Here’s The Real Reason Bitcoin Maximalists Hate CryptoWhale.
Debunking the 100% False “CryptoRandy” Narrative.
https://cryptowhale.medium.com/heres-the-real-reason-bitcoin-maximalists-hate-cryptowhale-62fed6166d87
In a week, the crypto shills will face a wall driving at 129 mph... with no brakes
BTC promoters turning against one another...
CSW
Oct 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634941883194000?thread_ts=1634941883.194000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3190
Debunking the 100% False “CryptoRandy” Narrative.
https://cryptowhale.medium.com/heres-the-real-reason-bitcoin-maximalists-hate-cryptowhale-62fed6166d87
In a week, the crypto shills will face a wall driving at 129 mph... with no brakes
BTC promoters turning against one another...
CSW
Oct 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634941883194000?thread_ts=1634941883.194000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3190
Medium
Debunking the False CryptoWhale “CryptoRandy” Scammer Rumor.
NOTE: This is a lengthy article, but will cover many of the slander attempts, accusations, and lies being spread about me by maximalist…
The truth is that there is no innovation but rather a devolution and the concept of digital gold.
In creating a system that enables slow high fee settlement, BTC and others have created an attempt to bring back “free banking” in the form that existed in the nineteenth century. Effectively, a system that allowed certain robber barons to become rich at the expense of everyone else.
None of this is about freedom.
None of this is about financial sovereignty.
It is about the control of the system.
Corporations such as Facebook make money and gain power by owning information. They do this by collating various sources of where you travel on the Internet, when you move as your phone gives them data and if they managed to subvert payments, everything you actually ever do ever again.
Corporations such as MasterCard and Visa want to ensure that you stay on a system that is based on debt. To this end, they link the concept of debit cards to facilitate people to move into credit easily.
Bitcoin is a unit threat to the models that are created by each of these companies. Whilst they can exist, they fear the change in the innovation that can arise from my invention. They fear that they will lose when competition opens and many other forms of innovations start to evolve
CSW
Oct 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634999843225500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3192
In creating a system that enables slow high fee settlement, BTC and others have created an attempt to bring back “free banking” in the form that existed in the nineteenth century. Effectively, a system that allowed certain robber barons to become rich at the expense of everyone else.
None of this is about freedom.
None of this is about financial sovereignty.
It is about the control of the system.
Corporations such as Facebook make money and gain power by owning information. They do this by collating various sources of where you travel on the Internet, when you move as your phone gives them data and if they managed to subvert payments, everything you actually ever do ever again.
Corporations such as MasterCard and Visa want to ensure that you stay on a system that is based on debt. To this end, they link the concept of debit cards to facilitate people to move into credit easily.
Bitcoin is a unit threat to the models that are created by each of these companies. Whilst they can exist, they fear the change in the innovation that can arise from my invention. They fear that they will lose when competition opens and many other forms of innovations start to evolve
CSW
Oct 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634999843225500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3192
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634999843225500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3192
Oct 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634999843225500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3192
Let me make this really, really clear for everyone.
After all of these cases, BTC will move because of the court. Not that it may move. Will move. There is no encryption in bitcoin, and there is no encryption in BTC. Nothing stops BTC from being moved by court order, and this is how it’s going to happen.
Note, as specifically stated that BTC will move without keys following a court order.
I made a very clear comment, don't make other comments from it
This is all very simple.
People have created a system based on my invention that doesn’t do what I wanted to do - this system of "crypto" is based on lies. They Claim it is an anti-government system.
Bitcoin is of been saying, and any Blockchain for that matter cannot be controlled outside of government rules. So the simple answer here is that this exercise will prove what I’ve been saying, and you will see a plethora of legal action started after this case. You will see bitcoin being frozen under proceeds of crime actions, and you will see tax actions. From this, you will start to see that those who act dishonestly do not have a right to hold that bitcoin or any Blockchain-based system.
The court order will have a signature.
Don't assume.
A sign on paper is a signature.
Miners who do not enforce will not be miners
When BTC is issued by court order, people will start to understand my invention.
If is not a crypto currency
The use of the word honest matters
I am the sole issuer.
And, several core devs have already stated the CAN implement this even without my help.
They just don't want to
And...
The court doesn't care.
E pur si muove or Eppur si muove
You can thank Mr Ira Kleiman for this
I never wanted people to know who I am. I wanted to remain secret.
And, Cobra shows what that does
Read my whitepaper - ANY rules can be enforced - and a court order is a rule
ANY Exchange offering an AIRDROP (NOT FORK) of BTC as this is not bitcoin will find itself without banking. Any exchange offering the airdrop will find itself without DNS. Any exchange offering the airdrop will find itself without Internet connections and pipes.
