1.7b - you say well isn't that an interesting number, why not 1.5b, why not 2b? 😎🙏
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/2055308674101371015?s=20

Not a fan of this channel but this is a prudent move, and makes perfect sense, and I'd expect nothing less.
https://x.com/Osint613/status/2055326839560679662?s=20

More of what I voted for!
https://x.com/FoxNews/status/2055326776549605474?s=20

Lie-A-Watha gon' lie
https://x.com/EricTrump/status/2055344375039680889?s=20

‼️Trump Media & Technology Group has announced a merger involving TAE Technologies, a private U.S.-based company specialising in advanced nuclear fusion research.

• TAE Technologies, formerly known as Tri-Alpha Energy, has been developing fusion technology for over two decades and focuses on aneutronic fusion, a method designed to reduce radiation and nuclear waste compared to traditional fusion approaches.

• TAE’s work centres on plasma physics and alternative fusion fuels, with the stated objective of producing clean, safe, and scalable energy.

• The merger will make fusion-related technology accessible through a publicly traded entity linked to Trump Media & Technology Group.

• No commercial fusion reactor currently exists, and the technology remains in the research and development phase.

• The companies state that the merger is intended to position the group for future energy and technology demands.

https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel

Energy, Power and Suppression

Every civilisation, without exception, is built on energy. Not ideology, nor money, it’s actually ENERGY that marks the difference between thriving or merely surviving.

Who controls it, who distributes it, who decides its price, and who is allowed access to it, determines everything else that follows.

We are now moving into a world that will be increasingly digital, automated, AI-driven, and relentlessly energy-hungry. Data centres, computation, constant connectivity, all of it depends on vast, uninterrupted power.

This is why fusion matters and why plasma matters.

Aneutronic fusion, in particular, is not the crude, radioactive, heat-heavy nuclear model most people associate with the word “nuclear.” It is about precision and stability rather than explosion or force. It promises less radiation, less dependency and fewer choke points.

Plasma itself is not “fuel” in the way we’re used to thinking, it’s a state of matter that is electrically active, responsive to fields, capable of being organised and shaped. A medium, rather than a source.

Anyone who works seriously with plasma understands something else too, even if they rarely say it out loud: the vacuum is not empty.

Zero-point energy has existed as a concept for decades, but it’s consistently dismissed because energy abundance has always been more threatening to power than scarcity ever was.

Somehow the Trump Media & Technology Group merger with TAE Technologies, a company working on advanced and unconventional fusion approaches, seems very significant to me. And I can’t help but be reminded that it was Trump’s uncle, John G Trump, that was tasked with examining the seized papers of Nikola Tesla, a man who spoke openly about wireless power, energy drawn from the ether, and a world where electricity would no longer be metered or controlled.

Tesla died alone and impoverished, his ideas were shelved, and the energy system that followed moved in the opposite direction: centralised, metered, rationed and controlled. But when Trump places his own initials on a publicly traded company now tied to fusion research, I think we should pay attention…

The future whether we like it or not, is AI, but this requires more energy that we can even begin to imagine. Our current sources of energy are by no means capable of maintaining a digital world running, so perhaps they will finally have no choice but to slowly disclose methods of harnessing limitless energy.

It seems to me like fusion may be the acceptable bridge to get us there and plasma the missing key that finally opens the door to a whole new energy paradigm.

https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel

Nuclear energy is the figure. Let’s look at how $DJT TAE stacks up 🚨

Companies like OKLO SMR are aiming to use fast-fission technology. Their business model is Build-own-operate and sell power via long-term Power Purchase Agreements.

OKLO begins construction in 2026, commercial operations by 2028 and scale to gigawatts level by 2030.

TAE also begins construction 2026, first energy 2029, net energy scaling by 2030, and grid electricity ~2031.

Fission fuel: Uranium (enriched U-235), plutonium, or thorium. This produces long-lived radioactive waste

Fusion fuel: Deuterium (from seawater), tritium (lithium). No uranium involved
TAE’s p-B11 Uses ordinary hydrogen (protons) and boron; both extremely abundant, cheap, and non-radioactive.

While years away, TAE could achieve global scaling and crowd out new fission builds. Why build more uranium fueled reactors if fusion offers higher energy density, abundant fuel, inherent safety, and far less waste?

Both fission and fusion companies target the surging electricity demand from AI data centers and hyperscale computing. Trump made it a point that America will be the leader in A.I. and Cryptocurrency mining.

Power ⚡️
OKLO/SMR fast fusion ~75 MWt per unit. [ thermal the raw heat energy generated in tbe reactor core before conversion to electricity]

TAE p-B11 aneutronic fusion ~50MWe. Scaling to 350-500MWe. [“e” measures the usable electricity output, no heat waste. Or net deliverable power{

Nuclear power plants are not 100% efficient at turning heat into electricity. Conventional fission reactors are 33–35% efficient so 3000 MWt thermal might yield ~1000 MWe electric for example.

Realistically both fusion and fission have a place. OKLO stock ran from $5 to $194 in 2025 with no revenue and first commercial plant in 2028.

Commercial nuclear fusion has never been achieved but DJT-TAE stands to be the first.

This could substantially reduce or displace demand for uranium used in traditional nuclear fission reactors.

Is Nuclear Fusion the holy grail or crown jewel Devin Nunes referring to? See the link:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544223025446 https://truthsocial.com/@AzKyrie/116461224817528207