Theymos - Michael Marquardt
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAE_evyVGPv9FDEI4jg

CSW
Jul 30, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1564506937210000?thread_ts=1564506937.210000&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2253

Oh, by the way - Hal Finney patented all the time

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/2a/5e/59/da3ca44b7bf7eb/WO2008105941A2.pdf

And, commercially - not as a blocking patent

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/74/58/9a/cadd36254d6d9b/US4441104.pdf

CSW
Jul 30, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1564506937210000?thread_ts=1564506937.210000&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2253

Real estate

CSW
Jul 30, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1564503414194700

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2255

This is incorrect

1. The BitCH coin OP_Codes are not all enabled AND new ones are added

2. Block capped scaling and no plans to scale as I intended

3. Cash - no - it is now a drug contract coin

The reality is that cash is not used as much as you think these days

All the smuggling etc - stopped being cash a decade ago

Electronic transmission became easier

other assets

Real estate

CSW
Jul 30, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1564503414194700

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2255

CSW
Ago 17, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566076280075500?thread_ts=1566076280.075500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2257

Signing just proves possession.

Evidence is based on law.

Between 2006 and 2009, I wrote 110 papers and a lot of code.

The white paper is in some of these papers.

Satoshi did not copy me, and, I published in 2007.

Satoshi is the name I used.

The false narrative of a key being proof of identity ends. Law is law. Szabo is an idiot and has no understanding of the law.

And, bitcoin is not censorship proof

CSW
Ago 17, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566076280075500?thread_ts=1566076280.075500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2257

CSW
Ago 17, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566073635064700

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2259

That paper was a part of the submission in late 2007 in my Law masters to allow me to progress to the Thesis.

_The result of this is that commerce on the Internet has come to rely nearly exclusively on payment intermediaries with the associated costs and processing electronic payments. For the majority of day-to-day transactions, the system works well enough. The inherent weaknesses of the trust-based model come through the need to mitigate fraud and the associated economic costs that this creates. Micropayments would require the introduction of micropayments that are economically infeasible to mediate. To be of use, such a system would rely on either the buyer or the seller being willing to place trust in the other party to a level where they would prefer to walk away from a transaction than to dispute it. Mediation, arbitration and disputes that lead to court processes increase the friction of trade and increment transactional costs._

_Micropayments and even small casual transactions are thus precluded from being used and as with cases theory of the firm, intermediaries grow into the size that is economically viable. Many economic solutions fail to be implemented or developed due to the transactional frictions that exist. At present, no mechanism exists to make payments over communication channel without a trusted payment intermediary._

_Electronic payment systems including digital currency systems of the past have always required third-party interactions. Systems including digicash and EGold have looked to incorporate system such as traitor tracing and methodologies to expose parties who engage in fraudulent transactions or double spending._

The second paragraph here is interesting...

_The postal acceptance rule as a general consideration, does not to apply to Web-based communications. This is because most Web-based systems employee mechanisms such as check-sums to maintain constant communication between the client and server systems. The constant verification of this communication channel provides for the implication that communications take place though an immediate send process. Thus, both parties receive communications instantaneously._

_Similarly, with the web, a purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a payment intermediary. This form of contractual negotiations is distinct from e-mail and deserves separate consideration. “Click-wrap” Internet contracts (Reed, 2004) have their own issues, but they still mirror many of the technologies that have preceded them. Thus far, payment intermediaries have been required a system such as DigiCash and EGold use intermediaries as a solution to the double spending problem._

It becomes REALLY interesting when you Google that single paragraph.

Though that is the early draft and not the final :)

CSW
Ago 17, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566073635064700

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2259

The postal acceptance rule
THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2008

http://web.archive.org/web/20081107102451/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com:80/2008/01/postal-acceptance-rule.html

https://telegra.ph/The-postal-acceptance-rule-05-08

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2259

Craig Wright Articles
https://t.me/CSW_Articles

CSW
Ago 18, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566129426131600?thread_ts=1566129426.131600&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2263

Payments Providers and Intermediaries as Defined in the Law of the Internet.
14 Pages
Craig S Wright
nChain
Date Written: October 30, 2007

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3438946

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2263

1/2
It will be validated in due time.

My LLM was granted on the 15th May 2008.

