Fairpool Announcements
316 subscribers
342 photos
13 videos
384 links
Fairpool is a DEX for personal tokens.

Create your own token & receive royalties from trading volume. Increase volume by offering dividends / selling content for your token.

Learn more: https://fairpool.io/
Download Telegram
🔊 Listen to Coliquidity AMA: https://anchor.fm/coliquidity/episodes/Coliquidity-AMA-on-Nov-30-e1rhpb4

We found a successful strategy for attracting potential users for Fairpool.

It’s the good old local meetups that worked for us - we got 3 more people willing to try Fairpool.

Now we’ll try scaling this approach by hosting online “structured networking” events. If a person wants to participate in a networking call, he / she will need to specify the requests & the offers - what he / she needs and what he / she can provide in return. If there’s a match, they’ll receive a Calendly link to schedule a call.

Hope it would allow us to reach more people than at the local meetups, and connect with them at the same level.
📢 Weekly update:

Designed a new testing strategy for the Fairpool smart contract.
Improved our security setup (WIP).
🤝 Advised another project.

👉 Read more

Coliquidity FAQ | Coliquidity app with Marnotaur token preset

Telegram group | Telegram announcements | Twitter | Anchor Podcasts
🔊 Listen to Coliquidity AMA: https://anchor.fm/coliquidity/episodes/Coliquidity-AMA-on-Dec-7-e1rsvfv

We feel that the Fairpool idea has been validated, and we want to move forward with the development.

Right now, we need to complete two tasks:

* Add more tests for the smart contract.
* Build the user interface.

We’ll implement the user interface using the admin panel package to save development time. It’ll work like a regular CRUD admin panel, but with the blockchain integration (in addition to the database, which will be used as cache for displaying the data quickly, without querying the blockchain).

Looking forward to showing off the app on the testnet!
🔊 Listen to Coliquidity AMA: https://anchor.fm/coliquidity/episodes/Coliquidity-AMA-on-Dec-14-e1s89oq

* We’ve explored multiple tools for smart contract testing.
* We have found a couple of minor bugs in the Fairpool contract. We’re glad we’ve found them early, before any major deployment.
* We got an idea for a new kind of testing framework: the one that generates simplified versions of a contract that match the behavior of a full contract under specific conditions. We’ve decided not to implement it for Fairpool - instead we’ll use the existing tools to finish it quicker.
📢 Weekly update:

Finished the testing of SharedOwnership & ERC20Enumerable (parent contracts of Fairpool).
Testing the Fairpool contract (WIP).
🤝 Advised another project.

👉 Read more

Coliquidity FAQ | Coliquidity app with Marnotaur token preset

Telegram group | Telegram announcements | Twitter | Anchor Podcasts
🔊 Listen to Coliquidity AMA: https://anchor.fm/coliquidity/episodes/Coliquidity-AMA-on-Dec-21-e1si59a

We’ve fixed more bugs in the Fairpool smart contract.

The reason those bugs existed in the first place is that we had to implement a lot of optimizations to ensure that transactions with the Fairpool contract stay under the gas limit. Due to optimizations, the contact code diverged from the original simple version, and the bugs arised in the more complex code.

We’re glad to have those bugs fixed now.

Special thanks to Echidna - the testing tool that we’re using!
📢 Weekly update:

Finished the testing of the Fairpool contract.
Added the fee system.
Designed the upgrade system.

👉 Read more

Coliquidity FAQ | Coliquidity app with Marnotaur token preset

Telegram group | Telegram announcements | Twitter | Anchor Podcasts
🔊 Listen to Coliquidity AMA: https://anchor.fm/coliquidity/episodes/Coliquidity-AMA-on-Dec-28-e1sqafl

We’ve finished the testing of the Fairpool contract & moved to frontend development.

We’ve already implemented the “Connect wallet” / “Switch network” functionalities with RainbowKit components (thanks a lot for publishing them!).

Right now we’re working on “buy” & “sell” methods, which would allow the traders to interact with the contracts.

After that, we’ll move on to the actual deployment of the Fairpool contracts on mainnet.

Looking forward!
📢 Weekly update:

Implemented the buy form in UI.
Implemented “connect wallet” & “change network”.
Deployed the Fairpool contract on testnet.

👉 Read more

Coliquidity FAQ | Coliquidity app with Marnotaur token preset

Telegram group | Telegram announcements | Twitter | Anchor Podcasts
🔊 Listen to Coliquidity AMA: https://anchor.fm/coliquidity/episodes/Coliquidity-AMA-on-Jan-4-e1t2q2r

We’ll be changing our name from Coliquidity to Fairpool & rebranding existing assets.

