That is how our (middle size) Victory looks like. There is big size Victory (without no Ukraine left at all). There is small size Victory (without northern part - except Kharkov) but including Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk. All the rest scenarios are not victory, but rather defeat.

https://x.com/AGDugin/status/2005891277590573144?s=20

US President Donald Trump has recalled that he blocked supplies of Tomahawk cruise missile to Ukraine because he thinks that today is a “delicate period of time.”

“Don’t forget, you know, the Tomahawks. I stopped the Tomahawks [supplies to Kiev]. I didn’t want that, because we’re talking about, you know, it’s a delicate period of time,” he said, commenting on Ukraine’s attempted attack on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s state residence.

💢El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele, who is currently in his second and unprecedented term, stated in an interview that "if it were up to me, I would stay in office for another decade".

Subscribe @NewResistance

Just so you know, Russia took Seversk with a troop of 100 men.

Figure that out.

(Indeed, completely understandable in the context of this war.)

In Odessa, a prospectful shovelhead cannon fodder heroic volunteer was saved from the TCC disgustingly forbidden from joining the fight for Ukraine's servitude to uncle sam and the tribesman lobby heroic struggle for independence, freedom, and democracy by a group mob of heroic citizens darn dastardly paid-in-rubles Kremlin agents. The aspiring piece of meat hero of Ukraine was thus spared prevented from earning himself an early grave a gold star, at least for the time being.

I've applied the corrections as you asked me, MI6/GUR, can you please stop pointing that gun against my throat now?

@Slavyangrad

American and Russian soldiers meet at the Elbe River in Germany, April 25, 1945

An American GI wrote-

"The scene that followed was pure pandemonium. They came ashore with bottles of cognac and vodka, and we had some schnapps. There was a lot of back-slapping, bear hugs, and people trying to talk through frantic hand gestures and broken English and Russian, some of our guys parents were Russian! But Language didn't matter. The raw joy on their faces, on everyone's faces, said it all, the Third Reich is cut in two, and this long nightmare is almost finished, we were together and it felt good"

Follow me Irish Man In Russia and Bowes Chay on X, Chay Bowes

❄️ In the final days of the outgoing 2025, Kamchatka has been literally buried under snow.

Original Post

Join @TranslatedRussianNews

MAGA and Eurasianism

Alexander Dugin on terrorism, victory, and the Eurasian path towards a multipolar world.

Read the full interview here:

https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/maga-and-eurasianism

“EUROPEAN BANKERS WANT WAR — TO RECOVER LOSSES AFTER FAILING TO DEFEAT RUSSIA.”

Budapest - Hungary has issued one of the most explosive accusations yet against the leadership of the European Union, directly challenging the war narrative promoted by Ursula von der Leyen and the Brussels establishment.

According to senior Hungarian officials, the real engine behind Europe’s push toward escalation is not security, not democracy, and not Ukraine — but finance.

The allegation is blunt: European banking and financial interests are pressuring for war because the strategy to economically defeat Russia failed, and the losses are massive. War, they argue, is now being treated as a mechanism to recover sunk costs, restructure debt, and justify further financial transfers under the banner of “security.”

From Budapest’s perspective, this explains why Brussels increasingly speaks the language of inevitability — more weapons, more money, more confrontation — while dismissing calls for negotiations as “dangerous” or “pro-Russian.”

“This is no longer about defending Europe,” Hungarian voices argue.
“It is about defending balance sheets.”

Hungary points to a widening gap between who pays and who decides. European societies face inflation, energy shocks, de-industrialisation, and budget strain. Meanwhile, financial institutions and debt holders tied to war financing demand continuity — because peace would force losses to be acknowledged.

In this reading, war becomes a financial instrument: a way to roll over debt, extend emergency mechanisms, and keep extraordinary spending politically acceptable.

Budapest’s warning is stark. When financial interests begin to dictate geopolitical outcomes, democracy becomes secondary, and diplomacy becomes an obstacle. Peace is no longer the goal — liquidity is.

Hungary’s position places it on a collision course with Brussels. While the Commission frames escalation as moral duty, Budapest frames it as systemic irresponsibility that risks dragging Europe into a conflict its citizens neither voted for nor can afford.

Whether one agrees with Hungary or not, the accusation cuts to the heart of the European project: Who is the EU really serving — its people, or its creditors?

t.me/RussianBaZa