CSW
Oct 7, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633630267403400?thread_ts=1633630267.403400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3106

Yes, I wrote code for hacking groups in the 80s.

I said that I am openly owning my past

I was in trouble as a teen for changing the teacher records in school. I didn't alter grades, I did add funny profiles and embarrassing materials.

I did hack white sands, when I was 13

I did have a visit from Nice men with ear pieces.

I was a teenager, welcome to young stupid Craig

I took over the global dns at one point, to make a point.

But, even those who never use bitcoin have used my protocols and code products

There was some of my code in Bay Networks systems

So... if you think you can make points on me by saying how bad I was as a kid, go for it.

CSW
Oct 7, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633630267403400?thread_ts=1633630267.403400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3106

CSW
Oct 7, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633643712426500

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3108

CSW
Oct 8, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633656628442200?thread_ts=1633656628.442200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3109

I need people to help me.

I have made a promise, it is legally binding. It will take effect after the US court case.

I have bound myself to donate 1 million bitcoin to the poorest 1 billion people.

This is what I am doing with the trust

I now need help

Ps

This is btc as well

All 60 billion usd

CSW
Oct 8, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633656628442200?thread_ts=1633656628.442200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3109

CSW
Oct 8, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633706855019000?thread_ts=1633706855.019000&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3111

The pledge is to get the 1 million bitcoin to 1 billion people.

BTC gets exchanged to bitcoin

And, money as in Bitcoin does help. Being a part if the cash economy

People don't need to be told what they need

They need a way to achieve and access

Oh.
The Value of the BTC will be distributed

The 1 million BTC become traded for BSV and local money, CBDC on BSV etc.

CSW
Oct 8, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633706855019000?thread_ts=1633706855.019000&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3111

CSW
Oct. 8, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633720782036400?thread_ts=1633720782.036400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3113

CSW
Oct 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633735090053300?thread_ts=1633735090.053300&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3114

I wonder if the BTC people understand...

nChain has the patent on discrete log contracts

Mixing

Taproot

November

Technically ever BTC node will be in violation of nChain ip when taproot is live

Nice that they see the value of R puzzles as well.

License fees

CSW
Oct 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633735090053300?thread_ts=1633735090.053300&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3114

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM_Studios%2C_Inc._v._Grokster%2C_Ltd

CSW
Oct 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633795608096300?thread_ts=1633795608.096300&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3117

"More BS: https://evanhatch.medium.com/len-sassaman-and-satoshi-e483c85c2b10"

CSW
Oct 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633832710103900?thread_ts=1633832710.103900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3118

Len Sassaman and Satoshi: a Cypherpunk History.
Evan Hatch
Feb 22, 2021 https://evanhatch.medium.com/len-sassaman-and-satoshi-e483c85c2b10

Basically, the BTC Core bois and Dodger come up with a new alternative cypherpunk every few weeks and then that person gets discredited and they move on to another. At the current rate they gonna run out of people very soon.

CSW
Oct 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633832710103900?thread_ts=1633832710.103900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3118

CSW
Oct 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633857836108200?thread_ts=1633857836.108200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3120

CSW
Oct 11, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633935037161600?thread_ts=1633935037.161600&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3121

Interestingly, many of the systems we use today, and machine learning and data analysis are, in fact, quite old. The distinction is not so much the model but rather the ability to process information and the efficiency of the hardware. As an example, O’Brien (1983) discussed the use of generalised linear modelling around four decades ago. The systems required for tools such as GLIM were large excessive machines that few people could access. Now, the same computational capacity is available on the average desktop and sometimes mobile phone.

Hopfield (1988) discussed artificial neural networks thirty years ago. Keller (1961) talked about perceptrons and the ability to create artificial neural networks sixty years ago. I remember having a presentation with Google in 2006 where the company told me that these things would never take off. The interesting aspect of this is that the constant expansion of computational and storage capacity means that many of the things we once took for granted or thought could not be done are now becoming increasingly simple.

Consequently, the benefits of storing information and starting to outweigh the cost of storage very shortly. Consequently, you will start to note that the cost of removing data and pruning will have a higher cost for many organisations than you find as a cost of storage. The doubling of storage capacity every fifteen months means that the entire global storage that exists today will be again available in fifteen months on top of what we have now. A further fifteen months from that, there will be four times what we have today.

