Based on Tuchelโs preferences, in a 3-4-3 it would be a Mount-Havertz-Sterling attack. Even with James & Chilwell back, the creativity in that team is too limited. A system which has a 4 man attack & new creator suits the team more. Even Mount would thrive more as a goalscorer.
[Premier league panel]
โน๏ธ @ChelseaAnalysis
[Premier league panel]
โน๏ธ @ChelseaAnalysis
๐71๐5
CHELSEA ANALYSIS ๐๐ต
Based on Tuchelโs preferences, in a 3-4-3 it would be a Mount-Havertz-Sterling attack. Even with James & Chilwell back, the creativity in that team is too limited. A system which has a 4 man attack & new creator suits the team more. Even Mount would thriveโฆ
Back 4 without proper DM is a rubbish formation that won't work with this players we have presently.
โน๏ธ @ChelseaAnalysis
โน๏ธ @ChelseaAnalysis
๐77๐2
CHELSEA ANALYSIS ๐๐ต
Based on Tuchelโs preferences, in a 3-4-3 it would be a Mount-Havertz-Sterling attack. Even with James & Chilwell back, the creativity in that team is too limited. A system which has a 4 man attack & new creator suits the team more. Even Mount would thriveโฆ
Can Havertz be a creator ? Donโt think so. Heโs best as a box 9 who drifts out wide to create overloads. His top League Cup final performance epitomised this.He caused Matip & VVD issues drifting into those wide pockets.This type of play suits a 4 man attack much more than 3-4-3.
[Premier league panel]
โน๏ธ @ChelseaAnalysis
[Premier league panel]
โน๏ธ @ChelseaAnalysis
๐64