If anyone wants to learn more about this tech and some pretty cool Parallels with Trump his Uncle, this tech and the upcoming TMTG-TAE merger, please check out this convo. went over comparison's to TAE and ALL other competitors and why TAE reign's Supreme, and again some Parallels to Tesla, and his battle with Edison over AC v DC, with a cool twist, and also John G. Trump and how his work echoes TAE's 3 divisions, of Fusion/PowerStorage/Life Sciences, pretty cool convo, sometimes Grok can get some things right, though it is rare, I think this is one of those times. Cheers

https://x.com/i/grok/share/87cf8c375d92442a9c2b642dd83f3075

A reminder of my article on exactly this, with sauce, vids, and links to the Bondi "flub" the Kash "testimony" etc
https://x.com/Derpst8d/status/2022860358227279995

Welp, here’s another win that makes my earlier cannibalization scenario even easier. Slowly turning it from possible to very doable. I will explain in the next post.
https://x.com/Derpst8d/status/2053950352190591412?s=20

Welp, here’s another big win that makes my earlier cannibalization scenario even easier...slowly turning it from possible to very doable.

Mississippi is now moving on a redraw post-Callais. If they deliver even +1 (cracking Bennie Thompson’s district- but I think +2 is likely tbh), we’re looking at a redraw baseline already sitting at +20 to +22 net (TX +5, FL +4, TN +1, NC/MO/OH +4-5 combined, LA/AL/MS/SC +6-8, plus the VA +4 negation).

And that’s before Utah potentially flips with new litigation and before California does its thing.

Speaking of Cali, as I’ve said in my other posts in regards to the cannibalization theory, I've proposed since August 2025, Prop 50’s packing (trying to flip CA-1, CA-3, CA-9, CA-13, CA-22, CA-27, CA-41, CA-47, CA-48) thinned out the margins in previously safe ones like CA-9, CA-13, CA-27, CA-47 and their adjacent districts like CA-25, CA-26, CA-28, CA-40, CA-45, CA-46.

Cali is pissed about the fires, fraud, costs, Newsom fatigue, and all the other bad news coming. That backlash plus strong MAGA turnout could easily deliver the +10 swing we need there.

SC still needs to play ball and the resolution to allow a special session passed the House and is now in the Senate. If it lands, Clyburn’s seat is a goner.

This is all falling into place just as I predicted so... Why is no one else talking about this? I think because they’re focused on getting Cali to lose their redraw.

But I don’t see that happening.

The reason it worked elsewhere was a direct ruling from the state Supreme Court in VA and the fact that red state legislatures were able to pass and do or are in process of passing and redrawing. CA doesn’t have a red legislature, far from it, and I highly doubt we have a SC that will uphold Callais either.

I think if people would take that into consideration, they'd give my theory more credence. And I prefer my theory vs reversal because my theory is a bigger win in both seats and perforated Dems feet from shooting them, and shows in just another way how blatantly unconstitutional their games are. A reversal gives them ammo to bitch with, like we are seeing now only with a little more legs being Cali.

Regardless, I think the convo switches soon, and...well.. you heard it here first when it does. LFG! 😎

🟥🌊Oh and dang I forgot to add, NY just got blocked from their redraw too, so that’s another +1 negation for Dems.

And we also have Alabama getting a fresh green light from SCOTUS today. That +1 to +2 is now looking very real and fast. The South just keeps stacking these Ws.

Redraw floor keeps climbing. LFG 🇺🇸😎🇺🇸
https://x.com/Derpst8d/status/2053965957132177594?s=20

Link to my Feb 20th post when SCOTUS ruled no on IEEPA

Fooking called another one: The DOJ is already in court defending Section 122 authority (the quick 15% temporary tariff tool with no investigation needed).
This fits perfectly into the bigger picture I laid out In February when the IEEPA got denied by SCOTUS.

SCOTUS closed the IEEPA door, so the admin immediately pivots to the proven alternatives (232 for national security, 301 for unfair practices, and 122 as the fast bridge).

Trump didn't get surprised by the ruling, he positioned for it.

Same national security framing, better legal footing, and now multiple tools working together.

The full breakdown of how this all connects (including the refunds-as-leverage play and why IEEPA was likely the deliberate opener) is in the thread below.

Trump is cooking. Trust the plan. 🇺🇸😎🇺🇸

https://x.com/AAGShumate/status/2053949687191720138?s=20

👇Related to👆. Posts i posted back when SCOTUS ruled on the IEEPA, and the call on 122, 232 and 301 😎👇