And, in a way, there always was a kill switch in Bitcoin. But is is not the technicall one people think.
Bitcoin does not survive a nuclear war.
Bitcoin does not exist without a highly interconnected society. The mythology around bitcoin is quite frankly complete bullshit. There is literally no way that you will have bitcoin surviving in an anarco capitalist world without government.
The reality here is that bitcoin is not about decentralisation and never was. The only decentralisation happens in terms of cash and SPV. The use of mining precludes a large number of individuals that people such as those in 2008 sought to bring about. They didn’t want to listen to me back then, and they talked about how they could improve my system, but the reality is, it was designed very carefully to ensure that that never happens.
We kill switch in bitcoin is not technical and also very simple. In 2009, the Australian government could have shot down bitcoin if they managed to bankrupt me as they tried and failed to do successfully.
The database is not covered by copyright under MIT. Further, database rights restrict what people can do. There are no encryption protocols within bitcoin. Bitcoin is purely clear text. It is not cryptographic but rather uses a digital signature algorithm to simplify the verification. There is no other way to verify billions of people without identity. But, that does not preclude other methodologies for enforcement, and the reality here is that these act outside of the necessary forms of control that users need. There are very few courts in the world compared to the number of people. There are very few governments in the world compared to the number of people. Governments and courts are never pseudonymous, let alone anonymous.
If I had not taken the actions I took in 2011...
Bitcoin would already be shut down
If that had occurred, it would never occur again.
The concept of digital currency was already rejected when I made bitcoin and if bitcoin failed, every future attempt would likely fail
Bitcoin enforces property rights
The construction of the Corporations overseas and the trusts Was carefully planned starting even before the development of bitcoin is a commercial project in order to isolate ownership from me
Because of the weakness in bitcoin is my ownership at the start that was transferred in 2009
If the Australian office succeeded in their attempt too bankrupt me...
The Austrian government would have owned and closed bitcoin
There would be no Domains running exchanges
there would be no Internet connections and IP addresses associated with applications
bitcoin does not run outside of connectivity requirements and naming
bitcoin does not run over anonymouus systems such as Tor
Rule of law matters - it is time people in this industry start to understand that
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635199476387200?thread_ts=1635199476.387200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3199
Bitcoin does not survive a nuclear war.
Bitcoin does not exist without a highly interconnected society. The mythology around bitcoin is quite frankly complete bullshit. There is literally no way that you will have bitcoin surviving in an anarco capitalist world without government.
The reality here is that bitcoin is not about decentralisation and never was. The only decentralisation happens in terms of cash and SPV. The use of mining precludes a large number of individuals that people such as those in 2008 sought to bring about. They didn’t want to listen to me back then, and they talked about how they could improve my system, but the reality is, it was designed very carefully to ensure that that never happens.
We kill switch in bitcoin is not technical and also very simple. In 2009, the Australian government could have shot down bitcoin if they managed to bankrupt me as they tried and failed to do successfully.
The database is not covered by copyright under MIT. Further, database rights restrict what people can do. There are no encryption protocols within bitcoin. Bitcoin is purely clear text. It is not cryptographic but rather uses a digital signature algorithm to simplify the verification. There is no other way to verify billions of people without identity. But, that does not preclude other methodologies for enforcement, and the reality here is that these act outside of the necessary forms of control that users need. There are very few courts in the world compared to the number of people. There are very few governments in the world compared to the number of people. Governments and courts are never pseudonymous, let alone anonymous.
If I had not taken the actions I took in 2011...
Bitcoin would already be shut down
If that had occurred, it would never occur again.
The concept of digital currency was already rejected when I made bitcoin and if bitcoin failed, every future attempt would likely fail
Bitcoin enforces property rights
The construction of the Corporations overseas and the trusts Was carefully planned starting even before the development of bitcoin is a commercial project in order to isolate ownership from me
Because of the weakness in bitcoin is my ownership at the start that was transferred in 2009
If the Australian office succeeded in their attempt too bankrupt me...
