Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
“Plaintiff States also urge that Dr. Fauci engaged in written and oral communications with Mark Zuckerberg about the Government’s COVID-19 response, and allegedly widespread social-media censorship of the lab-leak hypothesis ensued.“
“…communications with Mark Zuckerberg about the Government’s COVID-19 response, and allegedly widespread social-media censorship of the lab-leak hypothesis ensued.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“…communications with Mark Zuckerberg about the Government’s COVID-19 response, and allegedly widespread social-media censorship of the lab-leak hypothesis ensued.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
This next section contains the allegations about the Great Barrington Declaration, and how NIH heads work to create a “quick and devastating” takedown of the Declaration. Reading this language (from their emails) is actually quite chilling. These are unelected Bureaucrats discussing “takedown” of alternative scientific option relating to the most significant medical crisis in the history of man, Surely, you’d think that they would welcome alternative viewpoints. (Please note sarcasm)
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Next, we get in to what Twitter did to Alex Berenson. Twitter recently SETTLED (yes, you read that right) a case with Berenson and reinstated him to the platform. This has happened to untold numbers of people. The government CAN NOT collude with private business to censor speech. They CAN NOT. It is an affront to all we stand for. They did. Even the “President” got in on the action. Don’t get me started on the vaccines.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Then, plaintiffs allege Pfizer got in on the action, because Berenson’s speech threatened science, ermmm, Fauci directly.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
I want you to read this very closely. The judge says that the Plaintiffs have already PROVEN that Fauci had personal knowledge about the censorship, and that “… publicly available emails that prove that Dr. Fauci was communicating and acting as an intermediary for others in order to censor information from being shared across multiple social-media outlets.”
He hasn’t said “allege” or “potentially show”. He used the word PROVE. This is VERY substantial. I even used the little tool to underline.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
He hasn’t said “allege” or “potentially show”. He used the word PROVE. This is VERY substantial. I even used the little tool to underline.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
The judge tells Fauci that Free Speech is more important than inconveniencing “science”.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
2. Rob Flaherty
The plaintiffs move to depose Rob Flaherty (“Flaherty”), who is the Director of Digital Strategy for the White House; a “… a “key official in the White House’s pressure campaign on social-media companies to increase COVID-19 censorship and social-media companies’ policies and responses to COVID-19 vaccine claims.”
Plaintiffs allege Meta works with Flaherty to censor speech to curb shot hesitancy based on reports received from Meta, at the direction of the WH. ORWEILLIAN
@TracyBeanzOfficial
The plaintiffs move to depose Rob Flaherty (“Flaherty”), who is the Director of Digital Strategy for the White House; a “… a “key official in the White House’s pressure campaign on social-media companies to increase COVID-19 censorship and social-media companies’ policies and responses to COVID-19 vaccine claims.”
Plaintiffs allege Meta works with Flaherty to censor speech to curb shot hesitancy based on reports received from Meta, at the direction of the WH. ORWEILLIAN
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Again, here is that word, PROVEN. PROVEN. It is so consequential I want to make sure you all understand the significance here.
“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven that Flaherty has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”
This statement basically seals the win for the Plaintiffs. The statement itself means the Plaintiffs have won. Read it carefully. It acknowledges the collusion directly, and states that it has been PROVEN. It really is something. This is something we should all be very happy about— truly. I am not one to jump on board and be excited about something for no reason, but this truly is a massive order for so many reasons.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven that Flaherty has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”
This statement basically seals the win for the Plaintiffs. The statement itself means the Plaintiffs have won. Read it carefully. It acknowledges the collusion directly, and states that it has been PROVEN. It really is something. This is something we should all be very happy about— truly. I am not one to jump on board and be excited about something for no reason, but this truly is a massive order for so many reasons.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
This is a judge, speaking. Not a parties attorney, or someone as a party. This is really important:
“The substantive reasons for taking Flaherty’s depositions are set out herein, and the Court finds the substantive reasons are overwhelming.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“The substantive reasons for taking Flaherty’s depositions are set out herein, and the Court finds the substantive reasons are overwhelming.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
3. Andrew Slavitt
“ Defendant Andrew Slavitt (“Slavitt”) served as the White House’s Senior COVID-19 Advisor. Slavitt allegedly “led the charge” for the White House in its campaign with social-media companies to increase the censorship of private speech as it related to COVID-19 through meetings and oral conversations with representatives of multiple social-media platforms.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“ Defendant Andrew Slavitt (“Slavitt”) served as the White House’s Senior COVID-19 Advisor. Slavitt allegedly “led the charge” for the White House in its campaign with social-media companies to increase the censorship of private speech as it related to COVID-19 through meetings and oral conversations with representatives of multiple social-media platforms.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
Preposterous & totally fucking illegal. 👇
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Just read this. A director at the White House is asking a social media platform why they haven’t banned a private citizen for the things he is saying. It’s so preposterous on its face, but we knew this was happening and we were called “conspiracy theorists” for stating it. This is evil.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Their hubris will be their downfall. Part of the reason the court is allowing the deposition is because Slavitt bragged about his censorship role on a podcast.
“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven that Andrew Slavitt has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”
“…Slavitt’s own description of his role on a podcast that he went on showed he has specific knowledge as it relates to these issues”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven that Andrew Slavitt has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”
“…Slavitt’s own description of his role on a podcast that he went on showed he has specific knowledge as it relates to these issues”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
3. Jen “Peppermint Commie” Psaki:
“Jennifer Psaki (Psaki) is the former White House Press Secretary of President Biden. She is a Defendant in this case. Plaintiffs move to depose Psaki for a multitude of reasons.”
(Don’t credit me for the nickname. I got it from @CitizenFreePress. Happy 2,000 days team! Congrats.)
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“Jennifer Psaki (Psaki) is the former White House Press Secretary of President Biden. She is a Defendant in this case. Plaintiffs move to depose Psaki for a multitude of reasons.”
(Don’t credit me for the nickname. I got it from @CitizenFreePress. Happy 2,000 days team! Congrats.)
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
Translation: ‘the social media companies are beholden to us to censor *ALL* information damaging or inconvenient to us.’ 👇 Again, White House directed & UNDENIABLY ILLEGAL.
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
“Psaki stated at a White House press conference “the major platforms have a responsibility related to the health and safety of all Americans to stop amplifying untrustworthy content, disinformation, and misinformation, especially related to COVID-19, vaccinations, and elections. Psaki stated at another press conference on July 15, 2021, that she administration is in “regular touch” with social-media platforms and that the engagements happen between staff and platforms.” (Edited a bit for length)
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
‘If you say something we dont like, we will silence you EVERYWHERE.’ 👇
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
“You shouldn’t be banned from one platform and not others”
She actually said this. Out loud. In a press conference. And:
“Plaintiffs further argue that along with these statements, Psaki also “demanded” “robust strategies” for social-media companies to enforce censorship of “harmful posts.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
She actually said this. Out loud. In a press conference. And:
“Plaintiffs further argue that along with these statements, Psaki also “demanded” “robust strategies” for social-media companies to enforce censorship of “harmful posts.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven that Jennifer Psaki has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”
PROVEN.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
PROVEN.
@TracyBeanzOfficial