This will include something that does a shapeshift allowing for a token to token swap. Any exchange taking assets that link into swaps, including ones linked into airdrop coins, will discover that they lose banking, Internet and become subject to sequestration orders.
I have mentioned many times that bitcoin is not resilient against anti-law activity and will not survive an apocalypse. There is no bitcoin if there is no Internet.
Any miner on such an airdrop would not want to be associated to the west in any manner.
Nor in China
CSW
Oct 25, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635180524346100
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3197
After all of these cases, BTC will move because of the court. Not that it may move. Will move. There is no encryption in bitcoin, and there is no encryption in BTC. Nothing stops BTC from being moved by court order, and this is how it’s going to happen.
Note, as specifically stated that BTC will move without keys following a court order.
I made a very clear comment, don't make other comments from it
This is all very simple.
People have created a system based on my invention that doesn’t do what I wanted to do - this system of "crypto" is based on lies. They Claim it is an anti-government system.
Bitcoin is of been saying, and any Blockchain for that matter cannot be controlled outside of government rules. So the simple answer here is that this exercise will prove what I’ve been saying, and you will see a plethora of legal action started after this case. You will see bitcoin being frozen under proceeds of crime actions, and you will see tax actions. From this, you will start to see that those who act dishonestly do not have a right to hold that bitcoin or any Blockchain-based system.
The court order will have a signature.
Don't assume.
A sign on paper is a signature.
Miners who do not enforce will not be miners
When BTC is issued by court order, people will start to understand my invention.
If is not a crypto currency
The use of the word honest matters
I am the sole issuer.
And, several core devs have already stated the CAN implement this even without my help.
They just don't want to
And...
The court doesn't care.
E pur si muove or Eppur si muove
You can thank Mr Ira Kleiman for this
I never wanted people to know who I am. I wanted to remain secret.
And, Cobra shows what that does
Read my whitepaper - ANY rules can be enforced - and a court order is a rule
ANY Exchange offering an AIRDROP (NOT FORK) of BTC as this is not bitcoin will find itself without banking. Any exchange offering the airdrop will find itself without DNS. Any exchange offering the airdrop will find itself without Internet connections and pipes.
This will include something that does a shapeshift allowing for a token to token swap. Any exchange taking assets that link into swaps, including ones linked into airdrop coins, will discover that they lose banking, Internet and become subject to sequestration orders.
I have mentioned many times that bitcoin is not resilient against anti-law activity and will not survive an apocalypse. There is no bitcoin if there is no Internet.
Any miner on such an airdrop would not want to be associated to the west in any manner.
Nor in China
CSW
Oct 25, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635180524346100
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3197
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 25, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635180524346100
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3197
Oct 25, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635180524346100
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3197
And, in a way, there always was a kill switch in Bitcoin. But is is not the technicall one people think.
Bitcoin does not survive a nuclear war.
Bitcoin does not exist without a highly interconnected society. The mythology around bitcoin is quite frankly complete bullshit. There is literally no way that you will have bitcoin surviving in an anarco capitalist world without government.
The reality here is that bitcoin is not about decentralisation and never was. The only decentralisation happens in terms of cash and SPV. The use of mining precludes a large number of individuals that people such as those in 2008 sought to bring about. They didn’t want to listen to me back then, and they talked about how they could improve my system, but the reality is, it was designed very carefully to ensure that that never happens.
We kill switch in bitcoin is not technical and also very simple. In 2009, the Australian government could have shot down bitcoin if they managed to bankrupt me as they tried and failed to do successfully.
The database is not covered by copyright under MIT. Further, database rights restrict what people can do. There are no encryption protocols within bitcoin. Bitcoin is purely clear text. It is not cryptographic but rather uses a digital signature algorithm to simplify the verification. There is no other way to verify billions of people without identity. But, that does not preclude other methodologies for enforcement, and the reality here is that these act outside of the necessary forms of control that users need. There are very few courts in the world compared to the number of people. There are very few governments in the world compared to the number of people. Governments and courts are never pseudonymous, let alone anonymous.
If I had not taken the actions I took in 2011...
Bitcoin would already be shut down
If that had occurred, it would never occur again.
The concept of digital currency was already rejected when I made bitcoin and if bitcoin failed, every future attempt would likely fail
Bitcoin enforces property rights
The construction of the Corporations overseas and the trusts Was carefully planned starting even before the development of bitcoin is a commercial project in order to isolate ownership from me
Because of the weakness in bitcoin is my ownership at the start that was transferred in 2009
If the Australian office succeeded in their attempt too bankrupt me...
