I wonder if the BTC people understand...
nChain has the patent on discrete log contracts
Mixing
Taproot
November
Technically ever BTC node will be in violation of nChain ip when taproot is live
Nice that they see the value of R puzzles as well.
License fees
CSW
Oct 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633735090053300?thread_ts=1633735090.053300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3114
nChain has the patent on discrete log contracts
Mixing
Taproot
November
Technically ever BTC node will be in violation of nChain ip when taproot is live
Nice that they see the value of R puzzles as well.
License fees
CSW
Oct 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633735090053300?thread_ts=1633735090.053300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3114
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633735090053300?thread_ts=1633735090.053300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3114
Oct 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633735090053300?thread_ts=1633735090.053300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3114
Len Sassaman and Satoshi: a Cypherpunk History.
Evan Hatch
Feb 22, 2021 https://evanhatch.medium.com/len-sassaman-and-satoshi-e483c85c2b10
Basically, the BTC Core bois and Dodger come up with a new alternative cypherpunk every few weeks and then that person gets discredited and they move on to another. At the current rate they gonna run out of people very soon.
CSW
Oct 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633832710103900?thread_ts=1633832710.103900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3118
Evan Hatch
Feb 22, 2021 https://evanhatch.medium.com/len-sassaman-and-satoshi-e483c85c2b10
Basically, the BTC Core bois and Dodger come up with a new alternative cypherpunk every few weeks and then that person gets discredited and they move on to another. At the current rate they gonna run out of people very soon.
CSW
Oct 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633832710103900?thread_ts=1633832710.103900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3118
Medium
Len Sassaman and Satoshi
We’ve lost far too many hackers to suicide. What if Satoshi was one of them?
Interestingly, many of the systems we use today, and machine learning and data analysis are, in fact, quite old. The distinction is not so much the model but rather the ability to process information and the efficiency of the hardware. As an example, O’Brien (1983) discussed the use of generalised linear modelling around four decades ago. The systems required for tools such as GLIM were large excessive machines that few people could access. Now, the same computational capacity is available on the average desktop and sometimes mobile phone.
Hopfield (1988) discussed artificial neural networks thirty years ago. Keller (1961) talked about perceptrons and the ability to create artificial neural networks sixty years ago. I remember having a presentation with Google in 2006 where the company told me that these things would never take off. The interesting aspect of this is that the constant expansion of computational and storage capacity means that many of the things we once took for granted or thought could not be done are now becoming increasingly simple.
Consequently, the benefits of storing information and starting to outweigh the cost of storage very shortly. Consequently, you will start to note that the cost of removing data and pruning will have a higher cost for many organisations than you find as a cost of storage. The doubling of storage capacity every fifteen months means that the entire global storage that exists today will be again available in fifteen months on top of what we have now. A further fifteen months from that, there will be four times what we have today.
Hopfield, J. J. (1988). Artificial neural networks. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, 4(5), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/101.8118
Keller, H. B. (1961). Finite automata, pattern recognition and perceptrons. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 8(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/321052.321053
O’Brien, L. G. (1983). Generalised Linear Modelling Using the GLIM System. Area, 15(4), 327–336. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20001967
CSW
Oct 11, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633935037161600?thread_ts=1633935037.161600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3121
Hopfield (1988) discussed artificial neural networks thirty years ago. Keller (1961) talked about perceptrons and the ability to create artificial neural networks sixty years ago. I remember having a presentation with Google in 2006 where the company told me that these things would never take off. The interesting aspect of this is that the constant expansion of computational and storage capacity means that many of the things we once took for granted or thought could not be done are now becoming increasingly simple.
Consequently, the benefits of storing information and starting to outweigh the cost of storage very shortly. Consequently, you will start to note that the cost of removing data and pruning will have a higher cost for many organisations than you find as a cost of storage. The doubling of storage capacity every fifteen months means that the entire global storage that exists today will be again available in fifteen months on top of what we have now. A further fifteen months from that, there will be four times what we have today.
