By the way, if you don't like how I am playing the game, remember that it is my game.
I set the rules, and they are fair as they don't change.
You don't need to play, but Blockchain is in law.
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
I set the rules, and they are fair as they don't change.
You don't need to play, but Blockchain is in law.
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
What none of you truly seem to understand and that I’m going to try to clarify something from Frank Herbert’s novel. He who can destroy a thing controls a thing.
In 2011, I constructed a series of corporate movements that removed assets from my name. This is not part of the Ira Kleiman case; rather, it was done because of the action being taken illegally by the Australian Tax Office against me.
Some people, including I guess, this the other side, don’t want this case. I am resigned to it. I have been for quite some time now. I have zero issues with the case, and right now, you would have to offer me something to even have may consider settling. Not, note to settle, to even consider to settle. You have to pay me to come to the table.
My answer to the case is very simple - bring it on. The best that anyone would do is bring out the truth and that’s what I want.
When I left the further development of bitcoin, including the task of scaling and getting the opcodes back and working functionally so that people didn’t complain about security issues, I did so having removed all property assets that anyone can take all simultaneously, allowing myself a means to control the database.
If Core had simply continued on the plan that I had set and left my protocol unchanged, likely, you would never have heard about me again or even in the first place. I had never planned on coming out as Satoshi and taking control of my invention. You see, with a set protocol, there is no need. TCP doesn’t have anyone in charge.
The only way that bitcoin is decentralised, as people say, is to have the protocol fixed. However, this still does not stop what others are calling legal attacks. Because there is no legal attack and a rule of law country. The only people who are attacked under legal provisions are criminals. I didn’t build bitcoin for them. I built an honest system.
The thing that I decided in 2016 would eventually happen depending on the path taken. If Core had not stolen my database and created an airdrop that I would not have cared. I did want to scale, but it is the theft of my intellectual property that gauls me most.
The mantra of your key, your bitcoin, was never mine. It was never something that started with bitcoin, and it will never be something that is in any system that I have created.
People do not seem to understand that every issuer and every Blockchain maintains some control because of database rights. The new copy that database, you copy obligations, and you breach the owner’s rights if you do not negotiate a settlement with that person. You do not have the right to take the database, and you don’t get to say, “it’s open-source; it is mine”. Bitcoin is not one of the Communist versions of open source. It doesn’t give you rights because of the MIT license.
I will not destroy value - even in a crap system unless they refuse to follow the rules
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
In 2011, I constructed a series of corporate movements that removed assets from my name. This is not part of the Ira Kleiman case; rather, it was done because of the action being taken illegally by the Australian Tax Office against me.
Some people, including I guess, this the other side, don’t want this case. I am resigned to it. I have been for quite some time now. I have zero issues with the case, and right now, you would have to offer me something to even have may consider settling. Not, note to settle, to even consider to settle. You have to pay me to come to the table.
My answer to the case is very simple - bring it on. The best that anyone would do is bring out the truth and that’s what I want.
When I left the further development of bitcoin, including the task of scaling and getting the opcodes back and working functionally so that people didn’t complain about security issues, I did so having removed all property assets that anyone can take all simultaneously, allowing myself a means to control the database.
If Core had simply continued on the plan that I had set and left my protocol unchanged, likely, you would never have heard about me again or even in the first place. I had never planned on coming out as Satoshi and taking control of my invention. You see, with a set protocol, there is no need. TCP doesn’t have anyone in charge.
The only way that bitcoin is decentralised, as people say, is to have the protocol fixed. However, this still does not stop what others are calling legal attacks. Because there is no legal attack and a rule of law country. The only people who are attacked under legal provisions are criminals. I didn’t build bitcoin for them. I built an honest system.
The thing that I decided in 2016 would eventually happen depending on the path taken. If Core had not stolen my database and created an airdrop that I would not have cared. I did want to scale, but it is the theft of my intellectual property that gauls me most.
The mantra of your key, your bitcoin, was never mine. It was never something that started with bitcoin, and it will never be something that is in any system that I have created.
People do not seem to understand that every issuer and every Blockchain maintains some control because of database rights. The new copy that database, you copy obligations, and you breach the owner’s rights if you do not negotiate a settlement with that person. You do not have the right to take the database, and you don’t get to say, “it’s open-source; it is mine”. Bitcoin is not one of the Communist versions of open source. It doesn’t give you rights because of the MIT license.
I will not destroy value - even in a crap system unless they refuse to follow the rules
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
If you believe that bitcoin can exist in any fashion outside of legal structures, you’re an idiot. There is no other way to put it. If you think that domains can’t be seized, that the control of bitcoin is outside of government, you are a fucking moron.
And sorry, I’m being nice.
If you wanted the system to continue working without my involvement, the necessity was that you follow my path. By not following my path, you have created a path that requires that I return.
The simple answer here is that government and court orders apply. Every single Blockchain ever created and every single subsidiary system based on the Blockchain as a concept will always be subject to the will of courts. International law is messy, but ownership is very simple, and it has nothing to do with holding a key. That is possession.