The Austrian government would have owned and closed bitcoin
There would be no Domains running exchanges
there would be no Internet connections and IP addresses associated with applications
bitcoin does not run outside of connectivity requirements and naming
bitcoin does not run over anonymouus systems such as Tor
Rule of law matters - it is time people in this industry start to understand that
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635199476387200?thread_ts=1635199476.387200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3199
Bitcoin does not survive a nuclear war.
Bitcoin does not exist without a highly interconnected society. The mythology around bitcoin is quite frankly complete bullshit. There is literally no way that you will have bitcoin surviving in an anarco capitalist world without government.
The reality here is that bitcoin is not about decentralisation and never was. The only decentralisation happens in terms of cash and SPV. The use of mining precludes a large number of individuals that people such as those in 2008 sought to bring about. They didn’t want to listen to me back then, and they talked about how they could improve my system, but the reality is, it was designed very carefully to ensure that that never happens.
We kill switch in bitcoin is not technical and also very simple. In 2009, the Australian government could have shot down bitcoin if they managed to bankrupt me as they tried and failed to do successfully.
The database is not covered by copyright under MIT. Further, database rights restrict what people can do. There are no encryption protocols within bitcoin. Bitcoin is purely clear text. It is not cryptographic but rather uses a digital signature algorithm to simplify the verification. There is no other way to verify billions of people without identity. But, that does not preclude other methodologies for enforcement, and the reality here is that these act outside of the necessary forms of control that users need. There are very few courts in the world compared to the number of people. There are very few governments in the world compared to the number of people. Governments and courts are never pseudonymous, let alone anonymous.
If I had not taken the actions I took in 2011...
Bitcoin would already be shut down
If that had occurred, it would never occur again.
The concept of digital currency was already rejected when I made bitcoin and if bitcoin failed, every future attempt would likely fail
Bitcoin enforces property rights
The construction of the Corporations overseas and the trusts Was carefully planned starting even before the development of bitcoin is a commercial project in order to isolate ownership from me
Because of the weakness in bitcoin is my ownership at the start that was transferred in 2009
If the Australian office succeeded in their attempt too bankrupt me...
The Austrian government would have owned and closed bitcoin
There would be no Domains running exchanges
there would be no Internet connections and IP addresses associated with applications
bitcoin does not run outside of connectivity requirements and naming
bitcoin does not run over anonymouus systems such as Tor
Rule of law matters - it is time people in this industry start to understand that
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635199476387200?thread_ts=1635199476.387200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3199
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635199476387200?thread_ts=1635199476.387200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3199
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635199476387200?thread_ts=1635199476.387200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3199
https://twitter.com/sthenc/status/1451274440294088704
Remember, BTC requires that you help core devs commit tax fraud.
Please aid core devs in falsifying records - This is the call that you will see out there and the reality here is this is what it's about
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635243307414200?thread_ts=1635243307.414200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3201
Remember, BTC requires that you help core devs commit tax fraud.
Please aid core devs in falsifying records - This is the call that you will see out there and the reality here is this is what it's about
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635243307414200?thread_ts=1635243307.414200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3201
https://twitter.com/midmagic/status/1452785559840067584
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005), Sorry - but in 2005 the US Supreme court ALREADY decided that developers in P2P software projects ARE fiduciaries.
Funny thing.
I am winning all my cases.
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635246679415700?thread_ts=1635246679.415700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3202
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005), Sorry - but in 2005 the US Supreme court ALREADY decided that developers in P2P software projects ARE fiduciaries.
Funny thing.
I am winning all my cases.
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635246679415700?thread_ts=1635246679.415700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3202
The false assumption is that Developers do not get paid in writing code. All corporate recoveries include a reasonable fee that is paid for the process.
In the recovery process, some of the money goes to the Dev teams.
The allocation of bitcoin by development teams. Like recovery of a lost share certificate
It is decentralised
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635264521419700?thread_ts=1635264521.419700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3203
In the recovery process, some of the money goes to the Dev teams.
The allocation of bitcoin by development teams. Like recovery of a lost share certificate
It is decentralised
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635264521419700?thread_ts=1635264521.419700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3203
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635264521419700?thread_ts=1635264521.419700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3203
Oct 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635264521419700?thread_ts=1635264521.419700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3203
“No penséis que he venido a abolir la Ley o los Profetas; No he venido a abolirlos sino a cumplirlos ”.
Mateo 5:17
CSW
Ocr 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635266446420100?thread_ts=1635266446.420100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3205
Mateo 5:17
CSW
Ocr 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635266446420100?thread_ts=1635266446.420100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3205
By the way, if you don't like how I am playing the game, remember that it is my game.