It was submitted in Feb 2008. My proposal dates to versions between June and Nov 2007.

The papers that precede this go back as far as mid 2006.

My Masters in Statistics will be next. There are a number of papers associated with this, not the dissertation, but the ones leading to it.

A full dossier will be put together. My work on Systems engineering and Poisson and Binomial functions and on Risk models.

Intermediaries or third parties are the same thing. In common language, we call these Third Parties.

In law, they are intermediaries.

he seems to have missed the entire nature of my research, if you simply accept that an intermediary is a third-party using legal terminology you can start to see that the entire focus of my study in Northumbria was in this area

more importantly, it was not about digital gold. My studies were around digital cash for Internet payments. In this, I looked at micropayments and in particular existing peer-to-peer systems and failures. The problem with systems such as Visa or even PayPal at the time were that the cost of doing a transaction with another party precluded many of the initial possibilities that were foreseen with the Internet.

It took me many more years to finish the base aspects of metanet, but they are well underway now

Bitcoin started well before the financial crash.

I know people want to associate bitcoin with the Wall Street occupy movement and many other anti-government things that existed, but it is nothing like that. Bitcoin is an evidence trail. If you look at the other aspects of my study in audit and forensics, you will see how it ties in. My work in auditing Sarbanes Oxley 302 and 404 and other aspects of financial systems is built into bitcoin

quite possibly but the administrative side of things was never my strong suit

I've no idea what your name it.

The one thing I was never any good at was marketing.

In order to create bitcoin, I had to study to a postgrad level all of the following:

- Network theory
- Propagation theory
- Accounting and auditing
- Law
- Statistics and probability theory
- Perpetration theory
- Game theory
- Computer science
- Economics
- Risk and survival studies

So, the real problem that I find now is that I cannot isolate domains. In any of these fields experts have their own terms of art. I understand the all, however, with a grounding in so many separate fields of study, I no longer have the ability to pick the correct word for the correct person. The same terminology exists across fields where different acronyms are used. It is a shame that we don't have the same terminology used everywhere, but the reality is that us humans are messy

I have already been contacted by the privacy team at Northumbria University. There are people already seeking to validate my masters in law studies. I have approved it.

Generally speaking, universities don't approve requests about students. The comment from one of the people managing data protection at Northumbria in legal services is without giving away any information about his name:

_Although it appears that you have published this yourself, and therefore made your student ID ‘publically available’, the University has a standard policy of neither confirming not denying that someone is or was a student at the University without that persons consent, and for me to confirm that the paper was produced by you as a student of the University would naturally not be compatible with this position. I am therefore asking if you would like us to verify that the paper was produced by you as a student of Northumbria university or whether you would rather I respond with ‘neither confirm nor deny’?_

I have authorised the University and it will be confirmed shortly.


CSW
Ago 18, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566129426131600?thread_ts=1566129426.131600&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2263

2/2
This is something you should note when you read the Wikipedia and Forbes article.. There was a statement that they contacted Charles Sturt University who said that I had two masters degrees and no doctorate. That is very simple to dismiss. The University doesn't do that.

You see, in this age of private information, it remains a criminal offence to give out personally identifiable information without authority.

Even the part about my masters degrees was wrong. I have three masters degrees from Charles Sturt University and I was about to graduate a fourth. I had nearly completed the Masters In Systems Development. I had only to complete an industry subject that I taught. Yes, I actually had to take an exam for a subject I lectured and then I would have finished. However, I was enrolled with two separate student IDs. The University had a strict policy against this but had made an exception for me informally.

When Greg and crew decided to attack my reputation in mid-2015, one of the things they did was complained to the University about my enrolment 2 degrees simultaneously. I was forced to withdraw from one

*So one thing people don't get*.

A very simple way of discrediting the Forbes paid hit piece is to note that not only did they get the number of masters degrees I have wrong or to ignore the fact that I was listed on the site as staff but to note that the University does not validate information from random journalists. In fact, to do so would be a crime in Australia.