Hopfield, J. J. (1988). Artificial neural networks. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, 4(5), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/101.8118
Keller, H. B. (1961). Finite automata, pattern recognition and perceptrons. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 8(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/321052.321053
O’Brien, L. G. (1983). Generalised Linear Modelling Using the GLIM System. Area, 15(4), 327–336. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20001967
CSW
Oct 11, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633935037161600?thread_ts=1633935037.161600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3121
What I hate about TLAs
TLAs or three-letter (can be more, go figure) acronyms are reused across industries. CLTV, for instance, can mean customer lifetime value and has been used this way in finance and accounting for decades, yet a bunch of people decide to rename things and make life difficult for those who want to explain other concepts.
https://churnzero.net/churnopedia/lifetime-value-ltv-or-customer-lifetime-value-cltv/#:~:text=Lifetime%20Value%20(CLTV)-,Lifetime%20Value%20(LTV)%20or%20Customer%20Lifetime%20Value%20(CLTV),average%20lifetime%20as%20a%20customer.&text=EXAMPLE%3A,%2450%20per%20month%20(ARPU)
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/combinedloantovalue.asp#:~:text=The%20combined%20loan%2Dto%2Dvalue%20(CLTV)%20ratio%20is,than%20one%20loan%20is%20used
CLTV Formula and Calculation
\begin{aligned} &\text{CLTV}=\frac{\text{VL1 + VL2 + ... + VLn}}{\text{Total Value of the Property}}\\ &\textbf{where:}\\ &\text{VL = Value of loan}\\ \end{aligned}
CLTV=Total Value of the Property
VL1 + VL2 + ... + VLn
where:
VL = Value of loan
CSW
Oct 11, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633947675162800?thread_ts=1633947675.162800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3123
TLAs or three-letter (can be more, go figure) acronyms are reused across industries. CLTV, for instance, can mean customer lifetime value and has been used this way in finance and accounting for decades, yet a bunch of people decide to rename things and make life difficult for those who want to explain other concepts.
https://churnzero.net/churnopedia/lifetime-value-ltv-or-customer-lifetime-value-cltv/#:~:text=Lifetime%20Value%20(CLTV)-,Lifetime%20Value%20(LTV)%20or%20Customer%20Lifetime%20Value%20(CLTV),average%20lifetime%20as%20a%20customer.&text=EXAMPLE%3A,%2450%20per%20month%20(ARPU)
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/combinedloantovalue.asp#:~:text=The%20combined%20loan%2Dto%2Dvalue%20(CLTV)%20ratio%20is,than%20one%20loan%20is%20used
CLTV Formula and Calculation
\begin{aligned} &\text{CLTV}=\frac{\text{VL1 + VL2 + ... + VLn}}{\text{Total Value of the Property}}\\ &\textbf{where:}\\ &\text{VL = Value of loan}\\ \end{aligned}
CLTV=Total Value of the Property
VL1 + VL2 + ... + VLn
where:
VL = Value of loan
CSW
Oct 11, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633947675162800?thread_ts=1633947675.162800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3123
ChurnZero
Lifetime Value (LTV) or Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV) - ChurnZero
Lifetime Value (LTV) or Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV) is the gross profit a customer delivers to your business in their lifetime. Click for more...
If you think November is not about my showing that I created bitcoin, then, you are delusional.
The entire case is based on a premise of my being Satoshi and Ira being a greedy ass who thinks he can steal
The thing most people don’t understand is that the lies about Cryptocurrency will die in this case.
Then we are left with mopping up exercises with McCormick and others.
When the case is finished, there will be about a snowflake’s chance in the hottest part of hell that people don’t understand that bitcoin can be recovered. And this is important. Nobody cares about recovering $50. Not in real terms. They care about recovering large amounts of money, which will ensure that this case ends in a way that most people don’t expect.
Following this case, the mantra of your keys, your bitcoin, will be forever buried in a forgotten grave. There is a reason that I set things up the way that I did. It wasn’t for this case that this case will bring it to a head.
Nobody seems to understand that when I said the bitcoin is not being moved other than a court order, I did mean it.
Honestly, if you need Proof that I’m Satoshi by someone signing the keys then you’re a fucking moron.
When I stated that bitcoin is not encrypted, I meant it because it’s true. If you think that bitcoin is a crypto anarchist wet dream then you have no idea. The thing is, none of their little schemes will work because it’s all on the Blockchain and it cannot be subverted.
When I said that no bitcoin will move outside of a court order I mean that is the court order was set all of the movement in motion and it will have nothing to do with the key. People have been proving identity for centuries in courts and the thing is, I’m not going to change that to some, insane plan to allow people to identify themselves with a distributable key that they can give to anyone.
The simple answer is that if bitcoin was not recoverable, i.e. if it was encrypted, then it is lost and it is lost forever but the truth of the matter is that that’s not the case. Developers and miners follow court orders. The truth is that they are all a bunch of pussies who act tough but are really like three-year-olds who miss their mommy.
