Mark Davis shared a link.
8m ·
OK folks, it is time for another update, and this one is a doosie, so I’ll start from the beginning.
For several weeks now I have been interviewing with Mollie Hemmingway at The Federalist for her upcoming book on the 2020 elections, and she has been planning to go into detail about the residency issues I’ve raised.
Recently The Federalist was contacted by our Secretary of State’s office to arrange an interview with Secretary Raffensperger to talk about the DOJ lawsuit against Georgia over our new voting laws in light of the recent Supreme Court decision in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee. The reporter assigned to do the story is Margot Cleveland, who is also a seasoned attorney and adjunct law professor. Since she had the opportunity to interview Brad, she decided to end that interview by asking about their open investigation into votes cast in the November General Election with residency issues.
I told her when she starts asking about that they wound most likely respond in one of three ways:
1. They might try to discredit me or my analysis. I told her if they do that, she should remind them they tried to hire me as a contractor less than a year ago to do their statewide investigation into the double voting issue I discovered last year down in Long County. I wound up not doing that analysis because they wanted me to sign an NDA that would have prevented me from even discussing it. I really wanted to do it, and was willing to do it for free, but I will not be muzzled.
The other problem with that strategy is I always have the option of giving a copy of the data to a county district attorney who cares about election integrity so they can investigate unlawful votes cast in their county. So option #1 would be a generally bad idea.
2. They could just admit the problem exists, which they’ve actually already done without citing any numbers, and then try to blame the counties for it. The main problem with that approach is if a county is presented with a driver’s license that still has the voter’s old address on it, they have no way that I am aware of to detect that.
The other problem is that answer could also vindicate President Trump’s position on that now infamous Trump/Raffensperger phone call, in which President Trump and his Georgia attorney Kurt Hilbert demanded an investigation into these very issues. They literally wanted Raffensperger to investigate this same database of voters, which they had a copy of because these issues were part of President Trump’s Georgia lawsuit.
3. They could claim they can’t comment on an ongoing investigation, and then try to just run out the clock past the 2022 election. Frankly this was what I really expected them to do, and they probably could have gotten away with it. They’re just now clearing much smaller investigations from 2016 & 2018.
When the interview happened, Brad seemed to know little to nothing about the investigation, so the staff jumped in to respond. Surprisingly it would seem they chose option #1, and attempted to claim my analysis contains “False positives” because they have access to social security numbers and full dates of birth, and I do not.
First of all, social security numbers and full dates of birth are not used in National Change of Address (NCOA) processing, even when the SOS has it done. A hashed version of that information is used by ERIC (https://ericstates.org/) to compare the data from member states like Georgia with other states to identify people registered in more than one state, but NCOA itself is a different process and the USPS does not use that data to identify changes of address. I know this because I have a license which permits me to run NCOA on up to 100 million records per year, and I actually use up a pretty sizable chunk of that.
Second, I have said from the very beginning that some percentage of these records might be students who went away to college, or enlisted people away on a tour of duty, etc., but the majority of the nearly 35,000 records are not going to be temporary

Imagine my surprise....." Yet during my interview last week with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, he seemed unfamiliar with this most recent evidence of illegal voting......When asked for the status of Watson’s investigation and other details, while both were receptive to questions, neither Jones nor Fuchs could provide definitive answers. While on Friday Fuchs promised to give Watson permission to speak with me, and while both the deputy secretary of state and the press secretary promised to arrange an interview with Watson and to track down answers to several questions, to date, no further information has been provided and no interview has been arranged, notwithstanding several follow-up communications. Hopefully, that is because Watson is busy investigating the strong evidence of illegal voting and not because the Secretary of State’s Office is attempting to bury the story — and the fact that Trump might have been right after all — until after Raffensperger fights off a primary challenge." Margot Cleveland's Article based upon the above: https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/09/new-evidence-indicates-enough-illegal-votes-in-georgia-to-tip-2020-results/

Getting ready to drop payload on CALIFORNIA, for everyone who has been waiting.

Shasta, Kern, and Placer folks, man your battle stations.

Trump appears to have really blown it away with independents and old Dems, likely Hispanic working class, who didn't change party affiliation. In some places with D+ advantage, and even in a few spots with a D+ trend, strong enough to override those.

Now, where did all those extra votes come from?

The American West Coast and Your Vote

An Illustration

Red - Rampant Illegality
Yellow - Likely/Moderate Illegality
Green - Clean

Yeah. Don't think this will go over well with the Mama Bears out there.

https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1413523481594040322?s=20

State Police Assisting in Hunt for Individuals Making 'False Claims' About 2020 Election

READ: http://w-j.co/s/22514

Take a wild guess who those increased taxes on oil companies will be passed along to.

Biden Responds to Skyrocketing Gas Prices By Vowing to Raise Taxes on Oil Companies

READ: http://w-j.co/s/5781c

Via Dr. Frank @FollowTheData

“Shockwave”

On August 10-12, Mr Lindell is publicly releasing 34 Tb of PCAPs for over 3,000 counties in the US. Cyber experts from around the globe will be converging in Sioux Falls, SD to help translate them into useful information for the general public.

It is going to cause a shockwave across the country.

Essentially, PCAPs are recordings of chunks of internet traffic. Each PCAP contains immutable routing and timestamp information in addition to the content (data, code, and information).