The Austrian government would have owned and closed bitcoin
There would be no Domains running exchanges
there would be no Internet connections and IP addresses associated with applications
bitcoin does not run outside of connectivity requirements and naming
bitcoin does not run over anonymouus systems such as Tor
Rule of law matters - it is time people in this industry start to understand that
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635199476387200?thread_ts=1635199476.387200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3199
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635199476387200?thread_ts=1635199476.387200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3199
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635199476387200?thread_ts=1635199476.387200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3199
https://twitter.com/sthenc/status/1451274440294088704
Remember, BTC requires that you help core devs commit tax fraud.
Please aid core devs in falsifying records - This is the call that you will see out there and the reality here is this is what it's about
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635243307414200?thread_ts=1635243307.414200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3201
Remember, BTC requires that you help core devs commit tax fraud.
Please aid core devs in falsifying records - This is the call that you will see out there and the reality here is this is what it's about
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635243307414200?thread_ts=1635243307.414200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3201
https://twitter.com/midmagic/status/1452785559840067584
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005), Sorry - but in 2005 the US Supreme court ALREADY decided that developers in P2P software projects ARE fiduciaries.
Funny thing.
I am winning all my cases.
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635246679415700?thread_ts=1635246679.415700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3202
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005), Sorry - but in 2005 the US Supreme court ALREADY decided that developers in P2P software projects ARE fiduciaries.
Funny thing.
I am winning all my cases.
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635246679415700?thread_ts=1635246679.415700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3202
The false assumption is that Developers do not get paid in writing code. All corporate recoveries include a reasonable fee that is paid for the process.
In the recovery process, some of the money goes to the Dev teams.
The allocation of bitcoin by development teams. Like recovery of a lost share certificate
It is decentralised
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635264521419700?thread_ts=1635264521.419700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3203
In the recovery process, some of the money goes to the Dev teams.
The allocation of bitcoin by development teams. Like recovery of a lost share certificate
It is decentralised
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635264521419700?thread_ts=1635264521.419700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3203
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635264521419700?thread_ts=1635264521.419700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3203
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635264521419700?thread_ts=1635264521.419700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3203
“No penséis que he venido a abolir la Ley o los Profetas; No he venido a abolirlos sino a cumplirlos ”.
Mateo 5:17
CSW
Ocr 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635266446420100?thread_ts=1635266446.420100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3205
Mateo 5:17
CSW
Ocr 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635266446420100?thread_ts=1635266446.420100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3205
By the way, if you don't like how I am playing the game, remember that it is my game.
I set the rules, and they are fair as they don't change.
You don't need to play, but Blockchain is in law.
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
I set the rules, and they are fair as they don't change.
You don't need to play, but Blockchain is in law.
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
What none of you truly seem to understand and that I’m going to try to clarify something from Frank Herbert’s novel. He who can destroy a thing controls a thing.
In 2011, I constructed a series of corporate movements that removed assets from my name. This is not part of the Ira Kleiman case; rather, it was done because of the action being taken illegally by the Australian Tax Office against me.
Some people, including I guess, this the other side, don’t want this case. I am resigned to it. I have been for quite some time now. I have zero issues with the case, and right now, you would have to offer me something to even have may consider settling. Not, note to settle, to even consider to settle. You have to pay me to come to the table.
My answer to the case is very simple - bring it on. The best that anyone would do is bring out the truth and that’s what I want.
When I left the further development of bitcoin, including the task of scaling and getting the opcodes back and working functionally so that people didn’t complain about security issues, I did so having removed all property assets that anyone can take all simultaneously, allowing myself a means to control the database.
If Core had simply continued on the plan that I had set and left my protocol unchanged, likely, you would never have heard about me again or even in the first place. I had never planned on coming out as Satoshi and taking control of my invention. You see, with a set protocol, there is no need. TCP doesn’t have anyone in charge.
The only way that bitcoin is decentralised, as people say, is to have the protocol fixed. However, this still does not stop what others are calling legal attacks. Because there is no legal attack and a rule of law country. The only people who are attacked under legal provisions are criminals. I didn’t build bitcoin for them. I built an honest system.
The thing that I decided in 2016 would eventually happen depending on the path taken. If Core had not stolen my database and created an airdrop that I would not have cared. I did want to scale, but it is the theft of my intellectual property that gauls me most.
The mantra of your key, your bitcoin, was never mine. It was never something that started with bitcoin, and it will never be something that is in any system that I have created.