As I have explained many times the bitcoin is property of a company.
That company is owned by another company.
The owning company is in a trust.
No bitcoin owned by those companies will move now without a court order.
Those bitcoin will move.
No amount of anarco capitalist- really anarco Communist criminal assholes bullshit will stop that.
Nothing that people say on Twitter will have any impact on the court issuing an order.
The reality is that the case will be over in November.
The reality is that the coins will have to be moved when the court states they have to be moved. If people complain enough then they can go through the whole soft fork bullshit. But, any miner or developer who chooses to stay as a miner or developer will be sequestered under contempt of court.
Any miner in China is breaking the law as it currently stands. They are an easy target.
Anyone outside of China will realise that the exchanges are linked into the pro system and banking and that an American order will close every bucket shops that doesn’t comply. Every single non-compliant miner will find themselves earning nothing and having everything they own frozen.
So, they can go down the hard way or they can make profit as this becomes legitimate.
I would prefer that they fight but, as I said that is unlikely because they are all pussies
there will not be a single instance of a Blockchain that people say cannot be recovered by a court order in America or Britain or somewhere equally associated with the rule of law system in two years from now
This ends in November.
There is about zero chance of mistrial.
The reality here is very very simple.
This is ending and the court makes the decision.
Where have you been
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634022652192400?thread_ts=1634022652.192400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3125
The entire case is based on a premise of my being Satoshi and Ira being a greedy ass who thinks he can steal
The thing most people don’t understand is that the lies about Cryptocurrency will die in this case.
Then we are left with mopping up exercises with McCormick and others.
When the case is finished, there will be about a snowflake’s chance in the hottest part of hell that people don’t understand that bitcoin can be recovered. And this is important. Nobody cares about recovering $50. Not in real terms. They care about recovering large amounts of money, which will ensure that this case ends in a way that most people don’t expect.
Following this case, the mantra of your keys, your bitcoin, will be forever buried in a forgotten grave. There is a reason that I set things up the way that I did. It wasn’t for this case that this case will bring it to a head.
Nobody seems to understand that when I said the bitcoin is not being moved other than a court order, I did mean it.
Honestly, if you need Proof that I’m Satoshi by someone signing the keys then you’re a fucking moron.
When I stated that bitcoin is not encrypted, I meant it because it’s true. If you think that bitcoin is a crypto anarchist wet dream then you have no idea. The thing is, none of their little schemes will work because it’s all on the Blockchain and it cannot be subverted.
When I said that no bitcoin will move outside of a court order I mean that is the court order was set all of the movement in motion and it will have nothing to do with the key. People have been proving identity for centuries in courts and the thing is, I’m not going to change that to some, insane plan to allow people to identify themselves with a distributable key that they can give to anyone.
The simple answer is that if bitcoin was not recoverable, i.e. if it was encrypted, then it is lost and it is lost forever but the truth of the matter is that that’s not the case. Developers and miners follow court orders. The truth is that they are all a bunch of pussies who act tough but are really like three-year-olds who miss their mommy.
As I have explained many times the bitcoin is property of a company.
That company is owned by another company.
The owning company is in a trust.
No bitcoin owned by those companies will move now without a court order.
Those bitcoin will move.
No amount of anarco capitalist- really anarco Communist criminal assholes bullshit will stop that.
Nothing that people say on Twitter will have any impact on the court issuing an order.
The reality is that the case will be over in November.
The reality is that the coins will have to be moved when the court states they have to be moved. If people complain enough then they can go through the whole soft fork bullshit. But, any miner or developer who chooses to stay as a miner or developer will be sequestered under contempt of court.
Any miner in China is breaking the law as it currently stands. They are an easy target.
Anyone outside of China will realise that the exchanges are linked into the pro system and banking and that an American order will close every bucket shops that doesn’t comply. Every single non-compliant miner will find themselves earning nothing and having everything they own frozen.
So, they can go down the hard way or they can make profit as this becomes legitimate.
I would prefer that they fight but, as I said that is unlikely because they are all pussies
there will not be a single instance of a Blockchain that people say cannot be recovered by a court order in America or Britain or somewhere equally associated with the rule of law system in two years from now
This ends in November.
There is about zero chance of mistrial.
The reality here is very very simple.
This is ending and the court makes the decision.
