While it is an amazing time to see so many lies finally be uncovered from the past 5-7 years, there is a question that we'll have to get around to at some point - how many lies pre-Trump were never uncovered?

When a group is willing to shred the Bill of Rights, lie to destroy the lives of normal, innocent Americans, and gaslight the entire world to get rid of an "existential threat" to their power - they themselves are the true existential threat.

The clips that you're seeing from Tucker's J6 coverage last night doesn't do it justice.

Watch the whole thing. Still a lot missing, but more than most people understand:

https://rumble.com/v2c2tua-tucker-carlson-tonight-full-episode-monday-march-6.html

Just as with the Wikileaks DNC drops that proved The Party™️ had fixes its own votes in favor of HRC, the MSM is now trying to shun its (miniscule numbers of) viewers away from Tucker's J6 coverage of the real footage.

And just like the Wikileaks drops, it's to hide the media's own lies, obfuscation, malfeasance, and treachery.

Question: if the MSM prints or reports a story that they know to be false in order to vilify a political target, is that malicious?

The most important thing to remember now that J6 is back in the public conscious:

On that day, several GOP elected officials were doing what Trump voters wanted - asking for more time to investigate obvious election irregularities.

Who had the most to benefit by shutting that down?