New York knew damn well their new anti concealed carry law was a clear violation of, & in fact was in defiance of the US Supreme Court Bruen decision.

Now they are learning that they too are subject to the law no matter how much they think it doesn’t apply to them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4bLvV9kApA&feature=share&si=ELPmzJkDCLju2KnD5oyZMQ

Consider the implications of this: the Left thinks keeping Twitter censorship in place & making sure its a leftwing echo chamber is a ‘National Security’ issue. This is third-world Dictatorship actions. 👇

‘National Security’ issue. ⬇️

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/internet-sting-operation-j6-deleted-exposes-how-twitter-manipulated-jan-6-narrative-real

Did you see this?

👆🏼 thread on "tHe AdUlTs In ThE rOoM"

I promised you a thread on this order in the Missouri v. Biden case, and OH a thread you shall receive. This order is absolutely breathtaking, and judges don’t often make declarations of “fact” in a still to be decided case. He does here.

Some background- expedited depositions are relatively unheard of, and deposition of federal officials are even MORE unheard of. They usually don’t happen. This will be a long one and will take a bit so grab some coffee! Here is a link to the order: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520.90.0.pdf

First, understand what the case is about. It alleges that members of the government conspired with and directed social media platforms to censor people and topics they didn’t like because of “Mis, Dis and Malinformation” If you want some background, @WendiSMahoney have done a lot of work on this for @UncoverDC

(Read: https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/06/17/cisas-2022-interim-election-security-plan-says-mdm-is-a-persistent-threat/)

This is just one of many. (Continued)

The case covers several different verticals. And while I wish I was a party to the case, @gatewaypundit is represented from media, so whatever verdict comes in, we can appropriate it to the verticals we need as necessary.

They have COVID origin, Election Integrity, Early treatment, Hunters Laptop, and more. Also, you can read who they are requesting expedited deposition from, and the head of CISA is included, along with Fauci. Fauci has gotten the most attention, but it’s bigger than that

@TracyBeanzOfficial

You don’t want anyone being able to require expedited depo of high ranking officials because if they were sitting for depositions in every single court case anyone brought forward, they wouldn’t ever get anything done. Think about how certain parties would weaponize this when their friends weren’t in power. So, this truly is an extraordinary thing.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

The next bit of the order addresses the defendants (government) objections, which of course are all based on procedure and rules that aren’t really applicable and addresses the fact that some of the parties to be deposed are FORMER government officials (Psaki, etc) or weren’t listed on the first complaint but ARE on the amended complaint. The judge puts most of that to bed, but then goes on to say that he will detail his reasoning for EACH request. This is where it gets good.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

1. Dr. Anthony Fauci:

Dr. Fauci is being deposed as the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Chief Medical Advisor to the President.

They first allege he colluded to censor speech about COVID origins, and they allege that he was potentially behind funding the research to create the virus, and that he had a conference call which resulted in people making statements in medical journals about the origins of COVID (it’s just getting good. Hang in there)

@TracyBeanzOfficial

“Plaintiff States also urge that Dr. Fauci engaged in written and oral communications with Mark Zuckerberg about the Government’s COVID-19 response, and allegedly widespread social-media censorship of the lab-leak hypothesis ensued.“

“…communications with Mark Zuckerberg about the Government’s COVID-19 response, and allegedly widespread social-media censorship of the lab-leak hypothesis ensued.”

@TracyBeanzOfficial