Where have you been
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634022652192400?thread_ts=1634022652.192400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3125
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634022652192400?thread_ts=1634022652.192400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3125
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634022652192400?thread_ts=1634022652.192400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3125
What you have to start to understand is that the concept of an anonymous transaction system on bitcoin is an anathema to all that I stand for. Consequently, without the knowledge and system being implemented to ensure that bitcoin can be frozen by law enforcement, I would prefer to have nothing to do with it.
If you think that I’m going to go into either American or British court and tell a judge that I can prove them Satoshi because I can sign a key, then you are a fucking idiot with your head up your ass.
You see, under American law, and this has been determined by the Supreme Court, nobody can order me to give up a key. Even if I had them it wouldn’t be an option available to the court.
Which is the real thing here, I don’t need to do that. I don’t need to sign anything to have bitcoin recovered and I don’t need to sign something to prove that an Satoshi nor would that be a good indication. If you think it is then you’re either a moron or stuck in a humble bunch of lies and too dumb to get out.
Do you really want to live in a world where someone can frame people by giving them keys? Do you want your identity to be based on the possession of a digital file?
None of these things are happening but what I will say is that courts in America and Britain have ordered developers to change an update code. The case I put on the slack the other day concerning peer-to-peer networks demonstrates just what I’m talking about.
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634026812196800?thread_ts=1634026812.196800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3127
If you think that I’m going to go into either American or British court and tell a judge that I can prove them Satoshi because I can sign a key, then you are a fucking idiot with your head up your ass.
You see, under American law, and this has been determined by the Supreme Court, nobody can order me to give up a key. Even if I had them it wouldn’t be an option available to the court.
Which is the real thing here, I don’t need to do that. I don’t need to sign anything to have bitcoin recovered and I don’t need to sign something to prove that an Satoshi nor would that be a good indication. If you think it is then you’re either a moron or stuck in a humble bunch of lies and too dumb to get out.
Do you really want to live in a world where someone can frame people by giving them keys? Do you want your identity to be based on the possession of a digital file?
None of these things are happening but what I will say is that courts in America and Britain have ordered developers to change an update code. The case I put on the slack the other day concerning peer-to-peer networks demonstrates just what I’m talking about.
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634026812196800?thread_ts=1634026812.196800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3127
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634026812196800?thread_ts=1634026812.196800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3127
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634026812196800?thread_ts=1634026812.196800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3127
If I completely utterly win and Ira is completely discredited (fairly likely) and gets nothing and every coin is noted to be mined by the jury, it still moves by court order.
there is no outcome in this case that does not involve BTC being forced by US Federal Court to be frozen and then recovered
zero chance
Because if this doesn’t work out then I would burn everything to the ground before it continues. But, I don’t need to because it’s not encrypted.
I don’t want to see a system exist that allows people to sell drugs to children and get away with it and what they are trying to do is create such a system on top of bitcoin.
If I had the keys in my pocket right now, and hit them with a hammer.
As I said, the only way this ends is with a court order and every government official on earth and every law enforcement official on earth and every court on earth and every lawyer on earth starting to understand that there is no encryption on bitcoin and they have been conned for a decade.
You seem not to be getting this.
There is no chance that the coins are not moving by court order. Zero. The only thing that might change that is an unknown asteroid suddenly destroying the earth before the case ends. I have discounted that completely
There is no way that I will set a precedent that keys equal identity. Identity is defined in the whitepaper as being firewalled. Identity is not your keys. Read my bloody paper. Read some more. Read the entire Western canon for the last 2000 years.
To set the record straight
There is no outcome that will not have coins recovered by court order, none.
And he won't
So what
I will say what is owned categorically in court
This entire thing is about the bitcoin and it is about my identity
Twiter fools downplay this
And they are fools
Digital lead tainted with polonium
CSW
Oct 12,. 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634027489200600?thread_ts=1634027489.200600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3130
there is no outcome in this case that does not involve BTC being forced by US Federal Court to be frozen and then recovered
zero chance
Because if this doesn’t work out then I would burn everything to the ground before it continues. But, I don’t need to because it’s not encrypted.
I don’t want to see a system exist that allows people to sell drugs to children and get away with it and what they are trying to do is create such a system on top of bitcoin.
If I had the keys in my pocket right now, and hit them with a hammer.
As I said, the only way this ends is with a court order and every government official on earth and every law enforcement official on earth and every court on earth and every lawyer on earth starting to understand that there is no encryption on bitcoin and they have been conned for a decade.
You seem not to be getting this.