Hopfield, J. J. (1988). Artificial neural networks. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, 4(5), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/101.8118
Keller, H. B. (1961). Finite automata, pattern recognition and perceptrons. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 8(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/321052.321053
O’Brien, L. G. (1983). Generalised Linear Modelling Using the GLIM System. Area, 15(4), 327–336. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20001967

CSW
Oct 11, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633935037161600?thread_ts=1633935037.161600&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3121

CSW
Oct 11, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633947675162800?thread_ts=1633947675.162800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3123

What I hate about TLAs

TLAs or three-letter (can be more, go figure) acronyms are reused across industries. CLTV, for instance, can mean customer lifetime value and has been used this way in finance and accounting for decades, yet a bunch of people decide to rename things and make life difficult for those who want to explain other concepts.

https://churnzero.net/churnopedia/lifetime-value-ltv-or-customer-lifetime-value-cltv/#:~:text=Lifetime%20Value%20(CLTV)-,Lifetime%20Value%20(LTV)%20or%20Customer%20Lifetime%20Value%20(CLTV),average%20lifetime%20as%20a%20customer.&text=EXAMPLE%3A,%2450%20per%20month%20(ARPU)

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/combinedloantovalue.asp#:~:text=The%20combined%20loan%2Dto%2Dvalue%20(CLTV)%20ratio%20is,than%20one%20loan%20is%20used

CLTV Formula and Calculation
\begin{aligned} &\text{CLTV}=\frac{\text{VL1 + VL2 + ... + VLn}}{\text{Total Value of the Property}}\\ &\textbf{where:}\\ &\text{VL = Value of loan}\\ \end{aligned}


CLTV=Total Value of the Property

VL1 + VL2 + ... + VLn

where:
VL = Value of loan

CSW
Oct 11, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1633947675162800?thread_ts=1633947675.162800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3123

CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634022652192400?thread_ts=1634022652.192400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3125

If you think November is not about my showing that I created bitcoin, then, you are delusional.

The entire case is based on a premise of my being Satoshi and Ira being a greedy ass who thinks he can steal

The thing most people don’t understand is that the lies about Cryptocurrency will die in this case.

Then we are left with mopping up exercises with McCormick and others.

When the case is finished, there will be about a snowflake’s chance in the hottest part of hell that people don’t understand that bitcoin can be recovered. And this is important. Nobody cares about recovering $50. Not in real terms. They care about recovering large amounts of money, which will ensure that this case ends in a way that most people don’t expect.

Following this case, the mantra of your keys, your bitcoin, will be forever buried in a forgotten grave. There is a reason that I set things up the way that I did. It wasn’t for this case that this case will bring it to a head.

Nobody seems to understand that when I said the bitcoin is not being moved other than a court order, I did mean it.

Honestly, if you need Proof that I’m Satoshi by someone signing the keys then you’re a fucking moron.

When I stated that bitcoin is not encrypted, I meant it because it’s true. If you think that bitcoin is a crypto anarchist wet dream then you have no idea. The thing is, none of their little schemes will work because it’s all on the Blockchain and it cannot be subverted.

When I said that no bitcoin will move outside of a court order I mean that is the court order was set all of the movement in motion and it will have nothing to do with the key. People have been proving identity for centuries in courts and the thing is, I’m not going to change that to some, insane plan to allow people to identify themselves with a distributable key that they can give to anyone.

The simple answer is that if bitcoin was not recoverable, i.e. if it was encrypted, then it is lost and it is lost forever but the truth of the matter is that that’s not the case. Developers and miners follow court orders. The truth is that they are all a bunch of pussies who act tough but are really like three-year-olds who miss their mommy.

As I have explained many times the bitcoin is property of a company.
That company is owned by another company.
The owning company is in a trust.

No bitcoin owned by those companies will move now without a court order.

Those bitcoin will move.

No amount of anarco capitalist- really anarco Communist criminal assholes bullshit will stop that.

Nothing that people say on Twitter will have any impact on the court issuing an order.

The reality is that the case will be over in November.

The reality is that the coins will have to be moved when the court states they have to be moved. If people complain enough then they can go through the whole soft fork bullshit. But, any miner or developer who chooses to stay as a miner or developer will be sequestered under contempt of court.

Any miner in China is breaking the law as it currently stands. They are an easy target.
Anyone outside of China will realise that the exchanges are linked into the pro system and banking and that an American order will close every bucket shops that doesn’t comply. Every single non-compliant miner will find themselves earning nothing and having everything they own frozen.
So, they can go down the hard way or they can make profit as this becomes legitimate.

I would prefer that they fight but, as I said that is unlikely because they are all pussies

there will not be a single instance of a Blockchain that people say cannot be recovered by a court order in America or Britain or somewhere equally associated with the rule of law system in two years from now

This ends in November.

There is about zero chance of mistrial.

The reality here is very very simple.

This is ending and the court makes the decision.

Where have you been

CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634022652192400?thread_ts=1634022652.192400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3125

CSW
Oct 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1634026812196800?thread_ts=1634026812.196800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3127