Remember, there is MORE than the coins, the assets are the rights, the database and the coins
And even the coins are recoverable
The Core guys don't want you to know, but they lied
The passing off and database claims for me are worth about 252 billion USD.
I don’t see a downside.
I will let you know that Bitcoin Cash will not survive. I have no interest in negotiating with Roger. He burnt his bridges.
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635846497089900?thread_ts=1635846497.089900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3288
And even the coins are recoverable
The Core guys don't want you to know, but they lied
The passing off and database claims for me are worth about 252 billion USD.
I don’t see a downside.
I will let you know that Bitcoin Cash will not survive. I have no interest in negotiating with Roger. He burnt his bridges.
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635846497089900?thread_ts=1635846497.089900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3288
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635846497089900?thread_ts=1635846497.089900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3288
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635846497089900?thread_ts=1635846497.089900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3288
Simply saying that Satoshi is hiding or that Satoshi is dead is inadequate. You see, there is a court case for the control of the protocol and the coins. All up, it is worth probably $314 billion US dollars. If I wasn’t Satoshi (I am), there are many ways that Satoshi could have discredited me anonymously. But that won’t happen because very simply I am. I know they don’t want to admit that but, reality is dealt with in courts and not the relativistic BS that some people seem to want.
Next …
The PoSM crowd will start with an argument is that Satoshi is dead. Then, they will argue that Satoshi was an utter loner with no computer systems or that at least Satoshi somehow threw these into a volcano just before jumping in himself. Finally, they will argue that Satoshi has no background or history and came out of nowhere. Self-taught in 8 to 10 different disciplines.
They will argue that Satoshi has no family. Likely arguing that either he was a virgin birth or sprung whole out of the row of a God in the form of Minerva.
They will say that Satoshi had no friends, work colleagues, or anyone else with whom he could have talked and shared information.
The funny thing that they seem to ignore is that people don’t exist outside of the real world. Not even Aspies like myself. In the real world, people have other people that they can trust. There are people like my uncle with who I shared information. My cousins. My friends, as limited as that really is.
They want you to believe that proof comes from a digital code. They want to believe that if you share that code, someone may not be the owner. They want to claim that dread pirate Roberts was someone else and that the years of forensic evidence found on the laptop belonging to Ross Ulbricht was all placed by the police. They want you to believe that normal people share their keys. They want you to believe that the only purpose for bitcoin is to buy heroin. I wanted to believe that it is a system that has nothing to do with contract or law.
They want you to believe a lie.
Well, if Satoshi was not me, it would be easy to intervene - years ago.
Not a good arguement
If Bitcoin is SO very resiliant - then there should be no flaws
There is no attach if bitcoin is honest.
You see, the "legal attack" only refers to dishonest money. But, bitcoin is about honest money.
So, there is no attack.
CSW
Nov 2,. 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635853404098300?thread_ts=1635853404.098300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3290
Next …
The PoSM crowd will start with an argument is that Satoshi is dead. Then, they will argue that Satoshi was an utter loner with no computer systems or that at least Satoshi somehow threw these into a volcano just before jumping in himself. Finally, they will argue that Satoshi has no background or history and came out of nowhere. Self-taught in 8 to 10 different disciplines.
They will argue that Satoshi has no family. Likely arguing that either he was a virgin birth or sprung whole out of the row of a God in the form of Minerva.
They will say that Satoshi had no friends, work colleagues, or anyone else with whom he could have talked and shared information.
The funny thing that they seem to ignore is that people don’t exist outside of the real world. Not even Aspies like myself. In the real world, people have other people that they can trust. There are people like my uncle with who I shared information. My cousins. My friends, as limited as that really is.
They want you to believe that proof comes from a digital code. They want to believe that if you share that code, someone may not be the owner. They want to claim that dread pirate Roberts was someone else and that the years of forensic evidence found on the laptop belonging to Ross Ulbricht was all placed by the police. They want you to believe that normal people share their keys. They want you to believe that the only purpose for bitcoin is to buy heroin. I wanted to believe that it is a system that has nothing to do with contract or law.
They want you to believe a lie.
Well, if Satoshi was not me, it would be easy to intervene - years ago.
Not a good arguement
If Bitcoin is SO very resiliant - then there should be no flaws
There is no attach if bitcoin is honest.
You see, the "legal attack" only refers to dishonest money. But, bitcoin is about honest money.
So, there is no attack.
CSW
Nov 2,. 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635853404098300?thread_ts=1635853404.098300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3290
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Nov 2,. 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635853404098300?thread_ts=1635853404.098300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3290
Nov 2,. 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635853404098300?thread_ts=1635853404.098300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3290
(To Andreas M. Antonopoulos)
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635873521118700?thread_ts=1635873521.118700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3293
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635873521118700?thread_ts=1635873521.118700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3293
https://youtu.be/7v4BGnAOjIo
(To Andreas M. Antonopoulos)
I shook his hand, and I thanked him for bringing people to bitcoin in the early days.
And said I was sorry he lost the path.
But, when this is over, I will teach him to teach others the truth of my system.
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635873521118700?thread_ts=1635873521.118700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3293
(To Andreas M. Antonopoulos)
I shook his hand, and I thanked him for bringing people to bitcoin in the early days.
