Quick question:
Did the 9/11 Commision Report disclose the revalation from a few weeks ago that several of the 9/11 hijackers had been recruited by the CIA?

If not, why not?

And did we hear about those revelations from anyone in the MSM?

If not, why not?

Was the 9/11 Commission Report just another Watergate Commission snowjob with Allen Dullen types on board?

As a guy who went into the service because of 9/11, I'd like to know the answers.

'Member when the Taliban announced they'd hand Bin Laden over to the US shortly after 9/11 but they would only do so after being shown evidence he was the perpetrator?

Why wasn't it provided?

And why was the request for Ranger Regiment to provide a blocking force when we had him surrounded in Tora Bora denied?

Just like the tragic KAAF withdrawal decision, any Privatw could have told you what would happen when they instead chose corrupt local cops to provide the blocking force.

Here's the thing:
Some people find reason to suspect they were lied to, and opt to close their eyes & ears, double down and refuse they allowed themselves to be fooled.

Some of us have reason to suspect we were lied to and resign ourselves to find the truth, end result be damned.

I'm not saying I'm all in on the inside job theories, but we've certainly been given reason to doubt all of those we previously trusted.

And there are some pretty glaring holes in the story.