I suggest that you have a read of Ayn Rand’s Atlas shrugged.
What you will take away from that is that the system’s creator can leave the system in the state that he found it. The example I will give you is Ellis Wyatt.
All of the soy boys in Core continuously talk about property rights. Yet, they want to take mine from me. They want to say that I’m donating everything to the world because they want to appropriate what I created. I did not give them the right to do that. Nor shall I.
Foundainhead is about the man
AS is about the world that will come
Only people can stop what is already starting and only the few
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635333797454100?thread_ts=1635333797.454100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3210
And sorry, I’m being nice.
If you wanted the system to continue working without my involvement, the necessity was that you follow my path. By not following my path, you have created a path that requires that I return.
The simple answer here is that government and court orders apply. Every single Blockchain ever created and every single subsidiary system based on the Blockchain as a concept will always be subject to the will of courts. International law is messy, but ownership is very simple, and it has nothing to do with holding a key. That is possession.
I suggest that you have a read of Ayn Rand’s Atlas shrugged.
What you will take away from that is that the system’s creator can leave the system in the state that he found it. The example I will give you is Ellis Wyatt.
All of the soy boys in Core continuously talk about property rights. Yet, they want to take mine from me. They want to say that I’m donating everything to the world because they want to appropriate what I created. I did not give them the right to do that. Nor shall I.
Foundainhead is about the man
AS is about the world that will come
Only people can stop what is already starting and only the few
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635333797454100?thread_ts=1635333797.454100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3210
People don’t want what is going to happen in the crypto community because people want something that doesn’t exist in bitcoin. For example, several crypto-anarchists hate government and want a system that delivers code as law. Bitcoin was not designed for this and was designed to ensure that it doesn’t happen.
ThisWhen I discussed bitcoin as Satoshi and the 09/10 period, the distinction was that I was always discussing micropayments and a system where small amounts would be out of reach. In those discussions, recovery was always necessarily out of the reach of any reversal due to the cost of going to court.
A simple recovery action necessarily goes into the six figures. Of course, the proceeds of crime will be different, but nobody will seek recovery over a hundred dollars sale.
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635418340010600?thread_ts=1635418340.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3213
ThisWhen I discussed bitcoin as Satoshi and the 09/10 period, the distinction was that I was always discussing micropayments and a system where small amounts would be out of reach. In those discussions, recovery was always necessarily out of the reach of any reversal due to the cost of going to court.
A simple recovery action necessarily goes into the six figures. Of course, the proceeds of crime will be different, but nobody will seek recovery over a hundred dollars sale.
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635418340010600?thread_ts=1635418340.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3213
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635418340010600?thread_ts=1635418340.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3213
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635418340010600?thread_ts=1635418340.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3213
I have made no statements that Ira will win anything and he won't. If there is a negative finding even for a single coin it won't be to Ira it will be to W and K.
W and K is a Florida LLC. To appoint members, a member has to vote if one still exists. That is, the individuals controling the Australian companies (The inheritor of information defence Pty Ltd) or Lynn Wright needed to sign off on Ira becoming a member or it is provably a fraudulent action.
The documents presented by Ira to take control of W and K are falsified
Judges do not decide
It will be in a few days
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635425470012500?thread_ts=1635425470.012500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3215
W and K is a Florida LLC. To appoint members, a member has to vote if one still exists. That is, the individuals controling the Australian companies (The inheritor of information defence Pty Ltd) or Lynn Wright needed to sign off on Ira becoming a member or it is provably a fraudulent action.
The documents presented by Ira to take control of W and K are falsified
Judges do not decide
It will be in a few days
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635425470012500?thread_ts=1635425470.012500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3215
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635425470012500?thread_ts=1635425470.012500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3215
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635425470012500?thread_ts=1635425470.012500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3215
Note:
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot avoid mediating disputes.
Bitcoin and my Whitepaper does not say that a transaction cannot be reversed.
It discusses the economic effect and notes that there are limits
BitCoin changes the way this works and allows small TXs to be made - and large ones to be reversed/recovered.
There is no mediation of a USD 1.00 TX as the costs to do this fall on the person making the claim.
So, Bitcoin does not stop reversal - it makes small payments possible.
Bitcoin does not stop fraud.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable.
Bitcoin makes fraud more expensive.
Criminal Specialization as a Corollary of Rational Choice.
11 Pages
Craig S Wright
nChain; University of Southern Queensland - University of Southern Queensland, Students; Leicester Law School
Date Written: May 28, 2010
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3461064
Criminals act based on profit
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635430084015700?thread_ts=1635430084.015700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3217
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot avoid mediating disputes.
Bitcoin and my Whitepaper does not say that a transaction cannot be reversed.
It discusses the economic effect and notes that there are limits
BitCoin changes the way this works and allows small TXs to be made - and large ones to be reversed/recovered.
There is no mediation of a USD 1.00 TX as the costs to do this fall on the person making the claim.
So, Bitcoin does not stop reversal - it makes small payments possible.
