Written ten years ago this week.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/towards-city-god

Over five years ago now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7lVw7KsurM

Not surprised to see those harmonic champs, the Church of God, turning up at the Montana-Alberta border crossing.

Question for you well-informed lot, from an excellent contact:

Do you have any information about who is behind the EU COVID certificate? Who are the contractors? Who wrote the guidelines?

Perfect Eighties Beeb intonation in the voiceover.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=UMHtqOqNLH0

Woes is incisive here. Not many years ago, we didn’t collectively know that all eight of these were tools in the deep state’s box of tricks.

https://t.me/millennialwoes/4433

“Farrell said officers said they were taking her clothes because she would not tell them who she was.”

This was Hertfordshire; the same thing was done to Dr Konstancja Duff by the Met, after she refused to disclose her identity. It seems to be Standard Operating Procedure for police on females whom police perceive as being uncooperative.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/feb/02/police-apologise-after-rastafarian-woman-left-naked-in-cell-after-wrongful-arrest

Constitutional Treaties 2: The Declaration of Rights 1688

“The evangelical elite’s superpower is rhetoric. They are very, very good at it.”

— This has struck me for many years, since I was knocking around in the Oxbridge and Ivy League bubble that churns out the evangelical élite. Now that the evangelical élite has largely gone to the bad, it falls to linguists to defang them.

After all, rhetoric is classically understood as the top layer of language, above the foundation of grammar and the middle layer of logic.

By pointing out ungrammatical and illogical statements made passionately by “Big Eva” churchmen—especially if one does it in a normie-appealing, unselfconscious way, as described in this piece—one can undo a lot of damage.

https://aaronrenn.substack.com/p/what-would-normal-people-think-of

Proper mask rebellion at a Washington State high school, with an evidently lawfully-minded young man as spokesman.

Lancashire schools have already seen similar.

https://twitter.com/XJCasper/status/1488796611324956674

“When I hear the wicked call on the rocks and hills to fall,
When I see them start and shrink on the fiery deluge brink,
Then, Lord, shall I fully know, not till then, how much I owe.”

— The forgotten verse of Robert Murray McCheyne’s When This Passing World Is Done


https://open.spotify.com/track/1A1Hp2qzkZOcGsU9Nwhz9M

Schwab’s Global Young Führers towing us into the New World Order

https://youtube.com/watch?v=dnWhBpV54nQ&t=22s

A short film. A normie goes to get vaccinated because it's the right thing to do. Then, interesting things happen 🙂

https://odysee.com/@RoddyBMurray:3/thanksforkeepingmesafeteaser:b

Mounties threaten truckers at the Alberta border with “trucks being forfeited to the Crown”. The truckers turn it right back at the Mounties by inviting them to defect.
Towards the end, their lawyer reminds the truckers of their constitutional rights.

I have just banned someone. His spurious but harmless claims that “unalienable” was anything other than a pre-C18th synonym for “inalienable” (paralleled by the same development in many other negative adjectives) I left uncommented, but he then wrote that “juridical” means “Jew-ridicule”.
No mockery of language on this channel. That’s what the enemy does.

Pastor Artur Pawlowski

https://t.me/right_on_radio/7223

Knock knock, Jock shock:
Go saw your door.

https://news.stv.tv/scotland/covid-plan-to-chop-bottom-of-classroom-doors-off-to-help-ventilation

For clarity, there is a perfectly valid point to be made that the intended meaning of “inalienable” over time was weakened from “incapable of alienation” to something more statist. I won’t, however, entertain cod evidence such as Google Ngram Viewer screenshots or dictionary definitions as supposedly proving an etymological basis for it. That’s not how variants function in the corpus of a language; rather, one variant wins out in standard usage over time.
There can be malice and sorcery afoot in the choice of variant words, but in the case of this pair of variants, it doesn’t have a basis in grammar or standard usage. It might well do in occult circles of power, and so reasserting “unalienable” to be sure of the strongest meaning is commendable.