CSW - Slack Channel
1.09K subscribers
4.21K photos
35 videos
198 files
4.7K links
Download Telegram
Global Blockchain Scaling with Dr. Craig Wright
by Cambridge Metanet Society

Free Register
Share this event
Date and time
Tue, 22 March 2022
18:00 – 20:00 GMT
Location
Gonville & Caius College, University of Cambridge

Trinity Street
Cambridge
CB2 1TA
United Kingdom

https://orlo.uk/kaX3E
πŸ‘1
2020. (2030)

10 billion TPS
Average fee, 0.001 US cents


That is my one real promise

Script

Able to naked transactions

That can sit 200 years and remain valid

Boring, Don't care

Everything ETH can do... but, 10,000 plus x cheaper

I know, boring

2030 10b tps

CSW
Mar 9, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646852223447739?thread_ts=1646852223.447739&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4165
Let me again make this clear.

Slack is not a place for discussion on anything that changes bitcoin.

Nowhere is.

As bitcoin does not change.

But, I will not stay if we discuss changes. And, these STILL will not ever for any reason occur

If you don't like it, stiff fucking shit.

Bitcoin is not a community project.

Bitcoin is not a democracy

Bitcoin is a protocol and it is fixed, set in stone!

CSW
Mar 10, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646884029139809?thread_ts=1646884029.139809&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4168
πŸ‘1
The node argument is a non sequitur.

The, but you have x we have y you are less decentralised, while in itself being erroneous is a form of special pleading.

The goal of Bitcoin was NOT decentralisation. That is the myth.

Bitcoin was a working micropayment system, digital cash.

In any debate, the goal of decentralisation is minor, the primary argument is whether the system can scale and achieve this cheaply.

Decentralisation is the red herring the opposition use to throw the argument away from Bitcoin as it was designed.

As long as there are competitors, the system is decentralised. As long as new entrants are able to compete, it is decentralised.

Note, by definition, PoS cannot be decentralised. The system is in stasis. The owner of a system retains power.

CSW
Mar 10, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646894324328459?thread_ts=1646894324.328459&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4173
Decentralisation is a side benefit of bitcoin, because of competition.

It is not the purpose.

P2P is Alice sends to Bob, IP 2 IP.

Alice to Node to Bob is NOT peer to peer

CSW
Mar 10, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646895328785669?thread_ts=1646895328.785669&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4176
πŸ‘2