People do not seem to understand that every issuer and every Blockchain maintains some control because of database rights. The new copy that database, you copy obligations, and you breach the owner’s rights if you do not negotiate a settlement with that person. You do not have the right to take the database, and you don’t get to say, “it’s open-source; it is mine”. Bitcoin is not one of the Communist versions of open source. It doesn’t give you rights because of the MIT license.
I will not destroy value - even in a crap system unless they refuse to follow the rules
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
In 2011, I constructed a series of corporate movements that removed assets from my name. This is not part of the Ira Kleiman case; rather, it was done because of the action being taken illegally by the Australian Tax Office against me.
Some people, including I guess, this the other side, don’t want this case. I am resigned to it. I have been for quite some time now. I have zero issues with the case, and right now, you would have to offer me something to even have may consider settling. Not, note to settle, to even consider to settle. You have to pay me to come to the table.
My answer to the case is very simple - bring it on. The best that anyone would do is bring out the truth and that’s what I want.
When I left the further development of bitcoin, including the task of scaling and getting the opcodes back and working functionally so that people didn’t complain about security issues, I did so having removed all property assets that anyone can take all simultaneously, allowing myself a means to control the database.
If Core had simply continued on the plan that I had set and left my protocol unchanged, likely, you would never have heard about me again or even in the first place. I had never planned on coming out as Satoshi and taking control of my invention. You see, with a set protocol, there is no need. TCP doesn’t have anyone in charge.
The only way that bitcoin is decentralised, as people say, is to have the protocol fixed. However, this still does not stop what others are calling legal attacks. Because there is no legal attack and a rule of law country. The only people who are attacked under legal provisions are criminals. I didn’t build bitcoin for them. I built an honest system.
The thing that I decided in 2016 would eventually happen depending on the path taken. If Core had not stolen my database and created an airdrop that I would not have cared. I did want to scale, but it is the theft of my intellectual property that gauls me most.
The mantra of your key, your bitcoin, was never mine. It was never something that started with bitcoin, and it will never be something that is in any system that I have created.
People do not seem to understand that every issuer and every Blockchain maintains some control because of database rights. The new copy that database, you copy obligations, and you breach the owner’s rights if you do not negotiate a settlement with that person. You do not have the right to take the database, and you don’t get to say, “it’s open-source; it is mine”. Bitcoin is not one of the Communist versions of open source. It doesn’t give you rights because of the MIT license.
I will not destroy value - even in a crap system unless they refuse to follow the rules
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
If you believe that bitcoin can exist in any fashion outside of legal structures, you’re an idiot. There is no other way to put it. If you think that domains can’t be seized, that the control of bitcoin is outside of government, you are a fucking moron.
And sorry, I’m being nice.
If you wanted the system to continue working without my involvement, the necessity was that you follow my path. By not following my path, you have created a path that requires that I return.
The simple answer here is that government and court orders apply. Every single Blockchain ever created and every single subsidiary system based on the Blockchain as a concept will always be subject to the will of courts. International law is messy, but ownership is very simple, and it has nothing to do with holding a key. That is possession.
I suggest that you have a read of Ayn Rand’s Atlas shrugged.
What you will take away from that is that the system’s creator can leave the system in the state that he found it. The example I will give you is Ellis Wyatt.
All of the soy boys in Core continuously talk about property rights. Yet, they want to take mine from me. They want to say that I’m donating everything to the world because they want to appropriate what I created. I did not give them the right to do that. Nor shall I.
Foundainhead is about the man
AS is about the world that will come
Only people can stop what is already starting and only the few
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635333797454100?thread_ts=1635333797.454100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3210
And sorry, I’m being nice.
If you wanted the system to continue working without my involvement, the necessity was that you follow my path. By not following my path, you have created a path that requires that I return.
The simple answer here is that government and court orders apply. Every single Blockchain ever created and every single subsidiary system based on the Blockchain as a concept will always be subject to the will of courts. International law is messy, but ownership is very simple, and it has nothing to do with holding a key. That is possession.
I suggest that you have a read of Ayn Rand’s Atlas shrugged.
What you will take away from that is that the system’s creator can leave the system in the state that he found it. The example I will give you is Ellis Wyatt.
All of the soy boys in Core continuously talk about property rights. Yet, they want to take mine from me. They want to say that I’m donating everything to the world because they want to appropriate what I created. I did not give them the right to do that. Nor shall I.
