CSW - Slack Channel

Imagine a share offering that had a constitutional provision that returns some of the money in the sale to the corporation if the share is not held for a sufficient period of time. Just as a speculative idea, imagine the following:
if the share is traded within one second, 25% of the share returns to the company,

if the share is traded within one hour, 10% of the share returns to the company,

if the share is traded within one day, 5% of the share returns to the company,

if the share is traded between one day and three months, 1% of the share is returned to the company, and

on any trade past that timeframe, the minimal handling fee that could be 0.01% of the share would be exchanged and no more.

In this concept, shareholders who maintain longer ownership and plan not just to speculate are rewarded more. There are no known scenarios where somebody planning on maintaining an investment in a company needs to hold a share for under one second. Equally, even day traders to close out at the end of the day don’t need to go into one-hour ownership or less. More importantly, this punishes those who merely speculate and don’t care about the company and any manner.

Shares are always owned

the value of dividends is already built into shares so that doesn't work

the market maker would need to hold a long-term position

this form of trading existed in the 1960s and before where people woouuld hold shares for an average of 6 to 9 months minimum

large orders are never done on market

these are always OTCs

in my entire time working with the Australian Stock Exchange and then consulting with them and then working with traders, a fifteen year period I thought zero large trades on market

what you consider large trades is not a large trade if that's the case

large trade is something that needs to be reported

as a large trade I don't mean a lot of money like people think I mean something that requires reporting not undertake over positions for market-based buys at that rate but those large trades that are done the change significant holder reporting

i.e., if it isn't changing at least 2.5% of the shareholding in the company it is not a large trade

the way that you seem to be talking would imply that I seem to care about brokers at all...

That I have any inkling of care for the amount of profit that a broker makes rather than the company

please understand

I do not give a shit about broker profit

the reality here is brokers are sucking moneyy out of companies and changing the corporate behaviour so, as were intended consequences this is how markets used to work

this is not something that is new it is something that has been collapsed by technology as people have eroded the controls

so, we are ready know the unintended consequences, they existed in the past and if you've studied the regulatory, legal and even econometric frameworks that existed in the periods before 1960 you will see each of these issues and how they can be addressed and how they were addressed

there were but they were not common

however, I still don't see a problem with people losing money on options because we are really talking about speculative gambling once again

the reality here is that long-term strategies always win

so, allowing companies to compete based on setting their own system gives an advantage that the market will set the correct values for instead of the casino

the timeframes on when shares can be sold would lead to differences in how they are traded and over time, different industries will find different ideal points

Long term value - people like me who found companies that are designed to create over time

There is nothing stopping you selling next day - if you have not just bought

50% of value in companies is lost to "finace" right now

and, nothing stops people from having mixes of shares that can be sold quickly and ones that can't

CSW
Sep 30, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632989164360900?thread_ts=1632989164.360900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3074