Forwarded from A World of Hurt
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Parents "absolutely don't" deserve to have rights over their children, Nova Scotia Education Minister Brandan Maguire says, as he voices support for secret gender transitions at schools and taxpayer-funded gender reassignment surgeries.
https://x.com/i/status/2048911491814887585
https://x.com/i/status/2048911491814887585
🤬19🤨2❤1
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
I’ve just published Part 1 of my new series on Substack, The Weaponisation of Law - A Structural History of Power Disguised as Justice - and Why Natural Law Offers a Way Out
This project has been a long time in the making. It began with a simple discomfort: the sense that the stories we are taught about law - its neutrality, its fairness, its protective purpose - do not align with the historical record. We inherit legal systems as if they were designed for our benefit, yet when we trace their development honestly, a different pattern emerges.
Part 1 explores that pattern from its earliest roots. It examines how law evolved from Celtic customs to Anglo‑Saxon moots, from the Danelaw to Norman feudalism, from Henry II’s common law to the rise and eventual rigidification of equity. Across these eras, one theme repeats: legal systems present themselves as instruments of justice while consistently serving the interests of those who hold power.
This series is not written from a place of certainty or ideology. It is not an attempt to tell anyone what to think. My intention is simply to invite readers to look again at what we have inherited, to question the comforting myths of legal neutrality, and to consider whether the structure of law itself - rather than any particular era or doctrine - is the real problem.
If this work succeeds in anything, I hope it is in encouraging independent thought. Not agreement. Not allegiance. Just thought.
You can read Part 1 here: https://open.substack.com/pub/clarewillsharrison/p/the-weaponisation-of-law
In Part 2 I will move into modern times, examining the doctrine of the separation of powers - how it is taught as a safeguard against tyranny, and how its misuse has helped entrench the very “control grid” that earlier legal systems laid the foundations for. In later parts I will cover parliamentary sovereignty, Entick V Carrington, our constitution and much more, tracing a path that I argue leads to control and subjugation.
Thank you to those who choose to read, reflect, and question. And I hope you enjoy this series.
This project has been a long time in the making. It began with a simple discomfort: the sense that the stories we are taught about law - its neutrality, its fairness, its protective purpose - do not align with the historical record. We inherit legal systems as if they were designed for our benefit, yet when we trace their development honestly, a different pattern emerges.
Part 1 explores that pattern from its earliest roots. It examines how law evolved from Celtic customs to Anglo‑Saxon moots, from the Danelaw to Norman feudalism, from Henry II’s common law to the rise and eventual rigidification of equity. Across these eras, one theme repeats: legal systems present themselves as instruments of justice while consistently serving the interests of those who hold power.
This series is not written from a place of certainty or ideology. It is not an attempt to tell anyone what to think. My intention is simply to invite readers to look again at what we have inherited, to question the comforting myths of legal neutrality, and to consider whether the structure of law itself - rather than any particular era or doctrine - is the real problem.
If this work succeeds in anything, I hope it is in encouraging independent thought. Not agreement. Not allegiance. Just thought.
You can read Part 1 here: https://open.substack.com/pub/clarewillsharrison/p/the-weaponisation-of-law
In Part 2 I will move into modern times, examining the doctrine of the separation of powers - how it is taught as a safeguard against tyranny, and how its misuse has helped entrench the very “control grid” that earlier legal systems laid the foundations for. In later parts I will cover parliamentary sovereignty, Entick V Carrington, our constitution and much more, tracing a path that I argue leads to control and subjugation.
Thank you to those who choose to read, reflect, and question. And I hope you enjoy this series.
Substack
The Weaponisation of Law
A Structural History of Power Disguised as Justice - and Why Natural Law Offers a Way Out – Part 1
👍11❤5
Forwarded from Katharine Gun
Had a lovely chat with Diane from UKC a few weeks back which was aired today on UK Column.
https://youtu.be/BilipMuYI9o
https://youtu.be/BilipMuYI9o
YouTube
Switch the Stories To Find the Truth — with Katharine Gun | UK Column Interviews
Switch the Stories To Find the Truth — with Katharine Gun | UK Column Interviews
► Subscribe to the UK Column YouTube channel ► https://bit.ly/ukcolumnofficial
As explained in the notes for UK Column’s January 2025 interview with Katharine, entitled ‘A…
► Subscribe to the UK Column YouTube channel ► https://bit.ly/ukcolumnofficial
As explained in the notes for UK Column’s January 2025 interview with Katharine, entitled ‘A…
❤4
All hail the Shah of Shahs, effulgent hero, lodestar of courage!
https://x.com/victoriaazad24/status/2047590575507980461
https://x.com/victoriaazad24/status/2047590575507980461
X (formerly Twitter)
Victoria Azad (@victoriaazad24) on X
Why put #RezaPahlavi in a jar? For fear of ketchup?! They don't set up this kind of thing for Trump either...
چرا گذاشتنش تو شیشه😂؟ از ترس سس کچاپ؟! حتی برای ترامپ هم از این جور چیزا درست نمیکنن...
@USABehFarsi
@IsraelPersian
چرا گذاشتنش تو شیشه😂؟ از ترس سس کچاپ؟! حتی برای ترامپ هم از این جور چیزا درست نمیکنن...
@USABehFarsi
@IsraelPersian
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
I occasionally use auto translate functions on browsers. You can’t always rely on it to do a proper job. Unless, that is, Belle Epoque buildings in France really do have fallopian tubes and eyes.
Best wishes
Mike
Best wishes
Mike
🤣14😁2
Forwarded from cryptogon
U.S. Debt Tops 100% of GDP
Via: Wall Street Journal:
The U.S. national debt now exceeds 100% of gross domestic product, crossing a once-unthinkable threshold, on the way toward breaking the record set in the wake of World War II.
As of March 31, the country’s publicly held debt was $31.265 trillion, while GDP over the preceding year was $31.216 trillion,…
https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=75082
Via: Wall Street Journal:
The U.S. national debt now exceeds 100% of gross domestic product, crossing a once-unthinkable threshold, on the way toward breaking the record set in the wake of World War II.
As of March 31, the country’s publicly held debt was $31.265 trillion, while GDP over the preceding year was $31.216 trillion,…
https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=75082
🤡1