Foundainhead is about the man
AS is about the world that will come
Only people can stop what is already starting and only the few
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635333797454100?thread_ts=1635333797.454100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3210
People don’t want what is going to happen in the crypto community because people want something that doesn’t exist in bitcoin. For example, several crypto-anarchists hate government and want a system that delivers code as law. Bitcoin was not designed for this and was designed to ensure that it doesn’t happen.
ThisWhen I discussed bitcoin as Satoshi and the 09/10 period, the distinction was that I was always discussing micropayments and a system where small amounts would be out of reach. In those discussions, recovery was always necessarily out of the reach of any reversal due to the cost of going to court.
A simple recovery action necessarily goes into the six figures. Of course, the proceeds of crime will be different, but nobody will seek recovery over a hundred dollars sale.
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635418340010600?thread_ts=1635418340.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3213
ThisWhen I discussed bitcoin as Satoshi and the 09/10 period, the distinction was that I was always discussing micropayments and a system where small amounts would be out of reach. In those discussions, recovery was always necessarily out of the reach of any reversal due to the cost of going to court.
A simple recovery action necessarily goes into the six figures. Of course, the proceeds of crime will be different, but nobody will seek recovery over a hundred dollars sale.
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635418340010600?thread_ts=1635418340.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3213
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635418340010600?thread_ts=1635418340.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3213
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635418340010600?thread_ts=1635418340.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3213
I have made no statements that Ira will win anything and he won't. If there is a negative finding even for a single coin it won't be to Ira it will be to W and K.
W and K is a Florida LLC. To appoint members, a member has to vote if one still exists. That is, the individuals controling the Australian companies (The inheritor of information defence Pty Ltd) or Lynn Wright needed to sign off on Ira becoming a member or it is provably a fraudulent action.
The documents presented by Ira to take control of W and K are falsified
Judges do not decide
It will be in a few days
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635425470012500?thread_ts=1635425470.012500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3215
W and K is a Florida LLC. To appoint members, a member has to vote if one still exists. That is, the individuals controling the Australian companies (The inheritor of information defence Pty Ltd) or Lynn Wright needed to sign off on Ira becoming a member or it is provably a fraudulent action.
The documents presented by Ira to take control of W and K are falsified
Judges do not decide
It will be in a few days
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635425470012500?thread_ts=1635425470.012500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3215
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635425470012500?thread_ts=1635425470.012500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3215
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635425470012500?thread_ts=1635425470.012500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3215
Note:
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot avoid mediating disputes.
Bitcoin and my Whitepaper does not say that a transaction cannot be reversed.
It discusses the economic effect and notes that there are limits
BitCoin changes the way this works and allows small TXs to be made - and large ones to be reversed/recovered.
There is no mediation of a USD 1.00 TX as the costs to do this fall on the person making the claim.
So, Bitcoin does not stop reversal - it makes small payments possible.
Bitcoin does not stop fraud.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable.
Bitcoin makes fraud more expensive.
Criminal Specialization as a Corollary of Rational Choice.
11 Pages
Craig S Wright
nChain; University of Southern Queensland - University of Southern Queensland, Students; Leicester Law School
Date Written: May 28, 2010
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3461064
Criminals act based on profit
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635430084015700?thread_ts=1635430084.015700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3217
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot avoid mediating disputes.
Bitcoin and my Whitepaper does not say that a transaction cannot be reversed.
It discusses the economic effect and notes that there are limits
BitCoin changes the way this works and allows small TXs to be made - and large ones to be reversed/recovered.
There is no mediation of a USD 1.00 TX as the costs to do this fall on the person making the claim.
So, Bitcoin does not stop reversal - it makes small payments possible.
Bitcoin does not stop fraud.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable.
Bitcoin makes fraud more expensive.
Criminal Specialization as a Corollary of Rational Choice.
11 Pages
Craig S Wright
nChain; University of Southern Queensland - University of Southern Queensland, Students; Leicester Law School
Date Written: May 28, 2010
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3461064
Criminals act based on profit
CSW
Oct 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635430084015700?thread_ts=1635430084.015700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3217
Ssrn
Criminal Specialization as a Corollary of Rational Choice
Organized criminal groups can be modeled using rational choice theory. Criminal groups act as profit seeking enterprises, and the ability to shift the economic