Bitcoin does not stop fraud.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable.
Bitcoin makes fraud more expensive.
Criminal Specialization as a Corollary of Rational Choice.
11 Pages
Craig S Wright
nChain; University of Southern Queensland - University of Southern Queensland, Students; Leicester Law School
Date Written: May 28, 2010
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3461064
Criminals act based on profit
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635430084015700?thread_ts=1635430084.015700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3217
Ssrn
Criminal Specialization as a Corollary of Rational Choice
Organized criminal groups can be modeled using rational choice theory. Criminal groups act as profit seeking enterprises, and the ability to shift the economic
AML / KYC covers funding - so Bitcoin was ALWAYS included. Watches, gold, grain, oil all count as a means to fund an exchange.
So, there are and always were limits on pseudonomy in bitcoin and other digital cash systems.
These costs and payment uncertainties can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments over a communications channel without a trusted party.
This never applied to a transaction over 2000 USD
The $3000 USD rule is more strict.
For a summary
https://www.ceauthority.com/StudyGuideContent/FAQS/AML%20glossary_0205.pdf
So, once 10,000 is hit... boom
So, bitcoin is not about LARGE exchanges - these require a full KYC verification.
These always did and always shall.
All exchanges (aka bucket shops in "crypto") are dealers.
I told the ATO and other Australian government orgainisations about Bitcoin as there is a legal requirement to tell governments of ANY assets over 10,000 held overseas.
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635430940019300?thread_ts=1635430940.019300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3219
So, there are and always were limits on pseudonomy in bitcoin and other digital cash systems.
These costs and payment uncertainties can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments over a communications channel without a trusted party.
This never applied to a transaction over 2000 USD
The $3000 USD rule is more strict.
For a summary
https://www.ceauthority.com/StudyGuideContent/FAQS/AML%20glossary_0205.pdf
So, once 10,000 is hit... boom
So, bitcoin is not about LARGE exchanges - these require a full KYC verification.
These always did and always shall.
All exchanges (aka bucket shops in "crypto") are dealers.
I told the ATO and other Australian government orgainisations about Bitcoin as there is a legal requirement to tell governments of ANY assets over 10,000 held overseas.
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635430940019300?thread_ts=1635430940.019300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3219
The DeFi idea of no physical location is well known and has a long legal history.
The DeFi idea of no physical location is well known and has a long legal history.
This is called a Shell Bank.
The USA PATRIOT Act includes specific provisions designed to limit the use of correspondent accounts for money laundering activity. These provisions are contained in sections 312, 313 and 319(b) and involve limitations on shell bank relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and record keeping requirements.
On 2002-11-28, final regulations (31 CFR 103.177 and 103.185) implementing section 313 and 319(b) of the US Patriot Act became effective. The regulations implement provisions of the BSA (Bank Secrecy Act) that relate to foreign corresponded accounts.
https://www.fdic.gov/resources/bankers/bank-secrecy-act/
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635431347022000?thread_ts=1635431347.022000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3221
The DeFi idea of no physical location is well known and has a long legal history.
This is called a Shell Bank.
The USA PATRIOT Act includes specific provisions designed to limit the use of correspondent accounts for money laundering activity. These provisions are contained in sections 312, 313 and 319(b) and involve limitations on shell bank relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and record keeping requirements.
On 2002-11-28, final regulations (31 CFR 103.177 and 103.185) implementing section 313 and 319(b) of the US Patriot Act became effective. The regulations implement provisions of the BSA (Bank Secrecy Act) that relate to foreign corresponded accounts.
https://www.fdic.gov/resources/bankers/bank-secrecy-act/
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635431347022000?thread_ts=1635431347.022000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3221
www.fdic.gov
Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) | FDIC.gov
BSA is the common name for a series of laws and regulations enacted in the United States to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism
The thing people are missing in the case.
Bitcoin are property. The coins in dispute are Satoshi's coins. The only way properety rights esist is tied to an identity - courts are not about possession.
If Satoshi was not me, then there was four years for this to be found.
This case is solely about the identity of Satoshi
No Satoshi Identity, no ownership.
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635456409038100?thread_ts=1635456409.038100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3223
Bitcoin are property. The coins in dispute are Satoshi's coins. The only way properety rights esist is tied to an identity - courts are not about possession.
If Satoshi was not me, then there was four years for this to be found.
This case is solely about the identity of Satoshi
No Satoshi Identity, no ownership.
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635456409038100?thread_ts=1635456409.038100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3223
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635456409038100?thread_ts=1635456409.038100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3223
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635456409038100?thread_ts=1635456409.038100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3223
The joke is people thinking 5 years is short
I said soon, soon is under a decade
Don't like it, meh
CSW
Oct 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635477564069500?thread_ts=1635477564.069500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3225
I said soon, soon is under a decade
Don't like it, meh
CSW
Oct 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635477564069500?thread_ts=1635477564.069500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3225
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635477564069500?thread_ts=1635477564.069500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3225
Oct 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635477564069500?thread_ts=1635477564.069500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3225