CSW - Slack Channel
1.09K subscribers
4.21K photos
35 videos
198 files
4.7K links
Download Telegram
Let me again make this clear.

Slack is not a place for discussion on anything that changes bitcoin.

Nowhere is.

As bitcoin does not change.

But, I will not stay if we discuss changes. And, these STILL will not ever for any reason occur

If you don't like it, stiff fucking shit.

Bitcoin is not a community project.

Bitcoin is not a democracy

Bitcoin is a protocol and it is fixed, set in stone!

CSW
Mar 10, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646884029139809?thread_ts=1646884029.139809&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4168
πŸ‘1
The node argument is a non sequitur.

The, but you have x we have y you are less decentralised, while in itself being erroneous is a form of special pleading.

The goal of Bitcoin was NOT decentralisation. That is the myth.

Bitcoin was a working micropayment system, digital cash.

In any debate, the goal of decentralisation is minor, the primary argument is whether the system can scale and achieve this cheaply.

Decentralisation is the red herring the opposition use to throw the argument away from Bitcoin as it was designed.

As long as there are competitors, the system is decentralised. As long as new entrants are able to compete, it is decentralised.

Note, by definition, PoS cannot be decentralised. The system is in stasis. The owner of a system retains power.

CSW
Mar 10, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646894324328459?thread_ts=1646894324.328459&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4173
Decentralisation is a side benefit of bitcoin, because of competition.

It is not the purpose.

P2P is Alice sends to Bob, IP 2 IP.

Alice to Node to Bob is NOT peer to peer

CSW
Mar 10, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646895328785669?thread_ts=1646895328.785669&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4176
πŸ‘2
Bitcoin HAS an issuer, all assets do.

But, in 2009, the system was worth negative 1.1 million

No pre mine, no wrapped asset

Creating a contract is legal, a commodity, legal

BTC issue is Core

CSW
Mar 10, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646918209631299?thread_ts=1646918209.631299&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4179
πŸ‘1
In an IEEE conference later this year, I will explain how we will take bitcoin to 1 billion tps peak, using 2022 tech. To 100 billion tps before 2030 and have SPV lookups and proofs served for this.

0.001c usd a tx

Up to 4.29 billion exchanges a tx (packets) for 0.001c

Consider this a financial information release under the UK and US laws concerning information related to investment related statements

If you think this is not important, do the maths.

This is what I left Gavin to work on. No, protocol is set on stone. The original is needed

Work out yearly miner revenue

10billion x 0.00,001 x seconds a year

"Up to 4.29 billion exchanges a tx (packets) for 0.001c"

Means, up to 4.3 billion packets for as low as 0.001 c to miners.

Ip2Ip

Limit right now, Internet capacity

4.3GB Γ— 4.3 packets x 10 billion per second

Peer to peer

Not mesh

0.00001 x 10^9 Γ—3600 Γ— 24 x 365
Cents. Tps. Sec. Hours days

In $

CSW
Mar 11, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646980019189349?thread_ts=1646980019.189349&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4183
😁1
"Regulations that affect advertising
Advertising to consumers
The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations mean you cannot mislead or harass consumers by, for example:

including false or deceptive messages
leaving out important information
using aggressive sales techniques
Read β€˜The consumer protection from unfair trading regulations’ for the rules on advertising legally."

https://www.gov.uk/marketing-advertising-law/regulations-that-affect-advertising