CSW - Slack Channel
1.1K subscribers
4.21K photos
35 videos
198 files
4.7K links
Download Telegram
Transfer in intellectual property.

There are multiple ways to transfer intellectual property. However, the only way that is a true sale is what is termed an exclusive transfer with an abrogation of rights for one party.

In the standard transfer of intellectual property, the property rights have not been removed but copied. It is analogous to copying a digital file. Both parties now have equal rights to the original. Any changes after the event create different rights.

For instance, if Alice has developed valuable intellectual property [A0] and transfers this property to Bob, then both Alice and Bob have simultaneous rights to exploit the intellectual property. Neither can preclude the use of the other. To preclude use would require an exclusivity deal, and even then, to ensure that nothing remains, a full abrogation of rights would need to occur.

In further developments, if Alice now builds upon original software or other intellectual property such that [A0] -> [A1], where [A1] is new intellectual property built to extend [A0], then Bob has no rights to the additional software that Alice has created.

Equally, where Bob extends development and takes [A0], which he has received and creates a new product that extends it, [B0], Alice still has rights to use and exploit [A0], but does not have any rights in the extended property of [B0].

In an exclusive transfer, if no abrogation is noted, both parties retain the intellectual property ownership. Still, the individual with the exclusive transfer has a right that limits the use by the first party in some manner. For instance, maybe Bob can act in some markets that exclude Alice.

If Alice enters into an abrogation, this is a complete relinquishing of all rights in the intellectual property. On this event, Alice can no longer build upon [A0] or even use it without the permission of Bob. For an abrogation of intellectual property rights to occur, a very specific clause mitigating all rights and abandoning them needs to be included.

CSW
Nov 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636550293201600?thread_ts=1636550293.201600&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3355
Interesting re Coinbase.

Technically, the letter is a material event. By not making a statement they are opening themselves to a class action lawsuit and leaving the directors and company officers personally liable for damages.

The issue extends to SEC action.

As a public company, the failure to report a material event of this size is a felony offence.

More, it is significantly large enough that we could push for their delisting from a public exchange and worse.

I hope people don't have Coinbase shares...

Rats.... boat...

CSW
Nov 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636576609270200?thread_ts=1636576609.270200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3359
SEC Accelerates and Expands Reporting of Significant Events on Form 8-K
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers |
Last updated April 20, 2017

https://corporate.findlaw.com/finance/sec-accelerates-and-expands-reporting-of-significant-events-on.html

CSW
Nov 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636576941274100?thread_ts=1636576941.274100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3362
SEC Accelerates and Expands Reporting of Significant Events on Form 8-K
This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers |
Last updated April 20, 2017
https://corporate.findlaw.com/finance/sec-accelerates-and-expands-reporting-of-significant-events-on.html

The letter is material and required an 8-k to be lodged by Coinbase.

You should NOTE this. That Coinbase is technically in default from withholding the SEC mandated 8-k form

It comes with possible felony charges. And, the CEO could be banned from operating an exchange or even a public company by not telling the market of this material event.

Funny how much h of this stuff I know.

Look up Rule 144, SEC.

Turn out, they (main pre-Ipo holders and officers) are legally bared and in criminal breach if they sell a single share or even take I lien on then for failing to disclose.

CSW
Nov 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636576941274100?thread_ts=1636576941.274100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3362
Core can thank the ATO for the patents.

I was silly enough to have been planning on releasing my IP for nix.

But, the ATO attacks stated that I was not an enterprise as I did not file my research as patents, but rather between 2011 and 2015 ended up giving most of it away freely.

In fact, in that time, I gave away ideas, software and more that has ended as 1000s of shit ICO and NFT offers

Before 2015, I never planned on patenting. The idea came from the tax office and was driven by those in opposition who helped the ATO misunderstand bitcoin (Greg, you here?)...

If there was not a block cap bs "debate", and bitcoin was not hobbled by Core and their lies....

I would not have needed to.

It gives a small advantage where we can start from 2010 while losing 2010 to 2020...

Think of it as a one time redo for the 2010 events

CSW
Nov 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636579922293000?thread_ts=1636579922.293000&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3364
Well, there are MANY ideas in the 2009 - 2015 timeframe that are public that I invented. My ideas are used in a lot of ICO and alt-coins, but they are single ideas away from the main system (and are mostly badly implemented).

None of these can be patented.

When I discussed a number of ideas in Au conferences in the 2011-2012 timeframe - that is a disclosure, so ALL those are ideas I gave away freely.

The ideas I discussed in a public forum the ATO and Au Gov called in 2013 and then again in 2014, are also not able to be patented - as I disclosed (the filings for these by others... are worthless as by discussions in that period form a public disclosure and hence invalidate any patents from that time and others that people published using that information).

CSW
Nov 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636581039297500?thread_ts=1636581039.297500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3366
There is a way out for Coinbase .

If they negotiate a licence, list bitcoin (BSV)...

They get to exist.

If not, we obliterate them.

Material event, why?

The suit against Coinbase will exceed the market value at the ATH, that of all directors and officers and still not be paid

I CAN be fair, but it is a VERY limited time offer.

Brian and I met in my office before the split.

Did he forget to say that?

CSW
Nov 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636583215303900?thread_ts=1636583215.303900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3368
I cannot believe nobody knows it

I was a young programmer.

I worked on contract for thermonuclear

Before EA Games took them over

Not only has nobody I ask seen Ready Player One, they have no idea what the fxxk a Bonzai Banzai is...

And they allowed some young Australian crud coders to cut their Teath.

CSW
Nov 11, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1636598811365400?thread_ts=1636598811.365400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3372