12TH.
π72π₯΄20πΎ5π4π2
Chelsea plan to hire Paul Mitchell. He is set to join in a senior post. While his friendship with incoming boss Mauricio Pochettino is a major attraction, he is also an ideal man to shift unwanted players.
[via Alan Nixon / SunSport]
βΉοΈMORE:@ChelseaAnalysis
[via Alan Nixon / SunSport]
βΉοΈMORE:@ChelseaAnalysis
π186β€10π₯3π2
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π134β€16π13π7
Had an argument with a fellow Chelsea fan offline, and I told him that the Roman model was bound to be phased out sooner than later and here is why
Money :Roman came into football at the time where the "haves" were really few and the "have not" were more. This created a natural
Separation, what this means is that Chelsea were operating on a different level financially than their fellow competitors. In todays game a Brighton or Southampton can casually spend 100mill+ in a transfer window and not flinch. Every one is Rich so the gap is closer than ever.
Talent :The talent pool we could access then due to our financial advantage can now be accessed even much earlier before peak season. Take a look at Evan Fergus /Havertz for the fee we paid, we signed an arguably less talented player. So where is the advantage? Clubs with proper
Planning are tapping into the superstar market way before the stardom happens, basically before you sign your Neymar from Barca, a club like Southampton has signed him from Santos. Crazy crazy stuff.
Coaches :Hire & fire the MO of Roman, as Mikel Obi mentioned "when he touched
down with his helicopter the manager was gone "this worked at the time because the few available class managers then prioritized winning over anything else and clubs of status attracted them. Today stability is the watchword. Why do you think Pep turned us down severally??
Stability plays a very key role in a managers success and this extends to players too. Also the constant chop and change meant that we had blow through atleast half the elite coaches available, a constant chop and change means at some point we will be left with re-hiring ex
Coaches or settling for unproven ones (that the fanbase hates so much) either way that course of action was bound to backfire. Many ofcourse will interpret this as a dig on Roman, no its not its just to show that what he was doing was unsustainable regardless of the intention.
[Via @Fxlse_nein1 on Twitter]
βΉοΈ MORE:@ChelseaAnalysis
Money :Roman came into football at the time where the "haves" were really few and the "have not" were more. This created a natural
Separation, what this means is that Chelsea were operating on a different level financially than their fellow competitors. In todays game a Brighton or Southampton can casually spend 100mill+ in a transfer window and not flinch. Every one is Rich so the gap is closer than ever.
Talent :The talent pool we could access then due to our financial advantage can now be accessed even much earlier before peak season. Take a look at Evan Fergus /Havertz for the fee we paid, we signed an arguably less talented player. So where is the advantage? Clubs with proper
Planning are tapping into the superstar market way before the stardom happens, basically before you sign your Neymar from Barca, a club like Southampton has signed him from Santos. Crazy crazy stuff.
Coaches :Hire & fire the MO of Roman, as Mikel Obi mentioned "when he touched
down with his helicopter the manager was gone "this worked at the time because the few available class managers then prioritized winning over anything else and clubs of status attracted them. Today stability is the watchword. Why do you think Pep turned us down severally??
Stability plays a very key role in a managers success and this extends to players too. Also the constant chop and change meant that we had blow through atleast half the elite coaches available, a constant chop and change means at some point we will be left with re-hiring ex
Coaches or settling for unproven ones (that the fanbase hates so much) either way that course of action was bound to backfire. Many ofcourse will interpret this as a dig on Roman, no its not its just to show that what he was doing was unsustainable regardless of the intention.
[Via @Fxlse_nein1 on Twitter]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π81β€25π8
CHELSEA ANALYSIS ππ΅
Had an argument with a fellow Chelsea fan offline, and I told him that the Roman model was bound to be phased out sooner than later and here is why Money :Roman came into football at the time where the "haves" were really few and the "have not" were more.β¦
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π31β€3π3
β€64π8π8π©7π4π3
β€99π©24π14π11π8π4