Then, plaintiffs allege Pfizer got in on the action, because Berenson’s speech threatened science, ermmm, Fauci directly.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

I want you to read this very closely. The judge says that the Plaintiffs have already PROVEN that Fauci had personal knowledge about the censorship, and that “… publicly available emails that prove that Dr. Fauci was communicating and acting as an intermediary for others in order to censor information from being shared across multiple social-media outlets.”

He hasn’t said “allege” or “potentially show”. He used the word PROVE. This is VERY substantial. I even used the little tool to underline.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

The judge tells Fauci that Free Speech is more important than inconveniencing “science”.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

2. Rob Flaherty

The plaintiffs move to depose Rob Flaherty (“Flaherty”), who is the Director of Digital Strategy for the White House; a “… a “key official in the White House’s pressure campaign on social-media companies to increase COVID-19 censorship and social-media companies’ policies and responses to COVID-19 vaccine claims.”

Plaintiffs allege Meta works with Flaherty to censor speech to curb shot hesitancy based on reports received from Meta, at the direction of the WH. ORWEILLIAN

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Again, here is that word, PROVEN. PROVEN. It is so consequential I want to make sure you all understand the significance here.

“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven that Flaherty has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”

This statement basically seals the win for the Plaintiffs. The statement itself means the Plaintiffs have won. Read it carefully. It acknowledges the collusion directly, and states that it has been PROVEN. It really is something. This is something we should all be very happy about— truly. I am not one to jump on board and be excited about something for no reason, but this truly is a massive order for so many reasons.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

This is a judge, speaking. Not a parties attorney, or someone as a party. This is really important:

“The substantive reasons for taking Flaherty’s depositions are set out herein, and the Court finds the substantive reasons are overwhelming.”

@TracyBeanzOfficial

3. Andrew Slavitt

“ Defendant Andrew Slavitt (“Slavitt”) served as the White House’s Senior COVID-19 Advisor. Slavitt allegedly “led the charge” for the White House in its campaign with social-media companies to increase the censorship of private speech as it related to COVID-19 through meetings and oral conversations with representatives of multiple social-media platforms.”

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Preposterous & totally fucking illegal. 👇

Just read this. A director at the White House is asking a social media platform why they haven’t banned a private citizen for the things he is saying. It’s so preposterous on its face, but we knew this was happening and we were called “conspiracy theorists” for stating it. This is evil.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Their hubris will be their downfall. Part of the reason the court is allowing the deposition is because Slavitt bragged about his censorship role on a podcast.

“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven that Andrew Slavitt has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”

“…Slavitt’s own description of his role on a podcast that he went on showed he has specific knowledge as it relates to these issues”

@TracyBeanzOfficial

This is Delicious. ⬇️

3. Jen “Peppermint Commie” Psaki:

“Jennifer Psaki (Psaki) is the former White House Press Secretary of President Biden. She is a Defendant in this case. Plaintiffs move to depose Psaki for a multitude of reasons.”

(Don’t credit me for the nickname. I got it from @CitizenFreePress. Happy 2,000 days team! Congrats.)

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Translation: ‘the social media companies are beholden to us to censor *ALL* information damaging or inconvenient to us.’ 👇 Again, White House directed & UNDENIABLY ILLEGAL.

“Psaki stated at a White House press conference “the major platforms have a responsibility related to the health and safety of all Americans to stop amplifying untrustworthy content, disinformation, and misinformation, especially related to COVID-19, vaccinations, and elections. Psaki stated at another press conference on July 15, 2021, that she administration is in “regular touch” with social-media platforms and that the engagements happen between staff and platforms.” (Edited a bit for length)

@TracyBeanzOfficial

‘If you say something we dont like, we will silence you EVERYWHERE.’ 👇

“You shouldn’t be banned from one platform and not others”

She actually said this. Out loud. In a press conference. And:

“Plaintiffs further argue that along with these statements, Psaki also “demanded” “robust strategies” for social-media companies to enforce censorship of “harmful posts.”

@TracyBeanzOfficial

“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven that Jennifer Psaki has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”

PROVEN.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

5. Elvis Chan

In comes the Biden laptop story, and again, their hubris as their downfall. The Joe Rogan podcast is the catalyst, and Meta had to reveal who the agent was because of a subpoena.

“Plaintiffs move to depose Elvis Chan (“Chan”), a named Defendant in this case and the FBI Supervisory Special Agent of Squad CY-1 in the San Francisco Division of the FBI.”

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Note here, the court uses different language when referring to Chan’s personal knowledge. The court doesn’t say “PROVEN” but uses the word “established.” It is an important distinction when taken in context with the rest of the order.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

6. Jen Easterly

“Plaintiffs move to depose Jen Easterly (“Easterly”), the Director of CISA within the Department of Homeland Security, because she supervises the “nerve center” of federally directed censorship.”

Think about this- CISA is designating YOUR THOUGHTS and speech as the most important form of US Infrastructure- COGNITIVE INFRASTRUCTURE. That in and of itself could be the subject of a lawsuit.

“…the most critical infrastructure is a cognitive infrastructure.”

@TracyBeanzOfficial

The “Disinformation Governance Board” is now on trial. This is really chilling, and thank goodness for the states of Missouri and Louisiana.

“Allegedly, these texts center around Easterly and Masterson discussing a “Disinformation Governance Board.” The conversations ultimately describe how Easterly seeks greater censorship and that this would be done by federal pressure on social media platforms to increase censorship.”

@TracyBeanzOfficial