And said I was sorry he lost the path.
But, when this is over, I will teach him to teach others the truth of my system.
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635873521118700?thread_ts=1635873521.118700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3293
YouTube
Kleiman vs Wright: Lunchtime Report | November 2
Live lunchtime report of the latest happenings of the Ira Kleiman vs Dr. Craig S. Wright Trial. Kurt Wuckert Jr. comes to you live from Miami to provide detailed analysis of the case over more than $66 billion in digital assets and intellectual property.
My promise to Dave will be known and kept.
It is NOT ira
It was at today's value, 5 billion to the VA
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635891576187700?thread_ts=1635891576.187700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3295
It is NOT ira
It was at today's value, 5 billion to the VA
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635891576187700?thread_ts=1635891576.187700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3295
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635891576187700?thread_ts=1635891576.187700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3295
Nov 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635891576187700?thread_ts=1635891576.187700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3295
Jamie Wilson just swore under path as an Account that the 30 August is the Australian end of Tax year and that is why I filed papers in court for that date...
Any Australian in the house want to take this one...
You would think an Australian accountant would know that.... unless he lied
CSW
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635951073303200?thread_ts=1635951073.303200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3298
Any Australian in the house want to take this one...
You would think an Australian accountant would know that.... unless he lied
CSW
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635951073303200?thread_ts=1635951073.303200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3298
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635951073303200?thread_ts=1635951073.303200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3298
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635951073303200?thread_ts=1635951073.303200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3298
https://patents.google.com/patent/AU2013201602B2/en
2011 filed.
Started, way earlier
Jamie was put on notice a few weeks before his testimony
We are planning to sue him for fraud
CSW
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635957100318800?thread_ts=1635957100.318800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3300
2011 filed.
Started, way earlier
Jamie was put on notice a few weeks before his testimony
We are planning to sue him for fraud
CSW
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635957100318800?thread_ts=1635957100.318800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3300
Goods and Services Tax Ruling
GSTR 2014/3
What this Ruling is about
1. This Ruling explains the Commissioner's view on the goods and services tax (GST) consequences of transactions involving the use of bitcoin.
2. In particular, this Ruling considers whether bitcoin may involve 'money' as defined in section 195-1 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act), and whether it is a 'financial supply' under subsection 40-5(1) of the GST Act.
3. In considering the GST consequences, the Ruling focuses on the requirement that there must be a 'supply for consideration' for there to be a taxable supply. For the purposes of this Ruling, it is assumed that the other requirements in section 9-5 (taxable supplies) and section 11-5 (creditable acquisitions) of the GST Act are satisfied.
4. All references in this Ruling are to the GST Act unless otherwise specified
...
"13. David, who is not registered for GST, sells 10 bitcoin to Liam who pays for them in Australian dollars (AUD). Liam's exchange rate for sellers at the time of the transaction is 1 bitcoin = AUD$500. The commission is $50. David receives AUD$4950 for his 10 bitcoin. As David has made no taxable supply of bitcoin to Liam, Liam cannot claim any input tax credits on the acquisition of bitcoin.[5]"
https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/document?docid=GST/GSTR20143/NAT/ATO/00001&PiT=20141217000001
GSTR 2014/3
What this Ruling is about
1. This Ruling explains the Commissioner's view on the goods and services tax (GST) consequences of transactions involving the use of bitcoin.
2. In particular, this Ruling considers whether bitcoin may involve 'money' as defined in section 195-1 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act), and whether it is a 'financial supply' under subsection 40-5(1) of the GST Act.
3. In considering the GST consequences, the Ruling focuses on the requirement that there must be a 'supply for consideration' for there to be a taxable supply. For the purposes of this Ruling, it is assumed that the other requirements in section 9-5 (taxable supplies) and section 11-5 (creditable acquisitions) of the GST Act are satisfied.
4. All references in this Ruling are to the GST Act unless otherwise specified
...
"13. David, who is not registered for GST, sells 10 bitcoin to Liam who pays for them in Australian dollars (AUD). Liam's exchange rate for sellers at the time of the transaction is 1 bitcoin = AUD$500. The commission is $50. David receives AUD$4950 for his 10 bitcoin. As David has made no taxable supply of bitcoin to Liam, Liam cannot claim any input tax credits on the acquisition of bitcoin.[5]"
https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/document?docid=GST/GSTR20143/NAT/ATO/00001&PiT=20141217000001
www.ato.gov.au
Legal Database
Goods and Services Tax Ruling
Pre 2017, the ATO wanted to put GST on all bitcoin exchanges.
The still beniifited from my work, my action, my legal team
CSW
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635963474329700?thread_ts=1635963474.329700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3305
The still beniifited from my work, my action, my legal team
CSW
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635963474329700?thread_ts=1635963474.329700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3305
We in the images, is not Dave, it was bitboy
CSW
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635970138334300?thread_ts=1635970138.334300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3306
CSW
Nov 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635970138334300?thread_ts=1635970138.334300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3306
Still your coins, even with lost keys IF you have an identity - that thing in the WP people ignore
CSW
Nov 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635988991376100?thread_ts=1635988991.376100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3308
CSW
Nov 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635988991376100?thread_ts=1635988991.376100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3308