Counties are typically divided up into dozens of precincts. The PCAPs were recorded before, during, and after the November 2020 election by white-hat hackers, and they were delivered to Mr Lindell on January 9th.

You don’t even necessarily need to understand what the information is... the fact that someone was successfully communicating with the election machines during the election is in itself alarming... and illegal…

“Why the delay?”

People are asking why Mr Lindell doesn’t just release the 34 Tb of PCAPs to the public immediately.

There are lots of good reasons. Here are some.

1) Only people with proper skills and training will know how to interpret the PCAPs. The information is volatile, so we want to make sure the job is done right.

2) There is a lot of collaboration and coordination that will be required, learning together, tabulating results, etc.

3) We are establishing quality controls and cross-checking strategies so that we can be confident that the final results are accurate.

4) We are predistributing samples to symposium registrants to qualify them for participation.

5) There are many logistical and security issues to consider. Lots of planning has been taking place, including identification of a suitable venue and reservation of a thousand hotel rooms.

6) There are several legal and chain of custody issues that are in play.

7) As the data are emerging, we may learn things that require careful treatment.

I have also been anxious to release these data sooner rather than later. But I see the wisdom in doing the release carefully and systematically. An immense amount of legal work and planning has gone into this over several months. I respect the people involved, and every time I ask these sorts of questions of them, their answers make sense and reveal the product of a great deal of careful thought and planning.

I know, it is tough to be patient. I’ve been privy to a few of the details along the way, and I have shared them as I am able. For example, the number of counties has recently increased to over 3,000. Based upon what I’ve already seen, we know that EVERY state has been hacked and tracked.

There are people already working on them, and some of that work has already been featured in the documovies “Absolute Proof,” “Absolute Interference,” and “Absolutely 9-0.”

ICYMI Watch 📺🔗 Absolutely 9-0
—

He is right.

The New VAERS Numbers Are Out Today:

438,440 Adverse Events
26,818 Hospitalizations
7,463 Disabled
3,324 Heart Attacks
2,200 Myocarditis Reactions
985 Miscarriages
9048 Deaths

100% safe and effective.

@KanekoaTheGreat

Moms Threatened With Lawsuit For Questioning Radical Leftist Indoctrination Of Their Kids

READ: https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/09/moms-threatened-with-lawsuit-for-questioning-radical-leftist-indoctrination-of-their-kids/ • @FDRLSTT

This is an outstanding platform for collaboration, research, and the sharing of free speech and ideas. I have many new followers, so it is good practice to re-state important points, and it is obvious watching some of the social media sentiment going around that reminders are needed. This may break into two parts, so look for a long post.

1) ARIZONA - many of the audits we wish to see happen are watching to see what comes out of Arizona. I know a lot of people are frustrated that there is no news, throwing a fit that no money is going to be donated until we get some updates. Please understand that there is a very big world outside of "America First" social media. A solid half of the country believes the election was decided thanks to cheating. About 30% of it not only would never believe it even if admitted, but would celebrate it as necessary. We are competing for the support of about 20% of the population, your "turn the other cheek" pastor or neighbor and your tax cut Republican who doesn't like to fight.

Imagine the audit team coming out with any sense that the audit is biased, and how that will sell nationally. Those who want information RIGHT NOW are requesting the integrity of the audit to be breached, and to also give an update to the opposition as to how to respond and cover up any information. This is why I tell people not to buy into everything you hear about the audit, because undoubtedly nefarious people are planting fake news bombs to give the impression of disorganization and utter catastrophe. I suggest that you prayerfully donate money to this audit, because it likely will reveal the "push" other states need to find their courage.

2) NEGATIVITY - There is a difference between being a realist and being negative. I have a character flaw of "reading comments." While nearly all comments are constructive or positive on this platform, I saw a page with some very angry folks the other day discussing my post about a red state doing an audit. I was accused of being a "Tick Tocker" and a tease. This should not take an explanation, but:
-There is a red state that was won solidly by Trump (not stolen) that is planning to audit at least one county showing major signs of electoral misconduct. Now, why won't I say which one it is? Can you imagine how fast the MSM would swoop in to doxx, harass, intimidate, and threaten the legislators putting that plan into motion? Think I'm joking? Here in Texas, there are a lot of high up the chain folks scratching heads about the numbers our teams are cranking out, but afraid of how the media would react, since after all, Trump won the state by 600k+. Well, we used to win it by over a million. Texas will be lost in 2028 if this is not corrected, so yes, there is some strategy here.
-There is also a purple county in a very blue state that is now woke to the data disparities, with major Dem gains that don't make sense. They are investigating conducting a full forensic audit - in an extremely blue state. Did the 101st tell the Nazi troops on Normandy when they were coming in? Or do we want some sort of stealth? If I tell you what county, the local perps will do everything they can to cover tracks.
-Now you may say, "if you want stealth," why are you telling it to everyone on hear? I'm telling you this because we have far too many people on the verge of throwing up hands and giving up. It is essential to know that every day citizens and people who are upholding oaths in elected office are actually moving toward addressing this problem.

3) GET INVOLVED - All 50 states have audit channels now. If you want to post "but nothing will be done about it" or "this is all a waste of time," then I encourage you to join one of those groups and get moving. Watching the Washington audit team is an inspiration. They are taking the 30,000' flyover data and applying local knowledge like Stonewall in the Shenandoah Valley like you'd never believe. This is what will spark a revelation of the truth.