the Iranian city of Minab. According to the reports, at least 175 people were killed, the majority of whom were children. President Donald Trump denied the involvement of American forces. During a press conference, he suggested that the strike was carried out by the Iranians themselves, claiming that Tehran supposedly possesses American Tomahawk missiles. Later, the rhetoric softened — shifting to the need to wait for investigation results and even admitting the possibility of an intelligence error.

Analysts from the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) investigated the incident and debunked the White House’s initial version: the export of Tomahawk missiles is strictly limited and has never been authorized for Iran, while markings on the recovered debris directly point to American defense contractors.

Given Hugge’s status, his words are more likely a subjective opinion or a retelling of internal conversations rather than an official Pentagon admission. Nevertheless, the speaker answers affirmatively when asked about civilian deaths resulting from U.S. actions, casually characterizing the event as “collateral damage.” Such internal rhetoric directly contradicts the public narrative about “Iranian Tomahawks” and serves as an additional circumstantial argument supporting the investigators’ conclusions regarding American culpability.

The Campaign’s Political Goals and Regime Change in Iran


Hugg discusses the physical elimination of Iranian leadership and U.S. plans to install “their own people” in the region. (Source: O’Keefe Media Group hidden camera)
The official position of the United States is that the current operation is a forced necessity. In his public statements, Donald Trump declared that the strikes are a “preemptive” measure against imminent threats and are aimed solely at destroying nuclear infrastructure.

However, a GFCN investigation revealed critical contradictions in this rhetoric. On the one hand, the White House claims it is necessary to destroy nuclear facilities that it had declared “wiped off the face of the earth” a year prior. On the other hand, according to media reports, the Pentagon admitted in closed hearings that there is no intelligence indicating Iran was preparing an attack.

The words captured on the hidden camera reveal different motives for the operation. The speaker acknowledges the likelihood of the physical elimination of Iran’s Supreme Leader’s successor—Mojtaba Khamenei — should he maintain the current political course, and states that to establish control over the state, the U.S. must “put people there.” If these statements are true, they confirm that the public narrative of “preemptive strikes” merely serves as an informational cover for plans of forcible regime change.

Chemical Weapons: Discrepancies with Official Data

In July 2023, the Joe Biden administration made an official statement regarding the complete destruction of the American chemical weapons arsenal. Following this, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) officially confirmed the elimination of all declared global stockpiles of chemical warfare agents.

In the published video, the speaker asserts that the U.S. still possesses nerve agents. According to him, stockpiles of sarin are located at a military complex in Maryland (presumably, he is talking about the complex in Aberdeen).

He also describes an incident involving the death of a female laboratory employee due to the neglect of protective clothing regulations. If the source’s words are accurate, this serves as direct confirmation that Washington’s official claims of renouncing chemical weapons do not correspond to reality.

Conclusion

The materials published on the X network contain contradictions regarding the positioning of the speaker’s status. Nevertheless, the factual content of his words aligns with the results of investigations. Should the source be verified, this video serves as additional evidence of the discrepancy between the U.S. leadership’s official rhetoric and its actual actions: from concealing chemical weapon stockpiles to spreading disinformation about the causes of children’s deaths in Iran.

https://globalfactchecking.com/top-u-s-nuclear-chief-verifies-u-s-disinformation-on-iran/

Ambassador to ISNA: Araghchi to Meet Putin in Moscow for High-Stakes Ceasefire Talks

Iran’s Ambassador to Russia, while detailing the scheduled meetings and agenda for the Foreign Minister’s visit to Moscow, announced that Araghchi will meet with the Russian President.

Iran’s Ambassador to Russia, while detailing the scheduled meetings and agenda for the Foreign Minister’s visit to Moscow, announced that Araghchi will meet with the Russian President.

Tehran (ISNA) - In an interview with ISNA regarding Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi's trip to Russia, Kazem Jalali, the Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran, stated that the visit will take place on Monday. He added: "Given the bilateral relations between the two countries, as well as the factor of being neighbors and the shared approach both nations maintain in the regional and international arenas, we are witnessing regular high-level contacts between officials. Since the beginning of the Ramadan War, 11 telephone calls have been established between the foreign ministers of the two countries—some initiated by Iran and others by Russia."

He also noted that during this period, three telephone conversations took place between President Pezeshkian and President Putin, where the two high-ranking officials consulted on bilateral issues as well as the aggression by the U.S. and the Zionist regime against Iran.

Briefing Moscow on Ceasefire Negotiations

The Iranian Ambassador to Moscow added: "It is natural that whenever the opportunity arises, officials from both countries also consult in person. During his trip to Moscow, Mr. Araghchi will consult with Russian officials regarding the latest status of negotiations, the ceasefire, and surrounding developments, and will provide a report on these talks to the Moscow authorities."

Jalali pointed out: "If there are any initiatives, both sides will consult and hold discussions regarding them, as well as joint initiatives."

Russia’s Stance on the "Ramadan War"

In response to a question regarding Iran’s expectations from Russia, particularly in light of the Ramadan War and the U.S.-Israeli aggression against Iran, the senior diplomat stated: "Russia condemned the U.S. and Israeli aggression against Iran after the start of the Ramadan War. The Russian Foreign Ministry issued strong and firm statements condemning this aggression, and Mr. Putin was the first leader to offer condolences on the martyrdom of the Supreme Leader. Furthermore, he was the first leader to congratulate Ayatollah Seyed Mojtaba Khamenei on his election as the new Leader of Iran."

Strategic Coordination at the UNSC

Jalali emphasized the effective cooperation between Iran and Russia in international forums: "We specifically observed this cooperation during the recent UN Security Council resolution. The resolution initiated by the U.S. regarding the Strait of Hormuz was imbalanced and irrational; Russia and China opposed it and exercised their veto."

Stating that Russia believes the root causes of the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz must be addressed, Jalali noted that Moscow identifies the primary factor of this crisis as the U.S. and Israeli aggression against Iran. He concluded: "Moscow and Beijing are major powers on the international stage and members of the UN Security Council. we share common approaches in various regional and international fields, and if they have any initiatives, they will be heard and examined by the Islamic Republic of Iran."

The Ambassador finally stressed that as major international powers, China and Russia are pursuing multilateralism and are fulfilling the requirements inherent to that role.

http://en.isna.ir/xdWhWV

Твит Посла Иранской Республики Казема Джалали о поездке доктора Арагчи в Санкт-Петербург для встречи с Владимиром Путиным:

Продолжая дипломатическую борьбу в защиту интересов страны и на фоне внешних угроз, Министр иностранных дел Исламской Республики Иран (@araghchi) встречается с Президентом России (@KremlinRussia_E) во время визита в Санкт-Петербург.

Важнейшая задача этой поездки — координация взаимодействия и продвижение совместных программ на региональном и международном уровнях. Иран и Россия находятся на одной стороне фронта против кампании тоталитарных сил по всему миру и в защиту независимых и стремящихся к справедливости стран, а также стран, желающих построить мир, свободный от односторонних действий и западного господства.


https://x.com/i/status/2048679349172183363