There is no chance that the coins are not moving by court order. Zero. The only thing that might change that is an unknown asteroid suddenly destroying the earth before the case ends. I have discounted that completely
There is no way that I will set a precedent that keys equal identity. Identity is defined in the whitepaper as being firewalled. Identity is not your keys. Read my bloody paper. Read some more. Read the entire Western canon for the last 2000 years.
To set the record straight
There is no outcome that will not have coins recovered by court order, none.
And he won't
So what
I will say what is owned categorically in court
This entire thing is about the bitcoin and it is about my identity
Twiter fools downplay this
And they are fools
Digital lead tainted with polonium
CSW
Oct 12,. 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634027489200600?thread_ts=1634027489.200600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3130
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 12,. 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634027489200600?thread_ts=1634027489.200600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3130
Oct 12,. 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634027489200600?thread_ts=1634027489.200600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3130
There is no option, there is no outcome, there is no imaginal other way that this will play out other than the court assigning the keys.
the deceentralised node bullshit ends
quite frankly, I will donate everyone of the coins to the jury and the court before I see any other option other than the court reasssigning ownership
next, this complete bullshit about not being able to do this is complete and utter crap
the developers other fiduciaries on the network
the case I posted the other day is frrom the US Supreme Court
peer-to-peer developers do not get a get out a free from jail card
they have no extra rights they are just a partnership
bitcoin is not located in Third World countries that nobody can touch, it is a system runin locations that are subject to the rule of law and governments have the ability to act
tthis is what is coming out of November
this is what you can thank Ira for
It is a jury decision
If there is an issue with law, and, it won't be
Ira is subject to another case when this ends
My Ex wife has a case on his fraud
As soon as this case ends, ira is crushed
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634030888208900?thread_ts=1634030888.208900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3132
the deceentralised node bullshit ends
quite frankly, I will donate everyone of the coins to the jury and the court before I see any other option other than the court reasssigning ownership
next, this complete bullshit about not being able to do this is complete and utter crap
the developers other fiduciaries on the network
the case I posted the other day is frrom the US Supreme Court
peer-to-peer developers do not get a get out a free from jail card
they have no extra rights they are just a partnership
bitcoin is not located in Third World countries that nobody can touch, it is a system runin locations that are subject to the rule of law and governments have the ability to act
tthis is what is coming out of November
this is what you can thank Ira for
It is a jury decision
If there is an issue with law, and, it won't be
Ira is subject to another case when this ends
My Ex wife has a case on his fraud
As soon as this case ends, ira is crushed
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634030888208900?thread_ts=1634030888.208900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3132
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634030888208900?thread_ts=1634030888.208900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3132
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634030888208900?thread_ts=1634030888.208900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3132
BTC will be subject to law - and there will be no forks to stop this.
There is already good law from the Supreme Court in the US and the High Court in Britain detailing software orders. Suppose an order is given for a company or partnership or a group. The individuals who obtain that either split off into some other group or someone else even unconnected to the first one takes up the challenge and decides to violate the court order. In that case, this is a contempt of court, and it ends in criminal contempt where people are punished by going to prison.
There are no anonymous groups.
There are no anonymous developers. Everything here is public and not on the dark web. There is nothing that anybody involved cannot stop or be stopped from doing.
The entirety of the myth around crypto is based on lies and deception.
bitcoin is not encrypted in bitcoin is not a Cryptocurrency
no Blockchain can ever be a true Cryptocurrency
this year there will be no further debates on this topic
it will be categorically demonstrated
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634032105213100?thread_ts=1634032105.213100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3134
There is already good law from the Supreme Court in the US and the High Court in Britain detailing software orders. Suppose an order is given for a company or partnership or a group. The individuals who obtain that either split off into some other group or someone else even unconnected to the first one takes up the challenge and decides to violate the court order. In that case, this is a contempt of court, and it ends in criminal contempt where people are punished by going to prison.
There are no anonymous groups.
There are no anonymous developers. Everything here is public and not on the dark web. There is nothing that anybody involved cannot stop or be stopped from doing.
The entirety of the myth around crypto is based on lies and deception.
bitcoin is not encrypted in bitcoin is not a Cryptocurrency
no Blockchain can ever be a true Cryptocurrency
this year there will be no further debates on this topic
it will be categorically demonstrated
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634032105213100?thread_ts=1634032105.213100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3134
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634032105213100?thread_ts=1634032105.213100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3134
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634032105213100?thread_ts=1634032105.213100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3134