Quick question:
Did the 9/11 Commision Report disclose the revalation from a few weeks ago that several of the 9/11 hijackers had been recruited by the CIA?

If not, why not?

And did we hear about those revelations from anyone in the MSM?

If not, why not?

Was the 9/11 Commission Report just another Watergate Commission snowjob with Allen Dullen types on board?

As a guy who went into the service because of 9/11, I'd like to know the answers.

'Member when the Taliban announced they'd hand Bin Laden over to the US shortly after 9/11 but they would only do so after being shown evidence he was the perpetrator?

Why wasn't it provided?

And why was the request for Ranger Regiment to provide a blocking force when we had him surrounded in Tora Bora denied?

Just like the tragic KAAF withdrawal decision, any Privatw could have told you what would happen when they instead chose corrupt local cops to provide the blocking force.

Here's the thing:
Some people find reason to suspect they were lied to, and opt to close their eyes & ears, double down and refuse they allowed themselves to be fooled.

Some of us have reason to suspect we were lied to and resign ourselves to find the truth, end result be damned.

I'm not saying I'm all in on the inside job theories, but we've certainly been given reason to doubt all of those we previously trusted.

And there are some pretty glaring holes in the story.

👆🏼a good reminder of just how many "anomalies" and unexplained events happened in the 2020 election.

Japanese Professor Murakami of Tokyo University expresses concerns over the alarming discovery of Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoters, associated with human cancer development, in Pfizer vials:

"The Pfizer vaccine has a staggering problem. I have made an amazing finding. This figure is an enlarged view of Pfizer's vaccine sequence. As you can see, the Pfizer vaccine sequence contains part of the SV40 sequence here. This sequence is known as a promoter. Roughly speaking, the promoter causes increased expression of the gene. The problem is that the sequence is present in a well-known carcinogenic virus.

The question is why such a sequence that is derived from a cancer virus is present in Pfizer's vaccine. There should be absolutely no need for such a carcinogenic virus sequence in the vaccine. This sequence is totally unnecessary for producing the mRNA vaccine. It is a problem that such a sequence is solidly contained in the vaccine. This is not the only problem. If a sequence like this is present in the DNA, the DNA is easily migrated to the nucleus.

So it means that the DNA can easily enter the genome. This is such an alarming problem. It is essential to remove the sequence. However, Pfizer produced the vaccine without removing the sequence. That is outrageously malicious. This kind of promoter sequence is completely unnecessary for the production of the mRNA vaccine. In fact, SV40 is a promoter of cancer viruses."

https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1660044984572157956

@KanekoaTheGreat

The great thing about corrupticrats is that they have no idea of how hot the anger flows within Twitter anons who hold a grudge.