I set the rules, and they are fair as they don't change.
You don't need to play, but Blockchain is in law.
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
I set the rules, and they are fair as they don't change.
You don't need to play, but Blockchain is in law.
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635288370429200?thread_ts=1635288370.429200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3206
What none of you truly seem to understand and that I’m going to try to clarify something from Frank Herbert’s novel. He who can destroy a thing controls a thing.
In 2011, I constructed a series of corporate movements that removed assets from my name. This is not part of the Ira Kleiman case; rather, it was done because of the action being taken illegally by the Australian Tax Office against me.
Some people, including I guess, this the other side, don’t want this case. I am resigned to it. I have been for quite some time now. I have zero issues with the case, and right now, you would have to offer me something to even have may consider settling. Not, note to settle, to even consider to settle. You have to pay me to come to the table.
My answer to the case is very simple - bring it on. The best that anyone would do is bring out the truth and that’s what I want.
When I left the further development of bitcoin, including the task of scaling and getting the opcodes back and working functionally so that people didn’t complain about security issues, I did so having removed all property assets that anyone can take all simultaneously, allowing myself a means to control the database.
If Core had simply continued on the plan that I had set and left my protocol unchanged, likely, you would never have heard about me again or even in the first place. I had never planned on coming out as Satoshi and taking control of my invention. You see, with a set protocol, there is no need. TCP doesn’t have anyone in charge.
The only way that bitcoin is decentralised, as people say, is to have the protocol fixed. However, this still does not stop what others are calling legal attacks. Because there is no legal attack and a rule of law country. The only people who are attacked under legal provisions are criminals. I didn’t build bitcoin for them. I built an honest system.
The thing that I decided in 2016 would eventually happen depending on the path taken. If Core had not stolen my database and created an airdrop that I would not have cared. I did want to scale, but it is the theft of my intellectual property that gauls me most.
The mantra of your key, your bitcoin, was never mine. It was never something that started with bitcoin, and it will never be something that is in any system that I have created.
People do not seem to understand that every issuer and every Blockchain maintains some control because of database rights. The new copy that database, you copy obligations, and you breach the owner’s rights if you do not negotiate a settlement with that person. You do not have the right to take the database, and you don’t get to say, “it’s open-source; it is mine”. Bitcoin is not one of the Communist versions of open source. It doesn’t give you rights because of the MIT license.
I will not destroy value - even in a crap system unless they refuse to follow the rules
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
In 2011, I constructed a series of corporate movements that removed assets from my name. This is not part of the Ira Kleiman case; rather, it was done because of the action being taken illegally by the Australian Tax Office against me.
Some people, including I guess, this the other side, don’t want this case. I am resigned to it. I have been for quite some time now. I have zero issues with the case, and right now, you would have to offer me something to even have may consider settling. Not, note to settle, to even consider to settle. You have to pay me to come to the table.
My answer to the case is very simple - bring it on. The best that anyone would do is bring out the truth and that’s what I want.
When I left the further development of bitcoin, including the task of scaling and getting the opcodes back and working functionally so that people didn’t complain about security issues, I did so having removed all property assets that anyone can take all simultaneously, allowing myself a means to control the database.
If Core had simply continued on the plan that I had set and left my protocol unchanged, likely, you would never have heard about me again or even in the first place. I had never planned on coming out as Satoshi and taking control of my invention. You see, with a set protocol, there is no need. TCP doesn’t have anyone in charge.
The only way that bitcoin is decentralised, as people say, is to have the protocol fixed. However, this still does not stop what others are calling legal attacks. Because there is no legal attack and a rule of law country. The only people who are attacked under legal provisions are criminals. I didn’t build bitcoin for them. I built an honest system.
The thing that I decided in 2016 would eventually happen depending on the path taken. If Core had not stolen my database and created an airdrop that I would not have cared. I did want to scale, but it is the theft of my intellectual property that gauls me most.
The mantra of your key, your bitcoin, was never mine. It was never something that started with bitcoin, and it will never be something that is in any system that I have created.
People do not seem to understand that every issuer and every Blockchain maintains some control because of database rights. The new copy that database, you copy obligations, and you breach the owner’s rights if you do not negotiate a settlement with that person. You do not have the right to take the database, and you don’t get to say, “it’s open-source; it is mine”. Bitcoin is not one of the Communist versions of open source. It doesn’t give you rights because of the MIT license.
I will not destroy value - even in a crap system unless they refuse to follow the rules
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208
Oct 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635332434444400?thread_ts=1635332434.444400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3208