The website is ready, we just need to update the social media accounts & the token smart contracts. We’re keeping the same token, just changing its name. All balances are preserved, and the contract addresses remain the same.

Additionally, we’ve decided to change the pricing formula in the Fairpool smart contract. While trading on testnet, we’ve realized that the price behaves like sqrt(totalSupply), but we want it to behave like totalSupply ^ 2. This change should be minor, since it doesn’t affect the other functionality of the contract (royalties, dividends, etc).
Channel name was changed to «Fairpool Announcements»
📢 Weekly update:

Rebranded our social media channels.
Tried different formulas to optimize the price behavior (the resulting chart).
🤝 Reconnected with people who were interested in creating their tokens.

👉 Read more

Twitter | Anchor podcasts | Telegram group | Telegram announcements
🔊 Listen to Fairpool AMA: https://anchor.fm/fairpooldex/episodes/Fairpool-AMA-on-Jan-11--2023-e1tbhre

Some influencers asked us for guidance on how to choose the pool parameters: speed of price growth, size of royalties & dividends. We’re going to prepare this guide for them, since it’s quite important to get those parameters right at the start. It won’t be possible to change the speed after someone buys the token, and it will only be possible to make the royalties lower (this is fair to the holders).

After that, we’re going to finish the influencer token page (web UI) & start the mainnet deployments.
📢 Weekly update:

Finished the sell form, improved the buy form.
Researched the impact of pool parameters on price behavior.
🤝 Reached a preliminary agreement for an introduction to a large group of influencers.
🤝 Prepared a presentation for speaking at a local event.

👉 Read more

Twitter | Anchor podcasts | Telegram group | Telegram announcements
🔊 Listen to Fairpool AMA: https://anchor.fm/fairpooldex/episodes/Fairpool-AMA-on-Jan-18-e1tlk34

We talked about our next steps.

Right now we need to finish the pool page, so that we could start launching the pools.

The pool page is already functional: it has the buy & sell forms, along with the influencer profile. To make it complete, we need to add three more sections: the token value proposition, the list of historical trades and the price chart.

We'll start with simple versions for the first two sections, then move to the price chart implementation. To make it efficient, we'll need to implement server-side caching of the Buy and Sell events emitted from the Fairpool smart contract.
📢 Weekly update:

Finished the token page.
Fixed tests (there were no bugs in the contract itself, but in the tests).
🤝 Presented Fairpool at a local meetup.

👉 Read more

Twitter | Anchor podcasts | Telegram group | Telegram announcements
🔊 Listen to Fairpool AMA: https://anchor.fm/fairpooldex/episodes/Fairpool-AMA-on-Jan-25-e1tvvto

We talked about whitelabeling of smart contracts - a special licensing agreement that allows forking the smart contracts, but only if the developer address is kept in the contract, so that it continues to receive the fees as recurring revenue.

We think it's the optimal solution for the blockchain development dilemma - should we release the code under permissive or restrictive license?

Whitelabeling answers this question in two ways - first, use a restrictive license in the code submitted to the block explorer, second, add a paragraph saying that you're open to whitelabeling.

The other developers would sign the whitelabeling agreement & develop their own products on top of the smart contracts (new UIs with better features, or even larger smart contract systems which extend the existing code).

We'll keep ourselves focused on the agent program, but we'll also keep our eyes open for whitelabeling opportunities.
📢 Weekly update:

Updated the Fairpool pricing formula.
Implemented the list of trades.
🤝 Reached an agreement with 1 more influencer to launch his Fairpool.

👉 Read more

Twitter | Anchor podcasts | Telegram group | Telegram announcements
🔊 Listen to Fairpool AMA: https://anchor.fm/fairpooldex/episodes/Fairpool-AMA-on-Feb-1-e1uagjc

We have migrated the Fairpool contract to a better pricing formula.

While migrating, we have discovered an interesting fact: the bonding curve parameters don't matter for the purposes of taking profit.

For example:

* Alice buys for 1 ETH
* Bob buys for 10 ETH
* Alice sells for X ETH (X > 1)

Alice profit is the same no matter what the bonding curve parameters are. This seems weird, because the price changes differently depending on parameters. However, if the price increases faster, that means the initial purchase for 1 ETH gives Alice less tokens. So when she takes profit, she sells less tokens, but gets the same profit (because, again, the price increases faster).

We've run the tests, and they confirmed this finding.

We'll still allow the influencers to choose the bonding curve parameters, but we'll allow only the exponential curves, which look attractive to speculators.
📢 Weekly update:

Deployed two tokens on the testnet: OLGA token, LEGIN token.
Improved the UI according to feedback.
Fixed the wallet connection bugs.

👉 Read more

Twitter | Anchor podcasts | Telegram group | Telegram announcements