CSW
Ago 18, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566129426131600?thread_ts=1566129426.131600&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2263

CSW
Ago 19, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566197803271400?thread_ts=1566197803.271400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2268

Banks versus markets.
By Craig Wright as
Adam Selene
Jun 29, 2017
https://medium.com/@adam_selene/banks-versus-markets-2d96bfef11db

https://telegra.ph/Banks-versus-markets-By-Craig-Wright-05-09-2

CSW
May 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1620638464018500?thread_ts=1620638464.018500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2270

8th Grade Final Exam: Salina, Kansas - 1895
This is the eighth-grade final exam* from 1895 from Salina, Kansas. It was taken
from the original document on file at the Smoky Valley Genealogical Society
and Library in Salina, Kansas and reprinted by the Salina Journal.
Grammar (Time, one hour)
1. Give nine rules for the use of Capital Letters.
2. Name the Parts of Speech and define those that have no modifications.
3. Define Verse, Stanza and Paragraph.
4. What are the Principal Parts of a verb? Give Principal Parts of do, lie, lay and run.
5. Define Case, Illustrate each Case.
6. What is Punctuation? Give rules for principal marks of Punctuation.
7-10. Write a composition of about 150 words and show therein that you understand the practical use of the rules of grammar.
Arithmetic (Time, 1.25 hours)
1. Name and define the Fundamental Rules of Arithmetic.
2. A wagon box is 2 ft. deep, 10 feet long, and 3 ft. wide. How many bushels of wheat will it hold?
3. If a load of wheat weighs 3942 lbs., what is it worth at 50cts. per bu, deducting 1050 lbs. for tare?
4. District No. 33 has a valuation of $35,000. What is the necessary levy to carry on a school seven months at $50 per month, and have $104 for incidentals?
5. Find cost of 6720 lbs. coal at $6.00 per ton.
6. Find the interest of $512.60 for 8 months and 18 days at 7 percent.
7. What is the cost of 40 boards 12 inches wide and 16 ft. long at $.20 per inch?
8. Find bank discount on $300 for 90 days (no grace) at 10 percent.
9. What is the cost of a square farm at $15 per acre, the distance around which is 640 rods?
10.Write a Bank Check, a Promissory Note, and a Receipt.
U.S. History (Time, 45 minutes)
1. Give the epochs into which U.S. History is divided.
2. Give an account of the discovery of America by Columbus.
3. Relate the causes and results of the Revolutionary War.
4. Show the territorial growth of the United States.
5. Tell what you can of the history of Kansas.
6. Describe three of the most prominent battles of the Rebellion.
7. Who were the following: Morse, Whitney, Fulton, Bell, Lincoln, Penn, and Howe?
8. Name events connected with the following dates: 1607, 1620, 1800, 1849, and 1865?
Orthography (Time, one hour)
1. What is meant by the following: Alphabet, phonetic orthography, etymology, syllabication?
2. What are elementary sounds? How classified?
3. What are the following, and give examples of each: Trigraph, subvocals, diphthong, cognate letters, linguals?
4. Give four substitutes for caret 'u'.
5. Give two rules for spelling words with final 'e'. Name two exceptions under each rule.
6. Give two uses of silent letters in spelling. Illustrate each.
7. Define the following prefixes and use in connection with a word: Bi, dis, mis, pre, semi, post, non, inter, mono, super.
8. Mark diacritically and divide into syllables the following, and name the sign that indicates the sound: Card, ball, mercy, sir, odd, cell, rise, blood, fare, last.
9. Use the following correctly in sentences, Cite, site, sight, fane, fain, feign, vane, vain, vein, raze, raise, rays.
10.Write 10 words frequently mispronounced and indicate pronunciation by use of diacritical marks and by syllabication.
Geography (Time, one hour)
1. What is climate? Upon what does climate depend?
2. How do you account for the extremes of climate in Kansas?
3. Of what use are rivers? Of what use is the ocean?
4. Describe the mountains of N.A.
5. Name and describe the following: Monrovia, Odessa, Denver, Manitoba, Hecla, Yukon, St. Helena, Juan Fermandez, Aspinwall and Orinoco.
6. Name and locate the principal trade centers of the U.S.
7. Name all the republics of Europe and give capital of each.
8. Why is the Atlantic Coast colder than the Pacific in the same latitude?
9. Describe the process by which the water of the ocean returns to the sources of rivers.
10.Describe the movements of the earth. Give inclination of the earth.

CSW
May 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1620638464018500?thread_ts=1620638464.018500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2270