1st Amendment Praetorian
4.14K subscribers
40.7K photos
2.97K videos
257 files
20K links
1AP is a group of military, law enforcement & intel community vets who protect Americans. https://1APraetorian.com
Download Telegram
As we close out another J6 anniversary with so many questions still unanswered, let's take a moment to walk through a few reasons the insurrection narrative is so ridiculous on its face.

1. Media, DC prosecutors, politicians, et al made a pretty big deal of the MILVET background of many they tried to label as "seditionists" and "leaders" of that day's events.

Question: what was their step 2?

Anyone with any NCO-level training will plan an operation with multiple objectives, and phase lines for each OBJ to keep measure of how things are progressing.

So they got inside the Capitol- what was step 2?

If the narrative that they were there to "overthrow the GOV" and they got into the capitol - why was there no 2nd objective?

They didn't seem to have any. Simply wandering around the Capitol is not anyone's idea of overthrowing the USGOV.

But you know who did seem to have quite a few planned objectives? Team Pelosi.

2. Take note that the line we first heard from Ray Epps ("storm the capitol") was quickly heard by the MSM - how? Why did they use those precise words?

And then they pivoted to the insurrection frame almost immediately despite the lack of weapons or, as noted above, any phase 2.

Like they had those specific words ready, prepped, and to the media.

3. Pelosi was quick to gavel in a completely new session when congress reconvened that very same night.

Because she gaveled in a completely new session rather than continuing the previous session, the states that were bringing issues to the floor were no longer allowed to do so in the new session.

There's video of the objectors trying to pick up where they left off when the new session gaveled in, but they weren't allowed.

4. To that very point, the "cui bono" question must be asked.

If there were multiple states standing up to declare their objections and ask for time to investigate anomalies, who benefited from stopping that process?

It was stopped, mind you, precisely when AZ began to state their objections.

The states were going alphabetically, which is another way of saying that it was stopped before it could start.

The very thing that Trump supporters wanted to happen was prevented from happening.

5. Mayor Bowser publicly released a letter denying Trump's request to have National Guard on hand.

The CapPo were at a lower readiness & staffing level than they would have been on a normal day.

Steven Sund has publicly stated he asked for hours during the day but was repeatedly stonewalled and denied.

Yet after they got their Reichstag Fire, the cavalry was allowed to show up because the media had its talking points and video.

6. And the years since have been a continuation of Team Pelosi's objective of using that Reichstag Fire to try to brand Trump and his supporters as domestic terrorists.

So ask yourself...who seemed to have had a long-term strategy and multi-stage set of objectives for that day?

Trump supporters who got into the capitol, wandered around and left?

Or Team Pelosi who had her own daughter there to film, a Ukrainian film crew strangely connected to all things UkraineGate, understaffed cops, denied National Guard, pre-prepped media talking points, barricades & signs that had been removed before any Trump supporters had arrived, and groups like the Sunshine Movement and Transition Integrity Partnership that had been outlining strikingly similar scenarios to what happened for months in advance?
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
F Ron DeSantis.