If this was Donald Trump Jr. it would get wall to wall coverage from every news outlet in the country for weeks.

But its the smartest guy Joe Biden knows so the propagandists activist media won't even mention it.

Subscribe: @KanekoaTheGreat

👆🏼worth the read and share

The latest from one of my heroes, Ben Garrison: "The Joy of Money Laundering.. Err.. Painting With Hunter Biden"

Dear (your state here) Senators:

In the minds of ( ), you have only one job between now and the next time your name is on the ballot—and that is to fix our broken election system.
If you succeed, you won't need to bother fund-raising. We'll gladly re-elect you.
If you fail, all the donations in the world won't help you get re-elected.
You have a choice:
Adjourn, go home, and raise money for your next election...
Or stay in session and fix the problem you created.
Choose wisely.

~ An (your state) voter.

Leaked Emails from Powerful Dem Insider Show Growing Rift Within the Party: Report

READ: http://w-j.co/s/0630a

Hi, Brian. General McInerney has stated that this is not his account. He has tried to have it removed. He is not on Telegram. Here is CJ's link about it for more info:

https://t.me/cjtruth316/5031

Suzi Voyles was on the Frederick's show this morning.

She said investigators interviewed her during Christmas break. She is thankful she took a witness with her, because of the tone of the interview. They seemed to be focused on her, and not the issue at hand. She then learned in February that the investigators were telling GA Legislators that she had 'recanted' her story. She did not, and told the Legislator so. Another example of dishonesty from the office.

That 'recanted' information was also sent to GA Congressmen in DC. She told them she never recanted either.

The 'recanted' narrative came up again in the court case recently.
She never did.

And she took a witness with her to the one and only interview.

Ask yourself why the investigators have gone so far to push this false narrative?

She is concerned about the fact that the investigators apparently gained access to the ballots in question, even though the judge sealed them.

I keep saying. They broke trust before the election, during the election, immediately after the election, and continue to do so.

We do not trust them.

The “aggressive interview” technique involves the interviewer trying to confuse the witness, making the witness doubt the reliability of certain points of her story or memory, and finally getting the witness to acknowledge she could be mistaken on certain details or that she has made some assumptions for which she has no first hand knowledge. The biased or corrupt investigator then packages these small kinks in the witness’ story, to conclude the witness “recanted.” These corrupt tactics generally get exposed in a courtroom, but until then, they can drive the narrative. Go listen to the recorded interview of the Wisconsin postal worker who claimed he was told by his supervisor to back-date mail in ballots. The Postal Inspector interviewer takes him through his story over and over, getting the witness to question his memory of the facts. After that interview, it hit the press that the guy recanted. He denied doing so and made his recording of the lengthy interview public. Many witnesses to fraud in the election in several states had similar experiences.

It's Spreading: MI County Calls Out Dominion, Demands Audit and Answers About Election Manipulation

READ: http://w-j.co/s/a4dda

INBOX - Trump on the upcoming Harris border visit.

@disclosetv

JUST IN - Reverse repo operations hit $814 billion today, a new all-time record and getting closer to $1 trillion.

Yet the Fed "isn’t concerned".

@disclosetv

Supreme Court Deals Significant Blow to Unions by Striking Down California Regulation

READ: http://w-j.co/s/b9bae

Welp, at least they're finally correct:

https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/1407402033896902661?s=19