Actuaries don’t lie. Their existence depends on this data.
https://www.theflstandard.com/top-insurance-analyst-600-000-americans-per-year-are-dying-from-covid-shots/
https://www.theflstandard.com/top-insurance-analyst-600-000-americans-per-year-are-dying-from-covid-shots/
Xoi Lac TV
Xoilac 365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem bóng đá chất lượng HD
Kênh bóng đá trực tuyến Xoilac365.tv✅ nguồn link trực tiếp bóng đá Xoilac TV full HD. Phát sóng trực tuyến Xôi Lạc TV tructiepbongda chất lượng cao.
Re: NIH FOI Case No. 58915
On August 29, 2022 I submitted a FOIA request to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), FOIA Office which was received in that office on September 1, 2022.
I requested:
(1) All email communications between Eric O Freed and Oliver Schildgen for the time period 20th August 2021 to 31st May 2022.
(2) All email communications from/to Eric O. Freed containing the phrase "expression of concern" or the name "Jiang" in the body of the email.
In an email dated on 8/31/22, you amended and perfected item (2) to “any emails containing the word “Jiang” and any of the words “paper,” “expression,” “concern,” “retract,” or “retraction”.
The NIH FOIA Office conducted a search for records and located 490 pages responsive to my request. The office under Gorka Garcia-Malene chose to withhold all records in full pursuant to exemption 4 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(4), and section 5.3 l (d) of the HHS FOIA Regulations, 45 CFR Part 5. Exemption 4 protects from disclosure trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential. The records withheld are communications about the review process and content is confidential.
There is an important public health value to releasing these unredacted communications. These records document the decision making process behind how science regulates itself. The methodology used to establish a claim by Eric O. Freed of the NCI that a paper written by two researchers in Sweden was invalid. Many esteemed researchers have reviewed the data used to force a retraction at MDPI Viruses have expressed astonishment at the weakness of Mr. Freed’s Expression of Concern that served as a prelude to the retraction. Further, the authors of the paper faced severe retaliation with one even losing a permanent position despite having caved to the pressure to retract. Additionally, another study was recently published in conjunction with scientists from NAIAD that validates the findings of the researchers in Sweden.
The public health importance of the information contained in Eric Freed’s communications with a foreign agent (Oliver Schildgen) cannot be understated. This study revealed a link between various cancers and the COVID vaccine spike protein, with a heightened focus on female cancers like breast and ovarian cancer. If this cancer/vaccine link is valid, then delaying, obfuscating, or obscuring the release and review of this data is potentially a threat to national security.
Mr. Gorka-Malene and the NIH/NCI have failed to give sufficient weight to the public’s interest in disclosure. MDPI is a non-profit business entity in Switzerland which operates a collection of scientific journals. The damage from exposed ‘review process’ trade secrets will be non-existent unless the communications reveal evidence of malfeasance. “An informed public is the most potent of all restraints upon misgovernment[.]” Grosjean v. Am. Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 250 (1936).
@brokentruthTV
On August 29, 2022 I submitted a FOIA request to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), FOIA Office which was received in that office on September 1, 2022.
I requested:
(1) All email communications between Eric O Freed and Oliver Schildgen for the time period 20th August 2021 to 31st May 2022.
(2) All email communications from/to Eric O. Freed containing the phrase "expression of concern" or the name "Jiang" in the body of the email.
In an email dated on 8/31/22, you amended and perfected item (2) to “any emails containing the word “Jiang” and any of the words “paper,” “expression,” “concern,” “retract,” or “retraction”.
The NIH FOIA Office conducted a search for records and located 490 pages responsive to my request. The office under Gorka Garcia-Malene chose to withhold all records in full pursuant to exemption 4 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(4), and section 5.3 l (d) of the HHS FOIA Regulations, 45 CFR Part 5. Exemption 4 protects from disclosure trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential. The records withheld are communications about the review process and content is confidential.
There is an important public health value to releasing these unredacted communications. These records document the decision making process behind how science regulates itself. The methodology used to establish a claim by Eric O. Freed of the NCI that a paper written by two researchers in Sweden was invalid. Many esteemed researchers have reviewed the data used to force a retraction at MDPI Viruses have expressed astonishment at the weakness of Mr. Freed’s Expression of Concern that served as a prelude to the retraction. Further, the authors of the paper faced severe retaliation with one even losing a permanent position despite having caved to the pressure to retract. Additionally, another study was recently published in conjunction with scientists from NAIAD that validates the findings of the researchers in Sweden.
The public health importance of the information contained in Eric Freed’s communications with a foreign agent (Oliver Schildgen) cannot be understated. This study revealed a link between various cancers and the COVID vaccine spike protein, with a heightened focus on female cancers like breast and ovarian cancer. If this cancer/vaccine link is valid, then delaying, obfuscating, or obscuring the release and review of this data is potentially a threat to national security.
Mr. Gorka-Malene and the NIH/NCI have failed to give sufficient weight to the public’s interest in disclosure. MDPI is a non-profit business entity in Switzerland which operates a collection of scientific journals. The damage from exposed ‘review process’ trade secrets will be non-existent unless the communications reveal evidence of malfeasance. “An informed public is the most potent of all restraints upon misgovernment[.]” Grosjean v. Am. Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 250 (1936).
@brokentruthTV
Keep your “Pride” month. I think we all need a humility month!
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#victoryjoy at premiere of #pkandemic3
Peter Hotez- the Clown that doesn’t stop.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj6-QDVYbv8&feature=youtu.be
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj6-QDVYbv8&feature=youtu.be
YouTube
Peter Hotez - Vaccine Expert
video by Orf
Correction: IFR for 0-18, according to Nature, was 2 in 1 million which is 0.000002 but when converted to a percentage is 0.0002%, not 0.000002%. While each # is effectively 0%, and this is obviously a comedy video, I still strive to be accurate…
Correction: IFR for 0-18, according to Nature, was 2 in 1 million which is 0.000002 but when converted to a percentage is 0.0002%, not 0.000002%. While each # is effectively 0%, and this is obviously a comedy video, I still strive to be accurate…
So you’re saying it’s not gene therapy?
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(21)00026-2/fulltext
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(21)00026-2/fulltext
eClinicalMedicine
mRNA vaccines: A matter of delivery
Vaccines based on messenger RNA (mRNA) are attracting worldwide attention as the Pfizer
and Moderna vaccines have been authorized for emergency use by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration and similar authorities around the world. This is the first time that…
and Moderna vaccines have been authorized for emergency use by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration and similar authorities around the world. This is the first time that…