#INGAME
This Gusto inversion is making that wing so vulnerable.
The midfield ball carrying isn't also there despite the fact that Betis isn't even pressing that hard.
These are the fixes we need. There is nothing tough with this match
This Gusto inversion is making that wing so vulnerable.
The midfield ball carrying isn't also there despite the fact that Betis isn't even pressing that hard.
These are the fixes we need. There is nothing tough with this match
π97β€16
Chelsea 1st half xG:
Vs Fulham - 0.17
Vs Liverpool -1.09
Vs Newcastle - 0.49
Vs United - 0.51
Vs Forest - 0.39
37' vs Betis - 0.05
Vs Fulham - 0.17
Vs Liverpool -1.09
Vs Newcastle - 0.49
Vs United - 0.51
Vs Forest - 0.39
37' vs Betis - 0.05
π89π24π13β€4
Maresca thinks Gusto can play midfield better than Enzo. I have no words
β€75π28π18π7
CHELSEA ANALYSIS ππ΅
#INGAME This Gusto inversion is making that wing so vulnerable. The midfield ball carrying isn't also there despite the fact that Betis isn't even pressing that hard. These are the fixes we need. There is nothing tough with this match
To fix?
You cannot invert Cucu because of the Anthony threat. I'd just stop the inversions altogether, maintain Gusto without inversion, pull out Enzo for James, let James be the defensive cover in mid and let Caicedo do ball carrying.
There is also the Isco threat inside if you decide to push Caicedo at RB for inversion.
This ball carrying should create empty spaces for Palmer to roam in.
You cannot invert Cucu because of the Anthony threat. I'd just stop the inversions altogether, maintain Gusto without inversion, pull out Enzo for James, let James be the defensive cover in mid and let Caicedo do ball carrying.
There is also the Isco threat inside if you decide to push Caicedo at RB for inversion.
This ball carrying should create empty spaces for Palmer to roam in.
π₯90π50β€26π10